Page:  / 4
Author
Message
justing344
Offline
Posts: 83
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 9:18:34 PM
[Last Edit: 7/26/2012 9:20:26 PM by justing344]
Not really an option for CCW but the 460 magnum would probably do the job
ALPHAGHOST
ARF.com Idiot
Offline
Posts: 35312
Feedback: 100% (658)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 10:16:36 PM
better practice––FTS drills/head shots/small targets, and tactics, like flanking, etc

imo, there is no magic caliber that will fix ALL scenarios...and pistol bullets still suck in the end
"I'm not stupid; y'all just retarded."
"Fight the enemy, not your gear"
"Si vis pacem, para bellum"
<img src=http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/smiley_tomcat.gi
Buffman_LT1
Offline
Posts: 208
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 10:22:45 PM
[Last Edit: 7/26/2012 10:24:12 PM by Buffman_LT1]

Originally Posted By jaqufrost:
5.7 is what is available and works. Wounding characteristics aren't quite as good as a 9mm, but wholes through the body work alot better than bruises on the chest.

Here is a video of the commercially available hollow point and ballistic tip ammo penetrating a lvl IIIa vest.


No Not it won't.. SS197 will not go through level II, 195,198, 192 will. Neither will go through IIIA. That's reserved for SS190..

Wounding characteristics are another matter, that isn't worth the discussion point on this topic..

Body Armor must have a compressible media behind it, otherwise throwing it up against a stump, or over a piece of cardboard is not a valid test.

SS197SR:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPIx15JkMU0

SS198LF:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8zlPlolpG4
Buffman_LT1
Offline
Posts: 209
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 10:28:17 PM

Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Guys blunt trauma is not going to do much if anything. Typical pistol rounds are approximately delivering 300-400 ft/lbs of energy, most of us are able to punch with more energy.

Physics... its a bitch

Vid

Vid2

Moral of the story; shoot how you have trained. Aim for center mass, an arm or both will likely end up in the field of fire, and/or with the movement may result in a pelvic or head/neck shot.

NIJ testing certification would disagree with you. Your fist has a lot larger surface area then a bullet. NIJ vest ratings take into consideration. If a clay backer exhibits more than 1.7x" of compression from a test, that vest fails to stop that round even if the round is captured..


However, these ratings often have a safety margin for penetration because blunt trauma is usually the limiting factor in certification. For example, Level II body armor would likely stop the III-A test standard, (9 mm submachine gun at 1400 fps) from actually PENETRATING through the Level II vest. But, the Level II vest would fail on blunt trauma impact (the NIJ deems any dent greater than ~1.7" (~44 mm.) on the soft clay test surface, a FAIL).




chewbacca
I f*ckin hate liberals.... seriously, I do.
Offline
Posts: 9590
Feedback: 100% (74)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 10:54:31 PM
Originally Posted By Buffman_LT1:

Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Guys blunt trauma is not going to do much if anything. Typical pistol rounds are approximately delivering 300-400 ft/lbs of energy, most of us are able to punch with more energy.

Physics... its a bitch

Vid

Vid2

Moral of the story; shoot how you have trained. Aim for center mass, an arm or both will likely end up in the field of fire, and/or with the movement may result in a pelvic or head/neck shot.

NIJ testing certification would disagree with you. Your fist has a lot larger surface area then a bullet. NIJ vest ratings take into consideration. If a clay backer exhibits more than 1.7x" of compression from a test, that vest fails to stop that round even if the round is captured..


However, these ratings often have a safety margin for penetration because blunt trauma is usually the limiting factor in certification. For example, Level II body armor would likely stop the III-A test standard, (9 mm submachine gun at 1400 fps) from actually PENETRATING through the Level II vest. But, the Level II vest would fail on blunt trauma impact (the NIJ deems any dent greater than ~1.7" (~44 mm.) on the soft clay test surface, a FAIL).






Duh.

