User Panel
Quoted:
I have one on order. It is going on a Bushmaster .308 MOE rifle I have on the way. BTW, they are having a Christmas sale on these wherein you order the scope at its normal price, and you can get a free quick detach mount for nothing with it. The QD mount is like $70.00 by itself. View Quote Link? |
|
|
I just got one of these and the clarity is awsome as is the illumination. I have to get it mounted and will take it to the range for a full report. I am really impressed with the glass.
pat |
|
I got mine along with the free high speed low drag quick detach mount. Very clear optics, the ACSS reticle is great both in black and red when illuminated. Mount is very solid and rugged. Anticipate taking the weapon to zero it this weekend. Primary Arms customer service is great. One of my lens cap covers was bunged up and they are already sending me another to replace it.
|
|
|
Quoted:
I had the old PA 3X and the glass was significantly better than the P223 it replaced. PA says the glass on this one is even better than the old 3X, so I'd expect a good difference View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Glass on this compared to Nikon 223 3x scope? I had the old PA 3X and the glass was significantly better than the P223 it replaced. PA says the glass on this one is even better than the old 3X, so I'd expect a good difference I have to say on mine the clarity is comparable to an ACOG. I no longer have any of my ACOGS to do a side by side comparing on but I do have a TR24 1-4 Accupoint and the clarity is very close. |
|
|
|
I bought one, and took it to the range twice now. Really like it. Clarity is exceptionally good. I like the reticle. It holds zero well. Accuracy capability is quite good, was able to do nice precision shooting with it. Quick snap shooting with it is very good. I purchased this unit because I wanted low power magnification in a package that can be used for both precision shooting, and snap shooting. That meant 2-3X level power, a quick view sight, which has fine precision aiming points as well.
A question though, what are the MOA drop levels for each of the dots? For example, how many MOA is the second dot below the first, and so-on down the line? This would be useful to plug into my ballistic calculator, as I may not be shooting the same loads it was designed for, or might even zero it for 200 rather than 300 yards. Yes, all the cool kids do 300 yard zero, and that's cool. But I like the 200 yard zero better. |
|
Quoted:
Its not a rip off and the reticle is designed in house by Primary Arms. In fact I wish I could put this reticle in some of my high dollar scopes like my Swarovski Z6i and Vortex Razor 2. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Another GRSC CRS ripoff? Its not a rip off and the reticle is designed in house by Primary Arms. In fact I wish I could put this reticle in some of my high dollar scopes like my Swarovski Z6i and Vortex Razor 2. This - it's not a rip-off of anything I've seen. There's some thought into that reticle. Best advise I can give is zero your rifle, and try like heck to see how much precision accuracy you can get. I think you'll be pleased. Then pick it up and snap-shoot off-hand at that same target again. You'll find the small horseshoe works great. Then snap-shoot again at 25 yard targets. The big horse-shoe works. And the best part is you'll naturally go with the right feature - it's not something you think about. No cumbersome flipping a sight over, and then flipping it back. Just the same sight for everything. I suppose it would be cool if it had a light sensor and auto-adjust option on the red dot. However, since the reticle is etched, that's far less necessary than something like an EOTech. Honestly, I think the whole EOTech bubble is popping. I know I finally wised up to the fact that $500 for a holographic red-dot that is never at the right light level, and doesn't self adjust, was pretty silly. And since I don't generally shoot an AR at 25 yards, the concept of low magnification makes a lot more sense for me, than no magnification plus a combersome multiplier that I added and always used, just making everything heavy. But hey, if anyone disagrees, I have a great XPS2-0 with LaRue Mounts all for sale for merely twice the price of this one scope. |
|
Quoted:
