|
|
Posted: 6/2/2009 9:29:05 PM
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
If I don't have a head space gauge can I use a dummy round to check how it feeds and what not? ![]() provided the dumy round is in spec, then yes you could use it as a GO gauge, if it chambers then you know you have more then the minimum safe headspace... I own acolt field gauge and a in spec dummy round....when i barrel an upper, first i make sure the dummy round chamers, then i use a real round (firing pin/ejector/extractor removed)...then i make sure my fiend gauge does NOT chamber, then i know im good to go. i still check the brass on the first few rounds to. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/2/2009 9:32:01 PM
Originally Posted By Heineken:
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
If I don't have a head space gauge can I use a dummy round to check how it feeds and what not? ![]() provided the dumy round is in spec, then yes you could use it as a GO gauge, if it chambers then you know you have more then the minimum safe headspace...BUT you would still need a no go or a field gauge. I own acolt field gauge and a in spec dummy round....when i barrel an upper, first i make sure the dummy round chamers, then i use a real round (firing pin/ejector/extractor removed)...then i make sure my fiend gauge does NOT chamber, then i know im good to go. i still check the brass on the first few rounds to. basicaly, if you only own one gauge, i would say it should be a field gauge. as long as it wont chamber you know you have less then the maximum headspace, and if you had less then then minimum then a round in theroy should not chamber. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/2/2009 9:52:52 PM
Awesome, I have a few different dummy rounds and shell casings laying around
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/4/2009 7:08:18 AM
Originally Posted By Heineken:
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
If I don't have a head space gauge can I use a dummy round to check how it feeds and what not? ![]() provided the dumy round is in spec, then yes you could use it as a GO gauge, if it chambers then you know you have more then the minimum safe headspace... I own acolt field gauge and a in spec dummy round....when i barrel an upper, first i make sure the dummy round chamers, then i use a real round (firing pin/ejector/extractor removed)...then i make sure my fiend gauge does NOT chamber, then i know im good to go. i still check the brass on the first few rounds to. I also have a no go field gauge...but I have a question. Why should we have to remove the firing pin, ejector, and extractor from the bolt? If you can not get the bolt to close on the gauge then all is well...even with those components installed...correct? Obviously you wouldn't want to slam the bolt closed with the gauge in...but I really don't see why the bolt has to be disassembled as long as you are careful.....but then I am not a smith ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/5/2009 10:22:52 PM
[Last Edit: 6/5/2009 10:25:28 PM by Heineken]
Originally Posted By SVGA-1:
Originally Posted By Heineken:
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
If I don't have a head space gauge can I use a dummy round to check how it feeds and what not? ![]() provided the dumy round is in spec, then yes you could use it as a GO gauge, if it chambers then you know you have more then the minimum safe headspace... I own acolt field gauge and a in spec dummy round....when i barrel an upper, first i make sure the dummy round chamers, then i use a real round (firing pin/ejector/extractor removed)...then i make sure my fiend gauge does NOT chamber, then i know im good to go. i still check the brass on the first few rounds to. I also have a no go field gauge...but I have a question. Why should we have to remove the firing pin, ejector, and extractor from the bolt? If you can not get the bolt to close on the gauge then all is well...even with those components installed...correct? Obviously you wouldn't want to slam the bolt closed with the gauge in...but I really don't see why the bolt has to be disassembled as long as you are careful.....but then I am not a smith ![]() The reason it is ALWAYS recomended to remove ejector and ectractor to test headspace is this: Lets say you are using a no go gauge (on no go field gauge), you DO NOT want it to chamber...well lets say you test it and it barily chambers, you know your have to much headspace...now lets go back in time a few minutes and pretend that you did not take the time remove the ejector and that little bit of extra tension kept it from chambering fausly leading you to believe you were good to go since it did not chamber...thsi would be a false reading. and with a go gauge, same thing that extra tension could keep it from chambering beacuse you have very tight headspace (but still in spec) and you might think, oh shit, my go gauge wound not chamber i must have a problem, when in fact with the ejector/extractor removed it would have chambered... hopfully i explaned that to make sense. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/11/2009 10:49:58 PM
Thanks for the schooling!!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/12/2009 9:24:23 AM
Originally Posted By SVGA-1:
Thanks for the schooling!! yep, all these years of arfcom helping me out with questions feels good to be able to actualy get to answer a question once in a while! |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/3/2009 11:14:11 PM
If you had multiple barrels/bolts to test, is there a way to check headspace without removing the ejector?