The blunt trauma from a typical pistol round is not going to kill somebody (okay, I can't say 'not' since there are no absolutes in life). I'm sure the NIJ has there reasons behind their testing protocol, but countless shootings have taken place since body armor has been adopted by police forces. Remember the North Hollywood shootout? Yeah... blunt trauma didn't phase those guys.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
Buffman_LT1
Offline
Posts: 211
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 11:00:34 PM

Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Originally Posted By Buffman_LT1:

Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Guys blunt trauma is not going to do much if anything. Typical pistol rounds are approximately delivering 300-400 ft/lbs of energy, most of us are able to punch with more energy.

Physics... its a bitch

Vid

Vid2

Moral of the story; shoot how you have trained. Aim for center mass, an arm or both will likely end up in the field of fire, and/or with the movement may result in a pelvic or head/neck shot.

NIJ testing certification would disagree with you. Your fist has a lot larger surface area then a bullet. NIJ vest ratings take into consideration. If a clay backer exhibits more than 1.7x" of compression from a test, that vest fails to stop that round even if the round is captured..


However, these ratings often have a safety margin for penetration because blunt trauma is usually the limiting factor in certification. For example, Level II body armor would likely stop the III-A test standard, (9 mm submachine gun at 1400 fps) from actually PENETRATING through the Level II vest. But, the Level II vest would fail on blunt trauma impact (the NIJ deems any dent greater than ~1.7" (~44 mm.) on the soft clay test surface, a FAIL).






Duh.

The blunt trauma from a typical pistol round is not going to kill somebody (okay, I can't say 'not' since there are no absolutes in life). I'm sure the NIJ has there reasons behind their testing protocol, but countless shootings have taken place since body armor has been adopted by police forces. Remember the North Hollywood shootout? Yeah... blunt trauma didn't phase those guys.


I agree in regards to depending on what vest was tested. Those North Hollywood guys were wearing more than just one vest/armor. I thought they had rifle plates as well?
chewbacca
I f*ckin hate liberals.... seriously, I do.
Offline
Posts: 9591
Feedback: 100% (74)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 11:06:13 PM
I don't remember. But since vests are NIJ rated anyway, it further proves that blunt trauma is not something to depend on in self defense.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
clickclickBOOM
Radiation Wrangler
Offline
Posts: 86
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 11:29:12 PM
5.7 Tridents in a 5.7 pistol or a PS90 are wicked! Get some REAL 5.7 ammo (not FNs weak stuff)if your worried about vests. I have this weapons platform, but I windup just carrying a Glock23 99% of the time.. http://www.eliteammunition.net/catalog/item/8450665/9240580.htm
crackshot308
Offline
Posts: 377
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/26/2012 11:57:06 PM
Originally Posted By Buffman_LT1:

Originally Posted By JoshAston:

Originally Posted By triburst1:
Originally Posted By godrilla47:
Aim for the head or legs? lllA stops 44 mag, I don't know if hot 10mm can do it.


Yeah, I doubt it too, hence the 9x25. The hottest .44 mag load is around 1600fps while the 9x25 can run up to 2000

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
I doubt any conventional handgun bullet would be able to punch through IIIA. Best bet, aim for the pelvis and below or the face.



SS190 will, and so will the 28gr JHP when pushed fast enough..

Although the SS190 beats it at three panels to it's one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npaqgBsCxkk


want FN 5.7!!!!!!
wlchase
Offline
Posts: 327
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 7/27/2012 4:54:34 PM
Originally Posted By MarcW:
Originally Posted By RenegadeX:
Soft armor is best defeated with multiple rounds on target causing it to fail. Thus the same rules apply - proper shot placement and do not stop shooting till the threat is terminated.

Multiple rounds on the exact same spot? Good luck with that! I'd rather get a 7.62x25.


+1 Plenty reasonable Tokarevs out there.

OTOH, not the best round for home defense.

Bill
PFC_Kramer
Member
Offline
Posts: 3769
Feedback: 100% (54)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/1/2012 8:18:01 AM
[Last Edit: 8/1/2012 8:18:46 AM by PFC_Kramer]
Originally Posted By JoshAston:

Originally Posted By Buffman_LT1:

Originally Posted By JoshAston:

Originally Posted By triburst1:
Originally Posted By godrilla47:
Aim for the head or legs? lllA stops 44 mag, I don't know if hot 10mm can do it.


