Quote History Quoted:
I chose 308... even if it is tracing a large arc. .
I'll take the extra barrel life at the expense of one or two tenths of MOA.
View Quote
Performance advantage of the 6.5s over .308 at 1000yds is far more than you currently understand, even better than a 190gr SMK from the .300 Win Mag.
My 130gr VLD load at 1000yds from .260 Rem at sea level is
8.6/29.7 mils drop, 2 mils drift with 10mph wind.
A .308 175gr BTHP at 1000yds from the same barrel length is
12.5 mils/43 MOA drop, 3 mils drift in same conditions.
Your hit probability with a .308 at 1000yds is extremely low, even with corrections.
When you do hit steel, it often looks like a miss because the bullet is coming down at such a high angle, that it deflects off the plate without spalling, and kicks up dirt in front of the target like a miss would, so it can be difficult to register unless you shoot massive gongs at 1000yds. I shoot reduced sils at 1000yds, because 1000yds is actually kinda boring with the 6.5mm, but it flies straight to the target, not down at it like a .308 does.
There's a reason why I sold all my .308 components, dies, and rifles. I chased that cat with several 24" and 22" .308s, and the juice was nowhere near worth the squeeze, especially when you look at the rifle weight and recoil.
The only place .30 bores make sense are in magnums, and the 7mm will still smoke it all day long from the larger cases, especially the 195gr Berger EOL, which beats the 230gr Berger .30s and 250gr .338s even.
The OP said his dad wants to shoot at 1000yds. My experience over the years chasing 1000yds with .308 is that you have a very frustrating time at the range, whereas with 6.5mm, you have a sh*t-eating grin on your face the whole time, and see 1000yds as not much of a challenge, looking for longer distances to stretch its legs at. The .260 Rem is still supersonic past 1400yds at sea level with my 130gr load. It is extremely flat at 1000yds, much more than I would have ever thought after years of watching .308 mortar-like performance.