My first thought would be to have a professional machine a hole in the gauge so the ejector doesn't push on the gauge. Pros and cons? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2009 4:46:57 PM
Originally Posted By samurairabbi:
–––––––– added June 4 ––––––––––––- I found the answers to my original questions at the Indy gun show this last weekend. The 3-thou range of these Forster guages is intended for checking headspace on BOLT-ACTION .223 rifles. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– I offer a question on the .223 Forster go/nogo guages. I have a set of these go/nogo guages marked the same as in AR15Texan's earlier post: 1.4636 Go and 1.4666 Nogo. Clearly these are different guages than the "3-decimal" Forster ones compared in the lead post of this thread. The "military" headspace range for a "New" rifle is given in this thread as 1.4646" to 1.4706". This is a 6-thousandth range. The "4-decimal" Forster guages give a 3-thousandth range between the Go and Nogo range, which is HALF the allowable military new range. Does that difference indicate that the "civilian" .223 headspace range has become far tighter than the 5.56 military headspace range? An earlier post by Falarak in this thread indicated that some new in-spec military chambers could still close on a Forster (civilian) Nogo guage. Is this another aspect of the tighter 3-thou range of the newer Forster guages? According to this post I have gathered that there are two different style guages one for bolt action, and one for auto. How can I tell the difference between the two? I am wanting to buy a go and no go headspace guage, but dont want to get the wrong ones.. Thanks.. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/11/2009 7:14:34 PM
[Last Edit: 8/11/2009 7:15:02 PM by FALARAK]
Originally Posted By wpeschel: Originally Posted By samurairabbi: –––––––– added June 4 ––––––––––––- I found the answers to my original questions at the Indy gun show this last weekend. The 3-thou range of these Forster guages is intended for checking headspace on BOLT-ACTION .223 rifles. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– I offer a question on the .223 Forster go/nogo guages. I have a set of these go/nogo guages marked the same as in AR15Texan's earlier post: 1.4636 Go and 1.4666 Nogo. Clearly these are different guages than the "3-decimal" Forster ones compared in the lead post of this thread. The "military" headspace range for a "New" rifle is given in this thread as 1.4646" to 1.4706". This is a 6-thousandth range. The "4-decimal" Forster guages give a 3-thousandth range between the Go and Nogo range, which is HALF the allowable military new range. Does that difference indicate that the "civilian" .223 headspace range has become far tighter than the 5.56 military headspace range? An earlier post by Falarak in this thread indicated that some new in-spec military chambers could still close on a Forster (civilian) Nogo guage. Is this another aspect of the tighter 3-thou range of the newer Forster guages? According to this post I have gathered that there are two different style guages one for bolt action, and one for auto. How can I tell the difference between the two? I am wanting to buy a go and no go headspace guage, but dont want to get the wrong ones.. Thanks.. That is incorrect. There are just gauges. Of different sizes. Period. They are USED to follow different specifications of "go" and "no go". They are "loosely" defined as Civilian, or Military. Also can be considered SAAMI vs NATO.... as in the chamber dimensions. GENERALLY - a bolt gun will have a SAAMI chamber, and a gas gun will have a NATO chamber, but that is not always the case. This isnt really as complicated as people make it... because as I have stated - loose headspace is not a big deal unless it is ridiculous....
