Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 5/22/2015 4:08:43 AM EDT
I know you guys are about to tear into me but let me explain my intentions first. I have a S&W no  dash M60 38 spl. This gun was made before +p existed and I carry it from time to time. I am wondering if there would be any issue with me carrying +p in the gun. I'm not talking about putting a steady diet of it through the gun but just using it as my carry ammo if I shoot a single round of +p through it in my life time it will be in a life or death situation and I'm sure the gun will hold up for five rounds. I don't feel the need to shoot any of the stuff through it for practice I since what ever additional recoil it generates will be a non issue. I shoot this gun and a few other smiths on a very regular basis (I usually have a smith with me ever week when I shoot and I am proficient with the big bore smiths too.

I just wanted to run this by you guys to get opinions before I do it.
Link Posted: 5/22/2015 4:27:58 AM EDT
[#1]
I wouldn't do it. Just buy some premium standard pressure 38 loadings. My preferred choice is Gold Dot short barrel for my snubbies. Matter of fact that is what I have in my M60 (no dash) right now.
Link Posted: 5/22/2015 6:37:53 AM EDT
[#2]
Do some research ! for one high pressure over standard level 38 loads have existed since the 1930's
Second it has been very clearly stated thousands of times any model number stamped steel frame smith is ok for plus p
The amount of increased performance of snubs with plus p over standard pressure is negligible and not worth the increased recoil and blast
And lastly even in a truly non plus p rated gun ( see comments above) my personal cut off is post World War Two - if for some reason I wanted to shoot plus p for defensive purposes or it was a situation where it was all I had I would not hesitate
Link Posted: 5/22/2015 6:42:07 AM EDT
[#3]
If you do elect to still carry plus p I would still shoot a cylinder or two to get a feel for the adt and recoil and to make not of any difference in point of aim impact that may result - I carry the hornady critical defense lite 90 grain poly tip in my revolvers ( both two inch) and in one at ten yards the poi is about an inch and a half lower than with my typical practice load, but in the other snub it is about 3 inches low. Something to keep in mind
Link Posted: 5/22/2015 1:19:10 PM EDT
[#4]
You could call smith and see what their official stance on it is.  I have a Colt DS that's not marked plus P and when I talked with them they said it's fine, just not a steady diet.
Link Posted: 5/23/2015 8:07:21 AM EDT
[#5]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Second it has been very clearly stated thousands of times any model number stamped steel frame smith is ok for plus p
The amount of increased performance of snubs with plus p over standard pressure is negligible and not worth the increased recoil and blast
View Quote


It depends on the loads in question.

With a 125 gr XTP I see a difference of 125 fps between a 17,000 psi standard pressure load and a 20,000 psi +P load in my 2.125" Model 60.  That's about the same velocity difference as I see with 4" versus 2.125" barrels using either standard pressure or +P loads. If instead your "+P" load is just over the SAAMI standard pressure limit, then the difference will be smaller.

In other words, a 20,000 psi +P load in a 2" barrel will get you back into the same performance category as a standard pressure load in a 4" barrel, and that's pretty much the floor for acceptable self defense in terms of penetration and expansion.

------

Stating something clearly thousands of times does not by itself make it true.  The major change in allowing +P loads in S&W pistols in the K frame pistols came with the heavy barrel models in 1959, two years after the change to model numbers.    In the J-frame, the heavy barrel was available around 1967, but it was't standard on the Model 36 until 1975 and S&W didn't +P mark the Model 36 until 1996 when it came out on the J-Magnum frame.  

To be fair, not all modern J-Magnum frame pistols have a heavy barrel and some of those are +P stamped.  The Model 36-10 is a good example, but I also suspect the metallurgy in them is different than it is in an early J frame Model 36 or Chiefs Special.

Now with that said, I don't think firing five rounds of +P self defense ammo in earnest in an early Model 36 or Pre-Model 36 Chiefs Special is going to harm the revolver at all, so I have no qualms about carrying +P loads in my Model 36 no dash.   However, I practice using standard pressure loads.
Link Posted: 5/23/2015 8:45:37 AM EDT
[#6]
I only brought this up because I was given a box of Remington ultimate defense 38 spl +p and this is the only gun I have practical use for it in.
Link Posted: 5/24/2015 8:46:14 AM EDT
[#7]
Buffalo Bore makes some good standard pressure carry loads.

Personally, I like the CorBon 110 gr loads.

