|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 10:34:29 AM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 10:34:45 AM by 9mmCarbine]
THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT Now for my considerations and requirements (would love some input here)- I know that these guns can be heavy and that Larue has the PredatAR series to shave some of that bulk down, but not seeing one of these in person I would be worried about ending up with a "skinny model" type gun that sacrifices performance in the name of saving weight. I have resigned myself to the fact that this gun is going to be heavy and I am not overly concerned about the weight, although since I do plan on carrying this gun in the woods any weight I can save would be beneficial. However, I don't want to sacrifice the durability, accuracy, or usefulness of the gun solely to save weight. Barrel length- I've read A LOT about this and have heard conflicting stories about what is needed. It sounds like an 18" barrel is a good compromise between overall range and accuracy as well as overall length of the gun, but since the LMT MWS isn't offered in an 18" configuration that would rule that one out and I don't want to discount that one. Where the MWS is appealing to me is the quick barrel change ability, because I could see having both a 16" barrel for battle rifle configuration as well as the 20" for the long range/hunting application. In actuality, most of my hunting shots would be inside 300 yards so I could probably relegate the 16" barrel to hunting duty as well. Something is telling me, however, that the 20" barrel would be useful at those 600 and 700 yard ranges. What say you? Other than weight & barrel length, the only factors I have found myself comparing as I search for "The Gun" are a rail system and I do want a collapsible stock. I would appreciate any light that could be shed on any other main points on the LMT MWS versus the Larue series of guns. I ended up ruling out an AR10 early on just based upon my gut, which I don't know if that was correct or not. It just seemed to me that the LMT & Larue offerings are a little more up to date and include a few more bells and whistles off the shelf. Unfortunately, the LWRC REPR is outside of my budget but I am not really a fan of that left side charging handle anyway. At this point, I am leaning towards the MWS pending some thoughts from you guys. I know these "what should I buy" threads come up from time to time and can get a little old, but I have done about as much research as I can on my own and I know that there are a good number of you here that really know these guns. I am not a gun newbie by any stretch of the imagination, but I really am just not familiar with these guns. Any time spent hammering out a reply with some good info for me to consider would be greatly appreciated. I'm only doing one of these 308's and I just don't want to make a mistake. Thanks, guys.... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:07:30 AM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 11:17:58 AM by RandyStacyE]
As far as barrel length goes ... I went with an 18" but would have also been happy with a 20".
Barrel removal. That is something that I personally would not want to do or do often. Some barrels can be a real bitch to remove for the average Joe. I would assemble it myself. It's not hard to do and doesn't require a great deal of knowledge or much at all in the way of tools. You'll want the use of a vice, a cheapo punch set, a hammer (nothing special), a upper receiver vice block and a torque wrench (which you can buy, use and return if you don't want to keep it). You'll actually save money in comparison to buying most any top tier brand name fully assembled rifle. You can get the very best barrel you can afford, a good BCG (bolt carrier group), an excellent trigger and you'll be way below the cost of a LaRue or most any other top tier brand name. The rest is just parts/accessories. Stock is a preference. Hand guard is a preference, though many appear to like the Troy hand guards. Believe it or not, but ARs are not hard to build. I bought 2 ARs before it dawned on me that I should have been assembling them myself. If you consider assembling one you generally have 2 options. You can use forged or billet upper & lower. I used a billet upper & lower because I liked the monolithic upper. If you use a forged upper & lower you will also want to look into the available hand guards to install. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:10:17 AM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 11:21:51 AM by jasonusvi]
Someone on M4carbine did a quick side by side impressions thread on the LMT / PreditAR. I own the LMT MWS, really like it, and think it is good value. The monolithic rail lends itself to maximum optics choice... standard rings are fine and no canteliver is needed.