This - it's not a rip-off of anything I've seen. There's some thought into that reticle. Best advise I can give is zero your rifle, and try like heck to see how much precision accuracy you can get. I think you'll be pleased. Then pick it up and snap-shoot off-hand at that same target again. You'll find the small horseshoe works great. Then snap-shoot again at 25 yard targets. The big horse-shoe works. And the best part is you'll naturally go with the right feature - it's not something you think about. No cumbersome flipping a sight over, and then flipping it back. Just the same sight for everything. I suppose it would be cool if it had a light sensor and auto-adjust option on the red dot. However, since the reticle is etched, that's far less necessary than something like an EOTech. Honestly, I think the whole EOTech bubble is popping. I know I finally wised up to the fact that $500 for a holographic red-dot that is never at the right light level, and doesn't self adjust, was pretty silly. And since I don't generally shoot an AR at 25 yards, the concept of low magnification makes a lot more sense for me, than no magnification plus a combersome multiplier that I added and always used, just making everything heavy. But hey, if anyone disagrees, I have a great XPS2-0 with LaRue Mounts all for sale for merely twice the price of this one scope. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Another GRSC CRS ripoff? Its not a rip off and the reticle is designed in house by Primary Arms. In fact I wish I could put this reticle in some of my high dollar scopes like my Swarovski Z6i and Vortex Razor 2. This - it's not a rip-off of anything I've seen. There's some thought into that reticle. Best advise I can give is zero your rifle, and try like heck to see how much precision accuracy you can get. I think you'll be pleased. Then pick it up and snap-shoot off-hand at that same target again. You'll find the small horseshoe works great. Then snap-shoot again at 25 yard targets. The big horse-shoe works. And the best part is you'll naturally go with the right feature - it's not something you think about. No cumbersome flipping a sight over, and then flipping it back. Just the same sight for everything. I suppose it would be cool if it had a light sensor and auto-adjust option on the red dot. However, since the reticle is etched, that's far less necessary than something like an EOTech. Honestly, I think the whole EOTech bubble is popping. I know I finally wised up to the fact that $500 for a holographic red-dot that is never at the right light level, and doesn't self adjust, was pretty silly. And since I don't generally shoot an AR at 25 yards, the concept of low magnification makes a lot more sense for me, than no magnification plus a combersome multiplier that I added and always used, just making everything heavy. But hey, if anyone disagrees, I have a great XPS2-0 with LaRue Mounts all for sale for merely twice the price of this one scope. Exactly! When designing it my goal was to be very fast snap shooting up 0-50 with large horseshoe, again 100-200 the small horseshoe, after that the BDC takes over in conjunction with auto range. I originally designed this reticle to go into an Eotech and be used with Magnifier. Then the question was asked " why not combine them in one light weight non battery dependent system?" the 2.5x ACSS CQB-m was born! Dimitri |
|
I'm gonna need to start saving pennies, cause I've decided to get one of these.
|
|
Quoted:
I bought one, and took it to the range twice now. Really like it. Clarity is exceptionally good. I like the reticle. It holds zero well. Accuracy capability is quite good, was able to do nice precision shooting with it. Quick snap shooting with it is very good. I purchased this unit because I wanted low power magnification in a package that can be used for both precision shooting, and snap shooting. That meant 2-3X level power, a quick view sight, which has fine precision aiming points as well. A question though, what are the MOA drop levels for each of the dots? For example, how many MOA is the second dot below the first, and so-on down the line? This would be useful to plug into my ballistic calculator, as I may not be shooting the same loads it was designed for, or might even zero it for 200 rather than 300 yards. Yes, all the cool kids do 300 yard zero, and that's cool. But I like the 200 yard zero better. http://www.ar15.com/media/viewFile.html?i=26758 View Quote PM sent 50 yard 0=200 yard 0 Dimitri |
|
I just got one and it is VERY nice. For the $$ can't go wrong.
|
|
|
If there are any around this summer to late spring I am going to buy one and then torture test the hell out of it with video. See how well they do at holding and returning to zero
|
|
I got mine mounted in the American Defense QD mount and sighted it in today.....took 18 rounds to get it where I wanted. The center dot is the same size as the bull at 100 yards (1 moa dot??). Given that it is designed as a quick snap-shoot CQB reticle, I was very pleased with its precision. In other words, I'm diggin' the reticle. The flip caps could fit a bit tighter, but that is minor.
