User Panel
Posted: 4/7/2015 8:53:41 PM EDT
For my Retro brothers out there, I see Fulton Armory has A-1 Slick Side reproduction uppers list as ( in stock ) for $149.95 each, their part number FA-FU-167, Just wanted to help those in need. Kevin
|
|
Unfortunately they are Cerakoted rather than anodized.
At least someone is making them again. http://www.fulton-armory.com/upperreceivera1usginofanocd.aspx |
|
it looks to be strait forge. hopefully they will offer them in the white ,for those wanting to do 601 or 602 conversions.
|
|
Oh, I didn't need to see that. I didn't want to destroy a 604 upper for my absurd Colt Concept gun... One of these will work nicely.
|
|
Quoted:
Unfortunately they are Cerakoted rather than anodized. At least someone is making them again. http://www.fulton-armory.com/upperreceivera1usginofanocd.aspx View Quote Cerakote what a bummer |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Unfortunately they are Cerakoted rather than anodized. At least someone is making them again. http://www.fulton-armory.com/upperreceivera1usginofanocd.aspx Cerakote what a bummer If they offered them "in the white" unfinished, I'd have 3 on the way already. Wes |
|
I'm not familiar with cerekote. I am in the market for a 604 upper though. NDS said possibly this summer taking orders again for 604 uppers. Would prefer a matching upper/lower combination. Think I'll hold out for now.
|
|
Quoted:
Unfortunately they are Cerakoted rather than anodized. At least someone is making them again. http://www.fulton-armory.com/upperreceivera1usginofanocd.aspx View Quote Why would anyone not anodize the upper in the process.. Doesn't this harden the surface???? |
|
We have the 604 upper receiver forgings in house, and now we need to get them into the CNC machining schedule.
It looks good that we will have available inventory this summer (2015). We will offer these gray anodized and 'in the white'. Final price has not yet been determined. Harlan NoDak Spud LLC |
|
Quoted:
Why would anyone not anodize the upper in the process.. Doesn't this harden the surface???? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Unfortunately they are Cerakoted rather than anodized. At least someone is making them again. http://www.fulton-armory.com/upperreceivera1usginofanocd.aspx Why would anyone not anodize the upper in the process.. Doesn't this harden the surface???? ....What a looooonnng....strange trip it's been. Yes it hardens the surface. Lots of scope and gun makers are going cerakote because it's cheaper , easier, more colors etc. Cost effective, but I don't like it as a substitute for Ano. |
|
Quoted:
For my Retro brothers out there, I see Fulton Armory has A-1 Slick Side reproduction uppers list as ( in stock ) for $149.95 each, their part number FA-FU-167, Just wanted to help those in need. Kevin View Quote but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside |
|
Quoted:
but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
For my Retro brothers out there, I see Fulton Armory has A-1 Slick Side reproduction uppers list as ( in stock ) for $149.95 each, their part number FA-FU-167, Just wanted to help those in need. Kevin but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside There is now! |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For my Retro brothers out there, I see Fulton Armory has A-1 Slick Side reproduction uppers list as ( in stock ) for $149.95 each, their part number FA-FU-167, Just wanted to help those in need. Kevin but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside There is now! Don't get me started on mislabeled C7s |
|
Quoted:
We have the 604 upper receiver forgings in house, and now we need to get them into the CNC machining schedule. It looks good that we will have available inventory this summer (2015). We will offer these gray anodized and 'in the white'. Final price has not yet been determined. Harlan NoDak Spud LLC View Quote Can we pre-order or get on the list for these? |
|
Quoted:
but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
For my Retro brothers out there, I see Fulton Armory has A-1 Slick Side reproduction uppers list as ( in stock ) for $149.95 each, their part number FA-FU-167, Just wanted to help those in need. Kevin but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside That's always bugged me too. |