Yeah, I doubt it too, hence the 9x25. The hottest .44 mag load is around 1600fps while the 9x25 can run up to 2000

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile
I doubt any conventional handgun bullet would be able to punch through IIIA. Best bet, aim for the pelvis and below or the face.



SS190 will, and so will the 28gr JHP when pushed fast enough..

Although the SS190 beats it at three panels to it's one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npaqgBsCxkk

5.7 is far from conventional


lol and 9 x 25 is? At least you can purchase 5.7 ammo in some big box stores and well stocked gun shops.

SPTiger
Member
Offline
Posts: 5433
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/2/2012 8:14:00 AM
[Last Edit: 8/2/2012 8:53:41 AM by SPTiger]
If an active shooter is wearing body armor I seriously doubt he's going to be hurt enough to stop if hit in the torso with a handgun round. Anyone remember a guy by the name of Mark Wilson? IIRC it was around 2005 when a guy had shot someone at a court house with an SKS or a MAK-90 I believe and Mark Wilson was a CCW permit holder that shot the perp with his carry piece, a 1911.45 ACP. Anyway he hit the guy multiple times but it didn't faze him and he was shot dead by the perp.
Better to have and not need than need and not have

Two out of three ain't bad, especially when one of 'em is a head shot.
كافر
Big_Jon
Member
Offline
Posts: 188
Feedback: 100% (12)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/2/2012 1:02:32 PM
I remember a cartridge from the 90's that was designed to defeat body armor, the .224 Boz, think they had it on a Glock frame.
chewbacca
I f*ckin hate liberals.... seriously, I do.
Offline
Posts: 9603
Feedback: 100% (74)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/2/2012 3:25:46 PM
Originally Posted By Big_Jon:
I remember a cartridge from the 90's that was designed to defeat body armor, the .224 Boz, think they had it on a Glock frame.


Yeah, IIRC that was a 10mm necked down to .224.
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin
Buffman_LT1
Offline
Posts: 214
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/2/2012 11:19:24 PM
Original was 10mm, and i think now they use 9mm. It still destroys breach faces on the pistol, so you have to have one with replacable breache faces :)
Czechers
Offline
Posts: 372
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/2/2012 11:30:42 PM
Pretty sure center mass shots with hot 10mm will distract the shooter....
FMJ
Member
Offline
Posts: 23024
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/3/2012 7:37:51 PM
Originally Posted By ALPHAGHOST:
better practice––FTS drills/head shots/small targets, and tactics, like flanking, etc

imo, there is no magic caliber that will fix ALL scenarios...and pistol bullets still suck in the end


awesome reply
Tatics
YOU ARE THE SAFETY !!!
jeepnik
Offline
Posts: 681
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/4/2012 5:48:50 PM
You know, I got to thinking about this and I've come to the conclusion that a grenade would be appropriate. Now you might have some collateral damage, but what the heck, you'll sure as hell stop the shooter.
bradleyswine
Offline
Posts: 2015
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/4/2012 9:10:10 PM
Originally Posted By triburst1:
No a likely scenario, but the mass murder in Colorado has me thinking. My primary carry guns are a GLOCK 19 and a GLOCK 20, both of which I load with hot middleweight Gold Dot HP, 124 +p in the 9mm and 165 grain in the 10mm.

Is there a "magic number" in regards to velocity and penetrating IIIA armor? Will any of the hot loaded lightweight 10mm do the trick? The 135 grain rounds are pushing 1600 fps.

I guess I could always pick up a 9x25 conversion barrel. Some of that shit is 2000 fps!


155mm

HE M107 Shell 43 kg (90 lb) TNT, 6.86 kg (15 lb 2 oz) 564 m/s (1,850 ft/s) 14,955 m

BDA
Offline
Posts: 605
Feedback: 100% (19)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/5/2012 12:28:30 AM
Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Guys blunt trauma is not going to do much if anything. Typical pistol rounds are approximately delivering 300-400 ft/lbs of energy, most of us are able to punch with more energy.

Physics... its a bitch

Vid

Vid2

Moral of the story; shoot how you have trained. Aim for center mass, an arm or both will likely end up in the field of fire, and/or with the movement may result in a pelvic or head/neck shot.


