|
|
Posted: 6/25/2012 10:26:17 PM
[Last Edit: 6/25/2012 11:26:49 PM by MeatAxe556]
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_16/575489_7_62x39_Tulammo_122gr_VS_124gr_Cutaway.html Has anyone bisected the Tula bullets to see if either or both are actually the elusive Uly 8M3 "effect" bullet or done any ballistic gel tests with them? I've checked out a box of each, TulAmmo 122 and 124 grain HPs, and neither has the deep "pre fail cuts" characteristic of the 8M3 (that I can see, anyway): http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.gunco.net/gallery/data/500/medium/WMCULYHP_3.jpg&imgrefurl=http://ak47talk.blogspot.com/2011/11/possible-current-8m3-bullet-source.html&h=600&w=485&sz=62&tbnid=d_9X4MKH5YgGEM:&tbnh=103&tbnw=83&prev=/search%3Fq%3D8m3%2Bpicture%26tbm%3Disch%26tbo%3Du&zoom=1&q=8m3+picture&usg=__kPqodpF5UkTAaij2P6UY6M1Df04=&docid=Bf3kBMS22CH8bM&sa=X&ei=3BvpT93aNoLy2QWVo4TrDQ&ved=0CEQQ9QEwAQ&dur=505 I wish these Rooskies would get a grip on free-enterprise marketing and realize that producing, selling (and marketing) the honest to goodness 8m3 bullet would translate into more rubles instead of keeping their customer base guessing which rounds have which bullets at any particular time. It kind of pisses me off to have to unravel this mystery within an enigma within a riddle just to find the right bullets. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 4:55:44 PM
In the AR15 thread you linked to they appear to be looking at FMJ rounds, so you know those aren't going to be the 8m3 as that would be a hollow point.
My understanding is that the 8m3 is 124 grain, which would be the first thing to look for. When I compared an old Wolf Military Classic with the new 124 grain hollow point they appeared to be identical and the big difference between them and other cheap hollow points was that the opening was much larger. Most cheap 7.62x39mm hollow points look like someone came along and just removed the tip of an FMJ round. The best way to tell is to take a pin and put the tip of the pin into the opening of the hollow point and fell around on the inside of the jacket. When I compared the new Wolf Military Classic and the new Tula 124 grain hollow point, I couldn't feel any notches on the new wolf, but I could feel them on the new TULA 124 grain FMJ. There was a thread where we discussed this a few months ago. In my opinion the Tula 124 grain hollow point is what you are looking for. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2012 11:05:16 PM
[Last Edit: 7/1/2012 11:37:17 AM by MeatAxe556]
Originally Posted By AJ1018:
In the AR15 thread you linked to they appear to be looking at FMJ rounds, so you know those aren't going to be the 8m3 as that would be a hollow point. My understanding is that the 8m3 is 124 grain, which would be the first thing to look for. When I compared an old Wolf Military Classic with the new 124 grain hollow point they appeared to be identical and the big difference between them and other cheap hollow points was that the opening was much larger. Most cheap 7.62x39mm hollow points look like someone came along and just removed the tip of an FMJ round. The best way to tell is to take a pin and put the tip of the pin into the opening of the hollow point and fell around on the inside of the jacket. When I compared the new Wolf Military Classic and the new Tula 124 grain hollow point, I couldn't feel any notches on the new wolf, but I could feel them on the new TULA 124 grain FMJ. There was a thread where we discussed this a few months ago. In my opinion the Tula 124 grain hollow point is what you are looking for. That's what I thought when I bought a 1000 round case of the Tula 124 grain HP over the internet, that it was going to be the 8M3 bullet. But I'll be damned if the first box I opened, the bullets had no obvious "pre fail cuts" inside the hollow point. I felt the inside of the hollow with a staple and then looked into it with a 8x magnifying loop nada. Actually, the box of TulAmmo 122 grain HPs that I got at Wally World did have three shallow pre fail cuts, but not the deep cuts I'd expect from the pix I've seen of the 8M3. It did have the Uly headstamp on the case, but that means nothing. I take that back, on closer examination it has the Tula headstamp (looks like a "U" upside down) and says "Tulammo." It may be that the stuff with the Ulyanovsk headstamp is 8M3, but I can't verify that. I hope Tula isn't just capitalizing on the reputation of the Tula 124 gr HP as being the 8M3 bullet (as spread on the interwebs) and putting any old HP bullet they want in a 124 grain HP labeled box, but I wouldn't put it past sketchy Rooskie "free enterprise." Makes me not trust Tula. At all. Of course, if all Rooskie HPs blew up inside the target like the 8M3s are supposed to, I wouldn't have a problem, but I don't know that to be true. Buyer beware look before you weep. Examine the cartridges in person before you purchase. It appears that not all TulAmmo boxed as 124 gr. HP is 8M3. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2012 12:02:39 AM
