User Panel
Posted: 12/9/2014 3:35:37 PM EDT
Out of curiosity, do you recommend keeping your mags loaded or unloaded in storage?
|
|
[#1]
And any difference of recommendation between steel jacket rounds and brass?
|
|
[#2]
the only unloaded mags i have are still in the packages jic theres another panic. i rotate ~50 ar mags and have been doing so for years
|
|
[#3]
Load them up because they aint going to do you any good unloaded
|
|
[#4]
what about brass versus Russian ammo that is steel cased? Any thoughts? Can they be pre-loaded too?
|
|
[#5]
|
|
[#6]
Quoted:
what about brass versus Russian ammo that is steel cased? Any thoughts? Can they be pre-loaded too? View Quote Are you concerned about it rusting together? Steel would be preferred over brass for long term as they are lacquer coated. YMMV 90% of my mags are loaded, in Ammo cans with Dessicant. the other 10% are either new in wrap or range mags. |
|
[#7]
Mine are loaded just because it's easier to store more ammo that way. Storing them loaded/unloaded doesn't hurt the springs. It is the compressing/decompressing the spring that wears it out.
|
|
[#8]
Quoted:
Mine are loaded just because it's easier to store more ammo that way. Storing them loaded/unloaded doesn't hurt the springs. It is the compressing/decompressing the spring that wears it out. View Quote Spot on! Storing a spring in a compressed state will not harm the spring in any way (unless it's at incredible elevated temps). It is the cycling of the spring that wears it out. Eventually it will form micro cracks, which will eventually lead to the spring breaking. No harm whatsoever to the spring from storing your mags loaded. And I do mean fully loaded. A properly designed mag does not need to be downloaded to 28 or 29 rounds. If it was designed to hold 30 load it up and forget about it. |
|
[#9]
Quoted:
Spot on! Storing a spring in a compressed state will not harm the spring in any way (unless it's at incredible elevated temps). It is the cycling of the spring that wears it out. Eventually it will form micro cracks, which will eventually lead to the spring breaking. No harm whatsoever to the spring from storing your mags loaded. And I do mean fully loaded. A properly designed mag does not need to be downloaded to 28 or 29 rounds. If it was designed to hold 30 load it up and forget about it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Mine are loaded just because it's easier to store more ammo that way. Storing them loaded/unloaded doesn't hurt the springs. It is the compressing/decompressing the spring that wears it out. Spot on! Storing a spring in a compressed state will not harm the spring in any way (unless it's at incredible elevated temps). It is the cycling of the spring that wears it out. Eventually it will form micro cracks, which will eventually lead to the spring breaking. No harm whatsoever to the spring from storing your mags loaded. And I do mean fully loaded. A properly designed mag does not need to be downloaded to 28 or 29 rounds. If it was designed to hold 30 load it up and forget about it. Bingo!! I have kept mags loaded for 10 years and they worked just as good as new ones. Just don't load and unload and load them all the time...as in just sitting around and messing with them Shooting them empty and then loading them is fine |
|
[#10]
So much not clear info.
So let us be clear: Storing a mag loaded is NOT the same as storing it empty. FACT. Buy a cheap book shelf... load a shelf full of books, leave one empty. Let me know which one sags first. And why did it? Because there was a force acting upon that material. Keeping a spring loaded has a force acting upon it. With the same results. Everyone says.. "it doesn't matter" and then when every service member that was in Vietnam says "had to download the 20s to 16 or your springs would fail and then so would your weapon" not a single peep chimes in to say they are lying. Literally watch ANY of the M16 history videos ripped on Youtube, they all have this in there somewhere. So back to being clear: An unloaded magazine is useless in a SD scenario. So it is worthwhile to load them up for that reason. Very worthwhile. It may even be a zombie SHTF situation, so load a bunch of them up. The reality is, the spring will still last a really, really long time.. most likely longer than you will. So in that way it doesn't matter. That does NOT mean it's the same. However, if you're planning on passing magazine to your kids and their kids and their kids in the event they can no longer ever be purchased... then I would strongly advise you to store those magazines unloaded if you want them to be functioning many, many, many years from now. |
|
[#11]
Loaded. Even unproven mags. I will pull them first for range use.
