User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 12:59:29 PM EDT
[#1]
I wouldn't pay anything extra for a LEO/restricted/etc lower as it does nothing for me.
Aesthetics do not add anything to the function. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:00:44 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wouldn't pay anything extra for a LEO/restricted/etc lower as it does nothing for me. Aesthetics do not add anything to the function. SAME HERE!!! Glad to see I'm not alone...to a lot of the Gun Newbs they are more desirable but around here, you'll find most people want more in spec lowers than just owning one that says LE on it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:02:30 PM EDT
[#3]
Nothing unless your plan is to resell in new/mint condition in 10+ years. Even then I'm not sure it's worth any extra money given all the other great AR products out there today
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:11:11 PM EDT
[#4]
I would pay less and would dump it fast. I have personally known corrupt LEOs and think they would use that as an excuse to confiscate.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:18:03 PM EDT
[#5]
None
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:35:17 PM EDT
[#6]
Same. None.
I've been using solely Anderson lowers on builds anyway for a while now - a forged lower is a forged lower as far as I'm concerned. Why overpay for a name or a logo? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:42:59 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Same. None. I've been using solely Anderson lowers on builds anyway for a while now - a forged lower is a forged lower as far as I'm concerned. Why overpay for a name or a logo? I know that Anderson lowers are cheap, but I'll never use one. After all the shill antics they pulled around here they lost any possible business from me. Plus that BS coating crap of theirs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:45:26 PM EDT
[#8]
means nuttin to me!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:49:19 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would pay less and would dump it fast. I have personally known corrupt LEOs and think they would use that as an excuse to confiscate. I've often wondered if those LEO marking ever case issues like this. ETA: I remember a guy on the EE a couple of months ago that thought the LEO markings added a lot of value to his rifle. He was asking a big premium for an LEO marked 6920. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 1:59:44 PM EDT
[#10]
None, and I own two.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 2:56:02 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
None, and I own two. This, except I sold one of them. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 6:03:40 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: None |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 6:35:37 PM EDT
[#14]
Having spent 14 years as an LEO and realizing that the job isn't anything any more special than any other job... Such rollmarks do nothing for me. In fact, I would much rather have an LE6920 marked as "M4 Carbine" than to have one marked "Colt's Law Enforcement Carbine". I never bought the Law Enforcement Carbine, but I bought the first M4 Carbine 6920 that I saw. To each his own, but I'd expect to pay $100.00 less for the older rollmark as it is far less desireable to me. Then again... My favorite AR currently has the controversial Spikes logo on it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 6:59:12 PM EDT
[#15]
Throw in $100 and I will trade you for a Mega
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/23/2014 7:14:10 PM EDT
[#16]
Topic Moved
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 5:22:41 AM EDT
[#17]
Those markings mean nothing to 99% of shooters, including myself. The other percentage think they are cool to have because they are holster sniffers, collectors, or just want the markings because they are getting more rare to find as of late; bragging rights perhaps. Pure conjecture on my part I'll admit.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 8:43:08 AM EDT
[#18]
Some people might, I wouldn't. However, I can give you a great deal on my "collector" LE-marked 6920.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 1:57:27 PM EDT
[#19]
I like them, I could live without but would rather have the marked lower. The biggest bonus id pay would probably only be like 25 bucks max
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 11:18:37 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I like them, I could live without but would rather have the marked lower. The biggest bonus id pay would probably only be like 25 bucks max 25 bucks? No way. $23.67 at the very most. |
|
|
|
Posted: 10/24/2014 11:54:10 PM EDT
[#21]
It's not a plus, it's a minus, IMO. Same with LEO marked mags. I don't won't any of them.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/25/2014 2:09:34 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
25 bucks? No way. $23.67 at the very most. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I like them, I could live without but would rather have the marked lower. The biggest bonus id pay would probably only be like 25 bucks max 25 bucks? No way. $23.67 at the very most. I will give you 6 million pennies and a pound of pocket lint for that thar fancy law man lower ya got der. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