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/8/2009 3:09:01 AM
If a Rifle manufacturer like DPMS is known to use minimum headspace when reaming the chamber and CMT is know to produce bolts slightly large then headspace of this combination could be tight.
it may chamber some rounds may not chamber some surplus. If some other manufacturer chambers a barrel on the large side with a CMT bolt then someone swaps to a LMT which is known to be a little loose excessive headspace could result. Not a big deal with most ammo but if a handloader screws the die down to far a difference of .020 could result and that could cause case head seperation and blow the bottom of the mag or worse. I have seen as much as .007 difference between bolts manufactured from different companies. Most of the time bolt swapping is not an issue but certain combinations can cause problems, better to take 5 minutes and check it out. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/26/2009 2:25:51 PM
maybe one of you can help. i finally got around to my first ar build this past weekend and found that my head-space is to tight. im not sure on the brand of go gauge we used but it would not chamber. i will go back by my friends later and try it again not that i have really scrubbed out my boar and chamber. before it would not always chamber lake city and it was a tight extraction and not they are smooth so it could have been gunk. im not sold on this. so i will post back when i know the brand of gauge. hopefully it will chamber but i have a feeling it wont.
Dannel defense 16inch chrome lined 5.56 barrel http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/Daniel-Defense-16-M4-Carbine-Gas-Barrel-stripped-p/dd%209060.htm bravo company manufacture complete bolt Assembly http://www.bravocompanyusa.com/BCM-Bolt-Carrier-Group-MPI-Auto-M16-p/bcm%20bolt%20carrier%20group%20auto%20mp.htm and a Yankee hill upper http://yankeehillmachine.com/store/product368.html with there barrel nut. that that the upper or nut really matter (i think maybe im wrong) so since i have a chrome lined boar what do i do? i have tried the bolt from my old bushmaster and it was having the same issues with some brass. although i did not have the gauge. so i will try my bushy bolt with the gauge as well as some of my friends bolts. assuming these dont work what is the next step? i was thinking of getting a piece of brass and some polishing compound and lapping the chamber? hopefully one of you can help, as i am afraid i am sol. my friend who is a colt armor is stumped and has never heard of this actually happening. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2009 1:34:24 PM
If it will not close on a go gauge I would not shoot it. I am FAR more concered about ANY short headspace than long headspace. If you clean the chamber, and try a couple bolts (with the extractor and ejector REMOVED) and it will not close on a .223 go gague - then I would send the barrel back to the manufacturer for defective replacement, and they should make good on it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/7/2009 5:11:38 PM
[Last Edit: 11/8/2009 11:44:58 AM by Bretshooter]
Answered earlier in thread. Delete.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/22/2009 12:26:46 AM
OK, I have a question. I often see where people say they "tighten the barrel nut three times, then torque to 30 ft/lbs." Can you explain the process more clearly? When you tighten three times, do you tighten, back off, tighten, back off, etc? It would be greatly appreciated if someone could provide a detailed explanation of the barrel installation/replacement process.
I apologize if this is already explained in this thread. I did try to read everything thoroughly but there is a lot of information here. Thanks in advance jonblack |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/26/2009 11:18:07 PM
Originally Posted By rick458:
Where are some good vendors to get 1/7" Barrels ? RRA has some good looking 1/8" I'd recommend BCM or LMT. You get the right price and quality mix. You should be able to find both at bravocompanyusa.com |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2009 8:30:55 PM
[Last Edit: 12/29/2009 12:33:09 PM by Suburban]
Originally Posted By FALARAK:
If it will not close on a go gauge I would not shoot it. I am FAR more concered about ANY short headspace than long headspace. If you clean the chamber, and try a couple bolts (with the extractor and ejector REMOVED) and it will not close on a .223 go gague - then I would send the barrel back to the manufacturer for defective replacement, and they should make good on it. Not good, huh? My Model 1 upper and LMT 16" upper checked out with the gages I bought from Bushmaster. I just tested a new LMT 10.5" upper with a new Colt bolt, and I can't get it to lock up with the 1.464" Go gage, but it will close on live rounds (with the firing pin removed). I tried again with another Colt bolt, removed the extractor and ejector, and tried again. Still won't lock up on the gage, but will with the live rounds. I'll try putting the LMT bolt in the 10.5" upper, and Colt bolt in the LMT 16" upper, but I don't like where this is going. EDIT: 10.5" upper still no-go with the GO gage and LMT bolt. LMT M4 upper - the bolt snaps easily on the GO gage, and I don't remember fighting with it when it was new. EDIT AGAIN: Gene Swanson at LMT says they made it that way on purpose. I guess as long as the upper functions, it's okay, and will probably break in a bit with use. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/28/2009 11:42:53 PM