Extra mags of known quality (Pmag, Lancer, D&H etc) are left unloaded because I know they will work the first time. |
|
[#12]
Quoted:
So much not clear info. So let us be clear: Storing a mag loaded is NOT the same as storing it empty. FACT. Buy a cheap book shelf... load a shelf full of books, leave one empty. Let me know which one sags first. And why did it? Because there was a force acting upon that material. Keeping a spring loaded has a force acting upon it. With the same results. Everyone says.. "it doesn't matter" and then when every service member that was in Vietnam says "had to download the 20s to 16 or your springs would fail and then so would your weapon" not a single peep chimes in to say they are lying. Literally watch ANY of the M16 history videos ripped on Youtube, they all have this in there somewhere. So back to being clear: An unloaded magazine is useless in a SD scenario. So it is worthwhile to load them up for that reason. Very worthwhile. It may even be a zombie SHTF situation, so load a bunch of them up. The reality is, the spring will still last a really, really long time.. most likely longer than you will. So in that way it doesn't matter. That does NOT mean it's the same. However, if you're planning on passing magazine to your kids and their kids and their kids in the event they can no longer ever be purchased... then I would strongly advise you to store those magazines unloaded if you want them to be functioning many, many, many years from now. View Quote I don't think anyone said loaded vs unloaded is the same. I will state this one more time so it is perfectly clear, storing a mag FULLY loaded will not harm the spring. It will not wear the spring out. It will not weaken the spring over time. If a mag is loaded to 30 rounds and stored that way for 10 years that spring will be just as strong and good as a spring in a mag that was stored empty. This is not theory, it's science. As long as the spring is not compressed beyond its yield point it will not be affected, not even a little bit. Springs wear out and weaken over time when they are CYCLED, not when sitting. Doesn't matter if it's compressed or uncompressed. If there were any truth to the need to down load those old mags it was because they were poorly designed and over compressed the spring when fully loaded. That is an entirely different problem all together. |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
So much not clear info. So let us be clear: Storing a mag loaded is NOT the same as storing it empty. FACT. Everyone says.. "it doesn't matter" and then when every service member that was in Vietnam says "had to download the 20s to 16 or your springs would fail and then so would your weapon" not a single peep chimes in to say they are lying. Literally watch ANY of the M16 history videos ripped on Youtube, they all have this in there somewhere. View Quote No one is saying the "nam vets were liars. A) The rifle and mags has come a loooooooooog way since then. B) Just because the vets all say it doesn't make it fact. I have ready many vet accounts from several wars where they were just flat out wrong on things in their way of thinking. Doesn't mean they were stupid or untrained, it just means they got something into their heads based on what they saw or think they saw and it was the truth to them. I started to download my mags by 1 or 2 after I couldn't get a mag in the rifle properly while being shot at in some very bad conditions. I never had a problem before that, but when the worst case came up, it darn near got me killed. I downloaded after that. The same conditions never came up again. Was i right to do it? No idea, but I lived and felt more confident. That doesn't make it the law of the land though. |
|
[#14]
Quoted:
the only unloaded mags i have are still in the packages jic theres another panic. i rotate ~50 ar mags and have been doing so for years View Quote This. If a mag I've been using fails somehow or cracks or something, it gets marked or smashed and thrown away. Then grab a new mag out of the stockpile and add it to the rotation. Buy one or two new magazines of your choice each payday and add them to the stockpile. Repeat. |
|
[#15]
Quoted:
Yes it's perfectly fine no difference. Keep your mags loaded, It's been proven it won't hurt them and they don't do you any good whatsoever unloaded. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
what about brass versus Russian ammo that is steel cased? Any thoughts? Can they be pre-loaded too? Yes it's perfectly fine no difference. Keep your mags loaded, It's been proven it won't hurt them and they don't do you any good whatsoever unloaded. No difference? I have to disagree. You are putting them under load. This stresses the metal on a molecular level. I've had handgun magazines that were loaded for years not feed as good and with a new spring they worked like new. I'm not saying don't do it, or it's going to completely ruin your mags, but I disagree that it's proven that there is no difference. I'm sure I'm splitting hairs, but changing anything from it's resting form tends to, over time, lead to malfunction. |
