User Panel
Ordered a set direct yesterday. The pins on my LMT are a pain in the butt. Can't wait to give these a try.
BAD ASS was already a must for any build. May be adding these to the list. |
|
You won't be disappointed. Well thought out and executed upgrade!
|
|
|
|
The EMR and EBC will probably be introduced very close together, we'll finalize the design on both of them very soon
|
|
Not sure how I missed this all this time, but I just put 3 on my amazon wish lish.
|
|
|
We're working with Seekins on a Battle Arms version, which has a few things we want that will be a little different than the Seekins original. But Seekins will be producing them for us.
Same quality, the Battle Arms version will bear family resemblance that are unique to our levers and EMR, there's couple other minor changes as well |
|
It would be pretty cool to see a catch that had a flat surface covered in dempels .
|
|
santantactical's STT-15 receiver has dimpled control surface on the mag release button, bolt release, etc.
|
|
IM inbound.
EMR prototypes are going out tomorrow Quoted:
Well, if you need a tester for the EMR I think I can help you out. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't know, the EMR still needs to be tested, the receiver has a few little tweaks to complete Well, if you need a tester for the EMR I think I can help you out. |
|
The prototype units are not threaded, therefore not usable on a lower. They are meant to test out the theory we have on the button
|
|
Quoted: santantactical's STT-15 receiver has dimpled control surface on the mag release button, bolt release, etc. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Duffy have you gotten to handle their lower? I just saw one for the first time online and am really thinking of buying it over the AXTS AX556, considering both are true billet ambi lowers... but the STT-15 comes in at over $100 less. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
santantactical's STT-15 receiver has dimpled control surface on the mag release button, bolt release, etc. I don't think the STT-15 has an ambi bolt hold back, therefore it isn't a true ambi lower. |
|
It's really a nice lower, the only thing some folks didn't like, which has since been corrected, is the right side bolt release. It's now closer to the receiver body, before it was jutting out at an angle.
They may be running another special for Christmas that includes our selector and EPS, you should contact Dennis and find out. Dennis is a great guy, I think there's a lot of good things to come from his company |
|
That is awesome to hear! I contacted them via their web form on Friday and hoping to hear back from them soon. If they are running such a deal I am most certainly getting their lower with your parts. I LOVE the BAD-ASS selector and the pin set is just icing on the cake. For a personal rifle it's almost necessary in the field.
|
|
If you don't hear from them, please send me an email with your info and I'll pass it to Dennis
|
|
My EPS set is sitting in customs clearance now, together with couple of new Magpul light mounts. Can't wait to get all of them.
Video how to change rear pin without removing castle nut is very helpful - HK does stack nut pretty good. |
|
Will these work on a colt sporter with a screw on pivot pin?
|
|
As long as the pivot pin hole is 0.250 and the pivot pin spring / detent housing has a hole to accommodate a spring and detent, it'll work.
If yours has a 0.315 pivot pin hole, it will not work |
|
|
Quoted:
I really need to pick up a few more sets.... these are a great upgrade and highly functional. <a href="http://s849.photobucket.com/user/UWone77/media/1535518_589945141077610_686766533_n_zps2d7d2a8b.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab55/UWone77/1535518_589945141077610_686766533_n_zps2d7d2a8b.jpg</a> View Quote Still digging these pins. I have a request though. I would love to see levers for the BAD CASS system in a length exactly half way between the short and long levers. The long is, well, too long and the short takes a little too much force to move even after shortening the spring. I think just a bit more length on a short one would greatly enhance the leverage without it getting in the way during use. I know I'm splitting hairs but its worth a shot. |
|
Any suggestion as to the length?
We thought about a "mid-length" lever, we weren't sure how to position it, whether as a thumb side lever (with less leverage than a standard lever), or a trigger finger side lever (more usable, but more interference for the trigger finger at the same time). |
|
Quoted:
You got them shipped to Poland? View Quote Of course. They are under $100 (and not on USML) and you are registered manufacturer so no separate export license was needed. Are you? Anyway my usual exporter is usually very strict on following export regulations (sometimes more strict, that regulations are). |
|
|
They will work on the HK416, not sure about the MR556 though, since they need a tool or bullet to unlock. If the MR556 still uses the 0.250 holes for the take down and pivot pin, and there are no changes in the receiver to accommodate the locking aspects of the pins, ours should work just fine.
|
|
Quoted:
Any suggestion as to the length? We thought about a "mid-length" lever, we weren't sure how to position it, whether as a thumb side lever (with less leverage than a standard lever), or a trigger finger side lever (more usable, but more interference for the trigger finger at the same time). View Quote As far as length I would say dead center between the long and short lever. As far as placement I would probably use it on both side but the thumb side for sure. I'm running 2 shorts on the 45 short throw system. |
|
Quoted:
They will work on the HK416, not sure about the MR556 though, since they need a tool or bullet to unlock. If the MR556 still uses the 0.250 holes for the take down and pivot pin, and there are no changes in the receiver to accommodate the locking aspects of the pins, ours should work just fine. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
They will work on the HK416, not sure about the MR556 though, since they need a tool or bullet to unlock. If the MR556 still uses the 0.250 holes for the take down and pivot pin, and there are no changes in the receiver to accommodate the locking aspects of the pins, ours should work just fine. Modification is only in pins, receivers are standard. Those HK pins are actually good at removing play between receivers, but very early MR223 rifles had standard pins from HK416 and play was minimal anyway (I had one of those very early rifles). I was going to replace them with standard pins, but when I saw your pins listed in Brownells, I knew I want them Quoted:
Quoted:
Any suggestion as to the length? We thought about a "mid-length" lever, we weren't sure how to position it, whether as a thumb side lever (with less leverage than a standard lever), or a trigger finger side lever (more usable, but more interference for the trigger finger at the same time). As far as length I would say dead center between the long and short lever. As far as placement I would probably use it on both side but the thumb side for sure. I'm running 2 shorts on the 45 short throw system. I did not use BAD-ASS 45dgr, but I use other make 45dgr safety (Hera - uses similar length for levers). I also think that for 45dgr option lever length in between those two would be improvement. Especially thumb side, as mentioned. |
|
Thanks, good to know. We don't have an HK MR556 in the shop to play around, I reckon we may have to get one, for T&E of course
RE: intermediate length lever, we need to discuss this internally. As mentioned, I had thought about it but did not pursue it because it seems to be neither here nor there, but we will look into it. Given the number of levers we already have, it'll add to the logistics mess we kind of created by offering so many different levers already. Options are good for customers, it's somewhat a nightmare for us and dealers lol. |
|
just got my set in... I was custom cutting YHM pins. can wait to get these in, i was tired of having to "make" the YHM set up work.