|
Quoted:
Can we pre-order or get on the list for these? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
We have the 604 upper receiver forgings in house, and now we need to get them into the CNC machining schedule. It looks good that we will have available inventory this summer (2015). We will offer these gray anodized and 'in the white'. Final price has not yet been determined. Harlan NoDak Spud LLC Can we pre-order or get on the list for these? We are not yet taking pre-orders, but you can email us with your indication of interest, and we will send out update notifications as needed. Send the email to [email protected]. Thanks. Harlan NoDak Spud LLC |
|
Quoted:
Don't get me started on mislabeled C7s View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For my Retro brothers out there, I see Fulton Armory has A-1 Slick Side reproduction uppers list as ( in stock ) for $149.95 each, their part number FA-FU-167, Just wanted to help those in need. Kevin but there's no such thing as an A1 slickside There is now! Don't get me started on mislabeled C7s Those are A2's with field sights, Colt's literature said so. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
<a href="http://s983.photobucket.com/user/44Echo10/media/Gun%20Stuff/AR/29987_zps8b719de4.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i983.photobucket.com/albums/ae318/44Echo10/Gun%20Stuff/AR/29987_zps8b719de4.jpg</a> <a href="http://s983.photobucket.com/user/44Echo10/media/Gun%20Stuff/AR/723-733b_zps85b80ac1.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i983.photobucket.com/albums/ae318/44Echo10/Gun%20Stuff/AR/723-733b_zps85b80ac1.jpg</a> View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Those are A2's with field sights, Colt's literature said so. Interesting, Id like to see a scan of that. <a href="http://s983.photobucket.com/user/44Echo10/media/Gun%20Stuff/AR/29987_zps8b719de4.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i983.photobucket.com/albums/ae318/44Echo10/Gun%20Stuff/AR/29987_zps8b719de4.jpg</a> <a href="http://s983.photobucket.com/user/44Echo10/media/Gun%20Stuff/AR/723-733b_zps85b80ac1.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i983.photobucket.com/albums/ae318/44Echo10/Gun%20Stuff/AR/723-733b_zps85b80ac1.jpg</a> Wow, Ive seen those before but never really looked that close. Thanks! Now, Im hijacking the thread but... What was the difference between a 711 and 715? |
|
Quoted:
Wow, Ive seen those before but never really looked that close. Thanks! Now, Im hijacking the thread but... What was the difference between a 711 and 715? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Those are A2's with field sights, Colt's literature said so. Interesting, Id like to see a scan of that. <a href="http://s983.photobucket.com/user/44Echo10/media/Gun%20Stuff/AR/29987_zps8b719de4.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i983.photobucket.com/albums/ae318/44Echo10/Gun%20Stuff/AR/29987_zps8b719de4.jpg</a> <a href="http://s983.photobucket.com/user/44Echo10/media/Gun%20Stuff/AR/723-733b_zps85b80ac1.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i983.photobucket.com/albums/ae318/44Echo10/Gun%20Stuff/AR/723-733b_zps85b80ac1.jpg</a> Wow, Ive seen those before but never really looked that close. Thanks! Now, Im hijacking the thread but... What was the difference between a 711 and 715? 715 had the A2/FS upper and a 1/7 A2 profile barrel. The 711 pictured has an A1 upper and 1/7 (1/12?) pencil barrel. |
|
interesting they are C marked. that's usually reserved for colt. maybe a 9mm overrun that they decided to ceracoat? i think manufacturers have made them remove forge codes in the past. you'll see ground off forge codes on early bushmasters that once had the FN forge code of F K.
|
|
Interesting theory. It's not a DMPS upper. They tend to smooth out the flash on the inside of the carry handle as far as I can remember, well at least on the A2 uppers anyway. I have it mounted on my NDS lower, it's a very tight fit. Over all I'm pretty pleased with it, even if it's not gray.
|
|
How hard would it be to have one stripped and anodized. Probably not very cost efficient when you could buy one from NoDak though...