|
[#16]
Quoted:
I don't think anyone said loaded vs unloaded is the same. I will state this one more time so it is perfectly clear, storing a mag FULLY loaded will not harm the spring. It will not wear the spring out. It will not weaken the spring over time. If a mag is loaded to 30 rounds and stored that way for 10 years that spring will be just as strong and good as a spring in a mag that was stored empty. This is not theory, it's science. As long as the spring is not compressed beyond its yield point it will not be affected, not even a little bit. Springs wear out and weaken over time when they are CYCLED, not when sitting. Doesn't matter if it's compressed or uncompressed. If there were any truth to the need to down load those old mags it was because they were poorly designed and over compressed the spring when fully loaded. That is an entirely different problem all together. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
SNIP I don't think anyone said loaded vs unloaded is the same. I will state this one more time so it is perfectly clear, storing a mag FULLY loaded will not harm the spring. It will not wear the spring out. It will not weaken the spring over time. If a mag is loaded to 30 rounds and stored that way for 10 years that spring will be just as strong and good as a spring in a mag that was stored empty. This is not theory, it's science. As long as the spring is not compressed beyond its yield point it will not be affected, not even a little bit. Springs wear out and weaken over time when they are CYCLED, not when sitting. Doesn't matter if it's compressed or uncompressed. If there were any truth to the need to down load those old mags it was because they were poorly designed and over compressed the spring when fully loaded. That is an entirely different problem all together. Sorry, this is just incorrect. You're trying to argue physics. Everyone here probably has enough mags to try this so answer the question for yourselves and stop believing what Non-metal/molecular engineers keep telling you. (obviously this test is simple and not to be taken as an end all, be all. It's just something for you to do at home) Simple test |
|
[#17]
Quoted:
Sorry, this is just incorrect. You're trying to argue physics. Everyone here probably has enough mags to try this so answer the question for yourselves and stop believing what Non-metal/molecular engineers keep telling you. (obviously this test is simple and not to be taken as an end all, be all. It's just something for you to do at home) Simple test View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
SNIP I don't think anyone said loaded vs unloaded is the same. I will state this one more time so it is perfectly clear, storing a mag FULLY loaded will not harm the spring. It will not wear the spring out. It will not weaken the spring over time. If a mag is loaded to 30 rounds and stored that way for 10 years that spring will be just as strong and good as a spring in a mag that was stored empty. This is not theory, it's science. As long as the spring is not compressed beyond its yield point it will not be affected, not even a little bit. Springs wear out and weaken over time when they are CYCLED, not when sitting. Doesn't matter if it's compressed or uncompressed. If there were any truth to the need to down load those old mags it was because they were poorly designed and over compressed the spring when fully loaded. That is an entirely different problem all together. Sorry, this is just incorrect. You're trying to argue physics. Everyone here probably has enough mags to try this so answer the question for yourselves and stop believing what Non-metal/molecular engineers keep telling you. (obviously this test is simple and not to be taken as an end all, be all. It's just something for you to do at home) Simple test Alright, lets get technical with this discussion. First lets talk about the spring taking a "set". All springs will take a "set" after a number of cycles, or from being compressed for some time. This is commonly know and the amount of "set" varies based on several factors like spring material, shaped, and processing. That is not damaging or hurting the spring, it's just part of their normal life cycle. Second, there are a few things that will change/affect the life of your spring. The first, and easiest to see and reproduce, is deforming the spring beyond it's intended yield point. Once this happens, the spring will be mis-shapen and never be the same again. It only takes one time doing this, once it yields, the damage is done. Cycling, as we all know, cycling the spring (usually thousands of times) will wear the spring out and weaken it over time, until it eventually breaks. As springs cycle, the metal forms microscopic cracks. Over time they get worse and worse. You can not see these with your naked eye, but they are there. This is why most springs fail from old age. Simple use and they wear out. What you were referring to in your post is know as creep. This phenomena happens in metals as well as plastics. Although