You may have to list each of the categories and assign a weight to each of the factors. If you value barrel change significantly then the choice is clear. I have the factory 16" CL that I am considering turning down to save some weight (I believe the PreditAR comes with a skinnier barrel), a 20" Noveske 6.5 Creedmoor, and am considering a 338 Federal barrel. You can't go wrong with your listed choices. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:21:46 AM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 11:35:46 AM by WhyNotDev8]
I own a LMT MWS and I love it. It's extremely accurate and well built.. I have no intentions of running around with thing as a battle rifle so the weight is not an issue.. However, from the factory the rifle is WAY overgassed, the trigger (compared to other two stages) blows, and for it's weight I felt as if it recoiled a lot more than it should. I added a UBR, Slash Buffer, and SD-E trigger and I am extremely pleased with the rifle now.
My sister owns a 16" PredetAR 7.62 that I have had extensive trigger time. The PredetAR is simply better in every category outside of POI shift if you plan on using a suppressor. It's significantly lighter, finished better, and recoils softer (and I have a Slash XH buffer in my MWS). I was surprised to see the PredetAR only uses a H2 buffer. For off hand shooting, or if you want to run a "battle rifle" the PredetAR simply cannot be beat. It handles like a 5.56 rifle. The LMT was a better value when it's price was around $2200-$2300, at the current prices I think the PredetAR is a better choice. I bought my MWS gently used for a really good price (under $2000) so I went with it. I do think it's somewhat telling that you see A LOT of LMT's for sale on the EE. I can't remember seeing a PredetAR. There is a reason for that. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:36:32 AM
Originally Posted By WhyNotDev8:
I do think it's somewhat telling that you see A LOT of LMT's for sale on the EE. I can't remember seeing a PredetAR. I don't see a cause and effect. Probably more MWSs listed because a bunch more have been sold... and they tend not to stay for sale too long. You planning to dump the LMT that you love and pick up the Larue you love more? |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:44:28 AM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 11:48:10 AM by WhyNotDev8]
Originally Posted By jasonusvi:
Originally Posted By WhyNotDev8:
I do think it's somewhat telling that you see A LOT of LMT's for sale on the EE. I can't remember seeing a PredetAR. I don't see a cause and effect. Probably more MWSs listed because a bunch more have been sold... and they tend not to stay for sale too long. You planning to dump the LMT that you love and pick up the Larue you love more? No, because at the price point I purchased my LMT (even after my modifications) I felt like it was a better value and I also plan on possibly trying some different calibers in the future. I realize the amount of LMT's dwarfs the PredetAR's in regards to how many are produced, but you see a decent amount of MWS's on EE. I think I have seen ONE PredetAR (now that I think about it) for sale on the EE. I think the overgassing and more so the weight aspect of the MWS really bothers people - it is a heavy pig. I see and hear a lot less gripes about the LaRue OBR and PredetAR than the LMT MWS. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:45:22 AM
Originally Posted By WhyNotDev8:
My experience is the same.
I own a LMT MWS and I love it. It's extremely accurate and well built.. I have no intentions of running around with thing as a battle rifle so the weight is not an issue.. However, from the factory the rifle is WAY overgassed, the trigger (compared to other two stages) blows, and for it's weight I felt as if it recoiled a lot more than it should. I added a UBR, Slash Buffer, and SD-E trigger and I am extremely pleased with the rifle now. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 12:35:49 PM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 12:41:15 PM by RWVA210]
I am the guy who did the side by side on M4c.and not trying to derail the thread
1. The LMT is heavier...but when held side by side with an optic the difference isn't overwhelming or in your face noticable. I handed both rifles to at least 6 people and all agreed that it was close. In fact the owner of the predatAR's first comment when he handled the MWS was" hey this isn't that bad" I think the weight issue is overblown in some regards. would I want a lighter rifle..well ..yes but after handling both side by side I wasn't looking to ditch my MWS in fact became more pleased with it knowing that the difference wasn't as huge as is made out in the interwebs. If you have it set up in a similar fashion it is not what I would call a "pig" go weigh a tarted up Ar and tell me. My 16" with a acog weighs 10 + lbs the lmt 12. We didn't have a scale when they were compared ...but there will be a another time when we get together and I'll make sure to have one.
