User Panel
Posted: 7/4/2016 8:56:20 AM EDT
real or rumor? No finger grooves and removeable trigger firing module ala Sig P250/320 and KelTec P11?
|
|
Quoted:
real or rumor? No finger grooves and removeable trigger firing module ala Sig P250/320 and KelTec P11? View Quote No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. |
|
Sounds like the FBI needs to pi$ off. Why do I hate when people try to change glocks. I guess I'm always afraid they'll. Take such a simple thing and make it complicated.
|
|
Quoted:
Sounds like the FBI needs to pi$ off. Why do I hate when people try to change glocks. I guess I'm always afraid they'll. Take such a simple thing and make it complicated. View Quote Sharp sticks worked great once upon a time, too. We improved on that. Glock will improve on Glock. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
Quoted:
They just put out a spec for what they want, Glock didn't have to submit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
They just put out a spec for what they want, Glock didn't have to submit. Quoted:
Sounds like the FBI needs to pi$ off. Why do I hate when people try to change glocks. I guess I'm always afraid they'll. Take such a simple thing and make it complicated. I think it's hilarious. The specs were pretty obviously designed with one particular pistol in mind. Having that pistol still lose to Glock is just great. |
|
Maybe Glock will release a paddle mag release for am I release! . If that happens you know the carbine is coming very soon after as well.
I bet they will just make a Gen4 with no finger grooves and call it a day. |
|
Quoted:
I think it's hilarious. The specs were pretty obviously designed with one particular pistol in mind. Having that pistol still lose to Glock is just great. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
They just put out a spec for what they want, Glock didn't have to submit. Quoted:
Sounds like the FBI needs to pi$ off. Why do I hate when people try to change glocks. I guess I'm always afraid they'll. Take such a simple thing and make it complicated. I think it's hilarious. The specs were pretty obviously designed with one particular pistol in mind. Having that pistol still lose to Glock is just great. Which pistol? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They just put out a spec for what they want, Glock didn't have to submit. Quoted:
Sounds like the FBI needs to pi$ off. Why do I hate when people try to change glocks. I guess I'm always afraid they'll. Take such a simple thing and make it complicated. I think it's hilarious. The specs were pretty obviously designed with one particular pistol in mind. Having that pistol still lose to Glock is just great. Which pistol? P320 Sig |
|
I really do not see Glock doing a complete redesign of their frame/locking block/frame rails to satisfy some paper-pusher requirement that grip frames be swappable between "guns" (serialized frames)... Generally, if someone wants a different sized gun, they'll buy a few that size.
I am interested to see if it turns out to be a non-finger groove Gen 4 style frame, maybe with better backstraps, and maybe front straps and grip panels, ala HK. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They just put out a spec for what they want, Glock didn't have to submit. Quoted:
Sounds like the FBI needs to pi$ off. Why do I hate when people try to change glocks. I guess I'm always afraid they'll. Take such a simple thing and make it complicated. I think it's hilarious. The specs were pretty obviously designed with one particular pistol in mind. Having that pistol still lose to Glock is just great. Which pistol? P320 Sig Why did they lose? I heard it was something about magazines breaking when dropped on concrete or something because of a hokey baseplate design? |
|
Of course all this news comes just after I buy a Gen 4.
Be nice if there was a way to get a frame. |
|
Interchangeable trigger modules are a fad. Conversions cost damn near what a new handgun costs. I'd much rather just have a second, separate firearm.
|
|
Quoted:
No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
real or rumor? No finger grooves and removeable trigger firing module ala Sig P250/320 and KelTec P11? No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. They need to improve the mag well. It sucks. And the mag release isn't the greatest either. |
|
So has anyone seen a spy photo of these modular Glocks? Do they really exist? Or did Fed's toss out some of the requirements after realizing they were stupid?
|
|
Quoted:
So has anyone seen a spy photo of these modular Glocks? Do they really exist? Or did Fed's toss out some of the requirements after realizing they were stupid? View Quote At this point we are not sure if FBI just chose Glock because they already had holsters or if Glock is making a new pistol for the FBI as spec-ed out. For all we know the FBI is adopting the Gen4 Glock as is. |
|
I have just assumed they would get delivered a Gen 4 w/o finger grooves, ambi mag release and good sights. Nope of that is a big leap for Glock.
|
|
The ambi mag release is easy. They've already released one pistol with it, and a LOT of mags have the metal area on the front to support it. Ambi slide stop lever is another story.
