Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page AR-15 » AR Variants
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Site Notices
25-223 (Page 40 of 46)
Page / 46
Link Posted: 10/20/2014 2:10:51 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By NCARGUY:


Any updates?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By NCARGUY:
Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Update:

I was able to take out the 25 today and I shot some loads that were waaay too hot with the old standard 25-223 chamber. But I felt they would be fine in the new 25-223AR Spec II chamber.

My load:

90 gr Game King on top of 26.0 of AA2200 with CCI Magnum Primer loaded to 2.30 COAL.  I am using ASC 10rd SS mags.  These mags allow 2.3x OAL with no mods and work great (thank you SCPossum1 for the suggestion) Mags:


DISCLAIMER:

DON"T USE THIS LOAD!  This load I feel is fine in MY RIFLE ONLY.  I am using the new 25-223AR Spec II chamber, have a low mass carrier and adjustable gas system.  This load is probably downright dangerous in the standard 25-223 chamber, especially if loaded to the old standard of 2.26. So again, this is for my rifle only..

The rifle:
http://i58.tinypic.com/24g2bs9.jpg

http://i58.tinypic.com/2hqvthw.jpg

The Chrony:
http://i61.tinypic.com/2zi5xxz.jpg

The brass:
http://i61.tinypic.com/2zs9x6q.jpg

On paper at 100:
http://i58.tinypic.com/2je60du.jpg
Obviously not quite zeroed.

I ended up shooting around 65 rounds zeroing the scope and red-dot and blasted various loads.  No malfunctions and recoil is so mild I can maintain scope picture when firing. Overall I am excited about the results.

I have some 87 Hot Core and 100 Hot Core to test next. Both of these bullets are the shortest for their given weight, and that's a good thing as it allows more room for powder. The 87 is shorter than the 90 GK has a better BC and is more robust than the GK, making it potentially ideal for this cartridge (at least for my intentions).. but that is to come later.

I don't know why the pics are sideways.


Any updates?

No.  I have a million things going on and haven't been out since that post.
Link Posted: 10/22/2014 5:51:06 AM EDT
[#2]
Well I have about 95% of my 25/223AR...

Made about 15 cases...



Loaded a couple dummy rounds to check out the ASC mags SCPossum1 mentioned /  recommended

Both the Nosler .257 100g Ballistic Tip SBT P/N 25100 & Privi-Partizan .257 100gr PSP part # PPB257PSP fit the mag seated to 2.30" ( 55gr FMJ .223 in middle for reference)



Just waiting on a barrel & handguard

Link Posted: 10/22/2014 11:31:01 PM EDT
[#3]
where can i find more info on this 25-223 AR Spec II chamber.  is that in this thread?  i havent been able to find it.
Link Posted: 10/22/2014 11:57:44 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nootay:
where can i find more info on this 25-223 AR Spec II chamber.  is that in this thread?  i havent been able to find it.
View Quote

IM 320 PF.
Link Posted: 10/24/2014 12:43:35 AM EDT
[Last Edit: JButlerHickok] [#5]
Tested a couple loads today. No accuracy testing. Just looking for pressure signs and chronographing velocities. There were no surprises of any kind except issues with feeding from mags but more on that later.
The 748 powder loads were disappointing in how much the velocity varied from shot to shot. H4198 is my sweetheart performer for powders today.

LOAD#
Avg velocity / load data.........All loads using new Lapua cases....20" barrel

1. 2721 / 75gr poly tipped Midway blems (Hornady?), 26.5gr Win 748, Fed Match primer

2. 2650 / 100gr Sierra SP spitzer, 22.5gr H4198, Wolf Mag primer
3. 2600 / 75gr poly tipped Midway blem, 25.5gr Win 748, CCI Mag primer
4. 2640 / 100gr Hornady soft pt flat base, 22.5gr H4198, Wolf Mag primer
5. 2677 / 75gr poly tip Midway blem, 25.5gr Win 748, Fed Match primer
6. 2828 / 90gr Sierra BTHP, 23.2gr H4198, Wolf Mag primer
7. 2600 / 75gr Sierra HP flat base, 25.5gr Win 748, CCI Mag primer
8. 2808 / 75gr poly tip Midway blem, 27.5gr Win 748, Fed Match primer

Its interesting to see the velocity difference between primers in loads 3 and 5.
2600 - CCI Mag
2677 - Fed Match

2721
2808

The mag feed issue. Every round was not being chambered fully and had to be extracted. However, if single loaded and bolt dropped they all chambered fine with no assistance needed. Was using 3 different mags...Pmag, old Thermold and a metal Brownells. Same problem with all three. I got to looking at how the cartridges feed out of the mag and the edge of the neck was catching on the magazine's edge. The obvious conclusion was the dragging was really slowing down the bolt's speed. My thought is if I lowered that edge the problem should go away.

Tomorrow is supposed to be even nicer than today, so I plan on heading out again. There aren't many nice days left this late in the year.
Link Posted: 10/24/2014 12:49:59 AM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LRRPF52:


One sound guideline to consider is to work up pressure ladders using 1% case volume increments, so in the case of the .223 Remington, I personally don't exceed .2gr increments, since it's case capacity in powder is usually in the low to mid 20's in grains.

With .270 Winchester, where case volume is usually in the 52-62gr region, I use .5 and .6gr increments, depending on the powder and published load data when doing pressure ladders.

With .260 Remington, I use .4gr increments, since most loads are around 40gr for the bullet weights I prefer.  For 6.5 Grendel, I use .3gr increments since we're in the high 20's and low 30's.