2. Shooting both side by side I can say just the opposite. The LMT shoots noticeably softer. In fact it shoots softer than an M1a, FAL and G3. If you have limited experience shooting .308 and your main centerfires have been AR's then I bet it feels huge. Again the owner of the PredatAR agreed that the LMT was smoother and I was shooting M118 and he was shooting 147 gr surplus. Regardless ..the recoil on both factory stock rifles is NOT an issue IMO and the difference minor but noticeable 3. The factory trigger in the LMT is adequate. I shot .05moa groups ( 5 rnds) at 100 yrds with it. That being said I bought a Geiselle SSA-E....because I could...it is a better trigger but man you can't argue with the results of the LMT ...
4. 16" is Cl barrel is pretty darn sweet....will shoot 800 easily and beyond. The difference between an 16" and 18" is about 100fps. BUT if I want an 18" I can get one and change it myself with a torque wrench with the MWS in minutes.... 5. Accuracy. Well because of circumstances We didn't have the time t do a side by side. I would imagine that the PredatAR is a very accurate as well ..as accurate LMT? Dunno but I think the LMT may have the advantage and especially after the PredatAR barrel heats up as it has a pencil barrel profile. Until that happens I bet they are close though maybe .05 moa vs .75moa.
Guess I am saying this......don't take the LMT off your list. I bought mine used and it was score ! As JSuvi noted there are more LMT's out there so they come up more frequently but NOT all the time. There far fewer PredatAr's out there but I have seen some for sale.I may have bought the PredtAR if the LMT didn't fall in my lap. Don't get me wrong you CANNOT make a mistake buying either rifle. THe Larue was a quality rifle...equal to that of the LMT but IMO firsthand knowledge of the two rifles the differences aren't as great as they are made out be. Believe me I was nervous when we went to compare but both of us went home very happy with our choices.
hope this helps |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 12:58:19 PM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 1:00:49 PM by 9mmCarbine]
Thanks for the good info, guys!
I guess to just muddy the waters a little further, is there any reason to consider a POF in the same league as the LMT and the Larue offerings? As I said, I don't want to leave any stone unturned. Also, everyone has been talking about the PredatAR in this thread, but not the OBR. Please add whatever comments you might have about that one as well, as it is in the running too. From what I've found, the thing that SUCKS about all these rifles is availability right now. I guess my timing blows because of the political/gun scare right now- I am just a gun enthusiast who happens to be in the market for a gun at the wrong time.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 1:04:35 PM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 1:07:22 PM by BB]
Originally Posted By RWVA210:
Not my experience; I've owned several AR10s, DPMS 308s as well as M14s (issued in the .mil), G3s and probably every FAL variant ever made. The LMT recoil was worse than all of them, which was surprising for a gun of its weight. If that's not your experience with yours then there was a QA issue with my gun for sure because it was overgassed.
2. Shooting both side by side I can say just the opposite. The LMT shoots noticeably softer. In fact it shoots softer than an M1a, FAL and G3. If you have limited experience shooting .308 and your main centerfires have been AR's then I bet it feels huge. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 1:06:50 PM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 1:53:01 PM by WhyNotDev8]
There is a ~2lb weight difference between the PredetAR and LMT according to my scale. For a bench gun weight doesn't matter but for hunters and run and gun it does. And its not only the weight but the balance. The LMT is more front heavy. I found the LW50 barrel to be more accurate than the rock barrel, however I haven't got the barrel absurdly hot.
Both are awesome rifles with pros and cons. I just feel the PredetAR covers more area and has less cons. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 1:26:37 PM
Originally Posted By BB:
Originally Posted By RWVA210:
Not my experience; I've owned several AR10s, DPMS 308s as well as M14s (issued in the .mil), G3s and probably every FAL variant ever made. The LMT recoil was worse than all of them, which was surprising for a gun of its weight. If that's not your experience with yours then there was a QA issue with my gun for sure because it was overgassed.
2. Shooting both side by side I can say just the opposite. The LMT shoots noticeably softer. In fact it shoots softer than an M1a, FAL and G3. If you have limited experience shooting .308 and your main centerfires have been AR's then I bet it feels huge. This was my experience as well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 1:44:27 PM
[Last Edit: 5/2/2012 1:45:20 PM by RWVA210]
Originally Posted By BB:
Originally Posted By RWVA210:
Not my experience; I've owned several AR10s, DPMS 308s as well as M14s (issued in the .mil), G3s and probably every FAL variant ever made. The LMT recoil was worse than all of them, which was surprising for a gun of its weight. If that's not your experience with yours then there was a QA issue with my gun for sure because it was overgassed.
