Quote History View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:Quoted:Quoted:
3 shot groups are worthless. 5 shot groups are slightly less worthless, but not much.
10 shot groups will tell you a lot more about what's really going on. I like 9 shots, a reload, then the last round.
I have shot a few boxes of the ADI 55gr Blitz Kings with great accuracy out of a 14.5" BCM BFH barrel.
I disagree.
3-shot and 5-shot groups have their place in the world.
3-shot groups are great for walking in a zero, and saving ammo.
Shooting multiple 5-shot groups can still give you a good deal of information about the shooter, rifle, ammo, etc. Look at the 1MOA all day challenge, for example.
10-shot groups offer the statistical advantage. However, unless you're using a machine rest, I feel that they too can be flawed due to shooter's influence, fatigue, etc.
To say 3-shot and 5-shot are worthless is silly.
You are sadly misinformed.
http://www.ar15.com/ammo/project/Three_Shot_Groups/The_Trouble_With_3_Shot_Groups.htm#_Toc412927269 How so?
While I highly respect Molon, and have learned a great deal from him, I never quite agreed with him on one subject: the difference between using 5-shot groups vs 10-shot, when the sample size is the same (30 shots total fired).
If you read the original thread where he posted the information you copied and pasted, I asked him about this, and his response doesn't really give you much to go off of. He just says that they (5-shot groups) are inferior, and doesn't give a good explanation as to why. Being that I test ammo to write about it, I'm trying to increase my knowledge continually, and I looked up to Molon and respected his opinion. I was hoping for some type of answer that would educate me on the subject, versus one that would just say I'm wrong; with no supporting evidence to back up that statement.
I'm not misinformed. I use 3-shot, sometimes 2-shot groups to WALK IN A ZERO. I then proceed to shoot several 5-shot groups, or 10-shot groups to actually zero the rifle. I guess wanting to conserve ammo/money makes me sadly misinformed.
As far as precision or accuracy are concerned, shooting five or six 5-shot groups does still give you a good amount of data on a shooter/rifle/ammo combination.
If we are talking about using a machine rest, where no human error is involved, then I agree that there's no reason to not use 10-shot groups.
However, to say that 5-shot groups are worthless is silly. Just like 3-shot groups; they have their place in the world. So long as you are taking ALL of the data into account when determining the performance of a shooter/rifle/ammo combo, using multiple 5-shot groups, in my opinion, still gives you a good indication of how well a shooter/rifle/ammo combo are doing. The problem is taking only your best 5-shot group, and then saying you have a 1/4" or 1/2" capable rifle, when if you combine the rest of the groups, your average ES is more like 1 and 1/4" at 100 yards.