A .5gr charge weight increase can spike on you big time in the .223 Remington case, since it is of 2% case capacity.  You might also be skipping by accuracy nodes. Let us know how it works out for you.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By LRRPF52:
Originally Posted By nootay:
im working up some loads for the 25-223 with imr 4198 and barnes 80 gr ttsx bullets.  i didnt see any 4198 loads with this bullet so here is where im starting

22.0
22.5
23.0
23.5
24.0

let me know your thoughts.  has anyone tried this combo?  ill be shooting from a 20 in bbl


One sound guideline to consider is to work up pressure ladders using 1% case volume increments, so in the case of the .223 Remington, I personally don't exceed .2gr increments, since it's case capacity in powder is usually in the low to mid 20's in grains.

With .270 Winchester, where case volume is usually in the 52-62gr region, I use .5 and .6gr increments, depending on the powder and published load data when doing pressure ladders.

With .260 Remington, I use .4gr increments, since most loads are around 40gr for the bullet weights I prefer.  For 6.5 Grendel, I use .3gr increments since we're in the high 20's and low 30's.

A .5gr charge weight increase can spike on you big time in the .223 Remington case, since it is of 2% case capacity.  You might also be skipping by accuracy nodes. Let us know how it works out for you.


I found out how 1 grain too much can make a difference. When I first started this cartridge I was doing 1 grain jumps which worked until it didn't work.
Link Posted: 10/24/2014 8:19:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 320pf] [#7]
Hi nootay,

The only difference between the "Spec II" chamber and the standard chamber is that the lead/freebore is extended by 0.077".  This allows bullets like the Sierra 90 g GK to be seated out to 2.26" (2.30" with some mags) with out running into the lands. This give you more room for powder in the case thus increases velocities by ~100 fps.

Originally Posted By nootay:
where can i find more info on this 25-223 AR Spec II chamber.  is that in this thread?  i havent been able to find it.
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/26/2014 7:51:07 PM EDT
[#8]
This was only the second hunting trip this year due to my back being out in August and September. My 10 year old shot a nice doe with the 25/223 @150 yds.  Dropped her in her tracks. Excellent performance out of the 100gr hornady.



She's the log in the road with a whte tip. Sorry about e pic. Forgot to take another when we got back to the house. Not sure how many this makes with the 25, but it sure smokes them.
Link Posted: 10/26/2014 8:59:32 PM EDT
[#9]
Hi SCPossum,

Can you share some of the details?  Was the deer quartering away, towards, or broadside; did the bullet exit etc...?


Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SCPossum1:
This was only the second hunting trip this year due to my back being out in August and September. My 10 year old shot a nice doe with the 25/223 @150 yds.  Dropped her in her tracks. Excellent performance out of the 100gr hornady.

<a href="http://s313.photobucket.com/user/scpossum1/media/Mobile%20Uploads/919EDF63-DCF0-4C62-AAC8-6CDB022C7484.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i313.photobucket.com/albums/ll373/scpossum1/Mobile%20Uploads/919EDF63-DCF0-4C62-AAC8-6CDB022C7484.jpg</a>

She's the log in the road with a whte tip. Sorry about e pic. Forgot to take another when we got back to the house. Not sure how many this makes with the 25, but it sure smokes them.
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/26/2014 11:11:56 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JButlerHickok] [#10]
Modified several brands of magazines until the .25 cartridges slid out with little effort. So I thought I was GTG. However feeding issues plagued me and I believe the angle coming out of the mag is partially responsible. Ended up swapping complete bolt carrier from another rifle and that helped along with a modified Lancer 20 rd mag.

It operated perfectly with the Sierra 90gr HP load. (2828 fps / 90gr Sierra BTHP, 23.2gr H4198, Wolf Mag primer). Did my first real target shooting for accuracy testing and was very pleasantly surprised. The 90gr Sierra plunked into less than 1" groups. The blem poly tips didn't do too bad either at 1.25". The poly tips had two things going against them, their blem issues and the Win 748 powder (velocities) which was nowhere as consistent as H4198.

Sighted and ready to go.
Link Posted: 10/27/2014 11:55:36 AM EDT
[#11]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JButlerHickok:
Modified several brands of magazines until the .25 cartridges slid out with little effort. So I thought I was GTG. However feeding issues plagued me and I believe the angle coming out of the mag is partially responsible. Ended up swapping complete bolt carrier from another rifle and that helped along with a modified Lancer 20 rd mag.

It operated perfectly with the Sierra 90gr HP load. (2828 fps / 90gr Sierra BTHP, 23.2gr H4198, Wolf Mag primer). Did my first real target shooting for accuracy testing and was very pleasantly surprised. The 90gr Sierra plunked into less than 1" groups. The blem poly tips didn't do too bad either at 1.25". The poly tips had two things going against them, their blem issues and the Win 748 powder (velocities) which was nowhere as consistent as H4198.

Sighted and ready to go.
View Quote


Are you sizing your cases down far enough where the die cams over the shell holder? The bottom of the die should come in contact with the shell holder then have a slight pop feel when the ram is fully lowered.

You shouldn't have to be modifying magazines, I have used pretty much every mag on the market over the years and haven't needed to ( other than trying to get longer length) I think what is happening is your case is not sized enough (do you have a case gauge?) so when the rifle is trying to feed from the magazine then squeeze the round in the chamber it won't lock up fully. But when you drop the round in the chamber and let the bolt fly there is enough momentum to force the round in. I have seen this before where the case head is just a tiny bit oversized.  That is why some companies recommend "small base dies" for semi autos, like RCBS. But I have found those are unnecessary if the die set up correctly.  