2. Shooting both side by side I can say just the opposite. The LMT shoots noticeably softer. In fact it shoots softer than an M1a, FAL and G3. If you have limited experience shooting .308 and your main centerfires have been AR's then I bet it feels huge. This is not only my experience..my friends who have shot it all have similar impressions about the recoil but ymmv. As I said I am not trying to fanboi the LMT but give my experience. Recoil is a hard thing to quantify on the interwebs and subject to individual perception. All of the rifle choices that started this thread are great ...simple as that. I own the LMT and can give my impressions and have had the opportunity to compare it the predatAR. I'd love to shoot the Scar 17 and OBR too. Bottom line is that there some great options for a "modern" .308 rifle right now unlike 5 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 1:52:32 PM
Originally Posted By WhyNotDev8:
There is a ~2lb weight difference between the PredetAR and LMT according to my scale. For a bench gun weight doesn't matter but for hunters and run and gun it does. And its not only the weight but the balance. The LMT is more front heavy. I found the LW50 barrel to be more accurate than the rock barrel, however I haven't gotten the barrel absurdly hot. Both are awesome rifles with pros and cons. I just feel the PredetAR covers more area and has less cons. Definitely the PredatAr is balanced way better than the LMT. We tested both by balancing the rifle on our hand at the magwell....clear winner..... PredatAR Yeah the weight sounds about right as far as it being noticeably perceptible it doesn't seem huge...our impressions ...when we compared the two. Two rifles with slightly different roles in mind. LMT a DMR with battle rifle capabilities and the Larue an accurate battle rifle with dmr capabilities....lol |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/2/2012 2:00:37 PM
Originally Posted By RWVA210:
Agreed. I'd still have the LMT if I hadnt decided to build a custom gun to suit my niche; I've shot the SCAR and its fantastic. Didnt care for the charging handle but nothings perfect. Now I just need to get my hands on a Colt 901 and a set of AX762 receivers and I'll be set.
Originally Posted By BB:
Originally Posted By RWVA210:
Not my experience; I've owned several AR10s, DPMS 308s as well as M14s (issued in the .mil), G3s and probably every FAL variant ever made. The LMT recoil was worse than all of them, which was surprising for a gun of its weight. If that's not your experience with yours then there was a QA issue with my gun for sure because it was overgassed.
2. Shooting both side by side I can say just the opposite. The LMT shoots noticeably softer. In fact it shoots softer than an M1a, FAL and G3. If you have limited experience shooting .308 and your main centerfires have been AR's then I bet it feels huge. This is not only my experience..my friends who have shot it all have similar impressions about the recoil but ymmv. As I said I am not trying to fanboi the LMT but give my experience. Recoil is a hard thing to quantify on the interwebs and subject to individual perception. All of the rifle choices that started this thread are great ...simple as that. I own the LMT and can give my impressions and have had the opportunity to compare it the predatAR. I'd love to shoot the Scar 17 and OBR too. Bottom line is that there some great options for a "modern" .308 rifle right now unlike 5 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/4/2012 8:25:06 PM
Well, if all goes well and I can cut a decent deal I should be picking up a 20" CL MWS tomorrow. After thinking long and hard, I think the longer barrel will serve me well and allow the gun to reach its full potential. I must admit however that the shorter 16" is appealing just because of OAL concerns.
