Off the top of my head, I think the Rangers, but don't go by perceived shape. A couple years back I got a PPK, and (I know, different caliber, but the moral is the same I think) qualified with it as a backup/off duty gun. Well, like an idiot, I failed to test my carry ammo through it. I checked the list of authorized ammo, and upon inspecting .380 Gold Dots and Hydra-Shoks, noted that the Gold Dots were closest in profile to ball, and they chambered fine manually, so I loaded it and a couple spare mags with those, and called it good to go. A month or so down the line I was at a friends farm doing some shooting, and I decided to shoot the PPK with my carry ammo (having just bought a bunch of new .380 Gold Dots.)
Well, the dang thing would fire 'em just fine, it just wouldn't chamber a single one of them during actual shooting. A buddy of mine had a bunch of old .380 Hydra-Shoks with him, and I tried those, and they fed and fired just fine. I made a point to round up a hundred and shoot them through it, and had nary a problem with them, and that's what I have in it to this day if I happen to carry it.
My point being, you cannot rely on shape alone to determine anything worthwhile about feeding reliability. (Assuming that's your angle here.)