|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 8:52:46 AM
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT 1. Are the 9mm builds as reliable as others? Seems that there can be finicky if you have a block that doesn't fit or different mags? 2. Are there any really good complete kits with everything you need to bolt to a lower? 3. Why do most that I see seem to be SBRs? Are there many 16" out there or a reason not to go that way? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 9:14:54 AM
1. They are reliable once you get them running. They can be a bit more finicky when you're building them, mostly because they're not so common. They're not as standardized as a 5.56 AR and you're more limited in your selection of parts. Magazine blocks and magazines can be unreliable, but check the FAQ and you'll find the ones that are most reliable and try to stick to those.
2. Not that I know of. Spike's, RRA and I think CMMG offer complete 9mm uppers. Go with one of those and you can just drop it directly onto any complete lower with a magazine block. Or RRA and CMMG sell complete 9mm lowers that don't need a mag block. They also make complete 9mm rifles if you really want to make it easy. 3. Most people build SBRs because 9mm won't benefit much from a longer barrel. You don't gain much velocity or accuracy, and the round is most effective within 50 yards. Even with a SBR, I can hit a 12" plate at 100 yards fairly consistently, a 16+" rifle wouldn't make it any easier. And since there's no gas system on the guns, going with a shorter barrel is easy and doesn't affect reliability. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 9:31:14 AM
RMW Extreme is working on a DI Model. See the last caliber note.
When it's available it'll totally Kick Butt. Ron Field Tests all uppers before they ship. I have several of his 45 acp's and a 45 Win Mag. http://www.rmwxtreme.com/ Dave S |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 11:02:30 AM
While mine is only semi auto it is 100% with metalform mags.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 12:18:36 PM
Once you get it tuned, it will run like a clock. You should note though that some setups are less tolerant of changes than others. My RRA carbine runs fine with any ammo I've tried except aluminum Blazers, and I have it tweaked to run well with the Rock River modified Uzi mags I got with it, Metalform mags and even my CProducts magazines. My SBR works just as well within those same parameters. The tuning will involve a couple of things: making sure your ejector is aligned right, making sure your magazine block is placed correctly, and making sure your buffer and spring are appropriate for the ammo you're shooting. For example, my factory RRA carbine has their 9mm buffer (which is heavier than a carbine buffer) but my SBR runs 115gr and 124gr loads just fine with a standard carbine buffer. If you go with a "9mm lower" with an integral adapter, you may have less flexibility with different magazines - or not. It takes a little experimentation.
Good luck! I'm looking forward to seeing pictures of your build! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 12:20:38 PM
I had a blowback 9mm but sold it when I built a 7.62x25 from Ron. My 9 ran 100% with metalform mags and a RRA magblock plus the 7.62x25 has a lot more zip to it than the 9 and a lot cheaper to shoot with the surplus ammo
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 1:08:34 PM
I have a 9mm AR pistol (until the stamp comes back) built with a CMMG 9mm dedicated lower and RAA upper with a 5" ADCO barrel, CMMG BCG, and Spike's BAR 7" handguard. It runs like a top and is a lot of fun (it will be more fun when I can put a stock on it). I also have a 16" Colt AR6450 9mm. It also runs like a top, but the 16" carbine just isn't as fun as the little 9mm guns. I think one of the great things about the 9mm AR platform is the ability to suppress it and get nearly movie quiet (my 9mm suppressor is pending also). Hanging a suppressor on already 16" gun just makes it too big IMO.