I will let you guys know how I do. Then it will be time to talk optics! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/4/2012 11:18:57 PM
larue makes a nice rifle but i went with the LMT, i just think it offers a lot more to the shooter.
while the predatar is lighter than the LMT, that can be made up by having the barrel reprofiled and swapping the LMT sopmod for a CTR i can have both a lightweight 16 inch barrel and a 20 inch precision barrel,larue doesnt offer spare uppers or QD barrels i have the option of picking up a spare barrel in 308,260,6.5, 338 fed to taylor the gun to my needs i can form 1 it and pick up a 13.5 barrel with the Larue, you get what you get, your stuck with what ever configuration you chose, they make a great rifle, just dont feel that for my needs, a 16 inch barrel will suit all of my needs, i want a 14.5 and a SS 20 inch 308 for to suit me for close range stuff all the way out to 1000 LMT has done a great job of putting out a weapon that you can really set up as you need. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2012 12:11:29 AM
[Last Edit: 5/5/2012 12:15:56 AM by FREEFALLE7]
For the money (under 3k) the LMT kicks ass, The SR-25 is a awesome weapon if you have that kinda cash
I sold my LMT for a SR-25 EC so far no difference in accuracy only looks and weight. My SR-25 shoots a little lighter(LMT gun is still a little over gassed IMO). Gonna pick up another LMT when $$ allows it, its a great gun that I would recommend to anyone. My sold LMT
My SR-25
Best advice is to sell a kidney and buy all 3, its the only way to be sure Free |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/7/2012 3:49:29 PM
9mmCarbine,
I'm in the same boat - as I too am looking at the 308 ARs and have decided on the LMT. Where should I look to purchase in Florida? Thanks, |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/7/2012 11:38:49 PM
Another vote for the MWS. I have one and while I dont have experience with other .308 ARs, I have owned the following: FAL carbine and rifle, Saiga .308, PTR 91. To me the MWS shoots smoother and recoils considerably less than the PTR and the Saiga. The Fals having an adjustable gas system shot pretty smooth but my Fal carbine was not as reliable as MWS.
If I could take back my $ and make a purchase again, I would still buy the MWS. I think the weight issue/ non- issue is more in how the rifle is configured , and how the components balance on the rifle. My tacticooled Saiga .308 weighed less than the MWS fully equipped but did not balance near as well. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/8/2012 11:03:45 AM
[Last Edit: 5/8/2012 11:14:46 AM by WhyNotDev8]
Originally Posted By m4hk33:
larue makes a nice rifle but i went with the LMT, i just think it offers a lot more to the shooter. while the predatar is lighter than the LMT, that can be made up by having the barrel reprofiled and swapping the LMT sopmod for a CTR i can have both a lightweight 16 inch barrel and a 20 inch precision barrel,larue doesnt offer spare uppers or QD barrels i have the option of picking up a spare barrel in 308,260,6.5, 338 fed to taylor the gun to my needs i can form 1 it and pick up a 13.5 barrel with the Larue, you get what you get, your stuck with what ever configuration you chose, they make a great rifle, just dont feel that for my needs, a 16 inch barrel will suit all of my needs, i want a 14.5 and a SS 20 inch 308 for to suit me for close range stuff all the way out to 1000 LMT has done a great job of putting out a weapon that you can really set up as you need. That is simply not true. You can re-profile the MWS barrel and swap to a CTR, but the bulk of the weight of the MWS comes from the barrel capture assembly. Unless someone re-sleeves the barrel extension where the chassis clamps the barrel with titanium or something significantly lighter than steel, you are not going to be able to shed much weight. From what I've seen people have shed about .5lbs from re-profiling the barrel - which isn't worth it considering possible barrel harmonic/stress relief issues. The MWS is an excellent DMR/bench rifle. However from a weight/balance/ run and gun standpoint it is not going to compete with a PredetAR 7.62 no matter what you do to it. The MWS better compares/competes with the OBR 7.62 than the PredetAR. The PredetAR is better compared to the SR25 EMC/ECC than the MWS. I like my MWS because I bought it used for an awesome price and I plan on swapping out calibers/barrel lengths - however with the 7.62, much like the 5.56 MRP, most people never swap the barrels out - so the biggest selling point of the MWS (over it's competitors) is lost for most people. The MWS is a jack of all trades (or at least has the ability to be by the end user) but a master of none. I think the plethora of used ones on the EE make them excellent value purchases at ~$2000. At the current MSRP, I think they are overpriced and the LaRue products (either the PredetAR or OBR) depending on your needs are better purchases. I own a MWS and can admit as much - at equal price points the LaRue products are better. The SR25 EMC/ECC and it's versatility blows everyone out of the water, but at $5000 it most certainly should and I don't really consider it when talking about the LMT and OBR/PredetAR because of it's outrageous price. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/8/2012 11:58:00 AM
I really get a kick out of these discussions. For me, I'm looking for a DMR that has some battle rifle capablilties - so the weight and barrel options of the LMT are actually an advantage to me. It will be replacing an FN SPR. Based on all of your feedback (thank you), I'm angling toward the LMT. Besides, I'm probably going to get more joy out of it sitting beside me while I play Call of Duty.