most people only think of creep as a plastic problem because most metals creep so little it's never an issue in most applications. That said, there are 2 factors that affect creep, stress applied and heat. Raise either the stress, or heat, or both and the rate of creep goes up. On a very basic level, creep is where the actual molecules of the material begin to rearrange themselves. This happens because at the atomic level, there is a good amount of empty space for things to move around. When the forces of stress and heat are applied, the molecules of start to come "unraveled" and then begin to move. This movement is very similar to what happens when the material is melted, it can then flow almost like a liquid. Although creep is usually a very slow process. Now that we know what creep is, and what affects it, lets talk about creep in steel. Good spring steels are not very brittle and don't easily yield, that what makes them good for spring applications. Steel also melts at a very high temperature (compared to ambient temps). The closer to a material gets to it's melt temps, the worse the creep will be. This is the main reason that when stored at room temp 73F, the steel in your spring is not going to creep very much. in fact you won't be able to measure it. That is why is most low temp applications engineers don't even need to worry about creep in their steel springs. Lets take a look at some numbers. Most creep tests are performed for a set time, usually either 10,000 or 100,000 hours. The labs will vary the stress (psi) applied to the steel, and they will vary the temps to see how the material performs. Many tests with steel start at 10,000psi and the amount of creep at that low stress for steel is extremely small. So how much stress does the spring of an AR mag see when compressed? 1000psi? not even close. So based on scientific data from actual lab tests of steels we know that at room temp, 73F, at a stress level far lower than1000psi you are not going to see any measurable creep in steel. As far as that test you linked to, that was pretty cool, but the one problem that caught my attention immediately was how mis-shapen the spring was while he had it fully compressed. That spring was most likely deformed beyond it's yield point. As can be seen when he sits it on the table. Notice how twisted the spring looks compared to the other spring. It shouldn't look like that. It was damaged, and that damage wasn't from time, it was from being too distorted. Here I will show you what our spring looks like in a fully loaded mag.... Notice how nicely the spring holds its form because of our spring guide at the bottom. It looks almost perfect, not twisting or slinking going on that could damage the spring. Take a look at the spring compressed on that test page you linked to, it doesn't look like this at all. Now, here is one more picture of 2 of our springs that I just took. One is from a brand new, never used mag. The other is from a mag that has been sitting in storage for almost a year now to test creep for our housing feedlips. Notice there is literally no visible difference in the 2 springs. Not even a little bit. That is a perfectly good test in a real mag for an entire year, fully loaded. No change in the spring whatsoever. So while I will agree with you that there is more stress on a spring in a fully loaded mag, you are talking about the difference of 2 stress levels that are so low they are insignificant with regards to creep in steel. And that is why it doesn't matter to the spring if the mag is fully loaded, or empty, It would be like you have hair on your arms, or no hair. They weight of those hairs are not going to affect your arm in any way. |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
No difference? I have to disagree. You are putting them under load. This stresses the metal on a molecular level. I've had handgun magazines that were loaded for years not feed as good and with a new spring they worked like new. I'm not saying don't do it, or it's going to completely ruin your mags, but I disagree that it's proven that there is no difference. I'm sure I'm splitting hairs, but changing anything from it's resting form tends to, over time, lead to malfunction. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
what about brass versus Russian ammo that is steel cased? Any thoughts? Can they be pre-loaded too? Yes it's perfectly fine no difference. Keep your mags loaded, It's been proven it won't hurt them and they don't do you any good whatsoever unloaded. No difference? I have to disagree. You are putting them under load. This stresses the metal on a molecular level. I've had handgun magazines that were loaded for years not feed as good and with a new spring they worked like new. I'm not saying don't do it, or it's going to completely ruin your mags, but I disagree that it's proven that there is no difference. I'm sure I'm splitting hairs, but changing anything from it's resting form tends to, over time, lead to malfunction. This is the only experience I have personally with keeping a mag loaded for a LONG