User Panel
Sorry to hear the coating caused problems, let us know when you get the problem ironed out and are ready to ship. I'm looking forward to giving these a test in my 7.62x39 and my 6mm AR.
|
|
|
I'm getting texts from SHOT
|
|
Managing Member of Mischief
|
Originally Posted By backbencher:
I'm getting texts from SHOT View Quote Tonight's event went very well. Sorry for no video from me cause I was busy supervising the range. Running multi-caliber side by side is no joke. Thanks God no accident! Hopefully other media person would fill in the picture and video, if there are any. |
|
|
Very pleased you pulled this off @ SHOT, and hope Magpul makes you a generous offer that includes a ballistics laboratory.
|
|
Managing Member of Mischief
|
Looks like your mag has gotten the attention of TFB. I only usually go there for SHOT news but its awesome to see your mag got on as a update!
Linky |
|
I do believe that we have officially graduated from bad advice to a bad advice sandwich. - RedBlueLitez
ARFCOM Call sign: Shovel REPEAL THE NFA 1934 & GCA 1968! |
Longziz,
Good to hear you're getting some notice. Since you are being so generous by including me in the mag test I will offer this piece of design advice with your mag concerning the .458 Socom. Just from your photos I can see an obvious tweak needed. The forward edge of the mag just below the tip of a loaded cartridge, needs to either be beveled or a radius cut in it to accommodate bullet profiles like the Remington 405 grain soft point. The reason being this large soft exposed lead area, and hardcore .458 shooter use all lead bullets as well, will get shaved by the flat sharp edge of the mag. Shaved enough to create real feeding problems after a couple of rounds. This is one loading I intend to test in your mag. I have altered several metal and polymer mags to accommodate this bullet profile. They still feed .223 just fine. The 405 Rem SP is a very popular bullet since it can be bought in bulk and is relatively inexpensive compared to say the Barnes 300gr TTSX .458. Both of which are devastating on wild hogs. Looking forward to giving you some real world test data. |
|
""Surely something must be terribly wrong with a man who seems to be far more concerned with a Jew building a house in Israel than with a Muslim building a nuclear bomb in Iran."
|
I can do durability / impact testing, etc. Can also test it in 18" rifled gas barrels, and Daewoos. Contact me if interested.
|
|
Put down the Optic! Learn how to shoot the REAL way!
*************************************** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ligUEAJH25E |
Originally Posted By Longziz:
Last night's event went well. We shoot about 3K ammo in all five calibers, and featured some known bloger and editor such as Ian McCollum, (he didn't shoot because the range was crowded), his first impression can be found on today's TFB article; and Editor Choat from the Small Arms Review. I was mastering the range, so I didn't have the full picture of the attendants identity. However, Mr. Choat's command was the best summarize of people's feel of Unimag. He said:"I wasn't entirely impressed.........................until I shot it". I brought 300 rounds of 6.5 Grendel and 700 rounds of 6.8 SPC, and these two are the first to be run out, and not a single stoppage. There was a scare that one loaded a 6.8SPC to the 6.5 Grendel AR though, luckily, it wasn't able to be chambered. The magazines used were part of the 120 that I finished in the last batch, with a new spring. I am having even a newer spring in order, hopefully it would solve the problem that the distortion and mis-stamp that the current test mag have. If you guys are NOT picky about a magazine that is not drop free, I may be able to ship the test mag in a week or so. http://68forums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=12736&d=1422061704 View Quote i am not, i am interested in feeding drop free can be fixed easily |
|
Originally Posted By EvilApplesauce:The kess they jnie the better
|
are the magazine bodies different from USGI other than the dot matrix stamped in the side?
|
|
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Psalms 91:5
|
|
It was a pleasure meeting you at shot show. And thank you for taking time for us to meet.
The bodies are different and I am very intrigued by this design. The follower. . . Well wow is all I can say. I am looking forward to trying the unimag out. |
|
|
I shoot a lot of 5.45 out of my AR, I'm very interested in the 5.45 test results!!
|
|
|
I have been away at training for my job so have not been able to check this thread for awhile but I am happy to hear your SHOTSHow demo went well and I am
patiently waiting for my test mag! |
|
"I am not an Operator but I play one on AR15.com"
|
I'm in no hurry, I can wait until you have the kinks worked out.
|
|
|
What's the max COAL that will fit in the mag?
