Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
Posted: 3/4/2015 8:15:50 PM EDT
Wolf Gold 55 grain FMJ








When most shooters hear the phrase “Wolf ammunition,” what usually comes to mind is steel-cased rounds loaded with bi-metal jacketed bullets.  Fortunately, the 55 grain FMJ “Wolf Gold” ammunition that is manufactured in Taiwan does not fit this description.  

The Wolf Gold ammunition reviewed for this report uses brass cases with the annealing iris still visible and is loaded with typical copper jacketed/lead core bullets.  The 55 grain projectile has a cannelure and there is a collet crimp at the case mouth.  The case mouth is also sealed with asphalt sealant.  The brass case has crimped and sealed boxer primers and the round is charged with ball powder.





















When most shooters hear the phrase “55 grain FMJ,” what usually comes to mind is M193 ammunition. The velocity specification for M193 as cited in MIL-C-9963F states:

The average velocity of the sample cartridges, conditioned at 72 degrees, plus or minus 2 degrees Fahrenheit (F), shall be 3165 feet per second (ft/sec), plus or minus 40 ft/sec, at 75 feet from the muzzle of the weapon.  The standard deviation of the velocities shall not exceed 40 ft/sec.


The specification is for a 20” barrel.  Depending on multiple variables, this velocity specification equates to a muzzle velocity of approximately 3270 FPS, plus or minus 40 FPS.  I chronographed the Wolf Gold 55 grain FMJ ammunition from a semi-automatic AR-15 with a chrome-lined, NATO chambered 20” Colt M16A2 barrel.







Chronographing was conducted using an Oehler 35-P chronograph with “proof screen” technology. The Oehler 35P chronograph is actually two chronographs in one package that takes two separate chronograph readings for each shot and then has its onboard computer analyze the data to determine if there is any statistically significant difference between the two readings.  If there is, the chronograph “flags” the shot to let you know that the data is invalid.  There was no invalid data flagged during this testing.

The velocity stated below is the muzzle velocity as calculated from the instrumental velocity using Oehler’s Ballistic Explorer software program. The string of fire consisted of 10 rounds over the chronograph.













Each round was single-loaded and cycled into the chamber from a magazine fitted with a single-load follower. The bolt locked-back after each shot allowing the chamber to cool in between each shot. This technique was used to mitigate the possible influence of “chamber-soak” on velocity data. Each new shot was fired in a consistent manner after hitting the bolt release.  Atmospheric conditions were monitored and recorded using a Kestrel 4000 Pocket Weather Tracker.

The muzzle velocity for the 10-shot string of the Wolf Gold 55 grain FMJ ammunition was 3213 FPS with a standard deviation of 25 FPS. For comparison, IMI M193 had a muzzle velocity of 3274 FPS when fired from the same barrel, with a standard deviation of 18 FPS.








Atmospheric conditions.

Temperature:  77 degrees F
Humidity:  40%
Barometric pressure:  30.12 inches of Hg
Elevation:  950 feet above sea level



The accuracy specification for M193 cited in MIL-C-9963F is as follows:

The average of the mean radii of all targets of the sample cartridges, fired at 200 yards, shall not exceed 2.0 inches.

These averages are from 10-shot groups fired from machine rested, bolt-actioned test barrels, such as the ones pictured below.













All things being equal (which of course they seldom are) this specification equates to a mean radius of 1 inch at 100 yards for 10-shot groups.  For those of you who might not be familiar with the mean radius, I’ve posted some information about it here.

I conducted an accuracy (technically, precision) evaluation of the Wolf Gold 55 grain FMJ ammunition following my usual protocol.  This accuracy evaluation used statistically significant shot-group sizes and every single shot in a fired group was included in the measurements. There was absolutely no use of any Group Reduction Techniques (e.g. fliers, target movement, Butterfly Shots).