You are right... a punch will deliver more energy. However... a punch is spread out over how many square inches? And a 9mm is delivering its force into how many square inches? Big difference in surface area of the force applied. Physics.

are there cases of folks soaking up ridiculous amounts of hits and keep fighting? Sure. There are just as many, if not more cases of folks stopping a threat with a lot less... single hits of small caliber handgun.. pepper spray... taser... ect.

So what?

If faced with a threat that is wearing armor, I am going to keep dumping rounds into center mass. He may stop after the first few.. or after more. Its the rare person who can stand there soaking up rounds into soft body armor, and ignore it. Its better than not shooting.. or trying to make a miracle hit on a head.

UrbancommandoX
Offline
Posts: 1808
Feedback: 100% (30)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/5/2012 1:56:04 PM
I have to ask since I have never seen there rounds in bin ratings. 50ae, 50gi, 500 s&w. I'm guess due to there blunt point and diameter they will be stopped. Thought can the kevlar handle the energy they have?
hitchhiker
Offline
Posts: 178
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/14/2012 3:22:36 PM
Mosin nagant. 7.62x54r will stop about anything....

Hitchhiker out
gunnut003
Member
Offline
Posts: 5154
Feedback: 100% (242)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/16/2012 3:18:25 PM
Originally Posted By SPTiger:
If an active shooter is wearing body armor I seriously doubt he's going to be hurt enough to stop if hit in the torso with a handgun round. Anyone remember a guy by the name of Mark Wilson? IIRC it was around 2005 when a guy had shot someone at a court house with an SKS or a MAK-90 I believe and Mark Wilson was a CCW permit holder that shot the perp with his carry piece, a 1911.45 ACP. Anyway he hit the guy multiple times but it didn't faze him and he was shot dead by the perp.
I still xont understand why he took a pistol to a rifle shoot....from the story he saw the situatuon from his Apartment, and went to the street.

-Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I. ~ One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
-One good shoot by a citizen can clear up more open cases than a week of detective work!
SPTiger
Member
Offline
Posts: 5459
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/17/2012 8:10:51 AM
Originally Posted By gunnut003:
Originally Posted By SPTiger:
If an active shooter is wearing body armor I seriously doubt he's going to be hurt enough to stop if hit in the torso with a handgun round. Anyone remember a guy by the name of Mark Wilson? IIRC it was around 2005 when a guy had shot someone at a court house with an SKS or a MAK-90 I believe and Mark Wilson was a CCW permit holder that shot the perp with his carry piece, a 1911.45 ACP. Anyway he hit the guy multiple times but it didn't faze him and he was shot dead by the perp.
I still xont understand why he took a pistol to a rifle shoot....from the story he saw the situatuon from his Apartment, and went to the street.



I don't either. Maybe the 1911 was the quickest thing he could get to. Either way that guy had stones to jump into that mess with a handgun.

Better to have and not need than need and not have

Two out of three ain't bad, especially when one of 'em is a head shot.
كافر
jmreagan
Offline
Posts: 1472
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/18/2012 8:38:12 AM
Originally Posted By SPTiger:
Originally Posted By gunnut003:
Originally Posted By SPTiger:
If an active shooter is wearing body armor I seriously doubt he's going to be hurt enough to stop if hit in the torso with a handgun round. Anyone remember a guy by the name of Mark Wilson? IIRC it was around 2005 when a guy had shot someone at a court house with an SKS or a MAK-90 I believe and Mark Wilson was a CCW permit holder that shot the perp with his carry piece, a 1911.45 ACP. Anyway he hit the guy multiple times but it didn't faze him and he was shot dead by the perp.
I still xont understand why he took a pistol to a rifle shoot....from the story he saw the situatuon from his Apartment, and went to the street.



I don't either. Maybe the 1911 was the quickest thing he could get to. Either way that guy had stones to jump into that mess with a handgun.



He was just a bad ass that got pissed off at what he was seeing unfold in front of his eyes. He didn't think about taking a pistol to a rifle fight. He just did it. Unfortunately his bravery and willingness to go into harms way to protect others got him killed. Mark Wilson is a hero in my book. Thank God there are men like him.
Page:  / 4