Quote History Quoted:
Second it has been very clearly stated thousands of times any model number stamped steel frame smith is ok for plus p
The amount of increased performance of snubs with plus p over standard pressure is negligible and not worth the increased recoil and blast
View Quote
It depends on the loads in question.
With a 125 gr XTP I see a difference of 125 fps between a 17,000 psi standard pressure load and a 20,000 psi +P load in my 2.125" Model 60. That's about the same velocity difference as I see with 4" versus 2.125" barrels using either standard pressure or +P loads. If instead your "+P" load is just over the SAAMI standard pressure limit, then the difference will be smaller.
In other words, a 20,000 psi +P load in a 2" barrel will get you back into the same performance category as a standard pressure load in a 4" barrel, and that's pretty much the floor for acceptable self defense in terms of penetration and expansion.
------
Stating something clearly thousands of times does not by itself make it true. The major change in allowing +P loads in S&W pistols in the K frame pistols came with the heavy barrel models in 1959, two years after the change to model numbers. In the J-frame, the heavy barrel was available around 1967, but it was't standard on the Model 36 until 1975 and S&W didn't +P mark the Model 36 until 1996 when it came out on the J-Magnum frame.
To be fair, not all modern J-Magnum frame pistols have a heavy barrel and some of those are +P stamped. The Model 36-10 is a good example, but I also suspect the metallurgy in them is different than it is in an early J frame Model 36 or Chiefs Special.
Now with that said, I don't think firing five rounds of +P self defense ammo in earnest in an early Model 36 or Pre-Model 36 Chiefs Special is going to harm the revolver at all, so I have no qualms about carrying +P loads in my Model 36 no dash. However, I practice using standard pressure loads.