Are the rounds the don't allow the bolt to close difficult to extract? If so, the sizing issue is your problem.
Link Posted: 10/27/2014 2:07:23 PM EDT
[Last Edit: JButlerHickok] [#12]
I think case sizing is the issue. These cases were on their first firing after being formed and some shoulders have a little second "shoulder". Here's the head scratcher for me. All the cases were made up around the same time, same method (several years ago). The ones that'd stop the bolt short of lockup were tough to eject (forward asst is worthless IMO). But would not create any problems if single fed (not from the mags). Some (not all) of the stuck rounds exhibited a swelled out shoulder. Whether it happened during the feeding or during their making, I can't say for sure. I doubt during their making as then the majority should exhibit this from the box.

The bolt carrier group I was using was a new brand and I noticed it had a little catch right at the point where the bolt starts to cam over. This is about where it would get stuck when chambering a round. When I switched out the BC, mag and load everything worked good. So I'm thinking BC is primary issue plus it was so dry it was like the parts rubbing against sandpaper.

I ran out of daylight to further identify issues and solutions. Main thing is I have a combo that'll work and its sighted in with a deer slayer, just in case I need it for a reduction season.

I really like this cartridge. I'd really like to pitch it to a major ammo maker but I not sure how to go about it.

ETA: When I resize the fired cases I'll make sure of the cam-over. Usually I run the press just firmly touching the bottom of the die with only rarely needing to cam over. My next step would be to load these once-fired now resized cases. If all works well then mystery firmly solved.
Link Posted: 10/27/2014 9:24:09 PM EDT
[Last Edit: VeritatisUnus] [#13]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JButlerHickok:
I think case sizing is the issue. These cases were on their first firing after being formed and some shoulders have a little second "shoulder". Here's the head scratcher for me. All the cases were made up around the same time, same method (several years ago). The ones that'd stop the bolt short of lockup were tough to eject (forward asst is worthless IMO). But would not create any problems if single fed (not from the mags). Some (not all) of the stuck rounds exhibited a swelled out shoulder. Whether it happened during the feeding or during their making, I can't say for sure. I doubt during their making as then the majority should exhibit this from the box.

The bolt carrier group I was using was a new brand and I noticed it had a little catch right at the point where the bolt starts to cam over. This is about where it would get stuck when chambering a round. When I switched out the BC, mag and load everything worked good. So I'm thinking BC is primary issue plus it was so dry it was like the parts rubbing against sandpaper.

I ran out of daylight to further identify issues and solutions. Main thing is I have a combo that'll work and its sighted in with a deer slayer, just in case I need it for a reduction season.

I really like this cartridge. I'd really like to pitch it to a major ammo maker but I not sure how to go about it.

ETA: When I resize the fired cases I'll make sure of the cam-over. Usually I run the press just firmly touching the bottom of the die with only rarely needing to cam over. My next step would be to load these once-fired now resized cases. If all works well then mystery firmly solved.
View Quote


With the rounds that got stuck being difficult to eject and the FA doing nothing (only making it worse I bet) I will bet case sizing is your issue. Been there done that. See if you can get a case guage from 320 PF, once you get one I bet your current cases will stick out the back just a tad.

What dies are you using?  Also, double check your case length, make sure you are 1.70 or less by .01. You should be sizing 223 to 25 then trimming to length.
Link Posted: 10/27/2014 9:35:56 PM EDT
[#14]
I finally got to shoot my 20 inch 25-223 this past weekend.  Thought id share some load results.  althought these worked fine in my gun, they may not in yours.  I didnt have access to a chronograph at the time, however should have access to one this coming weekend.  None of the below loads showed pressure signs.  all were 5 shot groups at 100 yards with lc 08 brass, wolf magnum primers, and seated to 2.260.  

24.0 grains reloader 10x, 100 grain speer btsp - 1.534 group
24.5 grains reloader 10x, 100 grain speer btsp - .961 group

24.5 grain reloader 10x, 90 grain sierra game king hp - 3.072 group
25.0 grains reloader 10x, 90 grain sierra game king hp - 1.755 group

22.0 grains imr 4198, 90 grain sierra game king hp - 2.499 group
22.5 grains imr 4198, 90 grain sierra game king hp - 2.030 group

22.6 grains reloader 10x, 117 grain hornady SP - 1.217
22.0 grains reloader 10x, 117 grain hornady sp - 1.936

22.5 grains imr 4198, 80 grain barnes ttsx - .854 group
23.0 grains imr 4198, 80 grain barnes ttsx - .918 group


i plan on stepping up all of these loads and working with a chronograph this weekend.  i may also try some imr 4198 loads with the 117 grain hornady.  i currently have a stock mil spec trigger.  i feel like a new trigger would do a lot for these groups.  i also just got an asc mag in the mail and will test out some 2.30 COAL loads.

Link Posted: 10/27/2014 10:17:17 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chewbacca:


With the rounds that got stuck being difficult to eject and the FA doing nothing (only making it worse I bet) I will bet case sizing is your issue. Been there done that. See if you can get a case guage from 320 PF, once you get one I bet your current cases will stick out the back just a tad.