I don't shoot 3-gun much, and I'd take my 5.56 rifles for that anyway. I won the Sunshine State Games - Heavy Metal 3-gun division 2 years running; once with an HK91 and once with a standard M1A. I twice took 2nd place against 60 shooters at a North Florida Garand Match (Half with jackets, slings, and accurized rifles) and me in shorts and a T-shirt using a service grade Garand, a sling I bought at Wal-Mart, and de-linked machine gun ammo they gave me at the match. I normally shoot USPSA open pistol - and like the these discussion - I've spent a ton of time worrying about loads, comps, bullet weights, gun designs, et. al.. The best advice I ever received was 'quit dicking with damn thing and go practice'. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/8/2012 3:05:29 PM
Originally Posted By pirate308:
I really get a kick out of these discussions. For me, I'm looking for a DMR that has some battle rifle capablilties - so the weight and barrel options of the LMT are actually an advantage to me. It will be replacing an FN SPR. Based on all of your feedback (thank you), I'm angling toward the LMT. Besides, I'm probably going to get more joy out of it sitting beside me while I play Call of Duty. I don't shoot 3-gun much, and I'd take my 5.56 rifles for that anyway. I won the Sunshine State Games - Heavy Metal 3-gun division 2 years running; once with an HK91 and once with a standard M1A. I twice took 2nd place against 60 shooters at a North Florida Garand Match (Half with jackets, slings, and accurized rifles) and me in shorts and a T-shirt using a service grade Garand, a sling I bought at Wal-Mart, and de-linked machine gun ammo they gave me at the match. I normally shoot USPSA open pistol - and like the these discussion - I've spent a ton of time worrying about loads, comps, bullet weights, gun designs, et. al.. The best advice I ever received was 'quit dicking with damn thing and go practice'. /Thread This guy has got it... |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/10/2012 8:49:00 AM
Pirate, I've been having a tough time finding the MWS in my AO anywhere other than Shoot Straight and I'm not thrilled with the prospect of giving those guys my money. I did run over there last Saturday to check the gun out in person and after trying unsuccessfully to get them to work on the price I passed. I'm probably going to just order one from an ARFCOM sponsor and get it transferred to my local FFL.
Where are you at in Florida? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/10/2012 9:01:29 AM
Originally Posted By 9mmCarbine:
Pirate, I've been having a tough time finding the MWS in my AO anywhere other than Shoot Straight and I'm not thrilled with the prospect of giving those guys my money. I did run over there last Saturday to check the gun out in person and after trying unsuccessfully to get them to work on the price I passed. I'm probably going to just order one from an ARFCOM sponsor and get it transferred to my local FFL. Where are you at in Florida? Just my .02 - watch the EE. Many LMT's come up for sale, with low round counts for excellent prices. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/10/2012 12:29:42 PM
Originally Posted By WhyNotDev8:
Originally Posted By 9mmCarbine:
Pirate, I've been having a tough time finding the MWS in my AO anywhere other than Shoot Straight and I'm not thrilled with the prospect of giving those guys my money. I did run over there last Saturday to check the gun out in person and after trying unsuccessfully to get them to work on the price I passed. I'm probably going to just order one from an ARFCOM sponsor and get it transferred to my local FFL. Where are you at in Florida? Just my .02 - watch the EE. Many LMT's come up for sale, with low round counts for excellent prices. I've been watching, believe me. I've seen a couple over the last few weeks but they've all been 16" guns so far and I'm looking for a 20". Luckily, I am not in a huge hurry right now. |
|
|