|
|
Quoted:
At this point we are not sure if FBI just chose Glock because they already had holsters or if Glock is making a new pistol for the FBI as spec-ed out. For all we know the FBI is adopting the Gen4 Glock as is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So has anyone seen a spy photo of these modular Glocks? Do they really exist? Or did Fed's toss out some of the requirements after realizing they were stupid? At this point we are not sure if FBI just chose Glock because they already had holsters or if Glock is making a new pistol for the FBI as spec-ed out. For all we know the FBI is adopting the Gen4 Glock as is. That's what I'm thinking. But of course I have nothing to back it up. Just a hunch. |
|
Quoted: No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: real or rumor? No finger grooves and removeable trigger firing module ala Sig P250/320 and KelTec P11? No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. Ambi like gen 4 ambi or the old G21 ambis? |
|
Shoudn't be hard to CNC a new Gen4 mold with no finger grooves.
After 18 months or so, Glock will release the Gen4 FBI series to the civilian market...and people will gobble them up...like always. |
|
Glock doesn't have to build to those specs to win the contract. They could have submitted a regular gen 4 and said take it or leave it.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
and quite unnecessary too. slingshot or use the rear sight. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ambi slide stop lever is another story. and quite unnecessary too. slingshot or use the rear sight. Yeah, I don't think I've ever used the slide stop to release the slide when shooting. |
|
Just finished a Glock Armorers course today and both the LE rep and the instructor seemed to be pretty in the know about the new pistol.
No finger grooves and no coil trigger spring like Gen 1-4 guns, will have the same spring like on the 42s and 43s. Who knows, time will tell. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah, I don't think I've ever used the slide stop to release the slide when shooting. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ambi slide stop lever is another story. and quite unnecessary too. slingshot or use the rear sight. Yeah, I don't think I've ever used the slide stop to release the slide when shooting. Your doing it right, its a slide STOP not a slide release.. That's what you are supposed to do. |
|
Quoted:
Your doing it right, its a slide STOP not a slide release.. That's what you are supposed to do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ambi slide stop lever is another story. and quite unnecessary too. slingshot or use the rear sight. Yeah, I don't think I've ever used the slide stop to release the slide when shooting. Your doing it right, its a slide STOP not a slide release.. That's what you are supposed to do. Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? |
|
|
Quoted:
Just finished a Glock Armorers course today and both the LE rep and the instructor seemed to be pretty in the know about the new pistol. No finger grooves and no coil trigger spring like Gen 1-4 guns, will have the same spring like on the 42s and 43s. Who knows, time will tell. View Quote Took my course at Glock a month or so ago, instructors and rep said the same, they like the 42/43 changes and wanted to incorporate them on every model, eventually. |
|
Quoted:
Especially when it comes stock on the 34/35. Comp shooters use the slide stop all the time. It is faster. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? Especially when it comes stock on the 34/35. Comp shooters use the slide stop all the time. It is faster. Yeah, I wasn't meaning others shouldn't use it that way. I personally don't find the small slide stop a problem. I'm not a comp shooter. I just overhand it. In fact, it's an upside to me. Less likely to ride it. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Glock doesn't have to build to those specs to win the contract. They could have submitted a regular gen 4 and said take it or leave it. +1 Not possible. If the weapon doesn't meet the Statement of Work it gets disqualified. They would have to dump the contract and start the process over to just go with a Gen 4. Every other manufacturer would jump on that lawsuit. David |
|
First thing I thought of reading the requirements was a "big boy" G43 style frame.