I'm tempted to buy one from Fulton, don't know if I can wait til summer. |
|
Quoted:
How hard would it be to have one stripped and anodized. Probably not very cost efficient when you could buy one from NoDak though... I'm tempted to buy one from Fulton, don't know if I can wait til summer. View Quote i think ceracoat is pretty tough, don't think you can chemically strip it meaning you'd have to blast it off and victor says that reanodizing something that's been blasted doesn't yield great results. he prefers to chemically strip old anodizing so you'd probably end up spending time and money and it still not turn out great. |
|
Quoted:
Thanks to the "enablers" on this forum, I took a chance and ordered the slick upper from Fulton. I am surprised with the finish on it concidering it is cerekote. I've always wanted a 604 model and now I will have one, black one however. The upper does match the color and texture of the black NDS 16A1 lower pretty closely. I will try to get pictures of the completed rifle up soon. Thanks to all here for the invaluable information and guidance. The "C" is raised if anyone inquires and apparently my iphone sees dust there better than my eye did. http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/q583/bpb165/image4_zpsil8mqokm.jpg http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/q583/bpb165/image3_zpsf9dd6ejk.jpg http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/q583/bpb165/image2_zpsheflfroz.jpg http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/q583/bpb165/image1_zpsg5epfbsj.jpg View Quote Looks great. I'd pull trigger on one but I need gray for NDS XM16E1 lower it will go on. Looking forward to pic's on your black NDS lower for comparison. Also let us know of any parts fitment issues. |
|
Quoted:
i think ceracoat is pretty tough, don't think you can chemically strip it meaning you'd have to blast it off and victor says that reanodizing something that's been blasted doesn't yield great results. he prefers to chemically strip old anodizing so you'd probably end up spending time and money and it still not turn out great. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How hard would it be to have one stripped and anodized. Probably not very cost efficient when you could buy one from NoDak though... I'm tempted to buy one from Fulton, don't know if I can wait til summer. i think ceracoat is pretty tough, don't think you can chemically strip it meaning you'd have to blast it off and victor says that reanodizing something that's been blasted doesn't yield great results. he prefers to chemically strip old anodizing so you'd probably end up spending time and money and it still not turn out great. I needed an upper stripped and re-anodized a couple months ago, Victor told me as long as it isn't Cerakoted he can do it. Now I see why. |
|
Quoted:
i think ceracoat is pretty tough, don't think you can chemically strip it meaning you'd have to blast it off and victor says that reanodizing something that's been blasted doesn't yield great results. he prefers to chemically strip old anodizing so you'd probably end up spending time and money and it still not turn out great. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
How hard would it be to have one stripped and anodized. Probably not very cost efficient when you could buy one from NoDak though... I'm tempted to buy one from Fulton, don't know if I can wait til summer. i think ceracoat is pretty tough, don't think you can chemically strip it meaning you'd have to blast it off and victor says that reanodizing something that's been blasted doesn't yield great results. he prefers to chemically strip old anodizing so you'd probably end up spending time and money and it still not turn out great. Thank you for the info. I still might go ahead and grab one of these to build something with and just leave the ceracoat. |
|
The "C" and "Splintered A" are standard on these forgings.
This is a house owned tool, and Anchor Harvey has just not bothered to change the engraving program for the die when it gets reworked. As you know we remove the forge codes and stamp ours with a letter "N" at the front of the ejection port area. ETA: it also looks like they didn't cut the slot for the CH latch properly. |
|
Quoted:
The "C" and "Splintered A" are standard on these forgings. This is a house owned tool, and Anchor Harvey has just not bothered to change the engraving program for the die when it gets reworked. As you know we remove the forge codes and stamp ours with a letter "N" at the front of the ejection port area. ETA: it also looks like they didn't cut the slot for the CH latch properly. View Quote cool. i'm surprised colt hasn't told them to remove it if it's not for them. |
|
|
The thing is sure gorgeous. Steep on price, and I dislike the fact that they're not anodized, but gorgeous!
|
|
Quoted:
The devil is in the details What's the right slot cut look like? Wes View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
ETA: it also looks like they didn't cut the slot for the CH latch properly. The devil is in the details What's the right slot cut look like? Wes Attached File |
|
I bought 2 of these uppers and I didn't catch that the charging handle latch slot wasn't completely milled out... I guess I'll see if ADCO can milled them out to original spec. Still happy that I picked them up since I now have a couple of slick slide uppers in my parts box!!
I'm OK with the cerakote finish... Anybody knows the name for the cerakote finish that will pretty much match a late 60s XM16E1 and a late 70s M16A1 Colt/USGI contract rifles? If they don't offer an exact or close color match, what would their best stock color for Colt/USGI rifles... That leans to the darker shade that isn't the current black M4/M16A4finish? |
|
So if one wanted to get one of these for a GAU-5ish build but wasn't a purist when it comes to color this would be adequate?
Also, regarding the "improperly" cut CH catch slot - the only issue is due to aesthetics compared to the originals not function correct? |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.