Quoted:


Thats what they got tues they do not get that much ever week.  I did pick up a lower the cal jack one,  i was surprised at the end of the day they still had 23 out of 100. Yes i do like supporting my loc store. But i like your store because you support us military guys

Quoted:
I ordered from Wideners on the 25th. Wideners is showing that my order is "processing." I just got off of the phone with my cc company and they said my card has been charged. No word from my ffl yet.

Quoted:
For those of us that got backordered on the adcor lower from Brownells the other day, They are estimating they will have those in mid February.

Quoted:All your posts are about this company, you'd think you work there....hint hint...
Pre hysteria prices? I don't think so...
That place is a rip off...$43 for a trasfer when everyone else in the area is $25! I know, I live in oakbrook, il

Quoted:
I ordered my Mega Arms lower from JSESurplus on 1/26 and just received my tracking #. Now I need my Umbrella Corporation lower to ship.

Quoted:
UPDATE on the Rainier Mega Pistol lowers from a few days ago, within the last two hours mine went from "pending" to "ffl".

Quoted:
Mega Billet Lowers just went live................http://www.rainierarms.com/?page=shop/detail&product_id=2538

Quoted:
Mega Billet Lowers just went live................http://www.rainierarms.com/?page=shop/detail&product_id=2538

Quoted:


Hi Dan:  I note that you are a Team Member with a large number of posts and, therefore, I know you possess a wealth of firearm knowledge.  Although I did not quote any specific comment, my post was in reference to preceding comments in this thread about individuals “flipping” multiple lower receivers –commonly meaning the purchase and sale of an item within a short period for a profit.  My understanding is that this activity would be a violation of the GCA of 1968.  For the benefit of myself and others, please help us understand whether ATF/DOJ would frown upon non-licensees “flipping” lowers.  In support of my prior position, I provide the following, with web citations for those who do not have access to Westlaw:

Federal Statute states, “It shall be unlawful for any person except a … licensed dealer, to engage in the business of … dealing in firearms…” 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(a)(1)(A) (link: http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf).

Federal Statute defines “engaged in the business” as, “a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms, but such term shall not include a person who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms.” 18 U.S.C.A. § 921(a)(21)(C) (link: http://www.atf.gov/publications/download/p/atf-p-5300-4.pdf).

Notwithstanding the statutory defense for persons who transfer firearms “for the enhancement of a personal collection,” Federal Courts have held that, “The government need not prove that dealing in firearms was the defendant’s ‘primary business,’” it “need only prove that the defendant ‘has guns on hand or is ready and able to procure them for the purpose of selling them from to time to such persons as might be accepted as customers.’  U.S. v. Carter, 801 F.2d 78, 81-82 (2d Cir. 1986) (citations omitted) (link: https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/801/801.F2d.78.86-1144.86-1141.1430-1433.html).  

A 2010 case affirmed an unlicensed dealing in firearms guilty verdict based solely upon evidence that a man sold an informant two firearms in a one month period and told the informant he had other firearms for sale. U.S. v. Shan, 361 Fed.Appx. 182, 183 (2d Cir. 2010) (link: http://federal-circuits.vlex.com/vid/united-states-v-shan-74614649).

In a 2012 Texas case, a Federal Court held that a “defendant engages in the business of dealing in firearms when his ‘principal motivation is economic’ and he ‘pursues this objective through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms’” U.S. v. Brenner, 481 Fed.Appx. 124 (5th Cir. 2012) (link: http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca5/11-50432/11-50432-2012-04-30.html).

In light of the foregoing, does a non-licensee not pose the risk of penalty under the GCA for  flipping lower receivers?

Quoted:


What lower did you order from them?

Quoted:
Here ya go boys...............http://www.rainierarms.com/?page=shop/detail&product_id=121

Quoted:


Says it's marked pistol...does that mean I can't put a regular AR upper with a stock on it?

Quoted:


Says it's marked pistol...does that mean I can't put a regular AR upper with a stock on it?

Quoted:
ATI Polymers @ PSA