The shooting set-up will be described in detail below. As many of the significant variables as was practicable were controlled for. Also, a  control group was fired from the test-rifle used in the evaluation using match-grade, hand-loaded ammunition; in order to demonstrate the capability of the barrel. Pictures of shot-groups are posted for documentation.

All shooting was conducted from a concrete bench-rest from a distance of 100 yards (confirmed with a laser rangefinder.) The barrel used in the evaluation was free-floated. The free-float handguards of the rifle rested in a Sinclair Windage Benchrest, while the stock of the rifle rested in a Protektor bunny-ear rear bag. Sighting was accomplished via a Leupold VARI-X III set at 25X magnification and adjusted to be parallax-free at 100 yards. A mirage shade was attached to the objective-bell of the scope. Wind conditions on the shooting range were continuously monitored using a Wind Probe. The set-up was very similar to that pictured below.









The Wind Probe.






The test vehicle for this evaluation was one of my semi-automatic precision AR-15s with a 20” stainless-steel Lothar Walther barrel.  The barrel has a 223 Wylde chamber with a 1:8” twist.

Prior to firing the Wolf Gold ammunition, I fired a 10-shot control group using match-grade hand-loads topped with the Sierra 55 grain BlitzKing.  That group had an extreme spread of 0.78”.









Next, three 10-shot groups of the Wolf Gold were fired in a row with the resulting extreme spreads:

2.13”
2.60”
2.44”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 2.39”.  The three 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group.  The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.76”.




The smallest 10-shot group.







The 30-shot composite group.






….
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 8:30:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Great post - you're a frickin' ballistic scientist...
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 8:31:00 PM EDT
[#2]
Welcome back

Do you have access to ZQI SS109 to test? I would love to see your test.... If no access how many rounds would you need?
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 8:32:33 PM EDT
[#3]
Appreciated as alway - thanks!

Conclusion -- decent shooting ammo.
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 8:56:22 PM EDT
[#4]
Wow, thanks for the test.  I just picked up about 1000rnds last week.
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 9:01:15 PM EDT
[#5]
I'll bet the dog was a big help!    
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 9:12:18 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


Do you have access to ZQI SS109 to test? I would love to see your test.... If no access how many rounds would you need?
View Quote



I have some around here somewhere, but I probably wont get around to testing until this spring/summer.  Thanks for your gracious offer though.
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 9:14:05 PM EDT
[#7]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



I have some around here somewhere, but I probably wont get around to testing until this spring/summer.  Thanks for your gracious offer though.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:


Do you have access to ZQI SS109 to test? I would love to see your test.... If no access how many rounds would you need?



I have some around here somewhere, but I probably wont get around to testing until this spring/summer.  Thanks for your gracious offer though.



My 1:8 Lothar Walthar loves this stuff. I'm interested to see what you find.
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 9:14:14 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I'll bet the dog was a big help!    
View Quote


That one, not so much.  But my cocker spaniel is definitely "Daddy's little helper."






....
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 9:23:18 PM EDT
[#9]
Another Thank You !!

I appreciate your stringent testing of more generic ammo as well as the high performance stuff.



Link Posted: 3/4/2015 9:54:57 PM EDT
[#10]
Thanks! These are the best reviews!
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 10:50:46 PM EDT
[#11]
Great info Thanks!
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 11:24:52 PM EDT
[#12]
nice
Link Posted: 3/4/2015 11:32:35 PM EDT
[#13]

     Thank you for the test results and as always they are better than I can find in any magazine.  


       
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 12:00:45 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Another Thank You !!

I appreciate your stringent testing of more generic ammo as well as the high performance stuff.



View Quote



+1
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 12:11:57 AM EDT
[#15]
Great review as always Molon.

Thanks!
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 2:51:46 AM EDT
[#16]
Molon,



I notice that, for accuracy requirements, the M193 spec talks about mean radii while the M855 spec talks about standard deviation (no more than 1.8" at 200 yds).  are they the same thing?
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 9:09:18 AM EDT
[#17]
Once again well done. Stuff is better than I imagined.