|
|
Quoted:
Especially when it comes stock on the 34/35. Comp shooters use the slide stop all the time. It is faster. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? Especially when it comes stock on the 34/35. Comp shooters use the slide stop all the time. It is faster. So do face shooters. Take a Vickers course. Either way is fine as long it gets the gun going again. |
|
|
Quoted:
That's cool. Feels like it gives some extra credibility to the 42 and 43. I really like the 43. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Took my course at Glock a month or so ago, instructors and rep said the same, they like the 42/43 changes and wanted to incorporate them on every model, eventually. That's cool. Feels like it gives some extra credibility to the 42 and 43. I really like the 43. Time will tell if it IS as good. But I do think having now finger grooves would be a good thing. |
|
Quoted:
So do face shooters. Take a Vickers course. Either way is fine as long it gets the gun going again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? Especially when it comes stock on the 34/35. Comp shooters use the slide stop all the time. It is faster. So do face shooters. Take a Vickers course. Either way is fine as long it gets the gun going again. My issue is that it should reflect how the FBI teaches it's agents how to shoot. If the FBI firearms curriculum stipulates that agents slingshot the slide into battery for two handed use or using a belt or shoe heel for one handed use, then an ambi slide stop shouldn't be a factor. It's kind of the same thinking where agencies say they want a hammer fired pistol for "second strike capability" on a dud. If the curriculum teaches some form of emergency action drill (which pretty much everyone does) and not pulling the trigger again on a dud round (which pretty much no one does), why the hell would you incorporate that into a statement of work? It runs counter to how you are trying to train your officers. The whole idea is to get a firearm that fits what you want to do with it, to include how you want to train your people. I'm not going to argue the pros/cons of one method or the other, just that the final form of the pistol needs to be conducive to how you want the officers trained. Maybe the FBI teaches it's agents to use the slide stop to get the slide back in battery; if so, then the ambi stop makes sense. If not, it doesn't. |
|
|
Quoted: No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: real or rumor? No finger grooves and removeable trigger firing module ala Sig P250/320 and KelTec P11? No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. Same ejection? |
|
Quoted:
My issue is that it should reflect how the FBI teaches it's agents how to shoot. If the FBI firearms curriculum stipulates that agents slingshot the slide into battery for two handed use or using a belt or shoe heel for one handed use, then an ambi slide stop shouldn't be a factor. It's kind of the same thinking where agencies say they want a hammer fired pistol for "second strike capability" on a dud. If the curriculum teaches some form of emergency action drill (which pretty much everyone does) and not pulling the trigger again on a dud round (which pretty much no one does), why the hell would you incorporate that into a statement of work? It runs counter to how you are trying to train your officers. The whole idea is to get a firearm that fits what you want to do with it, to include how you want to train your people. I'm not going to argue the pros/cons of one method or the other, just that the final form of the pistol needs to be conducive to how you want the officers trained. Maybe the FBI teaches it's agents to use the slide stop to get the slide back in battery; if so, then the ambi stop makes sense. If not, it doesn't. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? Especially when it comes stock on the 34/35. Comp shooters use the slide stop all the time. It is faster. So do face shooters. Take a Vickers course. Either way is fine as long it gets the gun going again. My issue is that it should reflect how the FBI teaches it's agents how to shoot. If the FBI firearms curriculum stipulates that agents slingshot the slide into battery for two handed use or using a belt or shoe heel for one handed use, then an ambi slide stop shouldn't be a factor. It's kind of the same thinking where agencies say they want a hammer fired pistol for "second strike capability" on a dud. If the curriculum teaches some form of emergency action drill (which pretty much everyone does) and not pulling the trigger again on a dud round (which pretty much no one does), why the hell would you incorporate that into a statement of work? It runs counter to how you are trying to train your officers. The whole idea is to get a firearm that fits what you want to do with it, to include how you want to train your people. I'm not going to argue the pros/cons of one method or the other, just that the final form of the pistol needs to be conducive to how you want the officers trained. Maybe the FBI teaches it's agents to use the slide stop to get the slide back in battery; if so, then the ambi stop makes sense. If not, it doesn't. I train police officers as well as recruits on firearms. Many of the recruits have little to no experience with handguns. The left handed shooters have a much more difficult time locking the slide open than the right handed shooters. Dropping the slide is not the only variable. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
real or rumor? No finger grooves and removeable trigger firing module ala Sig P250/320 and KelTec P11? No grooves, different magwell, and ambi slide release is the rumor I heard. Same ejection? Touché |
|
Quoted:
Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? View Quote It's designed to be pushed UP. Some will argue that it's "faster" to push down when reloading. That may be the case when you're on the range or in the class. The problem is when you're in a critical incident, and your Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activates, your fine motor skills degrade substantially. Flipping the slide stop lever with your thumb is a fine motor skill. The same can be said about the slingshot method of cycling the slide. You still have only a single digit on one side of the slide. If you think of the immediate action drill, it's hand over the top of the slide, "grip it and rip it". Use the same for releasing the slide during reloads. Same movement, and it uses gross motor skills. Also, notice Glock never refers to it as a slide RELEASE. And it's only mentioned once in the manual as an alternative method for releasing the slide, with stress on the grip it and rip it method. All other references are that it's for pushing UP to lock the slide open. |