|
|
|
Quoted: Say, didn't I send you a T&E set back in October? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Say, didn't I send you a T&E set back in October? Quoted: If all goes well, I'll install my pins today. Um, well yes. With a Matech upgrade kit that I ordered. Working two jobs I had no time to install them, and had a conflict of which gun to put them in. They are in now. |
|
Thanks for the suggestion
There is one problem with such levers: there will need to be two versions, one for the left side, and one for the right |
|
Quoted:
Thanks for the suggestion There is one problem with such levers: there will need to be two versions, one for the left side, and one for the right View Quote True. Some people, like me, could benefit from only 1 lever like was mocked up. I use the left side safety lever to take the gun off safe, while I use the right side safety lever to put the gun on safe. Would work perfectly |
|
Quoted:
I have an idea about this, but need to draw it up. I'll knock something out in a little while. ETA: Please excuse the crude drawing and I didn't specify dimensions etc. because I have no clue what they would be. I always wanted to see this based on the thin lever. The serrations would, of course, be on the angled surface facing the rear of the rifle. Continuing the serrations over the side wouldn't be a bad idea either. I use various combinations of levers based on lower, but I've always been partial to the thin and short-thin, but I find myself using the hybrid on rifles with selector stops. I think a design like this would work well in that scenario as well. I didn't show the serrations on the bottom, but we all know they exist. http://www.hillierr.com/arfcom/thin_slant.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Any suggestion as to the length? We thought about a "mid-length" lever, we weren't sure how to position it, whether as a thumb side lever (with less leverage than a standard lever), or a trigger finger side lever (more usable, but more interference for the trigger finger at the same time). I have an idea about this, but need to draw it up. I'll knock something out in a little while. ETA: Please excuse the crude drawing and I didn't specify dimensions etc. because I have no clue what they would be. I always wanted to see this based on the thin lever. The serrations would, of course, be on the angled surface facing the rear of the rifle. Continuing the serrations over the side wouldn't be a bad idea either. I use various combinations of levers based on lower, but I've always been partial to the thin and short-thin, but I find myself using the hybrid on rifles with selector stops. I think a design like this would work well in that scenario as well. I didn't show the serrations on the bottom, but we all know they exist. http://www.hillierr.com/arfcom/thin_slant.jpg I like that idea. I'd buy one to try it out |
|
Quoted: True. Some people, like me, could benefit from only 1 lever like was mocked up. I use the left side safety lever to take the gun off safe, while I use the right side safety lever to put the gun on safe. Would work perfectly View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Thanks for the suggestion There is one problem with such levers: there will need to be two versions, one for the left side, and one for the right True. Some people, like me, could benefit from only 1 lever like was mocked up. I use the left side safety lever to take the gun off safe, while I use the right side safety lever to put the gun on safe. Would work perfectly |
|
|
Quoted:
I have an idea about this, but need to draw it up. I'll knock something out in a little while. ETA: Please excuse the crude drawing and I didn't specify dimensions etc. because I have no clue what they would be. I always wanted to see this based on the thin lever. The serrations would, of course, be on the angled surface facing the rear of the rifle. Continuing the serrations over the side wouldn't be a bad idea either. I use various combinations of levers based on lower, but I've always been partial to the thin and short-thin, but I find myself using the hybrid on rifles with selector stops. I think a design like this would work well in that scenario as well. I didn't show the serrations on the bottom, but we all know they exist. http://www.hillierr.com/arfcom/thin_slant.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Any suggestion as to the length? We thought about a "mid-length" lever, we weren't sure how to position it, whether as a thumb side lever (with less leverage than a standard lever), or a trigger finger side lever (more usable, but more interference for the trigger finger at the same time). I have an idea about this, but need to draw it up. I'll knock something out in a little while. ETA: Please excuse the crude drawing and I didn't specify dimensions etc. because I have no clue what they would be. I always wanted to see this based on the thin lever. The serrations would, of course, be on the angled surface facing the rear of the rifle. Continuing the serrations over the side wouldn't be a bad idea either. I use various combinations of levers based on lower, but I've always been partial to the thin and short-thin, but I find myself using the hybrid on rifles with selector stops. I think a design like this would work well in that scenario as well. I didn't show the serrations on the bottom, but we all know they exist. http://www.hillierr.com/arfcom/thin_slant.jpg This is inspiring. To keep it even for both sides a medium length tear drop shape would be nice. |
|
Quoted:
Leave it to me to not totally think it through. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Thanks for the suggestion There is one problem with such levers: there will need to be two versions, one for the left side, and one for the right Leave it to me to not totally think it through. TC, awesome idea and draw up! agree with the top and bottom serrations. want one on both sides for switch hitting. iso |
|
Just ordered a set of these! I have been ordering something everyday for the last week, about to order a trigger group from you guys!
Thanks Mike |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.