User Panel
[#1]
Last February I bought my wife a 4" 329PD and a Gunfighters Inc. Kenai Holster.
Weighing 26ozs, it's her favorite hiking gun. Statistically the gun is too light, and too brutal to shoot....but in reality that's hardly the case. After putting 60rds through it, she is still convinced that she has the right revolver. In fact, everyone that has fired it in the last 10 months has commented positively.....a few want to see her shoot it first though. Just throwing this out as an option. Hap |
|
[#2]
Quoted:
Last February I bought my wife a 4" 329PD and a Gunfighters Inc. Kenai Holster. Weighing 26ozs, it's her favorite hiking gun. Statistically the gun is too light, and too brutal to shoot....but in reality that's hardly the case. After putting 60rds through it, she is still convinced that she has the right revolver. In fact, everyone that has fired it in the last 10 months has commented positively.....a few want to see her shoot it first though. Just throwing this out as an option. Hap View Quote |
|
[#3]
Sorry if I was not clear in my initial post. As stated in the title, this is to be a range gun, and if it doubled as a gun I could take camping or hiking, then great.
I am looking for something I could shoot all day at the range with full power loads that is not as heavy or long as the 53 ounce behemoth that is the SRH. I have shot the S&W 329 and it is great for its purpose, and not as bad as folks might anticipate – in the recoil department. However, it is far too light to be blasting through 100 rounds of full power ammo every weekend. Taurus makes good revolvers, but they do not fit me like the Rugers, BFRs, or S&Ws. |
|
[#4]
Full power loads all day at the range.....So you just limited your options as some brands just won't tolerate that type of shooting unless you mean factory 44 magnum loads in which case all will work. For serious distance/accuracy shooting my choices would be:
1)Freedom Arms 83 in 7.5" or 5.5", 5.5" if you want the secondary woods/camp gun you spoke of. 2)Dan Wesson and get multiple barrel lengths/shrouds which allows you to multi-function it for any type of shooting. Both of the above will take anything you can handload up well past what you should and both are seriously accurate as shown in the long range revolver world. |
|
[#5]
Get the 629 5" classic.
But suck it up and find a nice prelock if you can. |
|
[#8]
If you Mag-Na-Port a Super Blackhawk, the recoil is greatly reduced. The 44 Magnum seems like a 357 Magnum to me.
I have a 5.5 inch SBH and think it is about right. Get one and send it out to Mag-Na-Port and ask to have it ported and the action tuned. Good trail revolver, too. |
|
[#9]
I have a 6" 629 factory ported and can shoot it all day long. Also have a 6" Anaconda, but it only goes to the range once a year, and yes it is smooth as butter.
I like rugers, but don't have a ruger revolver yet. I have held a lot of rugers and I really like the SRH. Range report when you get a chance. |
|
[#10]
I have both a SRH 7.5 inch and a 629-4 4 inch. It is the perfect combo for me. Shoot both at the range, deer hunt w the Ruger and backpack in Alaska with the 629.
|
|
[#11]
If you aren't looking at the Ruger, the only real option for a DA revolver is one of the s&w offerings. For me, I'd be going for a 629.....6" barrel, full lug. You don't seem to want to go to 4" barrels due to velocity loss, and the little bit of extra forward weight would help tame the recoil to a degree.
Personally, 4" on a .44mag is a pretty good length compromise between ease of carry and velocity for a woods carry gun. Range/hunting gun.....yeah, 6" would be what I would seek. But for a woods EDC gun, 4" is quite practical. |
|
[#12]
If I remember right, in one of Skeeter Skelton's articles he said he didn't loose much velocity going from a 6 1/2" barrel to a 4" barrel, but under 4" is where it started really dropping.
Personally I would get either a Model 29 with a 4 or 6 1/2" barrel or one of the Super Blackhawks without the dragoon trigger guard. |
|
[#13]
Two suggestions for you, both Smiths
629 Mountain Gun model 69 |
|
[#14]
As mentioned search out a pre lock 29 or 629 classic with full lug five inch barrel.
Best compromise of weight, sight radius,ease of carry and recoil control all in one package. And its a smith so you will not be needing any trigger work or accuracy enhancements. |
|
[#15]
|
|
[#16]
I would opt for the new Ruger GP100 in 44 Special.
