|
|
Posted: 10/7/2008 10:27:22 PM
if your going to go that route, design a flip up front sight.... and to answer your question, it should have two pins in it that need to be knocked out. not hard. good solid punch and a mallet, two minutes and your done. the hard part is pulling the pressed on front sight. What i would use is an automotive gear puller. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2008 10:27:48 PM
That won't work too well. What happens is it places the weight further back with more leverage on the leaf spring. It then moves around too easy. I tried that by simply placing the red dot all the way to the front of the dog leg model. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2008 10:28:05 PM
oh, and if you need any beta testers... i'm game
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2008 10:36:16 PM
What benefit would the flip up front sight provide? If i can size it correctly so that it sits in the bottom 1/4 to 1/3 of the glass it doesn't seem like it would be bothersome. I see the AR's with flip up everything. Why do they do that? |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2008 10:38:35 PM
[Last Edit: 10/7/2008 10:40:04 PM by calicojack]
it's used for distance scopes, so that the sight does not interfere with the sight picture.\
which if i do end up getting a "beryl" style rail, which is what both yours and dph's designs technically are, i'll have both a red dot and a distance scope on quick release mounts. effectively making my ak an spr of sorts. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/7/2008 11:29:48 PM
Cool, I get it. Actually, when I started down this road I was just looking to make a steady and precise scope rail that sat low enough that I didn't have to put my chin on the buttstock to look through the optic. Then the requirements started to creep to include a reflex, co-witnessing, peeps, folding BUIS... |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2008 12:23:31 AM
A clamp on front sight, flip or not would be nice. I have added peep sights to some of my AK's and needed to cut and weld the existing front sight to make things work properly. A clamp on model would have been much easier and would allow for windage adjustment without repeated trial and error, wasted ammo, trips to the range.....
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2008 12:37:17 AM
I agree with you on that one. Some of these things seem kind of obvious but, I don't see available solutions out there for whatever reason. How much did you have to raise your front sight?
It seems to me like a complete solution to make this set-up work properly will need to include a taller front sight, beryl type rail, and adjustable rear peep sight. A kit like this would allow you to configure the weapon with your choice of most any reflex, a scope, or simply use the peep with the doubled sight radius. Quickly configure for the particular day's shooting as needed. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2008 3:02:18 PM
so what's the latest word?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2008 6:01:44 PM
Well, after lots of measuring and researching different iron sights and optic combinations etc.. it almost seems that for little more effort one could make a top cover inspired by this FNH. Nice loooong flat top rail that you could attach an unlimited number of combinations to. I don't know that I'll do this but, I am looking into the feasibility right now.
Whataya think? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2008 6:12:52 PM
omfg. nut. you owe me a keyboard.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2008 6:17:44 PM
I'm guessing you like it. I might be cutting metal as early as tomorrow. One of the perks of being a gun owner that owns a machine shop. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/10/2008 6:52:19 PM
now if you could make up a lower tri-rail hand guard that resembles the mounting mechanism of the ultimak, that was under $150 you'd be the shiznizzle.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/16/2008 7:28:01 PM
any updates?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/17/2008 11:33:03 PM
This next phase of my project was a much larger undertaking than expected. However here are a couple of pics I just took tonight. Lighting is crappy but, as the project moves along I'll take better pics outdoors under natural lighting. The basic concept is moving in a direction I like a whole lot better. What do you think? ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2008 2:17:07 PM
[Last Edit: 10/18/2008 2:17:50 PM by AK47CBR]
That's awesome! Is this something you plan on producing? Does it replace the dust cover or mount over it?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2008 3:31:27 PM
i'm so down for that. i'll volunteer for a beta tester program. your going to need a higher front sight. and we'd have to figure out how to zero it.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2008 5:48:03 PM
It is something I plan on producing. It didn't really start out that way. I was just goofing around with my AK and before I knew it, there I was doing new product development. It does replace the dust cover altogether. This thing is so different than the Dog Leg rail I started this thread on that I think I should start a new thread for this rail system. I'll provide some further details and pics on that new thread. Thanks for the help so far. You too Calicojack. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2008 5:58:28 PM
Do you plan on producing both systems, or is the dog-leg dead? I prefer the simplicity of the dog-leg (or a variation thereof) myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2008 6:03:18 PM
I plan on both systems. The Dog Leg is just on hold for a little while until I get the Flat Top done. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/18/2008 8:37:58 PM
better start thinking about pricing too. if it's kreb's cost ratio, it <might> not do very in terms of volume. Personally i subscribe to the volume over gross profit school of thought. meaning if you sell more at a lower profit margin, you'll very quickly make more than you would if you place a large price tag on them and sell only a couple.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/20/2008 4:37:50 PM
i sent you a message about one of your dog leg's. I've got an immediate need for a beryl style rail, and like yours over dpharm's atm. if you could, please reply to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2008 10:22:09 PM
[Last Edit: 10/23/2008 10:26:26 PM by mcad3333]
i like it first monolithic rail for an ak. can you put a step down in it like your dog leg rail to allow co witness. maybe make a cut out for the sight block so it could poke out the top similar to the ar carbine rails that are cut out for the front sight. also figure out a way to hinge it so you can clean the rifle. also create an extension on the end that also has a rail section but set to the height so an ar backup sight can be used. all of thes are just ideas and your already just came out with a very idea for the ak.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2008 11:32:27 PM
What a good idea!!!! A hole in the rail to let the rear sight block poke through. I can't believe that one totally escaped me. It may or may not look a little funny I'll have to try and see. Tomorrow morning I'm going to cut a hole in it to see if it works. The only concern I have is it may weaken the rail and allow it to flex. I'll just have to cut it up and try it. Putting a dog leg in the flat top isn't compatible with the design as it stands now. The only reason I had put the step in the Dog Leg rail was to try and make the rear end low enough so a BUIS could co-witness through the optic's glass with the front sight. In practice it didn't work. I couldn't find a red dot that was low enough. That's what lead me to develop the long flat top design which measures about 18 inches. Now you can have both the iron sights and the optic all mounted on the same plane which gives you unlimited sighting options. The cover will hinge at the front. The method was explained in an earlier post. I'll copy and paste this entry into the Flat Top's thread so others can follow. |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2008 1:57:49 AM
Personally I would prefer minimalist features with simple functions - just like the AK itself.
All the AR type stuff just ruins this choice of weapon IMHO. I'd just like to be able to mount an optic on top and be able to co-witness the standard AK sighting system. If that means cutting a groove in the middle of the rail and maintain the original rear sight thats OK. If it means creating a new rear sight of AK design that is positioned at the rear of the rail (to give a longer sight pattern) thats OK too. Moving things up real tall to accomplish this is not good either. Peep sights improve your accuracy but if you are going to put optics on top then you are adding two (2) "precision aiming" devices [not sure what other word to use] With a top rail for optics (ie, precision aiming) I think its best to have the original iron "combat sights" as the compliment. Please.... no flip up stuff. Thats available via countless AR folks Just my 2cents Best wishes Harv |
|
|