I would not worry about any +P factory loads in a M60.
Link Posted: 5/24/2015 2:59:13 PM EDT
[#8]
if you need  +P .38 special, buy a .357. There are plenty of standard .38 loads out there that will more than suffice in a SD situation. That being said, I seriously doubt the number that typically is fired during a SD shooting would damage your weapon and even if it did, would you care so long as it saved your bacon?
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 10:07:56 PM EDT
[#9]
IIRC Smith and Wesson has stated that any of their steel .38 revolvers made after 1957 were GTG with +P.

The Model 12's and any other aluminum allloy models not so much, although someone on one of the S&W forums was running a steady diet of factory +P through a Model 12  as a long term test and last I heard had seen no metalurgical issues so far. I haven't been over on that site forever so I can't tell you if its still ongoing.
Link Posted: 7/2/2015 10:17:45 PM EDT
[#10]
Every model marked smith is good with +p, certainly safe in your 60
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 12:00:17 PM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Every model marked smith is good with +p, certainly safe in your 60
View Quote

This.

Plus P isn't some high powered load that's going to tear your revolver apart. It's equivalent to some of the standard loads of yesteryear before manufacturers started watering loads down.

From a shooting perspective I've found +p disappointing. I expected more recoil and blast considering all the internet hype, but everything I've tried doesn't feel a whole lot hotter. In a steel framed gun it is very manageable. In an alloy framed gun it's just a little peppier.

Don't believe the hype. Use it at your leisure.
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 12:30:53 PM EDT
[#12]
Shoot a cylinder full of 135 +P Gold Dots and tell me if you can't notice a difference between that and the standard pressure stuff.  IMO, it's an appreciable difference.
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 1:20:10 PM EDT
[#13]
FWIW my normal target load for all my .38's is 4 grains 231 with a 158 Lead SWC. I shoot this in everything, including my alloy framed model 12.

Per the new Hodgdon load books that is .3 grains over MAX, however I developed this load when 231 was an Olin product and their book listed 4 grains as max. One could logically consider this a +P load today although compared to the factory standard 158 lead loads is a ballistic equal in velocity and recoil.

Load your 60 with +P's and you'll be fine. I've got a Model 36 loaded with 135 gold dot +P's and carry it a lot. Some folks have supposedly had issues with the old FBI loads in snubbies with the lead bullets unseating with recoil and jamming between the cylinder and forcing cone but YMMV.
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 1:44:59 PM EDT
[#14]
 
Per the new Hodgdon load books that is .3 grains over MAX, however I developed this load when 231 was an Olin product and their book listed 4 grains as max. One could logically consider this a +P load today although compared to the factory standard 158 lead loads is a ballistic equal in velocity and recoil.  
View Quote


My 1989 Winchester reloading catalog lists 4.3 grains of 231 behind a 158 grain lead bullet for a standard pressure load.

The +p load is listed as 4.6 grains.

Now, all these 158 grain lead bullets are probably not identical.

But, recommended loads have indeed fallen over the years.  Speaking from personal experience, the old loads didn't seem to be too hot.

I didn't shoot any though aluminum framed guns, but a lot did go through a couple of Charter Arms .38s, which aren't the toughest things in the world.

I wouldn't worry about very limited use of +p in the old guns, (old meaning since the late 1950s).

But, in the lightweight short barreled guns, I don't think they offer a significant increase in performance.
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 3:41:19 PM EDT
[#15]
Unless you are shooting some old pre WWII gun I wouldn't worry about any steel S&W.

Another issue is most folks recommend training with what you will carry . Smaller guns can have significant point of impact shift with different loads
Link Posted: 7/3/2015 4:32:33 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Shoot a cylinder full of 135 +P Gold Dots and tell me if you can't notice a difference between that and the standard pressure stuff.  IMO, it's an appreciable difference.
View Quote


20150319_090636 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr

These actually show slightly higher energy figures, but the Speers are currently in the gun. No biggie.

I shoot my carry ammo regularly.

A cylinder full of 357's in an Airlite is another story, but is still tolerable.
Screenshot_2015-01-13-15-11-13 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr
Link Posted: 7/4/2015 1:12:27 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


<a href="https://flic.kr/p/rnScXP" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8648/16656361457_b8f78f01a6_c.jpg</a>20150319_090636 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr

These actually show slightly higher energy figures, but the Speers are currently in the gun. No biggie.

I shoot my carry ammo regularly.