The 44 Special is so much more fun to shoot that I rarely shoot any of my full power loads anymore (except for the Desert Eagle, which doesn't like anything which isn't full power). And so few things the 44 Special can't handle just as well as the 44 Magnum (of course grizzly bears are one exception). G. |
|
[#17]
I own 629s in 4", 5", and 6". The 5" is my favorite; best balance between recoil reduction and size.
|
|
[#18]
Could not be more jealous of the Anaconda! bumped into a young buck with one at the range. The revolver was in fantastic shape and probably onlder than the kid shootin' it - said he inherited it from his grandfather. The kid let me shoot it and the action was incredible, at first the grip seemed a little short, but was perfect during recoil. Balance was perfect despite the lug and 6" barrel - shot a ragged hole of six shots.
If it was still in production, I'd already have one. |
|
[#19]
Quoted:
If you Mag-Na-Port a Super Blackhawk, the recoil is greatly reduced. The 44 Magnum seems like a 357 Magnum to me. I have a 5.5 inch SBH and think it is about right. Get one and send it out to Mag-Na-Port and ask to have it ported and the action tuned. Good trail revolver, too. View Quote Interesting...thanks for the info. |
|
[#20]
Check out this thread http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_5_33/170334_My-Custom-Super-Blackhawk-Hunter.html. Mag Na Port did the work on his SBHH and to me this is the perfect .44 mag handgun.
|
|
[#21]
I have a 629 6" classic and it was nice for both range and hunting. I stumbled across a good deal on a 4" Mountain gun 629 which I absolutely love for hiking/hunting but would take the full lug 6'" to range any day especially with hot loads.
I have considered selling both and search for a 5" to get best of both worlds. |
|
[#22]
Quoted:
I have a 629 6" classic and it was nice for both range and hunting. I stumbled across a good deal on a 4" Mountain gun 629 which I absolutely love for hiking/hunting but would take the full lug 6'" to range any day especially with hot loads. I have considered selling both and search for a 5" to get best of both worlds. View Quote I've got all three, 629 Mountain Gun, 5" and 6.5" Classics. I use the 6.5 inches hunting and the Mountain Gun as a holster gun. The 5 inch Classic is nice, but I rarely use it. Attached File |
|
[#23]
If you like the redhawk so much why don't you get a 4" bbl'd redhawk and have the same work done on it that you did on the longer bbl'd redhawk???
If you don't like the recoil of the shorter lighter bbl, get it ported. |
|
[#24]
Nice collection warhawk!!!
I've owned a 7.5" Redhawk, a 4" M629 and now have a 5" M629. For my use the 5" gun is awesome. It looks and balances great. In a perfect world I'd have a 329 PD, the 5" Classic and a longer barreled 44 with optics for handgun only hunts. As it is, I'm very thankful to own the one I have. |
|
[#25]
Quoted:
I would opt for the new Ruger GP100 in 44 Special. The 44 Special is so much more fun to shoot that I rarely shoot any of my full power loads anymore (except for the Desert Eagle, which doesn't like anything which isn't full power). And so few things the 44 Special can't handle just as well as the 44 Magnum (of course grizzly bears are one exception). G. View Quote I was scrolling down to say the same thing. If you just LIKE/WANT a .44 Magnum, that's fine, but there's simply no advantage to the Magnum over the Special until you start shooting at game larger than deer or black ear. And if you handload, the Magnum is almost a moot point because S&W's and Ruger's in .44 Special can be loaded to the same levels of factory ammo as loaded by the Big 3 manufacturers, all in revolvers that weigh less than the magnums. I've been hunting and killing deer and hogs with a .44 Special now going on 4 years and have found I don't even need "hot" loads at all. My load runs a 258 gr. cast SWC 950 +/- fps depending on the revolver, and so far has sailed through everything I've shot with it. |
|
[#26]
Quoted:
Sorry if I was not clear in my initial post. As stated in the title, this is to be a range gun, and if it doubled as a gun I could take camping or hiking, then great. I am looking for something I could shoot all day at the range with full power loads that is not as heavy or long as the 53 ounce behemoth that is the SRH. I have shot the S&W 329 and it is great for its purpose, and not as bad as folks might anticipate – in the recoil department. However, it is far too light to be blasting through 100 rounds of full power ammo every weekend. Taurus makes good revolvers, but they do not fit me like the Rugers, BFRs, or S&Ws. View Quote I guess I must be a sissy ( as well as all my shooting associates) as I know no one who would welcome shooting full house 44's all day at the range. Most people call it quits after no more than 100 rounds |
|
[#27]
I prefer the 4" S&W 629, and carry one regularly as a "woods gun". I find the recoil to be very manageable, but I am not very recoil sensitive.
