This is a very timely thread for me. I'm buying a pistol-caliber carbine (PCC), a Kel Tec SUB 2000 in .40 cal, Glock magazine. But before that I had been thinking of approaching it from a different angle - using the same carbine I shoot my full-power 5.56 or 7.62x39 but just changing the ammo, which would have to be hand-loaded. Problems inherent in this plan mainly are operational - making it hot enough to cycle the gun with no mechanical changes but not exceed about 1350 FPS.A few years ago I was getting there when I discovered Tula 154 gr soft point that I shoot out of my AMD65 with an 11.5" original barrel with extension/brake. This works fine but is still too 'hot' to be considered a sub-caliber load. I guess using that as a starting point, a loader would pull that bullet and re-use it with a brass case and experiment until he got the action to cycle somewhere below 1400 FPS. There are many advantages to using the same gun and magazines you already have and are used-to for making it a RPC (reduced power carbine) with only an ammo change. If you are wondering 'why', it's because a PCC/RPC is the ideal personal defense weapon (PDW) and for shooting inside vehicles, buildings, apartments and outdoors in urban areas. Plenty of punch to be effective with decreased noise and over-penetration. More powerful than a handgun.
To the original question, it does seem counterproductive to me, maybe just dangerous, to go out for hogs with a PCC/RPC which may not incapacitate the animal without a very well-placed shot. I would want the heaviest full-power cartridge I could get for my caliber for a wild hog hunt.