User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/29/2011 12:49:03 PM EDT
[#1]
If it's a PAP like the pic below, it's dramatically overpriced. They normally go for $400-ish.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2011 1:00:18 PM EDT
[#2]
IIRC that rifle only accepts 10 shot magazines and requires machine work on the trunnion to convert it to accept standard magazines.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2011 1:53:10 PM EDT
[#3]
Quoted:
Exactly. While the Century Wasr's come into the US with a narrow magwell opening, the front trunnion is a hi cap part. These Yugo guns use a narrow opening front trunnion, which makes hogging out the opening much more labor intensive. GARY N4KVE
IIRC that rifle only accepts 10 shot magazines and requires machine work on the trunnion to convert it to accept standard magazines. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2011 2:54:51 PM EDT
[#4]
Local Cabella's has a bunch of them for either $399 or $349, (can't remember which).
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/30/2011 5:45:18 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
IIRC that rifle only accepts 10 shot magazines and requires machine work on the trunnion to convert it to accept standard magazines. and even after all the work it probably wont feed correctly, and the buttstock cannot be changed out into a PG configuration. I wish the serbs would make it easier to convert these rifles 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/31/2011 8:03:29 AM EDT
[#6]
Why can't the buttstock be changed out? Is the rear trunion different than a standard one?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/31/2011 9:07:25 AM EDT
[#7]
Quoted: Why can't the buttstock be changed out? Is the rear trunion different than a standard one? It can be changed out, a M70 butt stock will bolt right up. The slant receiver raises aesthetic issues, it really looks like ass unless something is done to accommodate the receiver slant. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/31/2011 12:22:10 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why can't the buttstock be changed out? Is the rear trunion different than a standard one? It can be changed out, a M70 butt stock will bolt right up. The slant receiver raises aesthetic issues, it really looks like ass unless something is done to accommodate the receiver slant. well I didnt know that you could put a m70 stock on it, but your right about the aesthetics it would not look right. here is a thread that explains the conversion http://www.akfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70004 and here is one with a good stock conversion http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_4_89/137015_Where_to_get_Synthetic_M70_Stock.html |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