Either way my vote goes to the 629. Ruger makes a great SA revolver, but S&W makes a better double action IMHO. |
|
[#30]
I also have a factory ported 629 6" classic 44 mag.
It is a soft shooter and I really enjoy it. I bought it for a Alaska pistol bear hunt and to carry while fishing. Now I carry my glock 10mm for capacity, size and capability is almost the same as the 44 |
|
[#31]
+ I have a factory ported S&W 629, great shooter and very good quality. But no as nice as my Anaconda.
|
|
[#32]
Quoted:
I also have a factory ported 629 6" classic 44 mag. It is a soft shooter and I really enjoy it. I bought it for a Alaska pistol bear hunt and to carry while fishing. Now I carry my glock 10mm for capacity, size and capability is almost the same as the 44 View Quote I've always read the 10mm is closer to a .357mag than anything else. I like the capacity but I'd still rather carry a .44 mag (or my .45 Colt-finally scored a stainless 5.5" Ruger Blackhawk Bisley Convertible) anywhere there's a chance of running in big bears. That said I have plans to add a 10mm "top end" to my G21 just because a mag full of 10mm definitely has it's advantages anywhere that big bears don't roam. JMOOC |
|
[#33]
|
|
[#34]
Over on the revolver pics thread, a Lipseys special just popped up. GP-100 5 inch BLUE in 44 Special.
Very tempting |
|
[#35]
|
|
[#37]
|
|
[#38]
|
|
[#39]
Quoted:
I just got a S&W M69 for backcountry fly fishing. Its a 5 shot so it sits tighter to my body in my chest holster and is light but still handles the recoil well. Not to say its a delight to shoot but I can handle it just fine http://gunblast.com/images/SW-69/DSC01615.jpg View Quote I did not care for the factory grips, but the no finger groove Hogues fit my hand perfectly. Attached File And my Mountain Gun field rig. Attached File |
|
[#40]
Quoted:
If you are willing to spend some $ there is an ideal middle ground. 5" guns are exceptional (in my experience/opinion). If I was wanting something lighter weight, with a longer sight radius, this is what I would do. I would take a common Model 29 or 629 (629 generally being more common and less expensive), with a 6", 6.5" or better barrel (not the full underlug models) and have it cut down. Then have it cut to accept Classic/Classic DX style Weigand inter-changeable front sights, and call it good. This was an 8& 3/8ths" 29-2 originally: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/IV_Troop/Handguns/P1010564_zps9jxvto5p.jpg They actually made a non full underlug 5" Model 629 for a short run, but they rarely pop up, and rather than wait, and wait, I would just build a custom to your specs. View Quote |
|
[#41]
Quoted:
I just knew you would show up to a .44mag thread. You post the best Smith .44mag pics. No homo View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
If you are willing to spend some $ there is an ideal middle ground. 5" guns are exceptional (in my experience/opinion). If I was wanting something lighter weight, with a longer sight radius, this is what I would do. I would take a common Model 29 or 629 (629 generally being more common and less expensive), with a 6", 6.5" or better barrel (not the full underlug models) and have it cut down. Then have it cut to accept Classic/Classic DX style Weigand inter-changeable front sights, and call it good. This was an 8& 3/8ths" 29-2 originally: http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b109/IV_Troop/Handguns/P1010564_zps9jxvto5p.jpg They actually made a non full underlug 5" Model 629 for a short run, but they rarely pop up, and rather than wait, and wait, I would just build a custom to your specs. |
|
[#42]
I love my 29's and 629's but my next 44 will be the new Ruger in 44 Special with the 3" barrel. I seldom need magnum performance and like using the shorter cases when I can, just because.
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.