[Last Edit: 7/27/2012 12:41:59 AM by MeatAxe556]
Update I got an email from the head of Tulammo about the Tula 124 gr. HPs:
"I wanted to respond to your email, but I was waiting to receive a definitive response from Ulyanovsk before I replied. The Tulammo HP bullet you refer to below is the only bullet currently being imported into the U.S. from the Ulyanovsk factory in Russia. The T in Tulammo stands for The Tula Cartridge Company. The UL stands for The Ulyanovsk Cartridge Company. Until you asked the question, I was under the assumption that all of the 124 GR. HP bullets had the necessary cuts inside the bullet to provide a similar effect as the 8M3. I was informed today, that under their manufacturing guidelines, roughly 10% of the production could have bullets that might not have as detailed cuts as the 8M3. For your information, this is the exact same guideline that has been in place since the first Ulyanovsk production was imported into the U.S. Nothing has changed at the Ulyanovsk factory concerning this over the past twenty years of Russian imports into the U.S. I have only been involved with the two Russian factories since November of 2009. Prior to that, I owned Sellier & Bellot, USA. If I had known of the discrepancy, I would have informed Ulyanovsk that 100% of the bullets (no manufacturing process for bullets will always guarantee 100%) need to meet the criteria. Even though Ulyanovsk cannot specifically tell us the exact production requirements of the military 8M3 bullet, I was assured today that they will take the necessary steps to implement the production of any future Tulammo 124 GR. HP bullets as closely as possible to the 8M3. Best regards, Ed Grasso President" Apparently, I got some of the 10% of non-8M3 type bullets in my batch every box I've opened of my order was non 8M3. So, hopefully, Uly will up their QC and make sure we get all 8M3 type bullets in the future. ETA: I'm not sure why Uly would not be open about the production requirements of the 8M3 bullet (didn't know the military used HPs under the Geneva Convention, etc.), or what the difference is between an 8M3 and an "8M3-type" bullet. It seem to me that if the 8M3 is as good as people say, Uly would be marketing the hell out of it as a superior stopper. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2012 6:52:22 PM
Originally Posted By MeatAxe556:
Update I got an email from the head of Tulammo about the Tula 124 gr. HPs: "I wanted to respond to your email, but I was waiting to receive a definitive response from Ulyanovsk before I replied. The Tulammo HP bullet you refer to below is the only bullet currently being imported into the U.S. from the Ulyanovsk factory in Russia. The T in Tulammo stands for The Tula Cartridge Company. The UL stands for The Ulyanovsk Cartridge Company. Until you asked the question, I was under the assumption that all of the 124 GR. HP bullets had the necessary cuts inside the bullet to provide a similar effect as the 8M3. I was informed today, that under their manufacturing guidelines, roughly 10% of the production could have bullets that might not have as detailed cuts as the 8M3. For your information, this is the exact same guideline that has been in place since the first Ulyanovsk production was imported into the U.S. Nothing has changed at the Ulyanovsk factory concerning this over the past twenty years of Russian imports into the U.S. I have only been involved with the two Russian factories since November of 2009. Prior to that, I owned Sellier & Bellot, USA. If I had known of the discrepancy, I would have informed Ulyanovsk that 100% of the bullets (no manufacturing process for bullets will always guarantee 100%) need to meet the criteria. Even though Ulyanovsk cannot specifically tell us the exact production requirements of the military 8M3 bullet, I was assured today that they will take the necessary steps to implement the production of any future Tulammo 124 GR. HP bullets as closely as possible to the 8M3. Best regards, Ed Grasso President" Apparently, I got some of the 10% of non-8M3 type bullets in my batch every box I've opened of my order was non 8M3. So, hopefully, Uly will up their QC and make sure we get all 8M3 type bullets in the future. Thanks for posting this. This is probably the most definitive bit of info about the current available 8m3 124gr HP ammo on the internet today. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/17/2012 9:22:31 PM
Excellent info here.Glad i checked this thread out,will come in handy.
