User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 9:34:20 PM EDT
[#1]
Pic?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/11/2014 9:36:37 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pic? Pic of the catalog? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2014 12:15:08 PM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2014 2:53:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pic of the catalog? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Pic? Pic of the catalog? Fixed it for you OP. 
Designed specifically for DPMS LR-308 and Knight’s SR-25 pattern rifles Built to same no-compromise quality standards as our AR-15/M16 mags New-design follower keeps even pressure on the round stack through entire feed path Straight mag body holds a full 20 rounds – fits existing mag pouches Plus. . . Rugged heat-treated aluminum construction Anti-corrosion hard-anodized finish Dry-film lubricant for smooth insertion in mag well Stainless steel spring Removable aluminum floorplate No listed dimension of weight specs yet. Brownells is my favorite manufacturer of AR15 magazines, and won out over all other brands in my personal mag test trials. These should be excellent. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2014 3:45:29 PM EDT
[#5]
I pre-ordered two. Brownell's says they expect these to start shipping in January.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2014 3:48:55 PM EDT
[#6]
I would really like to know the maximum COAL these will take.
M118LR tends to run long on its own, usually to the tune of 2.83". ETA: Man, they're cheaper than Pmags, too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2014 6:44:34 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would really like to know the maximum COAL these will take. M118LR tends to run long on its own, usually to the tune of 2.83". ETA: Man, they're cheaper than Pmags, too. What's a KAC mag accept for OAL? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/18/2014 8:46:11 PM EDT
[#8]
Thanks OP: these are relative to my interest. I might have missed them otherwise because I don't really look at Brownells anymore (they tend to be too expensive). I have 10 of their AR15 mags and have no complaints with the quality.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/12/2015 4:23:37 PM EDT
[#9]
So have these shipped yet?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/15/2015 11:19:54 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What's a KAC mag accept for OAL? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I would really like to know the maximum COAL these will take. M118LR tends to run long on its own, usually to the tune of 2.83". ETA: Man, they're cheaper than Pmags, too. What's a KAC mag accept for OAL? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Inside length from front to back of mags, obviously cartridge OAL needs to be slightly shorter: KAC - 2.880" LaRue - 2.875" Lancer L7 - 2.835" |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/15/2015 1:12:30 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Inside length from front to back of mags, obviously cartridge OAL needs to be slightly shorter: KAC - 2.880" LaRue - 2.875" Lancer L7 - 2.835" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I would really like to know the maximum COAL these will take. M118LR tends to run long on its own, usually to the tune of 2.83". ETA: Man, they're cheaper than Pmags, too. What's a KAC mag accept for OAL? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Inside length from front to back of mags, obviously cartridge OAL needs to be slightly shorter: KAC - 2.880" LaRue - 2.875" Lancer L7 - 2.835" When the Brownell's mags are received I'll see if I can't get some measurements. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/18/2015 8:04:38 PM EDT
[#12]
I'll take 4.
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/21/2015 10:31:08 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Inside length from front to back of mags, obviously cartridge OAL needs to be slightly shorter: KAC - 2.880" LaRue - 2.875" Lancer L7 - 2.835" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I would really like to know the maximum COAL these will take. M118LR tends to run long on its own, usually to the tune of 2.83". ETA: Man, they're cheaper than Pmags, too. What's a KAC mag accept for OAL? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Inside length from front to back of mags, obviously cartridge OAL needs to be slightly shorter: KAC - 2.880" LaRue - 2.875" Lancer L7 - 2.835" The KAC and LaRue mags are butt-welded at the seam, creating a box with no overlapping parts. The Brownells mag looks to have the same overlapping spot welded front as a USGI 5.56 mag, which will most likely shorten max COAL. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2015 6:02:37 PM EDT
[#14]
Brownells Q&A:
"I would not recommend anything over 2.875in. Customer Care from Brownells" Seems like a winner! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/26/2015 6:02:54 PM EDT
[#15]
Brownells Q&A:
"I would not recommend anything over 2.875in. Customer Care from Brownells" Seems like a winner! |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/29/2015 9:13:39 PM EDT
[#16]
Pre-ordered 4. Hope they work!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/16/2015 9:43:15 PM EDT
[#17]
Anyone heard any more about these? I preordered 5 and I understood they would begin to ship in January. Middle of March now and crickets. Seems like this is the way Brownells does business now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 3/19/2015 6:38:13 PM EDT
[#18]
I read a post in the industry section from a representative of a KAC, they tried to make a aluminum .308 magazine but they couldn't get it to work. Maybe that is why Brownells mag hasn't come out yet...
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