What dies are you using?  Also, double check your case length, make sure you are 1.70 or less by .01. You should be sizing 223 to 25 then trimming to length.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By chewbacca:
Originally Posted By JButlerHickok:
I think case sizing is the issue. These cases were on their first firing after being formed and some shoulders have a little second "shoulder". Here's the head scratcher for me. All the cases were made up around the same time, same method (several years ago). The ones that'd stop the bolt short of lockup were tough to eject (forward asst is worthless IMO). But would not create any problems if single fed (not from the mags). Some (not all) of the stuck rounds exhibited a swelled out shoulder. Whether it happened during the feeding or during their making, I can't say for sure. I doubt during their making as then the majority should exhibit this from the box.

The bolt carrier group I was using was a new brand and I noticed it had a little catch right at the point where the bolt starts to cam over. This is about where it would get stuck when chambering a round. When I switched out the BC, mag and load everything worked good. So I'm thinking BC is primary issue plus it was so dry it was like the parts rubbing against sandpaper.

I ran out of daylight to further identify issues and solutions. Main thing is I have a combo that'll work and its sighted in with a deer slayer, just in case I need it for a reduction season.

I really like this cartridge. I'd really like to pitch it to a major ammo maker but I not sure how to go about it.

ETA: When I resize the fired cases I'll make sure of the cam-over. Usually I run the press just firmly touching the bottom of the die with only rarely needing to cam over. My next step would be to load these once-fired now resized cases. If all works well then mystery firmly solved.


With the rounds that got stuck being difficult to eject and the FA doing nothing (only making it worse I bet) I will bet case sizing is your issue. Been there done that. See if you can get a case guage from 320 PF, once you get one I bet your current cases will stick out the back just a tad.

What dies are you using?  Also, double check your case length, make sure you are 1.70 or less by .01. You should be sizing 223 to 25 then trimming to length.


Yep I'm pretty sure the FA made things worse. I made these cases up a couple years ago and I really don't recall exactly how I did. Suspect I trimmed first then expanded to .243 then to .257. One thought that I had was neck thickness.

Before getting too worried I'm cleaning the fired brass then run it through my Hornady custom dies. From there I'll double check length. Thanks for the tip on the case gage because I was thinking one would be very handy.
Link Posted: 10/27/2014 11:42:48 PM EDT
[#16]
so ive seated a few different bullets out to 2.3 in some dummy loads and am trying to figure out how to see if they are touching the lands.  i put marker on the bullets and do have some type of mark on the bullet, but am not sure if its from ejecting the round of if its indeed touching the lands.  Can any of you tell from the picture?  Have another way of checking without any fancy tools?

Link Posted: 10/28/2014 12:10:17 AM EDT
[#17]
Yep I'm pretty sure the FA made things worse. I made these cases up a couple years ago and I really don't recall exactly how I did. Suspect I trimmed first then expanded to .243 then to .257. One thought that I had was neck thickness.

Before getting too worried I'm cleaning the fired brass then run it through my Hornady custom dies. From there I'll double check length. Thanks for the tip on the case gage because I was thinking one would be very handy.
View Quote


Grabbed a handful of the poly tip loads which seemed to be the worst troublemakers. Loaded them up in a unmodified 2gen Pmag 20 rdr and hand cycled them. Half jammed inside the chamber and required a two fisted extraction.

Pulled the decapping stem from my Hornady die and ran the batch through it. Made sure it cammed over. Hand cycled them through and SHAZAM!! They went through easy as a red hot knife thru soft butter. Pulling them out was like there was no cartridge attached to the bolt.

Think I'm floating on air right now. Thanks chewie for your help.
Link Posted: 10/28/2014 8:14:14 AM EDT
[#18]
Hi nootay,

Make up a dummy round WITHOUT A PRIMER) with the bullet seated way out (mic.measure and note the overall length of the cartridge) color it up with a marker like you did and chamber it. If you started with it seated out far enough it, the bolt will not got into battery (close). Carefully extract the case. You should see marks on the bullet ogive. Seat  test cartridge about 0.010" deeper and repeat. At some point the bolt will go into battery when the bullet is just touching or just clears the lands.

Another way is to again start with a long seated dummy round (color the tip), chamber the rounds and use the forward assist to close the bolt into battery. Then to extract the round use a cleaning rod and gently tip the bullet while you gently pull the bolt back. If you do this right the case length that you measure will be the length where the bullet is just touching the lands.

I hope this helps.

320pf

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nootay:
so ive seated a few different bullets out to 2.3 in some dummy loads and am trying to figure out how to see if they are touching the lands.  i put marker on the bullets and do have some type of mark on the bullet, but am not sure if its from ejecting the round of if its indeed touching the lands.  Can any of you tell from the picture?  Have another way of checking without any fancy tools?

http://i.imgur.com/7pA3F6Ol.jpg
View Quote

Link Posted: 10/28/2014 9:01:15 AM EDT
[#19]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JButlerHickok:


Grabbed a handful of the poly tip loads which seemed to be the worst troublemakers. Loaded them up in a unmodified 2gen Pmag 20 rdr and hand cycled them. Half jammed inside the chamber and required a two fisted extraction.

Pulled the decapping stem from my Hornady die and ran the batch through it. Made sure it cammed over. Hand cycled them through and SHAZAM!! They went through easy as a red hot knife thru soft butter. Pulling them out was like there was no cartridge attached to the bolt.

Think I'm floating on air right now. Thanks chewie for your help.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By JButlerHickok:
Yep I'm pretty sure the FA made things worse. I made these cases up a couple years ago and I really don't recall exactly how I did. Suspect I trimmed first then expanded to .243 then to .257. One thought that I had was neck thickness.

