I have the option to get a Sig 516 piston upper on the cheap. Is it really worth it to make the swap from a DI gun? I use a 10.5 carbine gas upper for duty and I haven't had a bit of trouble out of it. Aside from a little gas to the face suppressed it has done everything I need out of it and has been stupid reliable. The rifle sees a high round count, but being realistic, there's not going to be a time where I shoot a lot and am unable to clean it in an LE environment. Theoretically, it should always be in near clean "ready to go" status at the beginning of each shift.
I've read reviews on the 516 and it seems like a great platform. If I was starting from zero I wouldn't hesitate to go ahead and get the 516 upper. But since I already have a proven rifle, that cash money can go a long way... new optics, ammo, whatever.
Aside from the piston equipment and the I assume additional weight, the only other difference I can see is that the Sig upper barrel is chrome lined where mine is not. I don't want to start a DI vs. piston topic. I'm trying to decide if it's an improvement for my specific job.
Anyway, I appreciate the insight.
Edit: I'll add that I have had a few parts on my DI gun that have needed replacing. Broken gas rings, one side of cotter pin sheared off, bolt was replaced when lugs started wearing heavily. None of that ever kept the gun from working. I just noticed when I cleaned the rifle. Should a quality piston upper suffer from the same stuff; I guess with the exception of gas rings?