I have a 5.56 and a 6.8 SPC. The 6.8 SPC guys like to have mags that we can load out to 2.305" or more. |
|
|
Originally Posted By Longziz:
Quite different, so much so I own a separate patent for the body shell alone. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Longziz:
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
are the magazine bodies different from USGI other than the dot matrix stamped in the side? Quite different, so much so I own a separate patent for the body shell alone. Any plans to possibly make a version of the followers to convert USGI magazines? |
|
Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Psalms 91:5
|
Originally Posted By memsu:
What's the max COAL that will fit in the mag? I have a 5.56 and a 6.8 SPC. The 6.8 SPC guys like to have mags that we can load out to 2.305" or more. View Quote The mag has interior dimension of 2.31"~2.32" wide right now. The final is not a done deal yet cause one side need some rework. Don't think it will change that dimension though, but I don't want to give out false information before it is settled. |
|
|
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
Any plans to possibly make a version of the followers to convert USGI magazines? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
Originally Posted By Longziz:
Originally Posted By D_CRISIS:
are the magazine bodies different from USGI other than the dot matrix stamped in the side? Quite different, so much so I own a separate patent for the body shell alone. Any plans to possibly make a version of the followers to convert USGI magazines? The USGI magazine will not work as multi-caliber magazine, even if my follower would fit into the mag. If it is so, then there is no point for me to design and build a mag shell from the ground up. |
|
|
Originally Posted By SC-Texas:
It was a pleasure meeting you at shot show. And thank you for taking time for us to meet. The bodies are different and I am very intrigued by this design. The follower. . . Well wow is all I can say. I am looking forward to trying the unimag out. View Quote It is also my pleasure of meeting you, sir! I just heard the new spring will come in this week. My finger is crossed... |
|
|
The new spring coming in today does not work as I hoped, too strong. I am flying out Wednesday to the spring company to solve the problem. Will report back once I get this sorted out.
Other than that, I went out to shoot with Carlos from Tunas Firearm Sales/TFS as scheduled. I was using a fairly old spring design that the new spring should be improved on. Will post video later showing shooting 7.62X39, 223 and 5.45X39 just fine. The problem with this old spring is that the spring will bind up after certain rounds of 223 ammo inserted, which makes the last few rounds to reach capacity like mission impossible. The new spring suppose to fix that. I got to try Carlos's full auto lower, and he got to try my mag for the first time. Good trade! |
|
|
Keep pounding.
|
|
Managing Member of Mischief
|
Cool, thanks for the update. I didn't know you specifically wanted full auto testing as well, I think I can manage some of that too, since we have FA lowers at work, and I should be able to put my 5.45 and 300blk uppers on them.
Just picked up some of the Barnes 300blk out Walmart in the white and green Remington box, so now I have 2 different brands of 300blk to try as well. |
|
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
Official Site Nickname, given by NorCal - "Smack" |
I'd love to be a tester. Let me know if you need me.
|
|
Help restore ALL of our gun rights - Donate at:
http://www.gofundme.com/fmxlnk |
Well, the past week I was tweaking the combination of the main spring and follower to see if I can improve the 7.62X39 WPA ammo issue. It seems to me that the result is mixed. Sometime it works flawlessly but other time it is problematic. The magazine shell I am using is still the old batch that I made for the beta test, one side with a very sallow groove that almost useless. The supposed "correct" shell is still weeks away.
I am thinking to send out these mag to you guys anyway to have more test data collected on various AR platform to see the best combination. I will mail extra spring with the mag to let you have a say on which one is best working for you. I would have to ask you to document which ammo you are using with which spring used in the magazine. How about that? The current issue is only related to 7.62X39 WPA ammo. All other caliber I tested is just fine. Please reply to me if you are willing to test the mag at the current configuration. Thanks everybody! Jing |
|
|
|
I've got a 7.62x39 AR, and a 5.56, of course. I'd be willing to try out the mag. My x39 upper is pretty finicky, though, so I'm not sure if it would be the best candidate for your testing.
|
|
|
I'm a 14er, and I'm here to do the 14ers' work.
USA
|
Originally Posted By Longziz:
Yes, I think I have extra for more tester. Please stay tuned for my further announcement. Thanks! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Longziz:
Originally Posted By BlackRifleJuju:
I'd love to be a tester. Let me know if you need me. Yes, I think I have extra for more tester. Please stay tuned for my further announcement. Thanks! If that's the case, please keep me in mind. I didn't make it in for the original group but still would like to test the mag with 5.45, 223, and possibly others. |
|
I'm willing to test the mag you have, but don't have a 7.62x39 upper to test on, so I don't know if my results would be any benefit right now.
|
|
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
Official Site Nickname, given by NorCal - "Smack" |
I would like to know if any testing is going to happen with cartridges based on shortened .308 cases, such as .270 AR or .375 Reaper, and what kind of capacities we can expect.
Thanks. Best, JBR |
|
"I do not avoid women, Mandrake. But I do deny them my essence."