I had a Hahn dedicated mag block in a regular lower for a while, but I could never get it to run as well as the CMMG dedicated lower or the Colt. If you are serious about building a 9mm, get a dedicated lower. It isn't like the mag block is something you will be banging in and out on the range to switch uppers, and in my experience the dedicated 9mm lowers are much more reliable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 2:46:53 PM
[Last Edit: 5/28/2012 2:47:25 PM by -Carnage-]
Originally Posted By BillyJack:
... 3. Why do most that I see seem to be SBRs? Are there many 16" out there or a reason not to go that way? Simple handgun powders are designed for about 6 inches of burn and after that you don't see much in velocity gains and the bullet can actually slow down in the longer barrel... http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/9luger.html Now, let's take all the data there. The last column if the average for that inch, the next one is the %increase by that inch. Now, let's take for example the G17 with a ~4.5" Barrel (we took the average data 4"-5"), and we show the % increase taking the 4.5" barrel as reference, starting from 10"
A zoomed imaged
So you can see that a 13" you get the most increase regarding a 4.5" barrel as reference, a 16" barrel is useless as you get more weight and none increase in velocity regarding a 13" barrel. Using this data you get that the optimal barrel lenght available for 9mm would be a 12.5" Barrel (nearest to 13") instead of 10" or 16" Just my .02 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 6:55:08 PM
[Last Edit: 5/28/2012 6:59:11 PM by Hawkdriver]
My 9mm AR took some initial tweaking. I got a deal on a bunch of c-products mags. The followers all required modification to work with my Hahn dedicated block. I had to send some of the mags back for replacement…
The ejector also needed to be properly aligned. Now with Metalform mags and decent ammo, it runs great. I have a 14.5 inch CMMG upper half with permanent flash hider to keep it non NFA… |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/28/2012 9:48:38 PM
Originally Posted By BillyJack:
... I'd like to go with a 9 since I also have a P226 and plenty of ammo. You won't have plenty for long - these things are a hoot to shoot!! Originally Posted By Hawkdriver:
... Now with Metalform mags and decent ammo, it runs great. The more you read, the more you will see the above statement. I bought one mag that wasn't MetalForm, I won't buy another. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/29/2012 6:01:29 PM
[Last Edit: 5/29/2012 6:02:30 PM by forever4]
People have mixed experiences with 9mm AR's. Some will swear they won't work right with anything but Metalform mags. I can not confirm or deny that statement as I have NEVER used a Metalform magazine in either of my 9mm AR's. I use three different magazine brands and don't have any issues with any of them. (CProducts, ProMag, and modified surplus military mags of unknown origin...Uzi or something)
When I built my first 9mm AR I used a RRA bottom loading magwell adapter. It took me two or three trips to the range to figure out just how to adjust it. Since learning the ins and outs of magwell adjustments I have had no further issues at all, even when I switched my magwell over to another rifle. Oddly enough using the RRA adapter in an RRA rifle gave me the most problems! I put the adapter in a Cav Arms lower and it was 100% from the first outing. My other 9mm uses a CMMG dedicated lower. Its been just perfect from the fist, never one moment of drama with that one. So, while some report all sorts of issues with various set-ups I have to say that my two 9mm AR's just hum along with my mixed box of magazines. Someday I might even buy a Metalform mag just to see what one looks like. I have seen pictures however. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/29/2012 7:48:52 PM
The easy answer, assuming you don't mind solving a problem with rectangular dollars, is simply get the 6450 Colt and have done with it. Mine has run 100% save for some over-length reloads (my fault), and it is an absolute ball to shoot. It neatly splits the difference between a .22 and the 5.56. It's easily/cheaply reloaded (none of the drama involved with bottleneck cases); I've concocted a leather flap that attaches to the carry handle that drops the empties at my feet.