Thanks,much appreciated |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2012 12:41:34 PM
I noticed this discussion on HPs and 8m3 rounds before I visited Military Gun Supply over the weekend. I didn't find any Tula HP ammo, but I did find WPA Military Classic 124gr HP.
After reading some more about the 8m3 and the availability of the bullet in commercial brands, some online sources mentioned that Wolf did and did not have it. The only true was to look for prefail cuts. How do I look for that? I probed one hollowpoint with a dental pick to gauge basic depth, but that's it. Any ideas how to check for prefail cuts? BTW, is the WPA MC 124gr HP a worthwhile hollowpoint round? ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2012 1:46:15 PM
Originally Posted By Veers57:
I noticed this discussion on HPs and 8m3 rounds before I visited Military Gun Supply over the weekend. I didn't find any Tula HP ammo, but I did find WPA Military Classic 124gr HP. After reading some more about the 8m3 and the availability of the bullet in commercial brands, some online sources mentioned that Wolf did and did not have it. The only true was to look for prefail cuts. How do I look for that? I probed one hollowpoint with a dental pick to gauge basic depth, but that's it. Any ideas how to check for prefail cuts? BTW, is the WPA MC 124gr HP a worthwhile hollowpoint round? http://i1143.photobucket.com/albums/n634/Veers1957/IMG_7869a.jpg Use your dental pick to feel around the inner edges of the tip. Here is what the prefail cuts look like and what you are feeling for. Since Wolf went to the new WPA designation after all that hubbub, all the 7.62x39 ammo is made at a different plant and shouldn't have the 8m3 bullets. I forget if someone from Wolf confirmed this but that seems to be the general consensus: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2012 2:56:09 PM
[Last Edit: 7/18/2012 2:57:59 PM by Zhukov]
There's no point in them keeping the ammo consistent because there is no demand for it. Do you realize just how few people that buy 7.62x39 have any idea what the 8M3 bullet is or why it's better?
[ETA] I wouldn't count on this cuts inside the bullet nose to be indicative of anything. The bullet won't expand like a conventional soft-point hunting bullet (mushroom starting at the nose). The fragmentation will occur when the bullet has yawed 90 degrees. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/18/2012 3:57:25 PM
Thanks for the input. I didn't find any cuts or anything. Just an empty cavity. I knew the 7.62x39 HP is not like pistol hollowpoints. I have other rounds, ie V-Max (Z-Max) and soft points, that do a better job.
