Quoted:
Quoted:
300blk does one thing well, suppressed subsonic. It was designed for that purpose. It is superb in that roll.
300blk is not and never will be a proper medium game hunting round. It is better than 5.56, yes. However, it cannot reach expansion velocity for the .30 cal hunting bullets typically loaded. Thr ttsx loads that are about all I would dream of shooting a deer with from a BO are 1.50ea. Hardly a cheap round but not insane I suppose. Combine that with a short barrel and you will have a deer wounder.
Look at that chart above. You want to hit a deer with at least 1000ft/lbs to reliably kill it. If we trust the above chart, which I think is quite hot.... a 10" barrel with that bullet will have the round at 892ft/lbs at 100yards.
For comparison, a 120gr sst fired from a 6.8 spcII with a moderate load will hold 1000ft/lbs past 300 yards easily. I wont fan boy the 6.8 either... the grendel can do it too. Both of these are proper hunting loads for an ar15 platform. You can even shorten the barrel and still maintain 1000ft/lbs well within your estimated range.
I dont think you will be happy with this gun as a hunting rig. It will make you smile at the range with the can.... no doubt about that... but you will be greatly disappointed when you try to shoot a deer. Especially a big Wisconsin buck. Dont be deceived into the belief "it's a .30 cal and .30s kill deer". Or that its just like a 30-30... its not. It never will be. The 300 has its niche, its not in the Wisconsin deer stand.
You have no idea what you are talking about. I just love it when the people who have never fired or hunted with the 300BLK come and tell those who have how bad it is at hunting.
First the 300BLK was designed as a supersonic 30 cal rifle that was able to run subsonics as well.
Second your so twisted that you can't even read a chart right. It shows that the 300BLK out of a 10 inch barrel is 1,153 ft-lbs and 1,403 ft-lbs if you bump it up to a 16 inch barrel not 892 ft-lbs like you posted.
Third looking at the
Hornady Ballistics chart it shows your precious 6.8 only pushing 1,328 ft-lbs at 100 yards and 877 ft-lbs at 300 yards for a similar equipped 110 gr bullet out of a 16 inch barrel. But I am sure you will tell us how wrong hornady chart is and how much faster you could actually push the bullet if you handloaded it and went outside of the SAAMI pressure specs.
Fourth and the best of your moronic theory of what the 300BLK can and can't do falls by the wayside when it has been a proven deer killer by those who have shot the thousands of deer with the 300BLK and had no problem dropping them where they stand.
So, please don't come on these threads and spam your 6.8 drivel when in reality the 300BLK will do everything the 6.8 will do within 300 yards just as well or better and not need any specialty mags and bolts.
Just another point at how ignorant your post is when saying that the hunting bullets specifically made for the 300BLK won't expand. Because I don't know of anyone using plinking ammunition in either the 6.8 or the 300BLK when it comes to hunting. The many bullets specifically made for the 300BLK like the Barnes 110gr Black tips will fully expand to over a half an inch (a lot more expansion that what the 6.8 can do) out to 300 yards and penetrate 20 inches of ballistics gel at that range making it more than capable of taking any deer out to 300 yards.
Do you think we are all hunting with Mil Surplus tracers or 168gr pulls that won't expand? I guess you do since you seem to know so little about the 300BLK yet you have the audacity to post on it.
I think Mark Twain put it best when talking about people like you: It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.