|
|
Quoted:
I got mine mounted in the American Defense QD mount and sighted it in today.....took 18 rounds to get it where I wanted. The center dot is the same size as the bull at 100 yards (1 moa dot??). Given that it is designed as a quick snap-shoot CQB reticle, I was very pleased with its precision. In other words, I'm diggin' the reticle. The flip caps could fit a bit tighter, but that is minor. View Quote Took mine out to get sighted as well. Couldnt be happier. Worth ever single penny. The free QD deal was just too good to pass up. |
|
Quoted:
I got mine mounted in the American Defense QD mount and sighted it in today.....took 18 rounds to get it where I wanted. The center dot is the same size as the bull at 100 yards (1 moa dot??). Given that it is designed as a quick snap-shoot CQB reticle, I was very pleased with its precision. In other words, I'm diggin' the reticle. The flip caps could fit a bit tighter, but that is minor. View Quote It's made to be quick and very accurate. It's what the ACSS system reticles are known for. Dimitri |
|
Quoted:
Took mine out to get sighted as well. Couldnt be happier. Worth ever single penny. The free QD deal was just too good to pass up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I got mine mounted in the American Defense QD mount and sighted it in today.....took 18 rounds to get it where I wanted. The center dot is the same size as the bull at 100 yards (1 moa dot??). Given that it is designed as a quick snap-shoot CQB reticle, I was very pleased with its precision. In other words, I'm diggin' the reticle. The flip caps could fit a bit tighter, but that is minor. Took mine out to get sighted as well. Couldnt be happier. Worth ever single penny. The free QD deal was just too good to pass up. Aw man! Early buyers didn't get that! |
|
|
Quoted:
That was an into offer that we are not running anymore Dimitri View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Does this still come with the ADM mount? That was an into offer that we are not running anymore Dimitri We ran out during the promo. When they arrive early next week I will add a discounted ($10 off) option to the accessories drop down menu. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I got mine mounted in the American Defense QD mount and sighted it in today.....took 18 rounds to get it where I wanted. The center dot is the same size as the bull at 100 yards (1 moa dot??). Given that it is designed as a quick snap-shoot CQB reticle, I was very pleased with its precision. In other words, I'm diggin' the reticle. The flip caps could fit a bit tighter, but that is minor. Took mine out to get sighted as well. Couldnt be happier. Worth ever single penny. The free QD deal was just too good to pass up. Aw man! Early buyers didn't get that! Yep...I should have waited a couple of weeks to order mine. Oh well, will be ordering a QD mount soon anyway. Love the scope though! I also have one of the old 3x scopes. The new glass and reticle are definately an improvement. Seems like the eye relief is a bit more forgiving. Also dig the external design of the 2.5x. Not a whole lot smaller, but feels like it because of the cleaner design. |
|
Quoted:
Yep...I should have waited a couple of weeks to order mine. Oh well, will be ordering a QD mount soon anyway. Love the scope though! I also have one of the old 3x scopes. The new glass and reticle are definately an improvement. Seems like the eye relief is a bit more forgiving. Also dig the external design of the 2.5x. Not a whole lot smaller, but feels like it because of the cleaner design. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I got mine mounted in the American Defense QD mount and sighted it in today.....took 18 rounds to get it where I wanted. The center dot is the same size as the bull at 100 yards (1 moa dot??). Given that it is designed as a quick snap-shoot CQB reticle, I was very pleased with its precision. In other words, I'm diggin' the reticle. The flip caps could fit a bit tighter, but that is minor. Took mine out to get sighted as well. Couldnt be happier. Worth ever single penny. The free QD deal was just too good to pass up. Aw man! Early buyers didn't get that! Yep...I should have waited a couple of weeks to order mine. Oh well, will be ordering a QD mount soon anyway. Love the scope though! I also have one of the old 3x scopes. The new glass and reticle are definately an improvement. Seems like the eye relief is a bit more forgiving. Also dig the external design of the 2.5x. Not a whole lot smaller, but feels like it because of the cleaner design. I am going to hit up ADM for a special price on the mount. |
|
Thanks for the write up on that, I have been looking for something like this for my sbr and this scope looks like it would fit the bill nicely.
|
|
Took mine out on my M4 this week, fired it at 200 and 300 yards. It did fairly well. The optical clarity still impresses. The fine precision dot is a bit hard to see when really trying to aim precisely at 300 yards, and I think it would have been better to have these go even brighter than they do - the dot is tough to see on black bullseye. That said, if I were shooting a gong, I would have hit it pretty regularly.