period of time. In my case it was a Sig 229 mag. I bought two brand new "high cap" mags back in 98 when I got the pistol. One of them I kept fully loaded up, the other stayed new in the package for future use(this was back in the ban years when brand new high cap mags cost me $105 a pop). I kept the loaded mag in the pistol and rarely ever shot or emptied it as I thought this would wear it out. I just used 10 rounders when I went to the range. Fast forward 16 years....the mag that was kept loaded for all those years has a very noticably weaker spring than the other. After some feeding issues and failing to lock back the slide after the mag was empty I decided to replace the spring. The mag now has zero issues and the new spring feels just like the mag that wasn't used. So to me it seems pretty clear that at least in the case of older Sig mags, keeping it loaded for a long period of time definitely weakened the spring. It would make sense AR mags would be similar. I only keep a mag or two loaded these days. My rifles are just range guns and I don't need to keep ammo ready to go. I figure this way I'll get the longest possible use out of my mags. |
|
[#19]
Quoted:
This is the only experience I have personally with keeping a mag loaded for a LONG period of time. In my case it was a Sig 229 mag. I bought two brand new "high cap" mags back in 98 when I got the pistol. One of them I kept fully loaded up, the other stayed new in the package for future use(this was back in the ban years when brand new high cap mags cost me $105 a pop). I kept the loaded mag in the pistol and rarely ever shot or emptied it as I thought this would wear it out. I just used 10 rounders when I went to the range. Fast forward 16 years....the mag that was kept loaded for all those years has a very noticably weaker spring than the other. After some feeding issues and failing to lock back the slide after the mag was empty I decided to replace the spring. The mag now has zero issues and the new spring feels just like the mag that wasn't used. So to me it seems pretty clear that at least in the case of older Sig mags, keeping it loaded for a long period of time definitely weakened the spring. It would make sense AR mags would be similar. I only keep a mag or two loaded these days. My rifles are just range guns and I don't need to keep ammo ready to go. I figure this way I'll get the longest possible use out of my mags. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
what about brass versus Russian ammo that is steel cased? Any thoughts? Can they be pre-loaded too? Yes it's perfectly fine no difference. Keep your mags loaded, It's been proven it won't hurt them and they don't do you any good whatsoever unloaded. No difference? I have to disagree. You are putting them under load. This stresses the metal on a molecular level. I've had handgun magazines that were loaded for years not feed as good and with a new spring they worked like new. I'm not saying don't do it, or it's going to completely ruin your mags, but I disagree that it's proven that there is no difference. I'm sure I'm splitting hairs, but changing anything from it's resting form tends to, over time, lead to malfunction. This is the only experience I have personally with keeping a mag loaded for a LONG period of time. In my case it was a Sig 229 mag. I bought two brand new "high cap" mags back in 98 when I got the pistol. One of them I kept fully loaded up, the other stayed new in the package for future use(this was back in the ban years when brand new high cap mags cost me $105 a pop). I kept the loaded mag in the pistol and rarely ever shot or emptied it as I thought this would wear it out. I just used 10 rounders when I went to the range. Fast forward 16 years....the mag that was kept loaded for all those years has a very noticably weaker spring than the other. After some feeding issues and failing to lock back the slide after the mag was empty I decided to replace the spring. The mag now has zero issues and the new spring feels just like the mag that wasn't used. So to me it seems pretty clear that at least in the case of older Sig mags, keeping it loaded for a long period of time definitely weakened the spring. It would make sense AR mags would be similar. I only keep a mag or two loaded these days. My rifles are just range guns and I don't need to keep ammo ready to go. I figure this way I'll get the longest possible use out of my mags. There is not doubt more factors to consider when we open the conversation to all mags in all makes. The most important questions are what kind of spring steel was used. And was it designed properly to allow the mag to be fully loaded without damaging the spring. If all of these things are not done correctly the spring will get weak and be damaged. I know some LE who have had glock mags loaded for almost 20 years and never changed the spring. Still runs with no problems. |
|
[#20]
So then why do new MFR. 1911 mags not work out of the Box but 75+ year old 1911 mags loaded with 1942 dated ammo work fine? Not buying the idea that loaded will make the not work.
