Question. On 80% lowers with the rear pocket pre-machined, why would a vendor say it's
"just roughed out, it is not to the exact finished size nor is it exactly placed." ?
I can see the depth and fore/aft not being super critical as long as it's not too deep and is big enough
for the upper receiver lug to fit in. But the plans I have say the width is .500 +/-.004, this is I assume
to assure a good fit of the upper receiver, and that it's centered on the buffer tube opening. It seems to
me that having the upper centered on the buffer tube opening, and with as little side to side slop as possible,
would be a "Good Thing". No?
The issue I'm trying to wrap my head around is I milled one of these, and the jig had me shave a few thou
off one side of that rear pocket but not the other. Now, instead of the proper .502 or so I had pre-milling, I have .509
spacing from inside to inside where the rear upper receiver lug fits.
I don't think it's a terminal problem and I do think I can account for it next time, but I'm trying to understand
what went on to make this happen. As far as I can tell, not being able to measure anything off the centerline
with my meager micrometers and calipers, either the jig was off, or that pocket was off. And there is some slight
variation L/R in where one can place the jig, but it's very slight, thousandths. All my other measurements
check out good against the plans, or what I consider good for a guy with a router anyway. Trigger slot, FCG pocket
width, alignment, etc, etc.
Any thoughts? I'm not unhappy with the jig or lower or think anything is "wrong" exactly given what we're doing here
by hand, but I want to understand it. What brought this onto my radar as this is a pre-anodized lower and the milling
in that rear pocket only took the anno off one side, so I started looking and measuring.