Posted: 7/20/2014 5:40:35 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote History Quoted:
Nope. The Norma loads were hot, they may have been the standard, but they were still hot and not to mention very erratic and not much good at being consistent. Now I'm not sure how "mild" your mild 10mm is, it all depends, but a "warm" safe .40 is easily into 10mm territory. No, not equal to the 10mm overall, but using powder such as Longshot, a G23 will shoot a 180gr bullet to around 1200 fps, not bad from a 4" barrel and according to Hodgdon is within spec. Longshot from a G20 using a 180gr was getting me around 1180-1270 fps, but it's burning more powder and is using a longer barrel too. If you compare these, the 10mm is not only slightly higher pressure (i.e. slightly "warmer"), but it's not really that much faster.
If you look at much of the load data out there, the 10mm only shows to be 100-125 fps faster despite running at higher pressures and using a longer barrel than the majority .40 loads. Equalize pressure and barrel length and the 10mm is less than 100 fps from a .40 S&W, even less than 75 fps at times, again considering equal pressures and equal barrel lenghts with same powder/bullet combo. In what world does 100 fps (in a handgun no less) make any marked difference in performance? Sure places like UW and BB load the 10mm hot, but they just load it hotter than their .40 because "hot" 10mm sells, and they want your money.
The .45 Super is a beast, and comparitively, over the years I've shot warm 10mm's from a KKM G20 running a 180gr to over 1350 and a 200gr to just over 1300 both using over book max loads...well over max, but the Super using Starline brass (about the only available and according to Starline is the same strength as their 460 Rowland 40K PSI brass) can shoot a 185gr to 1600 fps, a 250gr JHP to over 1300 fps or a 300gr LFNGC hardcast to over 1150 fps, all from a 5" barrel. In other words, a .45 Super can mimick the 460 Rowland (but to be fair, at those speeds you have to use a compensator).
It's not that I dislike the 10mm, it's just that it's not the most powerful Glock by a good margin, heck loaded warm it's only got about 100 fps over a warm .40. I'm not saying the 10mm isn't versitile because it is to a degree, but why people think the 10mm is untouchabe is beyond me. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
To me that's the delimma with the 10mm. Really what most call "standard" 10mm is loaded pretty damn hot. Loads for UW, BB and DT aren't standard, neither were the original Noma loads. No they're loaded hot, and very hot at that. I say that because if there's no real desire to run the 10mm warm, then why bother? At that point the .40 and .45 are cheaper to shoot, just as effective and if you like the 1911 platform and want more bang, load up some .45 Super. I know a lot like the 10mm, but try as I might I just can't find a use for it.
The original norma loads were at the time the only 10 mm Auto ammo in existence, so they most certainly were THE standard, and rightfully still what all 10 mm loads are measured against. I load my 10 mm "mild", which means still hotter than .40 can ever do safely, and I'm just a magazine change away from hotter than .45 Super can ever do safely.
Nope. The Norma loads were hot, they may have been the standard, but they were still hot and not to mention very erratic and not much good at being consistent. Now I'm not sure how "mild" your mild 10mm is, it all depends, but a "warm" safe .40 is easily into 10mm territory. No, not equal to the 10mm overall, but using powder such as Longshot, a G23 will shoot a 180gr bullet to around 1200 fps, not bad from a 4" barrel and according to Hodgdon is within spec. Longshot from a G20 using a 180gr was getting me around 1180-1270 fps, but it's burning more powder and is using a longer barrel too. If you compare these, the 10mm is not only slightly higher pressure (i.e. slightly "warmer"), but it's not really that much faster.
If you look at much of the load data out there, the 10mm only shows to be 100-125 fps faster despite running at higher pressures and using a longer barrel than the majority .40 loads. Equalize pressure and barrel length and the 10mm is less than 100 fps from a .40 S&W, even less than 75 fps at times, again considering equal pressures and equal barrel lenghts with same powder/bullet combo. In what world does 100 fps (in a handgun no less) make any marked difference in performance? Sure places like UW and BB load the 10mm hot, but they just load it hotter than their .40 because "hot" 10mm sells, and they want your money.
The .45 Super is a beast, and comparitively, over the years I've shot warm 10mm's from a KKM G20 running a 180gr to over 1350 and a 200gr to just over 1300 both using over book max loads...well over max, but the Super using Starline brass (about the only available and according to Starline is the same strength as their 460 Rowland 40K PSI brass) can shoot a 185gr to 1600 fps, a 250gr JHP to over 1300 fps or a 300gr LFNGC hardcast to over 1150 fps, all from a 5" barrel. In other words, a .45 Super can mimick the 460 Rowland (but to be fair, at those speeds you have to use a compensator).
It's not that I dislike the 10mm, it's just that it's not the most powerful Glock by a good margin, heck loaded warm it's only got about 100 fps over a warm .40. I'm not saying the 10mm isn't versitile because it is to a degree, but why people think the 10mm is untouchabe is beyond me.
by my definition a "warm" load is one that falls smack in the middle of the low and high data.
|