Before getting too worried I'm cleaning the fired brass then run it through my Hornady custom dies. From there I'll double check length. Thanks for the tip on the case gage because I was thinking one would be very handy.


Grabbed a handful of the poly tip loads which seemed to be the worst troublemakers. Loaded them up in a unmodified 2gen Pmag 20 rdr and hand cycled them. Half jammed inside the chamber and required a two fisted extraction.

Pulled the decapping stem from my Hornady die and ran the batch through it. Made sure it cammed over. Hand cycled them through and SHAZAM!! They went through easy as a red hot knife thru soft butter. Pulling them out was like there was no cartridge attached to the bolt.

Think I'm floating on air right now. Thanks chewie for your help.


Awesome.  No problem.  If I hadn't experienced the problem myself it would be a tricky one to diagnose.
Link Posted: 10/28/2014 6:54:26 PM EDT
[Last Edit: SCPossum1] [#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SCPossum1:
This was only the second hunting trip this year due to my back being out in August and September. My 10 year old shot a nice doe with the 25/223 @150 yds.  Dropped her in her tracks. Excellent performance out of the 100gr hornady.

She's the log in the road with a whte tip. Sorry about e pic. Forgot to take another when we got back to the house. Not sure how many this makes with the 25, but it sure smokes them.
View Quote


Sorry, just saw the post. Sorry about lack of pics. Deer was broadside at 150 yds.  He had to shoot quickly and caught the upper shoulder region clipping both lungs and breaking the backbone. Bullet exited. I am not sure if we have ever found a bullet yet. I will have to check on that. The wound channel was the same as we have experienced in the past with a 3.5" to 4" disruption (estimate from visual observation) in the middle of the deer and exiting with a quarter sized exit hole.  Inside 200yds there is no doubt that the gun is capable of dropping deer size game constantly.  I plan on hunting a stand this weekend with 250-300 yd shots possible and will report back on what happens. With the ballistics of this round, I am sure there will be a positive result. Last year we held the distance until we got a feel for what the bullet would do. Now I feel more confident in stretching it out some.  It is a consistently producing results.
Link Posted: 11/1/2014 10:17:42 PM EDT
[#21]
so im having some short stroking issues.  i thought my loads might just be on the weak side, but some of the loads i shot today were showing ejector swipes.  I have a slr adjustable gas block which is wide open.  I have double checked the gas block placement and it is correct.  My gas port was drilled with a 3/32 drill bit.  the tube is pinned well and fits in the gas key well.  i do have some carbon buildup  around the adjustment screw.  is this normal?  this is my first adjustable gas block.  any other suggestions to look over?
Link Posted: 11/7/2014 12:42:42 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nootay:
so im having some short stroking issues.  i thought my loads might just be on the weak side, but some of the loads i shot today were showing ejector swipes.  I have a slr adjustable gas block which is wide open.  I have double checked the gas block placement and it is correct.  My gas port was drilled with a 3/32 drill bit.  the tube is pinned well and fits in the gas key well.  i do have some carbon buildup  around the adjustment screw.  is this normal?  this is my first adjustable gas block.  any other suggestions to look over?
View Quote


What powder are you using and what gas system do you have?  

Link Posted: 11/7/2014 7:50:41 PM EDT
[Last Edit: nootay] [#23]
Powders - IMR 4198, Reloader 10x
Barrel size - 20 inch
Gas port size - .096
Gas tube - rifle length
Gas block - SLR adjustable
bullet size - 80, 90, 100, 117 grain

Im going to be shooting with a different BCG tomorrow.  if i blow on the gas key of the current BCG, i hear more air compared to the BCG on my 5.56 gun.  
i have fiddled with the gas block quite a bit and feel its definitely in the right position.  ive taken the gas tube off and its clear, gas block is clear, and gas tube is clear.  if the other BCG doesnt resolve the issue, i feel like my next step is to open the gas port a bit more.  

Link Posted: 11/7/2014 8:18:04 PM EDT
[#24]
Ive read about some people having a hard time with short stroking on the 6.8 in a rifle length 20 inch barrel.  From reading through this thread, it seems quite a few people are running 20 inch rifle length systems.  What size is your gas port?  

I left off one detail, it seems to cycle more reliably (still not 100%) if i shoot it about 10 times in a row.  that makes me think i have a leak somewhere and the heat is expanding something somewhere to seal the gap.  there isnt any carbon buildup around the gas block, so this makes me thing the gas key on the bcg.
Link Posted: 11/8/2014 11:33:22 AM EDT
[#25]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nootay:
Powders - IMR 4198, Reloader 10x
Barrel size - 20 inch
Gas port size - .096
Gas tube - rifle length
Gas block - SLR adjustable
bullet size - 80, 90, 100, 117 grain

Im going to be shooting with a different BCG tomorrow.  if i blow on the gas key of the current BCG, i hear more air compared to the BCG on my 5.56 gun.  
i have fiddled with the gas block quite a bit and feel its definitely in the right position.  ive taken the gas tube off and its clear, gas block is clear, and gas tube is clear.  if the other BCG doesnt resolve the issue, i feel like my next step is to open the gas port a bit more.  

View Quote


I had a feeling it was 4198.  I shoulve put that in my last post.  That short stroked my rifle.  Seems the burn rate isn't ideal for a rifle gas system.

