So, which way did you go?
I had the same analysis for the same reasons a week ago (I didn't see this thread, but I read quite a few reviews).
While the Weaver almost got my dollar, the Midway-BSA (which is a better way to reference the scope, since it is just a contract run in the same Chinese shop that makes the Falcon and the Primary Arms) won it, due to the FFP and the enhanced Mil ret. I need fast range estimation at unkown distances (potentially for more than one target) and hold over vs. dial for qucker range adjustments (light tactical/hunting use model), which is why I made that choice. If I was shooting at paper at know distances at the range, with time to dial (Precision shooting), I would have went with either the weaver adjustable, or just gone with their fixed 10x.
Having used good glass in the Army, and still owning a Steiner, I certainly recognize the benefits of a better quality FFP scope starting at $750 (Bushnell 3-12 G2), and likely hitting $2k as a median price. But when funds are tight, and the bills HAVE to be payed, us "poor folk" still need glass, and want the features we feel we need. I'll try and post a separate review of this scope in a few months, letting you know how it did on top of my LR308 at long range. Cheers!