ilokano Member Joined: Jul 2008  NV, USA Posts: 32 Feedback: 0% (0)	Posted: 3/29/2012 9:15:34 AM THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT Do I need to be 922 compliance if want to turn my Draco into a rifle? I tried searching older post but can't find any info.
	User Info

AEnemaBay 2111 - USMC Team Member Joined: Jan 2007  UZB Posts: 2521 Feedback: 100% (39) Link To This Post	Posted: 3/29/2012 9:34:32 AM Yes.
	"Nothing says 'come to my tree stand for a good cornholing' more than a Browning Buckmark sticker on your oversized truck." - dport "Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list. User Info

DasBaldDog Member Joined: Mar 2011  PA, USA Posts: 89 Feedback: 100% (4) Link To This Post	Posted: 3/29/2012 9:58:35 AM Originally Posted By AEnemaBay: Yes. Debateable.... But I would like to prevent having that debate in a courtroom.... I would err on the side of caution and follow 922.
	User Info

AEnemaBay 2111 - USMC Team Member Joined: Jan 2007  UZB Posts: 2524 Feedback: 100% (39) Link To This Post

Posted: 3/29/2012 3:16:42 PM Originally Posted By DasBaldDog: Originally Posted By AEnemaBay: Yes. Debateable.... But I would like to prevent having that debate in a courtroom.... I would err on the side of caution and follow 922. No, it's not debatable, it's down right stupid. I've given up trying to tell people that it doesn't apply to their situation and just say "yes/no" from now on. Everyone seems to think that EVERY rifle you own needs to be 922r compliant when it doesn't. Ugh...

"Nothing says 'come to my tree stand for a good cornholing' more than a Browning Buckmark sticker on your oversized truck." - dport "Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list. User Info

Angry1 Member Joined: Feb 2012  MN, USA Posts: 4 Feedback: 0% (0) Link To This Post	Posted: 3/29/2012 7:45:42 PM [Last Edit: 3/29/2012 7:47:15 PM by Angry1] No, it's not debatable, it's down right stupid. I've given up trying to tell people that it doesn't apply to their situation and just say "yes/no" from now on. Everyone seems to think that EVERY rifle you own needs to be 922r compliant when it doesn't. Ugh... Amen brother!
	User Info

sporter Member Joined: Jan 2001  IN, USA Posts: 6477 Feedback: 100% (137) Link To This Post	Posted: 3/30/2012 2:09:11 PM Originally Posted By AEnemaBay: Yes. this.
	User Info

762x39nut Member Joined: Jul 2007  IL, USA Posts: 816 Feedback: 100% (49) Link To This Post	Posted: 3/30/2012 7:43:54 PM When JBI did mine,he had to swap the original trigger group.
	User Info

g230d Member Joined: Jun 2011  AZ, USA Posts: 99 Feedback: 100% (11) Link To This Post	Posted: 3/31/2012 4:40:46 PM IF you couldn't import it the way you want it, than it has to be 922(r) compliant. A pistol is importable so making it a rifle you gotta look at your U.S. part count since as a rifle it couldn't be imported. It would have to come in like a SAIGA sporter or however the hell the WASRs come in before Century monkeys with them.
	User Info

cfpkiller Member Joined: Apr 2008  NC, USA Posts: 481 Feedback: 100% (14) Link To This Post	Posted: 4/8/2012 8:35:22 PM this was my draco rifle us parts were tapco fcg us pistol grip kvar us butstock ultimak us made barel extension/brake
	User Info

ilokano Member Joined: Jul 2008  NV, USA Posts: 34 Feedback: 0% (0) Link To This Post	Posted: 4/9/2012 12:10:26 AM How did you install the stock is that a sidefolder?
	User Info

evlblkwpnz Gunshine State Native Team Member Joined: Aug 2008  FL, USA Posts: 4023 Feedback: 100% (74) Link To This Post	Posted: 4/15/2012 11:58:57 AM [Last Edit: 4/15/2012 9:54:56 PM by evlblkwpnz] Not a sidefolder. Fixed KVar WARSAW. My choice for a fixed stock on an AK as well. ETA: The more I look at it, the more it looks like NATO length....
	I am a slave to my creations.... my image cannot be seen in them, but they bear my heart and soul - evl.... User Info