This and move it forward on your rail. Take advantage of that huge eyebox.

I have a,

TA01NSN on my M4
TA31F RCO A4 on my A4
TA11J308, it used to be on my 901

I prefer the crosshair reticules of the NSN and TA11 to the Chevron on the TA31.

The eye relief for me is fine on all, with a slight advantage to the TA11

The glass on each is great

All that said I also have an Elcan Specter and it's on my SCAR 17. It's the cream of the crop, everything I want in a short range sight

Great Replies Folks!!  Thank you and keep them coming!!

I like the TA33 over the 31 but I did just look through a TA11 yesterday. Between the 2 the TA11 wins by a long shot IMO.

You have a little more weight but you almost get the same large FOV as the 31 and the 11 has the same huge eye box of the 33. I really like the compact size of the 33 and its basically the same weight or less than many RDS.

All right. Got it sighted in at 100. Yes, the FOV is pretty small. No, I don't mind it.


Super clear, super bright and super light. So far I really really like it.

rocking a TA-31 HG, green horseshoe reticle, love it

TA-11. It's by far the most balanced in regards to eye relief, magnification, and FOV. It's on the larger/heavier side compared to 4x ACOG's, but the extra 3/4" eye relief is really nice especially when using the BAC with using adjustable stocks and rail placement.

I wish my TA-11 was a tad smaller but the glass is clear and I really dig the M249 reticle. I tried a TA-44 and wanted to love it but the 1.5x was too much magnification for what I thought,

It helps to shoot both eyes open (if you aren't already).   sgav8r44 nailed the comparison in his post.  It all comes down to which factors are more important.  I used a TA31 in Afghanistan and the short eye relief really bugged me as did the red chevron reticle.  So I bought a TA33 green horseshoe.  I agree the FOV is small, but I wouldn't have wanted the weight difference between the TA33 and the TA11.

Comparing in store I was initially planning on the Chevron but the green horseshoe is great.  It's fast for both eyes open, the green shows up on more targets, is brighter, and the center is small enough for precision at close range.

TA31-G-ACSS here. I love the thing. The FOV is huge through the scope. The ACSS reticle is great, it's fast and it's also precise. It is small, but I have worse eyes than just about anyone and I can still see it just fine. The weight of the scope is another great thing too. It's smallish and light so you don't feel like you have a tree growing out of the top of your upper. I haven't handled the other two ACOGS you mentioned, but honestly being that the eye-relief thing doesn't bother me at all, I'm not even interested. That really seems to be all people complain about with the TA31. Plus, you can still keep your head a little further back and still see a nice target picture, you just get blurring around the edge and a narrower field of view.

BAC works, but I threw an RM06 on top and now I can see everything. The way I use it is that I look through the scope with my right eye like normal, then when I transition to a target indie of 50 years, I will tilt the rifle like someone with a 45 degree offset RMR would, except I'm tilting the RMR in front of my left eye. I keep both eyes open and the bright 3.25 MOA dot is fast. I can pick it up immediately.

IMO, this is the perfect set up.

Great looking stick!

I wish the TA33 G ACSS was an option when I got mine, definitely would have went with it.  The standard HG reticule isn't a slouch though.