In comparison to an EOTech plus multiplier, this is still way better. Got home, and my QD mount upgrade showed up. The QD mount is quite nice. I was apprehensive about getting one, fearing that elevate my sight by being a bigger and heavier base. Not at all, it replaces the existing base, and weighs about the same too - if not even less. I like the QD mount quite a bit, and recommend it as an upgrade. |
|
Quoted:
Took mine out on my M4 this week, fired it at 200 and 300 yards. It did fairly well. The optical clarity still impresses. The fine precision dot is a bit hard to see when really trying to aim precisely at 300 yards, and I think it would have been better to have these go even brighter than they do - the dot is tough to see on black bullseye. That said, if I were shooting a gong, I would have hit it pretty regularly. In comparison to an EOTech plus multiplier, this is still way better. Got home, and my QD mount upgrade showed up. The QD mount is quite nice. I was apprehensive about getting one, fearing that elevate my sight by being a bigger and heavier base. Not at all, it replaces the existing base, and weighs about the same too - if not even less. I like the QD mount quite a bit, and recommend it as an upgrade. View Quote Are you not able to see the illuminated dots against the blk gong? Dimitri |
|
Quoted:
Are you not able to see the illuminated dots against the blk gong? Dimitri View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Took mine out on my M4 this week, fired it at 200 and 300 yards. It did fairly well. The optical clarity still impresses. The fine precision dot is a bit hard to see when really trying to aim precisely at 300 yards, and I think it would have been better to have these go even brighter than they do - the dot is tough to see on black bullseye. That said, if I were shooting a gong, I would have hit it pretty regularly. In comparison to an EOTech plus multiplier, this is still way better. Got home, and my QD mount upgrade showed up. The QD mount is quite nice. I was apprehensive about getting one, fearing that elevate my sight by being a bigger and heavier base. Not at all, it replaces the existing base, and weighs about the same too - if not even less. I like the QD mount quite a bit, and recommend it as an upgrade. Are you not able to see the illuminated dots against the blk gong? Dimitri Not as well as I'd like. They are small and quite fine, and for my eyes not easy to see against a black background on a bright day - the red just isn't quite strong enough. I was shooting near Pearland - ironically enough |
|
Quoted:
Not as well as I'd like. They are small and quite fine, and for my eyes not easy to see against a black background on a bright day - the red just isn't quite strong enough. I was shooting near Pearland - ironically enough View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Took mine out on my M4 this week, fired it at 200 and 300 yards. It did fairly well. The optical clarity still impresses. The fine precision dot is a bit hard to see when really trying to aim precisely at 300 yards, and I think it would have been better to have these go even brighter than they do - the dot is tough to see on black bullseye. That said, if I were shooting a gong, I would have hit it pretty regularly. In comparison to an EOTech plus multiplier, this is still way better. Got home, and my QD mount upgrade showed up. The QD mount is quite nice. I was apprehensive about getting one, fearing that elevate my sight by being a bigger and heavier base. Not at all, it replaces the existing base, and weighs about the same too - if not even less. I like the QD mount quite a bit, and recommend it as an upgrade. Are you not able to see the illuminated dots against the blk gong? Dimitri Not as well as I'd like. They are small and quite fine, and for my eyes not easy to see against a black background on a bright day - the red just isn't quite strong enough. I was shooting near Pearland - ironically enough Could it be that your having difficulty spotting a dark target against a dark background. Illumination does not help with that as much. I had the same issue the other day with the targets we put up at 400 yards that were in the shadows but it was just as hard with a 2000 Vortex 5-20x scope and a 3-15 Nightforce. Painting the targets white helped a bunch. Sometimes it just hard to see stuff but good clear glass helps a ton and this new sight does have remarkably clear glass. Pat |
|
Quoted:
Could it be that your having difficulty spotting a dark target against a dark background. Illumination does not help with that as much. I had the same issue the other day with the targets we put up at 400 yards that were in the shadows but it was just as hard with a 2000 Vortex 5-20x scope and a 3-15 Nightforce. Painting the targets white helped a bunch. Sometimes it just hard to see stuff but good clear glass helps a ton and this new sight does have remarkably clear glass. Pat View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Took mine out on my M4 this week, fired it at 200 and 300 yards. It did fairly well. The optical clarity still impresses. The fine precision dot is a bit hard to see when really trying to aim precisely at 300 yards, and I think it would have been better to have these go even brighter than they do - the dot is tough to see on black bullseye. That said, if I were shooting a gong, I would have hit it pretty regularly. In comparison to an EOTech plus multiplier, this is still way better. Got home, and my QD mount upgrade showed up. The QD mount is quite nice. I was apprehensive about getting one, fearing that elevate my sight by being a bigger and heavier base. Not at all, it replaces the existing base, and weighs about the same too - if not even less. I like the QD mount quite a bit, and recommend it as an upgrade. Are you not able to see the illuminated dots against the blk gong? Dimitri Not as well as I'd like. They are small and quite fine, and for my eyes not easy to see against a black background on a bright day - the red just isn't quite strong enough. I was shooting near Pearland - ironically enough Could it be that your having difficulty spotting a dark target against a dark background. Illumination does not help with that as much. I had the same issue the other day with the targets we put up at 400 yards that were in the shadows but it was just as hard with a 2000 Vortex 5-20x scope and a 3-15 Nightforce. Painting the targets white helped a bunch. Sometimes it just hard to see stuff but good clear glass helps a ton and this new sight does have remarkably clear glass. Pat Agreed! We would paint our targets white and in the desert shadow lined at 600-800 yards you should not see them! I started painting them that bright yellow safety color. |
|
|
Quoted:
Yesterday I was able to take it out to 200 yards. http://i40.tinypic.com/54hsm8.jpg Not bad. That's something like a 3" group. For a light weight BBL with ball ammo - that's mechanically about as good as you can hope for. Heck, I think the high shot was me. The scope wasn't the limiter. Dimly lit target again. View Quote Good shooting! Dimitri |
|
Reticle seems cluttered, nobody here is gonna use that optic to shoot anybody with a weapon on the run.