|
Quoted: It's designed to be pushed UP. Some will argue that it's "faster" to push down when reloading. That may be the case when you're on the range or in the class. The problem is when you're in a critical incident, and your Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activates, your fine motor skills degrade substantially. Flipping the slide stop lever with your thumb is a fine motor skill. The same can be said about the slingshot method of cycling the slide. You still have only a single digit on one side of the slide. If you think of the immediate action drill, it's hand over the top of the slide, "grip it and rip it". Use the same for releasing the slide during reloads. Same movement, and it uses gross motor skills. Also, notice Glock never refers to it as a slide RELEASE. And it's only mentioned once in the manual as an alternative method for releasing the slide, with stress on the grip it and rip it method. All other references are that it's for pushing UP to lock the slide open. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? It's designed to be pushed UP. Some will argue that it's "faster" to push down when reloading. That may be the case when you're on the range or in the class. The problem is when you're in a critical incident, and your Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activates, your fine motor skills degrade substantially. Flipping the slide stop lever with your thumb is a fine motor skill. The same can be said about the slingshot method of cycling the slide. You still have only a single digit on one side of the slide. If you think of the immediate action drill, it's hand over the top of the slide, "grip it and rip it". Use the same for releasing the slide during reloads. Same movement, and it uses gross motor skills. Also, notice Glock never refers to it as a slide RELEASE. And it's only mentioned once in the manual as an alternative method for releasing the slide, with stress on the grip it and rip it method. All other references are that it's for pushing UP to lock the slide open. You know how I know you don't own a shot timer??... |
|
Quoted:
It's designed to be pushed UP. Some will argue that it's "faster" to push down when reloading. That may be the case when you're on the range or in the class. The problem is when you're in a critical incident, and your Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activates, your fine motor skills degrade substantially. Flipping the slide stop lever with your thumb is a fine motor skill. The same can be said about the slingshot method of cycling the slide. You still have only a single digit on one side of the slide. If you think of the immediate action drill, it's hand over the top of the slide, "grip it and rip it". Use the same for releasing the slide during reloads. Same movement, and it uses gross motor skills. Also, notice Glock never refers to it as a slide RELEASE. And it's only mentioned once in the manual as an alternative method for releasing the slide, with stress on the grip it and rip it method. All other references are that it's for pushing UP to lock the slide open. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? It's designed to be pushed UP. Some will argue that it's "faster" to push down when reloading. That may be the case when you're on the range or in the class. The problem is when you're in a critical incident, and your Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activates, your fine motor skills degrade substantially. Flipping the slide stop lever with your thumb is a fine motor skill. The same can be said about the slingshot method of cycling the slide. You still have only a single digit on one side of the slide. If you think of the immediate action drill, it's hand over the top of the slide, "grip it and rip it". Use the same for releasing the slide during reloads. Same movement, and it uses gross motor skills. Also, notice Glock never refers to it as a slide RELEASE. And it's only mentioned once in the manual as an alternative method for releasing the slide, with stress on the grip it and rip it method. All other references are that it's for pushing UP to lock the slide open. Pressing the trigger to the rear is a fine motor skill and I can do it just fine in a stressful situation. Excuses excuses. |
|
Quoted:
Your doing it right, its a slide STOP not a slide release.. That's what you are supposed to do. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ambi slide stop lever is another story. and quite unnecessary too. slingshot or use the rear sight. Yeah, I don't think I've ever used the slide stop to release the slide when shooting. Your doing it right, its a slide STOP not a slide release.. That's what you are supposed to do. you might want to read your Glock manual sometime |
|
|
|
Quoted: Pressing the trigger to the rear is a fine motor skill and I can do it just fine in a stressful situation. Excuses excuses. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Then why do they texture it and make an extended version? It's designed to be pushed UP. Some will argue that it's "faster" to push down when reloading. That may be the case when you're on the range or in the class. The problem is when you're in a critical incident, and your Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) activates, your fine motor skills degrade substantially. Flipping the slide stop lever with your thumb is a fine motor skill. The same can be said about the slingshot method of cycling the slide. You still have only a single digit on one side of the slide. If you think of the immediate action drill, it's hand over the top of the slide, "grip it and rip it". Use the same for releasing the slide during reloads. Same movement, and it uses gross motor skills. Also, notice Glock never refers to it as a slide RELEASE. And it's only mentioned once in the manual as an alternative method for releasing the slide, with stress on the grip it and rip it method. All other references are that it's for pushing UP to lock the slide open. Pressing the trigger to the rear is a fine motor skill and I can do it just fine in a stressful situation. Excuses excuses. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.