ETA



Bullet has a nice cantalure. Wonder how it would do as far as fragmentation?



I know they use some type of bimetal bullet and would think it would make it less prone to fragment

Link Posted: 3/5/2015 9:26:13 AM EDT
[#18]
Thank You very much for the thorough report. Great job!!!
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 10:45:36 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Thank You very much for the thorough report. Great job!!!
View Quote

Ditto.....
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 12:10:37 PM EDT
[#20]
Thanks Molan! Glad to see you doing these reviews again
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 12:26:41 PM EDT
[#21]
Next, three 10-shot groups of the Wolf Gold were fired in a row with the resulting extreme spreads:

2.13”
2.60”
2.44”

for a 10-shot group average extreme spread of 2.39”.  The three 10-shot groups were over-layed on each other using RSI Shooting Lab to form a 30-shot composite group.  The mean radius for the 30-shot composite group was 0.76”.
View Quote


Those numbers are consistent with my experience with WG.  I also printed average groups in the 2.5" range, which was better than those printed with Federal M855, PMC 62gr X-Tac, and Federal 55gr AE that I put it up against.  Unfortunately, my danged firewall here at work is blocking your photos, so I can't see them.  The average velocity and SD data is also consistent with what I've read previously.  Being typically the cheapest all-brass ammo on the market, I'd say it's pretty good!
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 3:14:16 PM EDT
[#22]
Ver nice report!

Thank you for the effort and time you put into them
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 3:37:10 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



+1
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Another Thank You !!

I appreciate your stringent testing of more generic ammo as well as the high performance stuff.






+1


This
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 3:49:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Welcome back

View Quote

This^^^^^

Thanks as always.
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 4:43:30 PM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

This^^^^^

Thanks as always.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Welcome back


This^^^^^

Thanks as always.


+87

Glad to see you back.
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 6:36:52 PM EDT
[#26]
Thanks Molon!  
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 9:56:01 PM EDT
[#27]
thanks for the thorough review. I've shout 100 rounds of it and wasn't disappointed in any way.
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 10:20:47 PM EDT
[#28]
Great review dude
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 10:56:58 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Molon,

I notice that, for accuracy requirements, the M193 spec talks about mean radii while the M855 spec talks about standard deviation (no more than 1.8" at 200 yds).  are they the same thing?
View Quote


Negative Ghost Rider.
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 10:58:43 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Bullet has a nice cantalure. Wonder how it would do as far as fragmentation?

I know they use some type of bimetal bullet and would think it would make it less prone to fragment

View Quote


The Wolf Gold ammunition is loaded with typical copper jacketed/lead core bullets.
Link Posted: 3/5/2015 11:57:28 PM EDT
[#31]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
The Wolf Gold ammunition is loaded with typical copper jacketed/lead core bullets.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:



Bullet has a nice cantalure. Wonder how it would do as far as fragmentation?



I know they use some type of bimetal bullet and would think it would make it less prone to fragment







The Wolf Gold ammunition is loaded with typical copper jacketed/lead core bullets.



Nice. Next time I get a chance to purchase some Ill test it out. Sounds promising.
 
Link Posted: 3/6/2015 12:14:06 AM EDT
[#32]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Negative Ghost Rider.

View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

Molon,



I notice that, for accuracy requirements, the M193 spec talks about mean radii while the M855 spec talks about standard deviation (no more than 1.8" at 200 yds).  are they the same thing?




Negative Ghost Rider.





can you explain the differences?  my googling only turns up standard deviation in relation to velocity



 
Link Posted: 3/6/2015 2:34:39 AM EDT
[#33]
WG shot better than what I expected.  WG is definitely good practice/plinking ammo.  The velocity was pretty good, too.  I was really surprised by that.

