Hey all, I think this may actually be my 2nd post. Any rate, while I'm waiting on my CHL application to get processed, I've been going back and forth about which firearm to get. So I decided to rent both and try them out.
I wanted the Glock 17 and M&P 9, as that is the caliber I've decided will be for me, and today's test with the .40 guns confirmed that, but they didn't have a Glock 17 to rent along with an M&P 9... so I went with the .40's. I went through 100 rounds with both guns.
Some points for me on why I like the M&P better:
1. Comfort - Glock is like holding a square brick in my hand. M&P is literally a perfect fit with all the right curves.
2. Slide release/lock - this is so much easier for me to feel without looking on the M&P. That little release lever on the Glock took focus every time for some reason.
3. I shot the M&P better, but only slightly so. Best group of the day was at 10 yards. I was able to keep 14 of 15 rounds inside a 4" circle target on the M&P. 6 of 15 didn't stay in with the Glock. Other attempts at accuracy test all consistently proved that I am a better shot with the M&P overall... probably because of the comfort.
I've definitely decided that the .40 is not for me. Primarily because, the last 10 rounds of the 100 round lot, I was shaking like the paint department at Home Depot. The fatigue was overwhelming (and surprising, considering I do shoot a good bit of long rifle where fatigue really messes with your consistency). But also because I like to shoot a lot, and money is tight. Wally World has the $21 box of 9mm Luger x100, so I'll purchase as much of that as I can for range work, and likely carry some Federal HST hollow points.
I did send the target out to 25 yards. Put the last 10 of the 100 rounds through the M&P. Not very accurate. 9 of 10 rounds found the paper. Shaky shaky!
Any rate, I had fun, and the shooting today helped me make what was turning out to be a tough decision.