The last comparison I saw of the Olin/Winchester 12 gauge 9 pellet 00 buck vs Winchester 12 gauge 9 pellet 00 buck was several years old now. I finally got around to getting some of the military 00 buck at the local Meijer and wanted to see if there were any differences with current production shotshells...
The "military grade" 00 buck is produced by Winchester (marked as Olin which is the parent company that would have contracted with the govt for production). There is no year of production on the box or rounds. These are 12 gauge 2 3/4" 00 buckshot and have the following listed spec (from Cabelas):
"Buckshot loaded to military specifications is now available to the civilian market. Each 12-gauge 2 3⁄4" shell has a nine- pellet load of buffered 00 buckshot produces a muzzle velocity of 1,325 fps. All cases are green with a black anodized head for low visibility. Five rounds per box." I have seen this described on other sites as "contract overruns" available to the public.
This is a comparison to Winchester Super X 12 gauge 2 3/4 00 9 pellet round. The Super X is also listed as clocking in at 1325 fps.
The crimping and headstamps are the same between the 2. A peak inside of the shells. There is no discernable difference in shotshell casing thiskness. There are 9 cast lead pellets in a white buffer that sits upon 2 compressed fiber wads. The wads have a thin plastic seal on the top and bottom of each wad.
Carefully getting down to the powder charge... - It is held in place by a white opaque plastic retainer in both shells and the powder visually is the same. (sorry no scale to measure)
From a previous review by another reviewer back in 2010, both of the older production rounds had brown paper wads.These seem to have changed to brown compressed fiber wads that are sealed top/bottom with a thin tape-like liner. My guess is that this current wadding (compressed fiber with tape sealing vs unsealed brown compressed paper previously) will be less likely to be affected by high humidity. Paper/cardboard temds to attract water, so the "upgraded" wads might store better in humid environments - total conjecture.
Both shells are manufactured by Winchester and differ externally by anodizing and green hull color of the military shell. Crimping, headstamps, and most all of internal components appear to still be the same between the 2 with a change to compressed fiber wads from preious production years. There was no weatherproofing/sealing on the primer (al la centerfire 5.56 ball rounds) or differences in crimping of the military shell. It is hard to tell and likely minor, but the white buffer appears to be more uniform, slightly larger and a slight greyish-white in the military shell and the fiber wadding appears to be "more compressed" (while both Win and Military wads are 0.75 inches in height), less "rough" (see pic 3) and more uniform also in the military shell. Only internal differences and they might be my old eyes...
While there may be a difference in the type of powder (reduced flash, burn characteristics, weight, etc), the velocities for both are listed at 1325 fps.
Next up is the range report when I can get out to shoot here shortly.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EDIT to now include Range Report
Finally got to the range and here are the patterns out of my Shotgun:
Shotgun: Benelli M4 | 18.5 inch barrel | Modified choke
Targets: 18 x 24 inches with 9 inch center circle
I patterened the loads at 7, 15 and 25 yards. At 25 yards, I shot 3 separate targets and took the "worst" pattern to see if there were differences - there were.
NOTE: This is NOT a test to bash the loads - I simply want to see if there is a difference between the 2 in my barrel...
Results:
At 7 and 15 yards, the loads were identical. At 25 yards, I had 1 shot of the 3 taken of the Super-X, that had 2 pellts off the 11x24 in paper. The other 2 (25yard) Super-X shots still has all pellets on the paper but were wider than the Military.
Table measurements were inches. -2 denotes 2 pellets off paper.
Reference circle is 9 inches in diameter
At least in my Benelli M4, the military shell was a bit more consistent so perhaps there is something more than cosmetic differences. I was impressed that for a "standard" shell (no cup wadding), the Military version kept ~75% of pellets in a 9 inch circle at 25 yards. These are not the best shells but they are not the worst. They go bang each time I pull the trigger, cycle reliably in my semiauto and at 15 yards (HD distance), both pattern hand sized groups (at ~6 inches). YMMV
Again, this is not a post to bash these loads, I only put up these pics to show how my barrel patterns a couple other loads.
For comparison, my barrel loves Federal PD132-00. At 25 yards, the spread is less than 6 inches
Flight control is not a given in every barrel though. This is TAP FPD (2.75 in, 1600 fps with versatite/flightcontrol wad). This round is worse than the Winchester Military (13.5 in Military vs 15 in for the TAP FPD) out of my barrel.