I've haven't ever seen a TM on weapon lights not saying there isn't one just never seen one. From my experience the use of lights has been a unit SOP thing or left up to the individual. I've seen 952s and 962s issued interchangeably by units. Most don't care you just get what the armorer has available, or what you could talk him into. I haven't seen any 962s on anything since 2012 and that was one of the BDEs from the 82nd and it seemed like a random mix of 962s and 952s on the M4s. Just finishing another tour in Afghanistan and it seems like everyone has switched over to the 952Vs since I haven't seen a incan Surefire over the last 9 months.
Like others said you used to go to the 96x series for more light and throw over what the 95x could give you. But it came with more weight and batteries. I can remember guys with M4s with PEQ-4s and 962s when I was at Campbell back in 05, want to talk about heavy stuff on the rail. This deployment I didn't even bother putting the light on, just a PEQ-15 since I had that a sighted in and wire tied to the rail. Of course we weren't kicking in doors and running night operations like past deployments.so didn't need the light always mounted.
Speaking of tied down, every unit I've been in made us tie our stuff to the rail. We either had to use 550 cord or lacing wire. This included our lights, lasers and sights. This deployment the armorer actually had to do it and there was a specific standard that they had to follow but that was because the CSM established the standard. Other units just required that stuff be tied to the rail to reduce the likely hood of losing something.