|
|
[#21]
Quoted:
the only unloaded mags i have are still in the packages jic theres another panic. i rotate ~50 ar mags and have been doing so for years View Quote Same here. My mags that are "investments" are still in the wrapper. The rest are loaded (or waiting for me to buy more ammo to fill them). |
|
[#22]
So while I will agree with you that there is more stress on a spring in a fully loaded mag, you are talking about the difference of 2 stress levels that are so low they are insignificant with regards to creep in steel. And that is why it doesn't matter to the spring if the mag is fully loaded, or empty, It would be like you have hair on your arms, or no hair. They weight of those hairs are not going to affect your arm in any way. View Quote Sorry, I probably came off a bit more argumentative that I meant to. Sometimes I just can't help myself and like to argue every day use all the way up to extremes. And let's face it, I do keep some mags loaded and ready to go so I can't really sit here and poo poo it lol. I just had a stick up my ass that day I guess. Also, even if it did more damage than it does to keep them compressed, with the availability and price of mags these days who cares? lol. Cheers! |
|
[#23]
Quoted:
Sorry, I probably came off a bit more argumentative that I meant to. Sometimes I just can't help myself and like to argue every day use all the way up to extremes. And let's face it, I do keep some mags loaded and ready to go so I can't really sit here and poo poo it lol. I just had a stick up my ass that day I guess. Also, even if it did more damage than it does to keep them compressed, with the availability and price of mags these days who cares? lol. Cheers! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
So while I will agree with you that there is more stress on a spring in a fully loaded mag, you are talking about the difference of 2 stress levels that are so low they are insignificant with regards to creep in steel. And that is why it doesn't matter to the spring if the mag is fully loaded, or empty, It would be like you have hair on your arms, or no hair. They weight of those hairs are not going to affect your arm in any way. Sorry, I probably came off a bit more argumentative that I meant to. Sometimes I just can't help myself and like to argue every day use all the way up to extremes. And let's face it, I do keep some mags loaded and ready to go so I can't really sit here and poo poo it lol. I just had a stick up my ass that day I guess. Also, even if it did more damage than it does to keep them compressed, with the availability and price of mags these days who cares? lol. Cheers! No worries, I totally understand. I like debating these things also. It give all of us a chance to learn. |
|
[#24]
All stresses on a spring, are forced into the material when it's made.
I've got 9mm mags that have been loaded since the 80's. If you think about it, if you pulled the wire straight, it's what...3 feet long? In a mag your pushing one end down maybe 5". If you held that wire straight out, it would damn near sag 5" all by it's self. If you spread out the load over the wires length, it's very little "per inch" |
|
[#25]
Most say keeping them loaded doesn't hurt, but I've juster had a reason to keep them loaded. If I were at war, it wold be different.
|
|
[#26]
|
|
[#27]
Quoted:
You could be at war any minute. Then it's too late to load them. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Most say keeping them loaded doesn't hurt, but I've juster had a reason to keep them loaded. If I were at war, it wold be different. You could be at war any minute. Then it's too late to load them. True enough but I figure the ones that ARE loaded (3-4 dozen...) should likely be adequate for any sudden "holy carp" moments. No point I can see in going to the trouble of loading a bunch more unless I needed to free up storage space by eliminating the additional, separate space taken by ammo outside the magazines. In that case, sure. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.