|
|
Quoted:
Reticle seems cluttered, nobody here is gonna use that optic to shoot anybody with a weapon on the run or at anytime. View Quote Really? Hopefully not but I would not talk in absolutes as that means you will be wrong at least some of the time. Also in three gun we do shoot moving targets. Here is an example. moving target |
|
Quoted:
Reticle seems cluttered, nobody here is gonna use that optic to shoot anybody with a weapon on the run. View Quote Try it. I did. When shooting from the bench, clutter (the finer dots) are the aiming points, you don't notice the horseshoes. Then you stand up and try snap shooting, at something far, and all you even see is the fine Horseshoe - you don't see the other clutter. Shoot while on the move at close things, all you see is the big Horseshoe. It works - try it. |
|
Quoted:
Reticle seems cluttered, nobody here is gonna use that optic to shoot anybody with a weapon on the run. View Quote The reticle is far from cluttered. Dimitri put a great deal of thought and testing into the reticle. It flat out works for BDC and movers. Pat showed one example in the post above. I shoot movers every time I go to Rifles Only to train. Most good carbine classes include some movers. Plenty of people here train and use their AR in classes. We offer a 1-4X with a simple German 4 reticle for those that want that as well as most other major brands of scope. Plenty of reticle choose from but IMHO this is the best AR reticle for a combination of CQB anbd mid range. On a side note I am proud to say we had the first patent associated the the ACSS system get awarded today. |
|
You should add 6.8 to your description as well.
There are quite a few loads that match up nearly perfectly to your BDC. The most common is a 110gr at 2600-2700fps. Most all hand loaders are going to be in that range, and most factory ammo that is bought by 6.8 shooters that care enough to worry about a BDC reticle will be in that range as well since most buy the spec II / tactical / combat loads. Very few shooters by the standard SAAMI loads with are 2550-2600fps for more than plinking, and nobody makes the old SAAMI chambers anymore. I would say close to 85% of all 6.8 rifles out there were made in Spec II or equivalent. and out of that remaining 15%, probably at least 5% or so have had the chambers reamed with the Spec II reamer. Example here, SSA loaded, Nosler 110gr AB , 2650fps BDC in MOA 100 yards - 0 200 yards- 1.7 300 yards- 4.6 400 yards- 8.2 500 yards- 12.5 Just wanted to give you a heads up. Even SAMMI loads will be very close. Most all loads, in all weights from 85gr - 120gr will be close enough to that to use it effectively, with the lighter bullets being flatter out to 400 yards, and the heavier being a little better at 500. |
|
Quoted:
The reticle is far from cluttered. Dimitri put a great deal of thought and testing into the reticle. It flat out works for BDC and movers. Pat showed one example in the post above. I shoot movers every time I go to Rifles Only to train. Most good carbine classes include some movers. Plenty of people here train and use their AR in classes. We offer a 1-4X with a simple German 4 reticle for those that want that as well as most other major brands of scope. Plenty of reticle choose from but IMHO this is the best AR reticle for a combination of CQB anbd mid range. On a side note I am proud to say we had the first patent associated the the ACSS system get awarded today. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Reticle seems cluttered, nobody here is gonna use that optic to shoot anybody with a weapon on the run. The reticle is far from cluttered. Dimitri put a great deal of thought and testing into the reticle. It flat out works for BDC and movers. Pat showed one example in the post above. I shoot movers every time I go to Rifles Only to train. Most good carbine classes include some movers. Plenty of people here train and use their AR in classes. We offer a 1-4X with a simple German 4 reticle for those that want that as well as most other major brands of scope. Plenty of reticle choose from but IMHO this is the best AR reticle for a combination of CQB anbd mid range. On a side note I am proud to say we had the first patent associated the the ACSS system get awarded today. Congrats on the patent award! Pat |