I actually had to drill out gas port anyway on this cal, so you may to as well.  Its not a big deal at all and I can walk you through it.
Link Posted: 11/8/2014 12:39:14 PM EDT
[#26]
H335 has been a go to powder for me if you can find some now, id give it a shot. There is a lot of data in this thread. its hard to wade through i went through a very long process to get my 16" barrel to run(gas port was very small) final thing was to drill it out but i went through all the other things to get it right first. Really just for shits and giggles though.

Link Posted: 11/9/2014 8:19:11 PM EDT
[#27]
what size did you end up drilling to?  i was planning on drilling  to .104
Link Posted: 11/9/2014 9:22:15 PM EDT
[Last Edit: kevwil] [#28]
Has anyone tried Alliant PowerPro 1200R yet?

I did some informal pressure tests today for my 25-45 Sharps, using various combinations of A2200, H335, and PP1200R using Hornady 87gr Spire Point and Speer 100gr Hot-Cor and shooting over a Beta Chrony. The velocity from the PP1200R impressed me, so I will be doing a full OCW test of both bullet types with PP1200R next time out, probably testing 25.5gr - 26.0gr in 0.1gr increments.

I must say I'm also impressed by the Sharps 20" barrel. Bullets were landing so close to the point of aim, so consistently, that I expect groups to be well under 1 MOA. Less than half MOA groups wouldn't surprise me. No complaints about accuracy here.

If these speeds prove out under longer group tests, this project might be a success after all.
Link Posted: 11/9/2014 11:05:24 PM EDT
[#29]
these have been my hottest loads so far.  starting to get flattened primers and this one had a dark ring around it.  should i consider this my max with this powder?  24.8 RL 10x under 100 grain speer BTSP.

http://i.imgur.com/AjjL8v4.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/WE3hqgh.jpg

the primer didnt look too flattened one taken out.  you should be able to click and zoom in on these images
Link Posted: 11/10/2014 1:00:59 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nootay:
these have been my hottest loads so far.  starting to get flattened primers and this one had a dark ring around it.  should i consider this my max with this powder?  24.8 RL 10x under 100 grain speer BTSP.
View Quote


The primer in your picture appears to be normal. There's no unusual flattening or cratering of the firing pin strike. The dark ring around it is unlikely to be blow-bye unless the primer is a loose fit in the pocket. If the primer were loose, the flattening would be greater.The case rim looks normal too.

As always, just my opinion based on what I see. A closer look at multiple fired cases would be a better indicator of how hot your load is.
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 7:45:54 PM EDT
[Last Edit: SCPossum1] [#31]
FYI:  Sportsman's warehouse in Columbia, SC has about 10 1lb cannisters of 2200 and about 6 cans of H335 @ 5:30pm EST.
Link Posted: 11/14/2014 11:00:46 PM EDT
[Last Edit: scatterbrains] [#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By nootay:
what size did you end up drilling to?  i was planning on drilling  to .104
View Quote


I have no clue it is somewhere in this thread ill see if i can find it it was a # drill bit though.

Seems this is the range i settled in from reading back through the thread

.082" to .086"
Link Posted: 11/19/2014 10:40:34 AM EDT
[#33]
I received the short barrels from Brent and now have two .25-223 pistols (with Sig Tac Braces) put together.  Now I just need time to load some ammo and shoot them to report on the short barrel performance of this cartridge.

Link Posted: 11/19/2014 9:31:41 PM EDT
[#34]
very nice man!  have you gotten to shoot them yet?
Link Posted: 11/19/2014 11:07:22 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By scatterbrains:
very nice man!  have you gotten to shoot them yet?
View Quote


Not yet.  

I work about 45-50 hours a week at my day job and I just recently purchased a gun store and indoor range, which takes about 20 hours a week.  I also have two small children so my free time has been extremely limited lately.  I haven't even gotten any ammo loaded for them yet.  

Hopefully in the next week or two I can squeeze a few free hours out to get some ammo loaded and chronographed.  I'm very interested to see how much difference I get with the same load in these vs my 16" rifles.
Link Posted: 11/21/2014 9:32:15 PM EDT
[#36]
Cool, thats what i am curious about the velocity of the loads.

On a side note i got me a new bullet to try in the 25ar, Lehigh defense 85gr cotrolled chaos
bullets

According to LD i can use my current data for the nosler 85grBT, ill drop a 1gr and rework up and see what i can get.
Link Posted: 11/24/2014 10:05:49 AM EDT
[#37]
So, did Sharps basically copy what you did here or are you working with them or?  (Sharps 25-45)?

I haven't read back in the thread to see if you guys are working together.
Link Posted: 11/24/2014 1:08:17 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheHomelandSoldier:
So, did Sharps basically copy what you did here or are you working with them or?  (Sharps 25-45)?

I haven't read back in the thread to see if you guys are working together.
View Quote


I am not in the know, this is based only on what I've read in this thread, but I've been following the cartridge for some time now and I don't believe either is the case.

320pf developed this idea and put it forth here on arfcom before the .25-45 Sharps came about.  I believe Sharps arrived at the same idea independently, which is why it was done a little differently.  I don't think they copied anything, nor were they working with 320pf, based on all the information I've come across.  

The main difference between the two is that the .25-45 uses a full length case, where the .25-223 uses a shortened neck.  This means the .25-45 cannot use some of the longer bullets that the .25-223 uses well, like the 100gr Game Kings as an example.
Link Posted: 11/24/2014 1:13:25 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Altair:


I am not in the know, this is based only on what I've read in this thread, but I've been following the cartridge for some time now and I don't believe either is the case.

