Quote History Quoted:
Is the double action Omega trigger in your opinion worse, better, or about the same out of the box as the standard 75B double action trigger? I've noticed also the trigger on these CZ 75B Omegas seem to be more straight and less curved, looking more like the trigger on a P-07 in terms of shape.
View Quote
Out of the box? Omega is a bit better in terms of trigger pull weight and grit.
Here's the thing. The Omega system is radically simplified and the parts are easily interchangeable without fitting and are interlocking. Which is fantastic for a mass produced and mass distributed gun from an administrative perspective.
To an individual user, that means wider tolerance and less trigger mass (the weight and interaction of all the objects that the trigger moves effects the force required to move it).
The standard 75 system has a huge trigger bar and lots of points of contact within the FCG. Besides the firing pin block, which is an afterthought in the B model.
So, the Omega trigger can be lighter and shorter in travel, but not as smooth as the classic 75 (after break in).
Because the Omega has higher tolerances and less parts, the DA trigger is greatly affected by tolerance stacking and cheaper design. If you can remove some of the unnecessary tension and smooth the stamped trigger bar's contact points, plus a lighter hammer spring, the Omega DA comes around.
The flatter trigger is supposed to be better for trigger reach.