Site Notices
11/28/2014 6:01:52 AM
11/27/2014 12:14:39 AM
Author
Message
theenforcer
Offline
Posts: 331
Feedback: 0% (0)
Posted: 4/10/2013 11:11:18 AM EST
[Last Edit: 4/10/2013 11:11:44 AM EST by theenforcer]
Curious what are the pro's and cons of both and which do you consider be the more economical and productive not going to run any suppressors considering 11" 7.62 x 39 pistol vs 8.5" - 300 Blackout pistol?
makintrax73
Member
Offline
Posts: 2406
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 11:35:13 AM EST
The answer depends mostly on whether you reload or not. 300blk is a great reloader's cartridge because of the availability of brass (convert from 223) and bullets.

zangief7
Offline
Posts: 91
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 11:55:03 AM EST
Been wondering the same. Also have been wondering why I don't see 7.63x39 rounds loaded with these 110gr and 125gr bullets that people are putting in the super sonic 300 BLK. Also seems like they could load subsonic 220 gr rounds as well. But I'm not a reloader so have no idea.
huntkng
Offline
Posts: 39
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 12:14:48 PM EST
You might want to add the 7.63x40 from Wilson Arms. Supersonic with 110 & 125's, uses .223 brass and reviews are good as a medium size game hunting round. No need for a different bolt. I comparing all three of these now for next build, not in a pistol though..

Bill in OR
huntkng
Offline
Posts: 40
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 12:15:36 PM EST
Oop's 7.62x40 is what I meant.....not 7.63x40.
makintrax73
Member
Offline
Posts: 2407
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 12:46:18 PM EST
Originally Posted By zangief7:
Been wondering the same. Also have been wondering why I don't see 7.63x39 rounds loaded with these 110gr and 125gr bullets that people are putting in the super sonic 300 BLK. Also seems like they could load subsonic 220 gr rounds as well. But I'm not a reloader so have no idea.


Most of those other bullets are .308 and x39 uses .310 bullets. You can use them, but may not obtain good accuracy.

.308 subs will be the same. Not sure if you can even load them to mag length in x39 case or not?
rcassettyjr
Offline
Posts: 202
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 12:50:47 PM EST
Another thing to consider is ammo availability. If you don't reload you will want to be able to run to the store and buy ammo. See if your local store sells 300 blackout. Mine didn't but they all sell x39. That made my decision for me.
JC10311
Curmudgeon
NRAMilitary
Offline
Posts: 2673
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 12:55:46 PM EST
CONGRATULATIONS!!!!


You are the 10,000th poster asking this same question.

I don't normally dump on people for their posts, but this topic has been brought up so many times and it always ends in a pissing match between the 300 BLK supporters and the 6.8 SPC II fans. Do a few searches or just go to the 300 BLK master thread.

-- End of rant --
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.
Karl Marx [Sound like anyone you know???]
theenforcer
Offline
Posts: 332
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 2:20:56 PM EST
[Last Edit: 4/10/2013 2:22:00 PM EST by theenforcer]
Well reloading is out of the question I dont do it maybe i should but one thing for sure theres more 7.62 x 39 more readily available than 300 blk so is there anyother good comparison's or reasons for 1 over the other?
jwb47
Offline
Posts: 1862
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 4:46:41 PM EST
I see ak 7.62 x 39 pistols quite frequently and would say for you that would be your best bet .
d5griffin
Member
Offline
Posts: 1227
Feedback: 100% (30)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 4:54:21 PM EST
I would factor in the cost of a simple reloading setup vs. a 7.62x39 bolt and mags (two things you dont have to buy with 300blk)

After some initial frustrations were ironed out, I enjoy reloading now
ztug
Offline
Posts: 1623
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 5:14:29 PM EST
7.62x39 needs a special bolt and there are frequently problems with them breaking. It also requires a special magazine. If you want to shoot 7.62x39 buy an AK.
theenforcer
Offline
Posts: 333
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 6:38:21 PM EST
[Last Edit: 4/10/2013 6:42:50 PM EST by theenforcer]
Ok i have aks & i have ar 7.62 x 39 an plenty ammo i was looking for honest feedback im considering. A 300 blackout but im also wondering what are the performance difference between the two say out to 200 yds max say both have 11 inch barrels?
charles_lee_ray
Offline
Posts: 274
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/10/2013 7:15:54 PM EST
Originally Posted By theenforcer:
Ok i have aks & i have ar 7.62 x 39 an plenty ammo i was looking for honest feedback im considering. A 300 blackout but im also wondering what are the performance difference between the two say out to 200 yds max say both have 11 inch barrels?


Because Of the better ballistic coefficient the .300 blackout will retain more energy over a longer distance. .300 blackout also tends to have less flash and less concussive force out of shorter barrels due to its powder burn efficencey. I like the .300 blackout and after 2 years of searching for an alternate caliber it's what I decided on, I'm quite happy with it, I've used a 9" pistol at 200 yards and had pretty good results considering I was not sighted in at all.
wanderson
Offline
Posts: 702
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/11/2013 2:46:40 AM EST
If we're talking economy then 7.62x39, hands down. Last year I bought several crates of surplus ammo for 18 cents/round, I've seen .22lr sell for that lately. And this week I was hitting some local big box stores & gun shops for ammo and although there was no .223/5.56 to be found, one shop had several crates of Brown Bear 7.62x39 for sale (no limit). And the pre-panic price for most new production steel (Wolf, Tula, etc) is 25 cents/round. Best price I've seen .300 is Remington for 60 cents/round, still cheap compared to many other calibers but not 'reloaded 9mm in bulk' cheap. The biggest weaknesses in the 7.62x39 AR are the tapered case in a straight AR magwell, ASC mags are the best solution for this, and there are AR47 style lowers that take AK mags. And the bolt face, which is thinner than a 5.56/.300 blackout. I've not had any issues with mine in close to 2k rounds but I did recently upgrade to an LMT enhanced bolt as insurance. Even if I broke a bolt every 1k rounds that's still cheap shooting. And I'm not picking up spent cases. But if you prefer .300 don't let reloading scare you, it's simple once you know what to do and starter kits with single stage presses can be had for $100.
EdgecrusherXES_45
FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!
Offline
Posts: 7438
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/11/2013 4:33:54 AM EST
Originally Posted By ztug:
7.62x39 needs a special bolt and there are frequently problems with them breaking. It also requires a special magazine. If you want to shoot 7.62x39 buy an AK.


This... To this day I have not see in person a AR chambered in 7.62x39 that ran 100% no malfunctions. 300blk uses standard AR mags, standard AR bolt everything is the same except the barrel/gas tube lengths.
Yes 7.62x39 is more widely available if you want to shoot it get an AK or SKS.
I was born an AR in my hands. Behind the gun I will make my final stand, and that is why they call me .... bad company I cannot deny.... Bad company till the day I die.
theenforcer
Offline
Posts: 334
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/11/2013 5:41:36 AM EST
[Last Edit: 4/11/2013 7:52:52 AM EST by theenforcer]
Thanks Guys for your honest input because of it and what I kinda figured out myself I have just bought me a 10.5" 300 Black Out Barrel. I think it will be nice to have Both !!!

THANKYOU !!!
Charlielima
Offline
Posts: 17
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/11/2013 12:07:58 PM EST
I can say the same for any AR15 ...