320pf developed this idea and put it forth here on arfcom before the .25-45 Sharps came about.  I believe Sharps arrived at the same idea independently, which is why it was done a little differently.  I don't think they copied anything, nor were they working with 320pf, based on all the information I've come across.  

The main difference between the two is that the .25-45 uses a full length case, where the .25-223 uses a shortened neck.  This means the .25-45 cannot use some of the longer bullets that the .25-223 uses well, like the 100gr Game Kings as an example.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Altair:
Originally Posted By TheHomelandSoldier:
So, did Sharps basically copy what you did here or are you working with them or?  (Sharps 25-45)?

I haven't read back in the thread to see if you guys are working together.


I am not in the know, this is based only on what I've read in this thread, but I've been following the cartridge for some time now and I don't believe either is the case.

320pf developed this idea and put it forth here on arfcom before the .25-45 Sharps came about.  I believe Sharps arrived at the same idea independently, which is why it was done a little differently.  I don't think they copied anything, nor were they working with 320pf, based on all the information I've come across.  

The main difference between the two is that the .25-45 uses a full length case, where the .25-223 uses a shortened neck.  This means the .25-45 cannot use some of the longer bullets that the .25-223 uses well, like the 100gr Game Kings as an example.


Got it and agreed on bullet length issue.  Reason I asked is because as soon as I saw the Sharps announcement, the first thing that came to mind was the work done here.

How much do you trim the neck back with the .25-223?

The YouTube video I saw on the Sharps makes claims that it's just a barrel swap, but I don't see how that is the case as you described - they are going to have a hard time loading any of the longer bullets and I'm not sure the Re will not be magazine binding issues.

Thought I would ask. I can imagine it is not necessarily welcomed news that a slight deviation from all of this team's work is being promoted as a new concept without any recognition.

What I mean to say is I think you guys did a good job here.
Link Posted: 11/24/2014 2:32:48 PM EDT
[#40]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By TheHomelandSoldier:

Got it and agreed on bullet length issue.  Reason I asked is because as soon as I saw the Sharps announcement, the first thing that came to mind was the work done here.

How much do you trim the neck back with the .25-223?

The YouTube video I saw on the Sharps makes claims that it's just a barrel swap, but I don't see how that is the case as you described - they are going to have a hard time loading any of the longer bullets and I'm not sure the Re will not be magazine binding issues.

Thought I would ask. I can imagine it is not necessarily welcomed news that a slight deviation from all of this team's work is being promoted as a new concept without any recognition.

What I mean to say is I think you guys did a good job here.
View Quote


I really don't think Sharps was aware of the .25-223 when it first announced intentions for the .25-45 Sharps.  I could be mistaken, of course, but the concept is a simple one and I doubt 320pf was the first to neck a .223 up to .257".  I suspect it has been done, with slight variations, numerous times over the years.  I think 320pf and Sharps just arrived at a similar spot close in time to one another.

The .25-223 is trimmed back approximately 2mm shorter than .223 or .25-45 Sharps.  I don't recall the exact dimension and I don't have my data in front of me but that 2mm makes a big difference in bullet length that is usable in the case with the AR mag length restriction.

The .25-223 and .25-45 Sharps should have the same case profile and shoulder, so both should work fine in a standard magazine and require only a barrel swap.  I can personally vouch for the .25-223 and say that only a barrel swap is needed.  The .257" bullet doesn't expand the case enough to cause interference issues with the ribs in the standard .223 magazines I've tried.

I have found the .25-223 to be an exceptionally easy wildcat to make brass for and load.  It is this reason that I now have four ARs chambered in it and plan to use the .25-223 to cut my children's teeth on wildcatting when the time is right.  With only minor trimming and no fire forming it is barely any different than just reloading .223 ammo.   It is easy to do and you get substantial performance gains over .223/5.56 with very little effort.  

With 75-87gr light constructed bullets it is perfect for coyote and with 100gr bullets (or 80gr TTSX) it is great for deer.  Both of these animals are plentiful in my area so it is my intent to use the .25-223 to teach my children to hunt as well.  I had to build .25-223 pistols to meet my state legal requirements for deer, which I just got put together (see a few posts up) and I hope to have some load data for the short 12.5" barrels soon.  

As an aside I took a hard look at your .277 Wolverine when pondering what short barrels to use on my AR pistols.  It just so happened that 320pf had a couple short blanks left over and he made me a deal on the pair of barrels I just couldn't refuse.  That and sticking to a single caliber makes things simpler for logistical reasons for when I want to get my kids involved.


Link Posted: 11/24/2014 5:48:00 PM EDT
[#41]
I like what you guys have done, and thanks for the explanation.  Carry on with the good work and as always, have fun and pass it on as you say...
Link Posted: 11/24/2014 9:55:19 PM EDT
[#42]
Evening, all,
I dropped out about page 56 due to health, family, financial and chore problems, but i'm back with some info on the 25-25 Sharps.
First of the month I lucked out at a gun show and sold three safe queens that had not been out for about 30 years, so I had some cash
in hand when I passed the last table at the exit.  There were three Sabre Defence complete lowers, all calling to me. These are the Cav.
Arms type, and are really light.  I found myself carrying one to the truck.  Hey, at $100 each, how can you not buy?
Then I ran across some info on the Sharps company that mentioned really cheap barrels, and I visited the website.  Long story short, I now
have an 18" barrel, and have already ordered all the necessary parts to put togeather my first AR15.

Here's what I wanted to pass on about the barrel.