"Yes... yes. This is a fertile land, and we will thrive. We will rule over all this land, and we will call it... This Land." |
Remember Remember the Fifth of November
|
Been awhile since I checked this thread. Hope you get everything worked out soon Longziz.
|
|
NRA Life
Tennessee Squirrel Well endowed member Fuck if I know Not a haiku |
Originally Posted By JoshAston:
I'll be testing 6 BRX View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By JoshAston:
Originally Posted By Hellion-Productions:
I would like to know if any testing is going to happen with cartridges based on shortened .308 cases, such as .270 AR or .375 Reaper, and what kind of capacities we can expect. Thanks. Best, JBR I'll be testing 6 BRX Excellent. Thanks. Best, JBR |
|
"I do not avoid women, Mandrake. But I do deny them my essence."
"Yes... yes. This is a fertile land, and we will thrive. We will rule over all this land, and we will call it... This Land." |
Longziz,
I ended up selling my .300 blackout upper - I completely forgot about this test until after I sold it. I still have my 6.5 Grendel and 5.56 uppers, but if you would like to offer the test magazine to someone else with more calibers to choose from I understand. |
|
|
hope all is well and looking forward to testing one of these mags!
|
|
"I am not an Operator but I play one on AR15.com"
|
Yeah me too! Smith 5.56 upper
|
|
|
Well, new sample coming in last week, field test is encouraging. Since I have let you wait so long, one more week might not hurt. Tool maker will have press time for me next week, plus coating time, looks delivery of the second week of March. Again, sorry for delay, and keep my finger crossed.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Longziz: Well, new sample coming in last week, field test is encouraging. Since I have let you wait so long, one more week might not hurt. Tool maker will have press time for me next week, plus coating time, looks delivery of the second week of March. Again, sorry for delay, and keep my finger crossed. View Quote Our fingers are crossed as well. Once you've perfected this, you can turn your attention to the .308" AR compatibility issue: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_121/669426__308_AR_magazine_compatibility.html |
|
Managing Member of Mischief
|
No rush, standing by.
|
|
""Surely something must be terribly wrong with a man who seems to be far more concerned with a Jew building a house in Israel than with a Muslim building a nuclear bomb in Iran."
|
Also no rush, been really cold here, so saving the ammo I would normally be shooting to shoot once the magazine gets here. Also got my shorty 300blk upper, so now I have two of those to test it in, I know it shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes it does, so the more the merrier.
|
|
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
Official Site Nickname, given by NorCal - "Smack" |
No rush here either. We've gotten hit by several late season snows so its kept the temps way down and the ground too wet to really do the type of testing I want to do with this. Take your time and get this thing right.
|
|
The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president. - bulldog1967
|
Just to keep this thread alive. I recently came across some videos of your magazines and looked at your website. I will just say I am biting at the chomps to see when you will start mass producing them and what the cost of them will be.
|
|
|
Originally Posted By Longziz:
Just come back from my supplier. Seems that the distortion issue caused by coating high heat has been resolved. My coater will give me the final green light this Friday. Bring back 150 mag shell parts as well, looks like next week is crutch time! http://68forums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=12974&d=1426143831 A heat treated sample under throughout measurement. Never thought a shinny silver stainless steel would turn into gold color after the high heat. http://68forums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=12975&d=1426144083 View Quote Pictures not showing because they are linked to another forum that requires login |
|
“Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.” ? H.L. Mencken
|
Looking forward to it
|
|
Originally Posted By EvilApplesauce:The kess they jnie the better
|
I have a few different ARs in 5.56 caliber and I will be happy to test several different types of ammo in them if you send me mags,
BUT, I also want to build a 7.62X39 AR pistol. Would you be interested in test data from that sort of gun? If so, I'll start collecting parts. |
|
Help restore ALL of our gun rights - Donate at:
http://www.gofundme.com/fmxlnk |
If you need another tester, I would volunteer. I have multiple uppers and lowers in 556, 545 x 39, 6 x45, 762 x39, 762 x40, 300 AAC, 6.5 Grendel and 50 Beowulf. The lowers are multiple brands including polymer and uppers are different lengths from 7.5 pistol to 16". All work 100% with their respective mags and ammo, so any problems would be mag related. I have ammo for all in all the various configurations-HP, FMJ, SP and multiple weights. If I can help, let me know, and if a specific caliber would be better than another.
|
|
|
The coating sample coming in today, everything is what I expect it to be. The distortion issue is behind us now. The new tool and process solved the issue!
Started welding today and will continue tomorrow. Looking ship test sample next Friday or the Monday after the next . Stay tuned! |
|
|
Originally Posted By Longziz:
The coating sample coming in today, everything is what I expect it to be. The distortion issue is behind us now. The new tool and process solved the issue! Started welding today and will continue tomorrow. Looking ship test sample next Friday or the Monday after the next . Stay tuned! View Quote |
|
Originally Posted By EvilApplesauce:The kess they jnie the better
|
Can't wait.
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.