Lightly used, common model (safety/decocker).  Rail cover wasn't included...



Any issues I should know about?  I've never had a .40 92 type before.

No issues at all. I've had the 9mm version for several years now. The only thing I did with mine is install the "thin" grip. I also stippled the grip. You've got a great pistol there. If you get a 9mm barrel and magazine you can shoot 9mm out of it. I took it a step further and bought an entire .40 caliber model 96 upper assembly for mine so I can swap back and forth at will. It's a typical Beretta, reliable, accurate, and a littel chunky.

So there are no battering issues with .40?

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

Mine's a .40 and I've had none. I'm north of 2,500 rounds and it's been rock solid.

That's why there's a built in bushing in the 90-2 and the 92/96A1 models. On my 92A1, theres a blue bushing inside the frame.

I had the 9mm model before I sold it. Good gun, holsters are a pain to get without some searching. Don't worry about the rail cover, it's just a style thing. I never used mine.





As a hint: The leather holsters for the 92A1 work (leather flexes enough) but Kydex doesn't due to the different lines of the slide. The Serpa CQC for the Beretta Px4 works (my chosen range holster for 2 years for that gun). SHTF Gear makes a nice IWB hybrid for it for about $60 that's on their site or on amazon (my chosen ccw for a year until I sold the gun). The 6004 Safariland holster works great as well, although they are some hulking bulky rigs.



ETA: You can also drop in a 9mm barrel if you ever want to change.