Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 6/26/2017 12:52:08 PM EDT
I'm pretty new to guns in general, and the other day while I was out getting 5.56 ammo, I overheard someone getting .300 black for their AR, which is what I want to do next. But my question is, what the difference between subsonic, supersonic, etc?
Link Posted: 6/26/2017 1:38:37 PM EDT
[#1]
.300BLK is a fun caliber that's even better with a suppressor and subsonic ammo. Imagine shooting without hearing protection and hearing your bullet hit the target 50 yards away, over the sound of the bolt cycling. Most subsonic ammo is suitable for plinking although there are a few rounds out there designed to expand at such low velocities...Get ready to open your wallet for them though. You can find factory subsonic ammo out there for as little as $.50/rd. You can expect velocities around 1000-1050 FPS out of a 16" gun. A bit less out of a short barrel like an 8", 9" or 10.5".

Supersonic ammo is obviously faster and suitable for hunting up to medium game animals such as deer <150yds and obviously for self defense. There's a TON of factory loads out there ranging from about $.50/rd up to $2.00/rd or so. The consensus on one of the most effective round for hunting/defense is the Barnes 110gr TAC-TX but once again, get ready to open your wallet. Velocities will be a bit more "all over the board" with supers but the range is around 1900fps in short barrels to around 23-2400fps in 16"+ barrels...I get around 2100fps with that Barnes load from a 10.5" suppressed barrel.

You can get your cost down quite a bit if you choose to reload and if you're reloading subs especially, they hardly take any powder so your main costs are the projectile and primer, once you have some brass (that you can make out of 5.56 brass if you're ambitious.)

Some have described .300BLK as the "American AK" round for its relatively similar size to a 7.62x39 AK round. (BLK is 7.62x35 and shares similar ballistics).

My opinion, take the plunge. It's a great caliber and is extremely flexible, although more expensive to shoot if you limit yourself to factory loads only. It also only requires a barrel change to make it work in a standard AR. All other parts including the magazines are the same. ( I've had issues with both subs and supers cycling properly in Gen 2 Magpul 20's and Gen 3 Magpul 10's, just FYI).
Link Posted: 6/26/2017 3:37:50 PM EDT
[#2]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
.300BLK is a fun caliber that's even better with a suppressor and subsonic ammo. Imagine shooting without hearing protection and hearing your bullet hit the target 50 yards away, over the sound of the bolt cycling. Most subsonic ammo is suitable for plinking although there are a few rounds out there designed to expand at such low velocities...Get ready to open your wallet for them though. You can find factory subsonic ammo out there for as little as $.50/rd. You can expect velocities around 1000-1050 FPS out of a 16" gun. A bit less out of a short barrel like an 8", 9" or 10.5".

Supersonic ammo is obviously faster and suitable for hunting up to medium game animals such as deer <150yds and obviously for self defense. There's a TON of factory loads out there ranging from about $.50/rd up to $2.00/rd or so. The consensus on one of the most effective round for hunting/defense is the Barnes 110gr TAC-TX but once again, get ready to open your wallet. Velocities will be a bit more "all over the board" with supers but the range is around 1900fps in short barrels to around 23-2400fps in 16"+ barrels...I get around 2100fps with that Barnes load from a 10.5" suppressed barrel.

You can get your cost down quite a bit if you choose to reload and if you're reloading subs especially, they hardly take any powder so your main costs are the projectile and primer, once you have some brass (that you can make out of 5.56 brass if you're ambitious.)

Some have described .300BLK as the "American AK" round for its relatively similar size to a 7.62x39 AK round. (BLK is 7.62x35 and shares similar ballistics).

My opinion, take the plunge. It's a great caliber and is extremely flexible, although more expensive to shoot if you limit yourself to factory loads only. It also only requires a barrel change to make it work in a standard AR. All other parts including the magazines are the same. ( I've had issues with both subs and supers cycling properly in Gen 2 Magpul 20's and Gen 3 Magpul 10's, just FYI).
View Quote
Thank you so much for this. Extremely informative, but also easy to understand. Definetly want to start shooting .300 BLK and also have been wanting to start doing my own reloading as well, so I think its something worth investing in. Thank you once again
Link Posted: 6/26/2017 9:24:29 PM EDT
[#3]
If you didn't understand the difference between subs and sonic ammo then why are you looking at 300blk? Not trying to be rude just wondering why you're seeking another option as opposed to 556. 556 is a very capable round especially with modern defensive ammo, it is also a NATO round which places the economy's of scale largely in favor of 556 as opposed to other cartridges and makes the ammo more available from more places. So why another caliber?
Link Posted: 6/27/2017 1:01:20 AM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
If you didn't understand the difference between subs and sonic ammo then why are you looking at 300blk? Not trying to be rude just wondering why you're seeking another option as opposed to 556. 556 is a very capable round especially with modern defensive ammo, it is also a NATO round which places the economy's of scale largely in favor of 556 as opposed to other cartridges and makes the ammo more available from more places. So why another caliber?
View Quote
No, your not sounding rude at all, I understand the point your making and appreciate the thought. I have shot .300 blk before and although there are a lot of variables that go with this, it did seem to shoot a bit more accurately in general. And it's not like I'm replacing a 556, I just wanted to give it a shot maybe and learn more about it in general, I'm also still a noob at all of this so thanks for responding.
Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top