A cylinder full of 357's in an Airlite is another story, but is still tolerable.
<a href="https://flic.kr/p/q3uoqf" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8566/15780733974_3339029ca5_c.jpg</a>Screenshot_2015-01-13-15-11-13 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Shoot a cylinder full of 135 +P Gold Dots and tell me if you can't notice a difference between that and the standard pressure stuff.  IMO, it's an appreciable difference.


<a href="https://flic.kr/p/rnScXP" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8648/16656361457_b8f78f01a6_c.jpg</a>20150319_090636 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr

These actually show slightly higher energy figures, but the Speers are currently in the gun. No biggie.

I shoot my carry ammo regularly.

A cylinder full of 357's in an Airlite is another story, but is still tolerable.
<a href="https://flic.kr/p/q3uoqf" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8566/15780733974_3339029ca5_c.jpg</a>Screenshot_2015-01-13-15-11-13 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr



Purely subjective.....    I remember shooting some .357's through my Dad's 66 with a short barrel and I didn't like it at all.  His grips are just the standard wood ones though.  Magna's I guess you call them.  I remember thinking it rocked way up and my middle finger on my right hand didn't like it at all.  I can't even imagine what a little j frame would be like.
Link Posted: 7/5/2015 7:26:30 PM EDT
[#18]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Purely subjective.....    I remember shooting some .357's through my Dad's 66 with a short barrel and I didn't like it at all.  His grips are just the standard wood ones though.  Magna's I guess you call them.  I remember thinking it rocked way up and my middle finger on my right hand didn't like it at all.  I can't even imagine what a little j frame would be like.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Shoot a cylinder full of 135 +P Gold Dots and tell me if you can't notice a difference between that and the standard pressure stuff.  IMO, it's an appreciable difference.


<a href="https://flic.kr/p/rnScXP" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8648/16656361457_b8f78f01a6_c.jpg</a>20150319_090636 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr

These actually show slightly higher energy figures, but the Speers are currently in the gun. No biggie.

I shoot my carry ammo regularly.

A cylinder full of 357's in an Airlite is another story, but is still tolerable.
<a href="https://flic.kr/p/q3uoqf" target="_blank">https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8566/15780733974_3339029ca5_c.jpg</a>Screenshot_2015-01-13-15-11-13 by Slick_Rick77, on Flickr



Purely subjective.....    I remember shooting some .357's through my Dad's 66 with a short barrel and I didn't like it at all.  His grips are just the standard wood ones though.  Magna's I guess you call them.  I remember thinking it rocked way up and my middle finger on my right hand didn't like it at all.  I can't even imagine what a little j frame would be like.

Absolutely. After a decade or so of shooting a 44 Magnum most anything in a 357 feels alright.
Link Posted: 7/5/2015 11:41:29 PM EDT
[#19]
Shot placement is more important.
Link Posted: 7/6/2015 7:04:01 AM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Shot placement is more important.
View Quote

Sure, but if you can shoot a more powerful round at the same speed and with the same accuracy why would you not?

Most standard 38 special loads have marginal performance. A lot of +P's aren't much better. For a relatively low powered load out of a compromisingly short barrel, it makes sense.

Much like the 40S&W auto hate, it only doesn't make sense if it reveals shooter limitations. It's more a matter of technique and familiarity.
Link Posted: 7/6/2015 11:34:21 AM EDT
[#21]
I would use them as carry loads and feel good about it
Link Posted: 7/6/2015 4:39:41 PM EDT
[#22]
yes but just g a +P rated gun
Link Posted: 7/6/2015 5:54:11 PM EDT
[#23]
Those 38 sp +p dont expand at all. ScubaOZ did a youtube video on them and tested them twice.
Neither test showed expansion.  I would ge some PDX 1 or XTP.  I have XTP 158 gr HP in my 38.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1RpsfsFVKQ
Link Posted: 7/7/2015 10:15:16 AM EDT
[#24]
They are pretty old school but work well. Like most conventional hollow points they can get clogged with enough clothing materials. This is FL and that tends to not be a problem.

As mentioned, I'm carrying GDHP +P right meow.
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 8:03:37 AM EDT
[#25]
Link Posted: 7/10/2015 8:54:53 AM EDT
[#26]
i have a model 36, and it may not be officially marked for +P but everything i read said a post war .38 smith is G2G with +P.

Link Posted: 7/10/2015 8:41:35 PM EDT
[#27]
I carry 158 grain +P Winchester LHP in my 1970's M60. Practice with standard loads and just shoot your +P carry ammo whenever you change to fresh rounds. It may increase wear a tiny amount, but most of us won't shoot a snub .38 enough to ever wear one out.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top