Originally Posted By jonblack:
OK, I have a question. I often see where people say they "tighten the barrel nut three times, then torque to 30 ft/lbs." Can you explain the process more clearly? When you tighten three times, do you tighten, back off, tighten, back off, etc? It would be greatly appreciated if someone could provide a detailed explanation of the barrel installation/replacement process. I apologize if this is already explained in this thread. I did try to read everything thoroughly but there is a lot of information here. Thanks in advance jonblack It's done as you describe. I think the idea is to mate the threads of the barrel nut and upper, to get an accurate torque. Whether it's really necessary may be debatable, but it only takes a few minutes. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2010 10:45:01 AM
After reading the posts I have just one question. I have a barrel that is not chrome lined, is there a barrel break in process for it? I haven't attached it yet cause I'm standing by for front sight and flash hider so id like to know before iattatch it so I know what to do. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/11/2010 10:38:58 AM
Originally Posted By LARman0311:
After reading the posts I have just one question. I have a barrel that is not chrome lined, is there a barrel break in process for it? I haven't attached it yet cause I'm standing by for front sight and flash hider so id like to know before iattatch it so I know what to do. Thanks. yes, there is barrel break in processes, lots of different options and opinions on this, i have my method but u might want to do a search and find one that u like |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/30/2010 8:26:44 PM
BREAK IN FOR ACURACY I am new to this post, but a Retired Guy, you may want to consider this for break in of any rifle you want to be as accurate as it can be. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/25/2010 11:21:43 PM
Originally Posted By SVGA-1:
Originally Posted By Heineken:
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
If I don't have a head space gauge can I use a dummy round to check how it feeds and what not? ![]() provided the dumy round is in spec, then yes you could use it as a GO gauge, if it chambers then you know you have more then the minimum safe headspace... I own acolt field gauge and a in spec dummy round....when i barrel an upper, first i make sure the dummy round chamers, then i use a real round (firing pin/ejector/extractor removed)...then i make sure my fiend gauge does NOT chamber, then i know im good to go. i still check the brass on the first few rounds to. I also have a no go field gauge...but I have a question. Why should we have to remove the firing pin, ejector, and extractor from the bolt? If you can not get the bolt to close on the gauge then all is well...even with those components installed...correct? Obviously you wouldn't want to slam the bolt closed with the gauge in...but I really don't see why the bolt has to be disassembled as long as you are careful.....but then I am not a smith ![]() Well I was an armorer in the Marine Corps trained at aberdeen proving grounds ... we never disassemble the bolt for this ... you just use pressure at the back of the carrier and make sure it travels as far as it can go . |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/16/2010 9:38:55 AM
OLD18C thanks for the info, I was looking for something along these lines as America's Really Missguided Youngsters. I Am currently trying to break in a new 1:7 twist YHM 16" barrel and only have 40-50 rounds through it so far. And I am still unable to get it into a at least a 1 MOA at 100 yards. Deffently still in the break in period.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/8/2010 4:32:55 PM
[Last Edit: 8/8/2010 8:20:05 PM by slaxer07]
I'm sorry if this has been asked but in theory wouldnt you only need a field or no-go guage. If it closes on them you make need to look further into it but what do you gain from a go guage if it doesnt close on that wouldnt you have a problem chambering a round? I'm just trying to decide what I'm going to do with a upper I built that has a new barrel and used bolt (about 400 rds).
Thanks for the help. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/3/2010 10:27:06 PM
From my 6 years experience in the Army working on all weapons from the 9mm up to the 155mm howitzers, I know a little about headspace. When I was taught to check headspace in M16/M4 I was taught to do it with the extractor and ejector in place. If the bolt went into battery, locked up completely, it failed headspace. The cure for this was either to change the barrel or the bolt or in extreme cases of wear, change both. Usually a new bolt will give you better headspace specs. You should always double check after doing work to an AR. Buying one new, you need not worry. It should be checked from the manufacturer. To clarify after doing work: THe only time headspace COULD be affected is with changing bolt or barrel. If anyone has further questions, feel free to ask, I will answer to the best of my ability and if I do not know the answer, I will try to research it to find out. Good luck!
|
|
|