Quote History Quoted:
However unlikely, if they were incorrectly logged as rifles, they're rifles...ask the BATFE to clarify that for you if need be.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They were purchased NEW, stripped? If yes build whatever you want.
Unless they were incorrectly logged as "rifles" at the transfer.
That would not change the legal status of the firearm however.
- OS
However
unlikely, if they were
incorrectly logged as
rifles, they're
rifles...ask the BATFE to clarify that for you if need be.
Oh, I see, so if an FFL puts that your Ruger .357 revolver is "long gun" and "rifle" on the 4473, that makes it a legal rifle, eh? So you could then put a stock on it too I suppose.
Or if he transfers you a complete AR rifle as "other firearm" you can make a pistol out of it? How about he writes "rifle" for your Remmie 870, I guess you can cut it down to 16" instead of 18" because it's legally not really a shotgun. Right.
Hell, he can even correctly transfer you a used lower as "other firearm", but that doesn't mean you can legally make a pistol out of it.
Etc.
What an FFL puts on a 4473 might cock an eyebrow during an investigation, but in fact does not at all conclusively determine the legal classification of the firearm or what you can legally do with it after the fact. A mistake on his part does not make something other than it really is, and provable by combination of manufacturer/distributor record of config, interplay of fields 18 and 29 of the 4473, his bound book, your receipt, his accounting ledger, whatever.
Patently absurd claim.
- OS