- From the standpoint of terminal ballistics in actual people, it performs the same as 9x19/.40 S&W/.45ACP.
- Being bottlenecked, it has a theoretical advantage in smooth feeding.
- For a given 9x19/.40 S&W based gun, you get the same (reduced) magazine capacity as the .40, without a corresponding gain in terminal ballistic performance. Then again, the same can be said for the .40 S&W versions.
- Having a short neck, bullet setback is a potential problem.
- You get more blast, flash, and recoil (thus, slower followup) than the 9x19, again without a corresponding terminal ballistic gain. I find it similar to shooting .40 S&W. Recoil is obviously less than .45ACP, although blast is significantly greater, which can lead to the perception of increased recoil.
- Given the higher velocity and smaller diameter bullets, it should be a dandy round for deep penetration, assuming you use bullets designed for deep penetration.
If you like it, by all means go for it. It's fun, but there's nothing remarkable about it: it's basically like having a slightly bigger Tokarev.