User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/25/2015 3:35:38 PM EDT
Primary Arms 1-6X24 SFP Scope with Patented ACSS 300AAC Blackout/ 7.62X39 Reticle. It is an advanced durable optic designed for CQB and medium range, featuring our revolutionary patented partially-illuminated ACSS reticle. It is perfect for your AK, SKS, SAIGA, MINI 30, AR or any 300AAC Blackout/ 7.62X39 chambered rifle.
Tube Diameter: 30 mm Magnification: 1-6X Objective Diameter: 24 mm Ocular Diameter: 33.2 mm Exit Pupil: 9 mm- 4 mm Eye Relief: 3.3 in. - 3.5 in. Field of View: 110 feet @ 100 yards at 1X 19.3 feet @ 100 yards at 6X Click Value: 0.5 MOA Total Elevation:100 MOA Total Windage: 100 MOA Length: 10 inches Net Weight: 15.52 oz. Partial red illumination is daylight visible Fast focus eyepiece for quick magnification changes Second Focal Plane Waterproof Nitrogen purged Fog resistant Fully multi-coated lenses provide maximum clarity and resolution 6063 aluminum Comes with Flip Up Scope Covers Three year warranty $269.99 LNK TO WEB SITE 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2015 12:53:08 AM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2015 1:40:23 AM EDT
[#2]
What are the actual MOA drops for each hold over?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2015 9:24:48 AM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/26/2015 11:45:01 PM EDT
[#4]
I'm a newb to the 300 but am planning mine now so go easy on me. How does this bdc correlate to short barrels? Been looking for an optic like this for my build. This intrigues me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/29/2015 12:43:45 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm a newb to the 300 but am planning mine now so go easy on me. How does this bdc correlate to short barrels? Been looking for an optic like this for my build. This intrigues me. It's going to depend on the ammo but with 147gr Freedom Munitions loads (pictured) and a 10.5'' barrel it's pretty much spot on. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/30/2015 10:03:38 PM EDT
[#6]
Thanks plouffedaddy for the reply. I should've been more clear-I'm looking at SUBSONIC through a short barrel and don't see any subsonic loads in their data chart.
Sweet rifle too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/1/2015 12:48:54 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thanks plouffedaddy for the reply. I should've been more clear-I'm looking at SUBSONIC through a short barrel and don't see any subsonic loads in their data chart. Sweet rifle too. you'll have even more variation there. Subs will vary wildly in holdovers as in 300BLK you're talking about a 50(ish) grain difference that can all be loaded subsonic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/1/2015 11:33:01 PM EDT
[#8]
Wow, this looks complicated. Hopefully it can be memorized with use. Couple questions, Marshall. (1) By "center dot" you actually mean the chevron? (2) Why are the 300BLK ballistics listed on page 2 if You said to use a 50 yd zero in bold letters on the first page? (3) And I don't understand the 18" ranging instructions: "Center average center mass"?
Edit: words |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/2/2015 8:18:45 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wow, this looks complicated. Hopefully it can be memorized with use. Couple questions, Marshall. (1) By "center dot" you actually mean the chevron? (2) What are the 300BLK ballistics listed? You said to use a 50 yd zero in bold letter on the first page. (3) And I don't understand the 18" ranging instructions: "Center average center mass"? Not complicated at all. You only use the part of the reticle that is pertinent to what you are doing at that moment. A good example is it is way more complicated to hit a mover with no point of reference. PM me a phone number and a few times to call and I will walk you through it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/2/2015 10:14:31 AM EDT
[#10]
Thanks I'll call you.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 5:36:37 PM EDT
[#11]
This is probably a dumb question but I was curious why this 1-6 varies from youre 1-6 in 5.56. Almost an inche shorter and 2 ounces lighter.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/22/2015 6:58:52 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This is probably a dumb question but I was curious why this 1-6 varies from youre 1-6 in 5.56. Almost an inche shorter and 2 ounces lighter. Shorter so it does not ht the rear iron on a AK |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2015 3:54:35 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not complicated at all. You only use the part of the reticle that is pertinent to what you are doing at that moment. A good example is it is way more complicated to hit a mover with no point of reference. PM me a phone number and a few times to call and I will walk you through it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Wow, this looks complicated. Hopefully it can be memorized with use. Couple questions, Marshall. (1) By "center dot" you actually mean the chevron? (2) What are the 300BLK ballistics listed? You said to use a 50 yd zero in bold letter on the first page. (3) And I don't understand the 18" ranging instructions: "Center average center mass"? Not complicated at all. You only use the part of the reticle that is pertinent to what you are doing at that moment. A good example is it is way more complicated to hit a mover with no point of reference. PM me a phone number and a few times to call and I will walk you through it. What is the reticle based on ...10.5 or 16" barrel? |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2015 5:13:00 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What is the reticle based on ...10.5 or 16" barrel? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Wow, this looks complicated. Hopefully it can be memorized with use. Couple questions, Marshall. (1) By "center dot" you actually mean the chevron? (2) What are the 300BLK ballistics listed? You said to use a 50 yd zero in bold letter on the first page. (3) And I don't understand the 18" ranging instructions: "Center average center mass"? Not complicated at all. You only use the part of the reticle that is pertinent to what you are doing at that moment. A good example is it is way more complicated to hit a mover with no point of reference. PM me a phone number and a few times to call and I will walk you through it. What is the reticle based on ...10.5 or 16" barrel? Should find that in the third photo of the first post. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2015 2:40:51 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Shorter so it does not ht the rear iron on a AK Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
This is probably a dumb question but I was curious why this 1-6 varies from youre 1-6 in 5.56. Almost an inche shorter and 2 ounces lighter. Shorter so it does not ht the rear iron on a AK I know theres reasons for the difference I just meant making your 5.56 version shorter and lighter would have made it more attractive to a larger crowd.. A 15 ounce 1-6x would have garnished even more attention...especially someone doing a lightweight jack of all trades kinda build could throw one of those and an aero mount on a rifle and itd only add a bit over a pound. And purely for aesthetics I like a shorter scope...they seem to balance a bit better to Really all I'm saying is I think it'd be awesome if you guys had a version of this in 5.56...chevron reticle and lighter and shorter |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/27/2015 10:39:54 PM EDT
[#16]
This is going to be absolutely perfect for my 7.62x39 AR
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/11/2015 9:14:59 PM EDT
[#17]
60 day rule
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