I got the box of WPA MC HP just to have a box. If I plan on getting any specialty rounds in bulk, I'd go with commercial or surplus soft points and SSTs/V-Maxs. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/19/2012 8:17:27 PM
[Last Edit: 7/19/2012 8:32:29 PM by MeatAxe556]
Originally Posted By Zhukov:
There's no point in them keeping the ammo consistent because there is no demand for it. Do you realize just how few people that buy 7.62x39 have any idea what the 8M3 bullet is or why it's better? [ETA] I wouldn't count on this cuts inside the bullet nose to be indicative of anything. The bullet won't expand like a conventional soft-point hunting bullet (mushroom starting at the nose). The fragmentation will occur when the bullet has yawed 90 degrees. Well, based on claims on this website and others, I searched for 8M3 type bullets, touted as the best bulk self defense rounds available. For example: http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defense_Ammo_FAQ/index.htm#7.62x39 The 8M3 rounds are described here and elsewhere as being made by Ulyanovsk and having deep "pre fail" cuts on the jacket inside of the hollow (see above), so that's what I was looking for. Naturally, when I didn't see the Uly headstamp or the pre fail cuts, I was not happy. Now, I haven't used any of these or seen any ballistics gel tests on the 8M3, Tula or otherwise, to back up these claims. I just took it on faith (I know, I know) that all Tula 124 gr. HPs are the fabled 8M3 fragmentation round that would shred a zombie and still be cheap (@ 25 cents/ round) as opposed to Hornady SSTs, Z-Max, V-Max, Lapua, etc. etc. costing upwards of $1.00/rd. or more. Now those expensive rounds are great stoppers, I'm sure, but they are not really cost effective for bulk storage in preparation of a zombie apocalypse. Of course, most people don't buy thousands of rounds at a time for SHTF day they just buy a box or two to plink cans, so they don't care. However, for the rest of us serious (rightfully paranoid?) individuals, we want to buy the best, cost effective SD ammo available in bulk as well as the SSTs, Vmax, Zmax, etc. It would be helpful to see ballistics gel test of this Tula 124 HP ("8M3") ammo to see if it is as good as people say it is as a SD load, especially compared to other Com Bloc HPs, JSPs and FMJs on the market. If this 124 gr. HP is as good as people say at fragmentation / terminal ballistics, then Tula would be smart to market it as such. Then people would buy the hell out of it, because even weekend plinkers understand that when the shit hits the fan, you want some "go to" stoppers to keep the zombies at bay, even if you are a cheapskate. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/21/2012 3:18:59 PM
Went digging through my ammo stash and found i have @ 300 rounds of the 8M3 in plain white boxes that say hunting rounds made in Russia.Checked and they have the notch inside.
Didnt even know i had them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/22/2012 8:05:46 PM
Originally Posted By FlyLeaf:
Went digging through my ammo stash and found i have @ 300 rounds of the 8M3 in plain white boxes that say hunting rounds made in Russia.Checked and they have the notch inside. Didnt even know i had them. Ahh... The Ol' Sapsan's. I had to search high and low to get the couple hundred I have stashed. I keep'em under 500 rds of Tula 124's. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/22/2012 9:00:02 PM
Originally Posted By 00Ghost00:
Originally Posted By FlyLeaf:
Went digging through my ammo stash and found i have @ 300 rounds of the 8M3 in plain white boxes that say hunting rounds made in Russia.Checked and they have the notch inside. Didnt even know i had them. Ahh... The Ol' Sapsan's. I had to search high and low to get the couple hundred I have stashed. I keep'em under 500 rds of Tula 124's. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f98/spdr8cer/Sapsan8M3s.jpg Thats funny i have mine under a bunch of Uly and WPA boxes. Too bad i think i blasted through a couple hundred rounds of this without knowing it a few years ago |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2012 10:55:04 AM
Originally Posted By 00Ghost00:
Originally Posted By FlyLeaf:
Went digging through my ammo stash and found i have @ 300 rounds of the 8M3 in plain white boxes that say hunting rounds made in Russia.Checked and they have the notch inside. Didnt even know i had them. Ahh... The Ol' Sapsan's. I had to search high and low to get the couple hundred I have stashed. I keep'em under 500 rds of Tula 124's. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f98/spdr8cer/Sapsan8M3s.jpg Are your Tula 124 gr. HPs the 8M3 bullet (w/ pre-fail cuts)? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2012 10:33:21 PM
Originally Posted By MeatAxe556:
Originally Posted By 00Ghost00:
Originally Posted By FlyLeaf:
Went digging through my ammo stash and found i have @ 300 rounds of the 8M3 in plain white boxes that say hunting rounds made in Russia.Checked and they have the notch inside. Didnt even know i had them. Ahh... The Ol' Sapsan's. I had to search high and low to get the couple hundred I have stashed. I keep'em under 500 rds of Tula 124's. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f98/spdr8cer/Sapsan8M3s.jpg Are your Tula 124 gr. HPs the 8M3 bullet (w/ pre-fail cuts)? Yes, they do have what feels like pre-fail cuts on the inside. I can't say with certainty that makes them 8M3's, but it is one of the good indicators. AFAIK, there's no markings on the box to validate if they are 8M3's, nor do I have a puller to verify 100%. My next chance to shoot outdoors won't be until October, but I do plan on testing the performance of the Tula's then. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/25/2012 12:42:37 AM
[Last Edit: 7/25/2012 12:45:21 AM by MeatAxe556]
Originally Posted By 00Ghost00:
Originally Posted By MeatAxe556:
Originally Posted By 00Ghost00:
Originally Posted By FlyLeaf:
Went digging through my ammo stash and found i have @ 300 rounds of the 8M3 in plain white boxes that say hunting rounds made in Russia.Checked and they have the notch inside. Didnt even know i had them. Ahh... The Ol' Sapsan's. I had to search high and low to get the couple hundred I have stashed. I keep'em under 500 rds of Tula 124's. http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f98/spdr8cer/Sapsan8M3s.jpg Are your Tula 124 gr. HPs the 8M3 bullet (w/ pre-fail cuts)? Yes, they do have what feels like pre-fail cuts on the inside. I can't say with certainty that makes them 8M3's, but it is one of the good indicators. AFAIK, there's no markings on the box to validate if they are 8M3's, nor do I have a puller to verify 100%. My next chance to shoot outdoors won't be until October, but I do plan on testing the performance of the Tula's then. Thanks for the info luck of the draw I got the shitty run of the mill Rooskie 124 gr. HPs from Tula. Needless to say, I won't be buying anymore unless I can inspect the bullets personally beforehand or somehow be guaranteed that they're 8M3.. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/27/2012 1:35:18 PM
That was a great reply from the guy at Tula. I contacted Wolf and they were about as helpful as me asking the box it's self. I wish Tula would import the old style cases with the laquar on them and not the polymer junk. They also need to seal the primer pocket and where the bullet goes into the case. Still I have been shooting there .45 ammo for a while now and have been very very pleased.
Thanks, Glenn |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 7:49:20 AM
Finding a stash of old laquered Uly would be cool
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 9:22:50 AM
TAGGED!! Great thread, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 11:06:51 AM
Originally Posted By grobinson2: That was a great reply from the guy at Tula. I contacted Wolf and they were about as helpful as me asking the box it's self. I wish Tula would import the old style cases with the laquar on them and not the polymer junk. They also need to seal the primer pocket and where the bullet goes into the case. Still I have been shooting there .45 ammo for a while now and have been very very pleased. Thanks, Glenn I wouldn't put too much trust in what the guy from Tula says. He sounds knowledgeable, but I kind of doubt the veracity of his statements. If you want guaranteed terminal performance, buy a Winchester SP or any of the Hornady VMAX loadings (including the Zombie Max stuff). It's expensive, but if you buy a few boxes every once in a while, you can build up a reasonable stash over time without bankrupting yourself. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 6:39:00 PM
Originally Posted By Zhukov:
Originally Posted By grobinson2:
That was a great reply from the guy at Tula. I contacted Wolf and they were about as helpful as me asking the box it's self. I wish Tula would import the old style cases with the laquar on them and not the polymer junk. They also need to seal the primer pocket and where the bullet goes into the case. Still I have been shooting there .45 ammo for a while now and have been very very pleased. Thanks, Glenn I wouldn't put too much trust in what the guy from Tula says. He sounds knowledgeable, but I kind of doubt the veracity of his statements. If you want guaranteed terminal performance, buy a Winchester SP or any of the Hornady VMAX loadings (including the Zombie Max stuff). It's expensive, but if you buy a few boxes every once in a while, you can build up a reasonable stash over time without bankrupting yourself. Wasn't 1 of the articles in the "Book of the AK-47" on defensive ammo and they said that pretty much any of the SP in the 124gr flavor were GTG? I think he specifically mentioned Brown Bear in the article) |
|