|
|
Posted: 10/3/2010 8:20:19 PM
Excellent write up. Thank you for sharing.
I wonder if IoR will be "cool guy" enough...? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/3/2010 10:16:51 PM
Thanks Sgt!!!!! Sweet review and timely for me. This optic is on my short list for 16" Recce in putting together.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 12:05:36 AM
Wow!!!
The barrel on mine will be the 16" Centurion Arms Recce mid-length. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 12:28:08 AM
Originally Posted By fire4fx:
Wow!!! The barrel on mine will be the 16" Centurion Arms Recce mid-length. I don't think Centurion was a player the last time I built a precision rifle. I'll look into them.... If you pick up the IOR, be sure to post your impressions once you get it broken in some.... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 2:01:36 AM
Nice work.... I'll have to pass this goodness along!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 1:22:21 PM
excellent write up, thankyou !
I have an older version on my 308
I've found it an excellent optic for the same reasons you mention. I believe that there is an even newer version available with exposed turrets. Whilst the reticule is still calibrated for 5.56, the elevation knob is cammed and marked for 308, so you can use holdover if shooting the former, dial in for the latter. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 3:19:45 PM
Great review. Scopt seems priced similar to the ACOGs. I got a very good deal on an ACOG or else was looking to a NF 2.5-10 compact also similarly priced ... how would you compare the two, assuming you have shot with the NF?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 3:43:26 PM
That's some nice illumination... of the barracks???
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 6:14:34 PM
Originally Posted By xsnrg:
Great review. Scopt seems priced similar to the ACOGs. I got a very good deal on an ACOG or else was looking to a NF 2.5-10 compact also similarly priced ... how would you compare the two, assuming you have shot with the NF? Thank You. IOR 1.5x8x26 Vs. NF 2.5x10. Have no experience with that particular NF scope. I "think" the glass on the IOR scopes is generally better than the glass on the NF's based on examples of each I have tried, looked at. I also think the 1.5 mag of the IOR vs the 2.5 on the NF gives you a great deal more flexibility. Room clearing with 1.5, not too bad. Room clearing with 2.5, suck donkey nuts. But I've done no direct comparisons between the two scopes, so I'll stop talking out of my ass. IOR 1.5x8x26 Vs. ACOG. Ran a 4 x ACOG with JPoint on top last deployment. The ACOG was great for distance work. The reticle comes in handy constantly. "How far away is that kulat?" "Fucked if I know, let me range that dude." (The IOR has more or less the same reticle.) The ACOG sucked for close in stuff, hence the JPoint. Unfortunately JPoints are frail, run out of juice rapidly, and require pretty precise head alignment. I really think variable power scopes are the future of combat optics. If I deployed again tomorrow I would choice this IOR over an ACOG (although I'd still throw it in my duffle in case ;)) |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 6:30:48 PM
Good review––thanks for posting it. Also, what is your general impression of the Pitbull? I have an TA31F ACOG and the Aimpoint RDS/3G combo but I'm always on the lookout for better kit and I was thinking the PB might be a way to go (my dealer is sold out of the 1.5-8 that you reviewed).
Stay safe. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 7:18:10 PM
Originally Posted By Yak9:
Good review––thanks for posting it. Also, what is your general impression of the Pitbull? I have an TA31F ACOG and the Aimpoint RDS/3G combo but I'm always on the lookout for better kit and I was thinking the PB might be a way to go (my dealer is sold out of the 1.5-8 that you reviewed). Stay safe. Was also able to T&E a Pitbull at the same time. A review will be posted (May take a couple weeks ... will be away on business.) General impressions though.... HEAVY. Like a MO FO. Magnification ring was really stiff, hard to manipulate, and set up for the right hand. A cat's tail and having the ring set up for the left hand would improve the scope 100%. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/4/2010 8:37:24 PM
Informational: American Defense Manufacturing (ADM) is now making a dedicated mount for the Pitbull called the 'Recon PB'. It's not on their website but I was told by staff that it is indeed a reality (be advised––I'm a severe LaRue-aphile and it was hard for me to even consider ADM but after using two of their products I can advise they're use without hesitation).
Looking at your pix it appears that you have an older generation PB. The newer types have a digital illumination module and a taller "cat tail like" lever to help facilitate magnification travel. Stay safe. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2010 2:19:04 AM
Good to know. I'd really like to check out a newer one with the mods you described.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2010 8:10:06 AM
Nice review man but now I hate you! I keep trying to talk myself out of this scope and your review sure as hell didn't help with that!
Thank you for your service ![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2010 12:21:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2010 10:09:58 PM
Really nice, informative review.
In response to: Add a “Cat's Tail” or whatever they are calling it to the magnification ring.
IOR does appear to make a version of the 1.5-8x26 with a cat's tail on the mag ring: http://valdada.com/product/a2655086-d6e1-4df9-ba34-42428d8b0c8b.aspx
This also has exposed knobs. I can't find it listed for sale on anyone's website, however. Every website appears to offer the version with capped turrets and no cat's tail only. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/5/2010 11:06:52 PM
Originally Posted By asiparks:
excellent write up, thankyou ! I have an older version on my 308 http://gallery.me.com/asiparks/100347/_MG_0844/web.jpg I've found it an excellent optic for the same reasons you mention. I believe that there is an even newer version available with exposed turrets. Whilst the reticule is still calibrated for 5.56, the elevation knob is cammed and marked for 308, so you can use holdover if shooting the former, dial in for the latter. Asiparks.... Can I cut and paste your reply to another forum where I posted the same review? A lot of folks expressed interest in running this scope with a 7.62 weapon..... Thank You. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2010 12:53:59 AM
How would this work on a 7.62 based weapon...Say like a LMT MWS...I just purchased one and this seems like a good mag range for the gun.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/29/2010 2:46:38 AM
[Last Edit: 10/31/2010 3:17:23 AM by mPisi]
Originally Posted By OlSarge2K:
Both American Defense Manufacturing and Larue (finally) offer 35mm scope mounts now. Great writeup, thanks. I am glad to get this news that other 35mm scope mounts are available, this was my one problem with the IOR 2-12 (35mm tube) I have on my SPRish 3-gun rifle. I like that scope alot, but something like this 1.5-8 would be a better balance. The rings are fine but it's be nice to have some quick releases. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2010 4:10:06 PM
Originally Posted By 1-75Ranger:
How would this work on a 7.62 based weapon...Say like a LMT MWS...I just purchased one and this seems like a good mag range for the gun. the newer versions, (with the exposed knobs as in the pic above), is available with the elevation knob cammed for 308, so you'd have to dial rather than use the reticle holdovers. Or you could use the reticle as a starting point and try your load at different ranges, then note POI against the reticle graduations. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/1/2010 4:19:13 PM
The IOR have some great glass. Out of the IOR’s the 1.5-8x and the 2-12x are my favorite.
Nice photos. Mike @ CS TACTICAL.com CS Gunworks is now CS TACTICAL.com www.cstactical.com mike@cstactical.com |
|