18" H-Bar, listed at 2.55 pounds.
Gas port measures 0.90-0.91" dia., mid-length position
Stainless steel, with a good smooth finish
Barrel is marked, just behind the threaded end, "Sharps Rifle Co., 25-45 Sharps, SS"
What I almost missed is the very light stamped info next to the barrel extension, which reads "BHW MP 1410"

A quick peep down the tube shows the rifling to definately NOT be your usual cut lands and grooves.

I also bought the RCBS three die set.  The special die for opening the case necks works just fine.  I lubed about every fourth case neck with
a trace of Imperial wax lub and all was well.  I am not going to load anything until I get the rifle put togeather.

If you drop back and reread my earlier notes (please don't) you will see that this setup is not what I described as my ideal.  Oh, well, at least I
will have a 25  caliber AR15, and it's close to the 25-223.
Link Posted: 11/24/2014 10:34:02 PM EDT
[Last Edit: Dr69er] [#43]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By SCBob260:
Evening, all,
I dropped out about page 56 due to health, family, financial and chore problems, but i'm back with some info on the 25-25 Sharps.
First of the month I lucked out at a gun show and sold three safe queens that had not been out for about 30 years, so I had some cash
in hand when I passed the last table at the exit.  There were three Sabre Defence complete lowers, all calling to me. These are the Cav.
Arms type, and are really light.  I found myself carrying one to the truck.  Hey, at $100 each, how can you not buy?
Then I ran across some info on the Sharps company that mentioned really cheap barrels, and I visited the website.  Long story short, I now
have an 18" barrel, and have already ordered all the necessary parts to put togeather my first AR15.

Here's what I wanted to pass on about the barrel.

18" H-Bar, listed at 2.55 pounds.
Gas port measures 0.90-0.91" dia., mid-length position
Stainless steel, with a good smooth finish
Barrel is marked, just behind the threaded end, "Sharps Rifle Co., 25-45 Sharps, SS"
What I almost missed is the very light stamped info next to the barrel extension, which reads "BHW MP 1410"

A quick peep down the tube shows the rifling to definately NOT be your usual cut lands and grooves.

I also bought the RCBS three die set.  The special die for opening the case necks works just fine.  I lubed about every fourth case neck with
a trace of Imperial wax lub and all was well.  I am not going to load anything until I get the rifle put togeather.

If you drop back and reread my earlier notes (please don't) you will see that this setup is not what I described as my ideal.  Oh, well, at least I
will have a 25  caliber AR15, and it's close to the 25-223.
View Quote




They seem to have used barrels/blanks made by BHW that utilize 416R SS Polygonal 3 groove rifling...The barrels themselves are of very good
quality, I would agree that the 25-45 Sharps round would limit itself to the lightest and/or shortest pills in the said caliber...
Link Posted: 11/26/2014 8:47:38 PM EDT
[#44]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dr69er:I would agree that the 25-45 Sharps round would limit itself to the lightest and/or shortest pills in the said caliber...
View Quote


It's not quite that bad. ;-) The 100gr HotCor has been working just fine so far. Depending on the ogive, many bullets in the 85-100 gr range should work.
Link Posted: 11/26/2014 11:09:57 PM EDT
[#45]
Hi everyone,  first post.  Not sure how many years I have been reading arfcom.   Well congrats because this thread has finally pushed me to register.   I think I have read all 80 pages of this thread.  

I'm so itching to get into this 25-223 club.   Happy Thanksgiving!
Link Posted: 11/27/2014 8:07:36 AM EDT
[#46]
Hi Baconriver72,

Welcome and Happy Thanksgiving!

320pf
Link Posted: 11/28/2014 4:47:24 AM EDT
[#47]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Baconriver72:
Hi everyone,  first post.  Not sure how many years I have been reading arfcom.   Well congrats because this thread has finally pushed me to register.   I think I have read all 80 pages of this thread.  

I'm so itching to get into this 25-223 club.   Happy Thanksgiving!
View Quote


I'm confident you'll find this is one very fine cartridge. Personally I think the M16 should have been chambered for it. I've had interesting times tinkering with powders and bullets.
Link Posted: 11/28/2014 10:13:31 AM EDT
[#48]
I've spent the last few years playing with load development for my 300 BLK.  Good fun.

The bullet weight vs. velocity vs. BC vs. platform equation for the 25-223 is very interesting to me.   It appears to sit in a functional sweet spot.  Ha!  I know we all have our own definition of that.  

How do I go about acquiring a barrel and dies?   Good to be here.
Link Posted: 11/28/2014 10:31:54 AM EDT
[#49]
If this has been answered before  I apologize,  on CH4D website there are 3 different 25-223 dies; 25-223Rem, 25-223Remimp30, and 25-223Remimp40. Which is recommended for the barrels that are being used here in this thread?
Link Posted: 11/28/2014 11:35:18 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Baconriver72:
If this has been answered before  I apologize,  on CH4D website there are 3 different 25-223 dies; 25-223Rem, 25-223Remimp30, and 25-223Remimp40. Which is recommended for the barrels that are being used here in this thread?
View Quote


You don't need the CH4D dies.

For sizing you can use the Redding type S bushing full length sizing die 77323 & replace the 223 sizing button with the 25 cal sizing button part # 19256.

For seating, Any 223 seating die will work as long as you have enough adjustment...
Page / 46
25-223 (Page 40 of 46)
Page AR-15 » AR Variants
AR Sponsor: bravocompany
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top