|
Quoted:
Reticle seems cluttered, nobody here is gonna use that optic to shoot anybody with a weapon on the run. View Quote Your not using it right. Up close 0-50 all you need to do is snap shoot using the large horse shoe. 100-200 use the small horseshoe 300-600 the fine dots. There many that train against moving targets. Get some rounds down range. Dimitri |
|
Quoted:
You should add 6.8 to your description as well. There are quite a few loads that match up nearly perfectly to your BDC. The most common is a 110gr at 2600-2700fps. Most all hand loaders are going to be in that range, and most factory ammo that is bought by 6.8 shooters that care enough to worry about a BDC reticle will be in that range as well since most buy the spec II / tactical / combat loads. Very few shooters by the standard SAAMI loads with are 2550-2600fps for more than plinking, and nobody makes the old SAAMI chambers anymore. I would say close to 85% of all 6.8 rifles out there were made in Spec II or equivalent. and out of that remaining 15%, probably at least 5% or so have had the chambers reamed with the Spec II reamer. Example here, SSA loaded, Nosler 110gr AB , 2650fps BDC in MOA 100 yards - 0 200 yards- 1.7 300 yards- 4.6 400 yards- 8.2 500 yards- 12.5 Just wanted to give you a heads up. Even SAMMI loads will be very close. Most all loads, in all weights from 85gr - 120gr will be close enough to that to use it effectively, with the lighter bullets being flatter out to 400 yards, and the heavier being a little better at 500. View Quote We are thanks you Dimitri |
|
Quoted:
You should add 6.8 to your description as well. There are quite a few loads that match up nearly perfectly to your BDC. The most common is a 110gr at 2600-2700fps. Most all hand loaders are going to be in that range, and most factory ammo that is bought by 6.8 shooters that care enough to worry about a BDC reticle will be in that range as well since most buy the spec II / tactical / combat loads. Very few shooters by the standard SAAMI loads with are 2550-2600fps for more than plinking, and nobody makes the old SAAMI chambers anymore. I would say close to 85% of all 6.8 rifles out there were made in Spec II or equivalent. and out of that remaining 15%, probably at least 5% or so have had the chambers reamed with the Spec II reamer. Example here, SSA loaded, Nosler 110gr AB , 2650fps BDC in MOA 100 yards - 0 200 yards- 1.7 300 yards- 4.6 400 yards- 8.2 500 yards- 12.5 Just wanted to give you a heads up. Even SAMMI loads will be very close. Most all loads, in all weights from 85gr - 120gr will be close enough to that to use it effectively, with the lighter bullets being flatter out to 400 yards, and the heavier being a little better at 500. View Quote From page 1, the 50-300 yard dot is at 0. 400 yard dot at 4.74 MOA 500 yard dot at 8.43 MOA 600 yard dot at 12.44 MOA This lines up really well with the 110 gr 6.8 load shown above. Do a 100 yard zero instead of a 50 yard. The center dot would then be good 50-200 yards. The next dot would be for 300 yards, not 400. The third dot would be for 400 yards, not 500. The lowest dot would match up for 500 yards, not 600. I have one on my lightweight 6.8. It is the third Primary Arms compact scope on that rifle: Original 4x, improved 3x, now the 2.5x. I like it very much. |
|
|
I'm currently looking for an optic such as this one.
I had a look at the Burris AR 332, but the small size of the reticle turned me away from it. Anyone know if the reticle in the PA is any larger? |
|
Quoted: http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff166/ar15reloader/ACSS_800yards.jpg This was sent in from a customer shooting the ACSS at 800 yards using M855! Dimitri View Quote Was that with the 2.5x or with the 6x? |
|
Quoted:
Was that with the 2.5x or with the 6x? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff166/ar15reloader/ACSS_800yards.jpg This was sent in from a customer shooting the ACSS at 800 yards using M855! Dimitri Was that with the 2.5x or with the 6x? That was a 6X. The 2.5X was tested out to 600 yards this was with a .308 in very windy conditions Dimitri |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.