It also answers the question of 'what to shoot at', as it will knock down a hefty steel plate at 50yds, but not crater them. Some of the issues with the 9mm seem to center on the notched hammers/unramped bolts that were part of the deal originally. It appears that the notched hammer business was some more of Hartford's paranoia about somebody converting one to rock n' roll. In any case, the ramped bolt and (in my case, SSA trigger) run smoothly. As the chart above makes abundantly clear, less barrel really has little effect on bullet performance. I'm running irons, so sight radius is what it is, and the 10.5 is just so much handier; my SBR paperwork is in WV. Generally a more favorable attitude to Metalforms than other choices, but that's based on Internet info more than any actual problems with mine. Moon |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/30/2012 4:02:07 AM
Mine is finally running right but it doesn't like the plastic promags. It runs colt and converted Uzi mags no problem. I can't remember if I have used the Cproduct mag yet.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/30/2012 10:33:15 AM
Mine has always been 100%, RRA 16" upper w/ramped bolt, Hahn toploader block & metalform mags. There are 110 ways to configure a 9mm AR but if you do the research you can have a setup that works right the first time. I like the flexibility of my hahn toploader ( I've got the one that doesn't require removing the bolt catch but doesn't hold open on the last round) but if you're eventually planning to run a dedicated setup the 9mm lowers cost the same as a regular lower + magwell adaptor. As far as ballistics, my 7.62x39 upper is better and the cheap surplus ammo is as cheap as 9mm reloads, but 9mm will ALWAYS be around, and I've always got bulk 9mm on hand.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/30/2012 2:00:33 PM
With good magazines and a good lower...yes. I have a RRA dedicated magwell rifle that I SBR'd to a 7" with a RRA barrel. Using RRA modified Uzi and CProducts magazines...I've yet to have a problem. Most issues folks have with the 9mm can be directly traced to magazines and the magwell block. I waited until RRA came out with their dedicated magwell lower before taking the plunge into the 9mm world. I don't like tinkering with my guns to get them to work and the various blocks on the market all have to be played with to find the "sweet spot". The newer lowers by DDLES, Lone Wolf, RRA and CMMG take all the guesswork outta the system. Stick with Metalform magazines and a quality lower and you should have no problems whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/31/2012 9:54:32 PM
[Last Edit: 6/2/2012 6:54:56 PM by theskuh]
Hahn block, metalform mags, kns pins, and RRA upper. I never have any issue with the gun in my avatar.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/31/2012 10:09:51 PM
AIM 9mm upper, Spikes mag block, Spikes 9mm buffer, converted Uzi mags. Once I broke it in and got the mag set up, no issues at all, and fast becoming my favorite AR. I do reload for it, and load a bit hotter just to make sure everything runs well.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/2/2012 10:12:45 PM
[Last Edit: 6/2/2012 10:16:16 PM by rjrivero]
Originally Posted By -Carnage-:
Originally Posted By BillyJack:
... 3. Why do most that I see seem to be SBRs? Are there many 16" out there or a reason not to go that way? Simple handgun powders are designed for about 6 inches of burn and after that you don't see much in velocity gains and the bullet can actually slow down in the longer barrel... http://ballisticsbytheinch.com/9luger.html Now, let's take all the data there. The last column if the average for that inch, the next one is the %increase by that inch. Now, let's take for example the G17 with a ~4.5" Barrel (we took the average data 4"-5"), and we show the % increase taking the 4.5" barrel as reference, starting from 10" http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/9577/9mmdata.jpg A zoomed imaged http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/4151/9mm45ref.jpg So you can see that a 13" you get the most increase regarding a 4.5" barrel as reference, a 16" barrel is useless as you get more weight and none increase in velocity regarding a 13" barrel. Using this data you get that the optimal barrel lenght available for 9mm would be a 12.5" Barrel (nearest to 13") instead of 10" or 16" Just my .02 Take this data with a grain of salt. For Blow Back guns, this doesn't hold pefectly true to form. For instance, I have a 16" 9mm Blowback AR upper and found it to be SLOWER than my 8" upper with the same bolt, and lower. Once the bolt starts to open, you begin to see the bullet drag through the rifling and actually SLOW DOWN. Interestingly enough, the 8" barrel was a few fps slower than the 5" barrel in the AR. I'm using a Rock River Bolt, ST-T2 Buffer with spacer and standard carbine spring. Perhaps a heavier Buffer would give you more velocity, but I didn't have one on hand to test with. The Glock 34 showed the same velocity as the 5" AR barrel. This was using American Eagle 147gr Factory ammo. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/2/2012 10:21:01 PM
A 16" 9mm AR kicks serious butt. It is a blast to shoot and is very controlsble. A 10.5" 9mm AR is a different kind of blast to shoot; still very controllable, still very cool, but different. The beauty of the 9mm setup is that it runs well in both barrel lengths with standard ammunition, and once you get the gun running, it runs like a top.
While I started out with a 16" carbine, I also built my SBR as a 9 (probably going to get a 11.5" 5.56 upper by the end of the year), and they both still rock. There are places that don't allow NFA weapons of any kind, and others that have special fees and limitations, so having both (the ARFCOM way!) gives me flexibility, I'm looking forward to seeing how both like cast bullets later in the year. Should be a blast. |
|