Oh, and I had to do a double-take when I saw the post date.  I was, like, "Oh, this is a new post by Molon!"  Cool beans, bruh.  Glad to have you back.  Don't go disappearing on us again, ya hear?  
Link Posted: 3/6/2015 2:37:53 AM EDT
[#34]
So,  safe to say that wolf gold is M193, or will some still split hairs over 17 fps  ?
Link Posted: 3/6/2015 2:51:47 AM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So,  safe to say that wolf gold is M193, or will some still split hairs over 17 fps  ?
View Quote


I think the velocity is fine.  What I'm wondering is how THICK the jacket is.  It'd be cool if the jacket was as thin as spec M193.
Link Posted: 3/6/2015 2:35:14 PM EDT
[#36]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I think the velocity is fine.  What I'm wondering is how THICK the jacket is.  It'd be cool if the jacket was as thin as spec M193.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
So,  safe to say that wolf gold is M193, or will some still split hairs over 17 fps  ?


I think the velocity is fine.  What I'm wondering is how THICK the jacket is.  It'd be cool if the jacket was as thin as spec M193.



Yup, that's the "money shot" issue....
Link Posted: 3/6/2015 6:30:03 PM EDT
[#37]
Thanks for another thorough and awesomely professional report.
The one thing I've learned though is that your results will always mark the upper limit of my own performance.
Because I'm just not that good anymore.(Assuming I ever was)
Link Posted: 3/11/2015 8:09:31 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


can you explain the differences?  my googling only turns up standard deviation in relation to velocity
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Molon,

I notice that, for accuracy requirements, the M193 spec talks about mean radii while the M855 spec talks about standard deviation (no more than 1.8" at 200 yds).  are they the same thing?


Negative Ghost Rider.


can you explain the differences?  my googling only turns up standard deviation in relation to velocity
 



I've posted information about the mean radius here.  The actual metric used to measure the accuracy of M855 is the average vertical standard deviation and the average horizontal standard deviation.  I'd rather not "muddy the waters" by going into that here.
Link Posted: 3/12/2015 12:22:55 AM EDT
[#39]


Very informative, thanks...
Link Posted: 3/12/2015 3:02:46 PM EDT
[#40]
Fantastic review.  Thanks Molon!
Link Posted: 3/12/2015 10:08:01 PM EDT
[#41]
I will be buying more of this as soon as it's available for $300 a case shipped again!
Link Posted: 3/14/2015 12:27:37 AM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



I've posted information about the mean radius here.  The actual metric used to measure the accuracy of M855 is the average vertical standard deviation and the average horizontal standard deviation.  I'd rather not "muddy the waters" by going into that here.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Molon,

I notice that, for accuracy requirements, the M193 spec talks about mean radii while the M855 spec talks about standard deviation (no more than 1.8" at 200 yds).  are they the same thing?


Negative Ghost Rider.


can you explain the differences?  my googling only turns up standard deviation in relation to velocity
 



I've posted information about the mean radius here.  The actual metric used to measure the accuracy of M855 is the average vertical standard deviation and the average horizontal standard deviation.  I'd rather not "muddy the waters" by going into that here.


It never fails that when I see a post from you in this forum I simply cannot click on it fast enough, thanks for the info once again.  Always fun/informative to read your stuff.
Link Posted: 3/14/2015 1:04:59 AM EDT
[#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I will be buying more of this as soon as it's available for $300 a case shipped again!
View Quote


Hopefully will be seeing it at that price again soon.  Sam over at SGammo keeps hinting that the price is gonna go back to at least $320. As wolf is looking to make a profit on the Gold again after selling it near cost for awhile.
Link Posted: 3/15/2015 9:38:46 AM EDT
[#44]
I grabbed a bunch of Wolf Gold before the M855-ban inspired panic hit.

Glad I did.

GREAT review...wow.
Link Posted: 3/15/2015 10:49:38 AM EDT
[#45]
I just wanted to say that I appreciate all of your threads, especially the ammo ones.
Link Posted: 3/15/2015 11:02:45 AM EDT
[#46]
Slightly off topic. Anyone ever load Wolf Gold brass?
Page AR-15 » Ammunition
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top