|
|
Posted: 7/2/2012 8:33:43 AM
A question to the folks running piston MRP's.
Are you running full or semi-auto carriers? Anyone have experiences with either? Does either affect cycling or reliability? thanks, S/F Al |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2012 9:37:42 AM
Originally Posted By CATM-Al:
A question to the folks running piston MRP's. Are you running full or semi-auto carriers? Anyone have experiences with either? Does either affect cycling or reliability? thanks, S/F Al I use an FA carrier and H buffer and runs great. If I set the piston for suppressed it wont cycle Silver Bear without the can (have not tried other ammo types). |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2012 7:34:18 PM
[Last Edit: 7/2/2012 7:39:18 PM by cabbynate]
Small changes. Added the Trijicon SRS..
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/2/2012 7:37:35 PM
Originally Posted By CATM-Al:
A question to the folks running piston MRP's. Are you running full or semi-auto carriers? Anyone have experiences with either? Does either affect cycling or reliability? thanks, S/F Al I ran a FA bolt in my 12" piston and it ran fine with an H2 buffer after I broke it in.. On the suppressed setting is would not cycle 223 ammo but would cycle 5.56. With the can on it ran 100% with what ever I ran through it.. I still have the set up, I just prefer the 10'5 a little more so the 12" just sits in the safe.. I added the POF cam pin and it smoothed out the system noticeably.. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/3/2012 3:35:39 AM
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Which would y'all prefer: the new LM8MRP or the old MRP? Older, especially considering the weight savings isn't that great. I wouldn't call it "old" though, they are going to continue to make it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/4/2012 2:54:39 AM
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/5/2012 1:39:29 AM
[Last Edit: 7/5/2012 1:40:07 AM by CATM-Al]
Just pulled the pin on a 16" Piston conversion with an FA carrier from Quantico Tactical. Really can't wait to run my buddies Halo on it. Might try the POF roller cam pin too.
Thanks for the input guys. S/F Al |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/9/2012 8:44:19 PM
[Last Edit: 7/9/2012 8:45:17 PM by bigtexan11764]
Originally Posted By AggiePhil:
Which would y'all prefer: the new LM8MRP or the old MRP? Older, especially considering the weight savings isn't that great. I wouldn't call it "old" though, they are going to continue to make it. +1 - I prefer the older MRP-CQB with rails over the slick version. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/10/2012 11:40:50 PM
Is that last post speaking from experience or opinion? your saying you have shot the slick and still prefer the quad rail because the weight savings isn't that great. I haven't even seen any slick cqb reviewed anywhere yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2012 1:57:25 AM
hey quick question. what torque wrench are yall using?? the one that it came with appears to be cheap and it is too big. any help or links are appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2012 10:16:42 AM
[Last Edit: 7/11/2012 10:20:42 AM by jasonusvi]
Originally Posted By icanhas11b:
hey quick question. what torque wrench are yall using?? the one that it came with appears to be cheap and it is too big. any help or links are appreciated. Effeto mariposa... Italian wrench designed for bikes +1 Maxes out right at 140 so no chance of breaking a bolt
![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2012 12:27:27 PM
Originally Posted By jasonusvi:
Originally Posted By icanhas11b:
hey quick question. what torque wrench are yall using?? the one that it came with appears to be cheap and it is too big. any help or links are appreciated. Effeto mariposa... Italian wrench designed for bikes +1 Maxes out right at 140 so no chance of breaking a bolt that is fucking bad ass thanks man |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/11/2012 1:14:33 PM
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/21/2012 4:10:45 PM
[Last Edit: 7/21/2012 4:24:51 PM by bigtexan11764]
Originally Posted By roady9999:
Is that last post speaking from experience or opinion? your saying you have shot the slick and still prefer the quad rail because the weight savings isn't that great. I haven't even seen any slick cqb reviewed anywhere yet? I did not say I have shot the LM8 slick. I just gave a +1 to M4A1's comment a couple of posts above mine to the question about preference between the LM8 and the CQB. I have a CQB but I handled the LM8 at the Shot Show. It is cool but there is not enough weight savings for me to justify any change. Just my simple preference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/22/2012 1:57:07 PM
I've got a question, i'm PCS'ing back to the states after 3 years abroad and about to go on a firearms spending spree. I want to get into the whole 300 blackout thing, basically what i want is a rilfe length mrp suppressed but i want the suppressor to sit flush with the rail sort of like the wilson combat rifle. Any input on what length barrel i'd need to make this happen? I'd like to get rolling on the stamps i'll need the second i touch down in the mother land.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/22/2012 7:11:06 PM
[Last Edit: 7/22/2012 10:11:18 PM by jtdam24]
![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/23/2012 5:53:49 PM
![]() |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/24/2012 12:51:34 AM
Originally Posted By BushyBlaster:
I've got a question, i'm PCS'ing back to the states after 3 years abroad and about to go on a firearms spending spree. I want to get into the whole 300 blackout thing, basically what i want is a rilfe length mrp suppressed but i want the suppressor to sit flush with the rail sort of like the wilson combat rifle. Any input on what length barrel i'd need to make this happen? I'd like to get rolling on the stamps i'll need the second i touch down in the mother land. Order up one of the factory 300BLK barrels from LMT... they are 16" but with pistol gas. Plan on having it cut to desired length (and port opened) for suppressor you want to run. Will likely need to use a 9mm pistol can (possibly subs only) to fit the internal diameter of the rail. The newer slim uppers actually have a slightly larger internal diameter (I believe 1.46") but I have seen someone post with a 9mm can inside a standard CQB rail. Perhaps you can find a slim Degroat... they are long but if you paired it up with a rifle length upper and say cut the barrel to 6-7" barrel should be really quiet. Liberty Mystic might also work and is user serviceable if you want to run heavy cast subs and get in to clean periodically but they recommend a 9" minimum barrel for running supers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/26/2012 9:00:17 PM
[Last Edit: 7/26/2012 9:02:18 PM by jasonusvi]
Special Opps Mission: Season 1: Episode 6... This show is from 2009 but is new to me via Netflix.
In episode 6 the main guy and his opponents are outfitted with LMTs... some with MRPs including Will. In the clip below he shows off the MRP he is going to use for the mission. Found it a little cheezy that they are selling it as a "sniper rifle" with an aimpoint and magnifier. Given both sides are using "simunition" I don't think he could realistically take a meaningfully long shot. He also has the front sight on backwards for some reason. http://military.discovery.com/videos/special-ops-mission-sniper-rifle.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 2:48:55 AM
Originally Posted By roady9999:
Is that last post speaking from experience or opinion? your saying you have shot the slick and still prefer the quad rail because the weight savings isn't that great. I haven't even seen any slick cqb reviewed anywhere yet? Don't need a review, called LMT directly. Weight savings is 3.4 ounces between the standard railed CQB MRP and the new LM8. Decide for yourself if that's a lot of weight. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 7:52:56 PM
My point to your post really wasn't about weight savings. It really was asking a question implying you have shot the standard LMT CQB and the slick LMT CQB next to each other and from your conclusion you still prefer the Standard LMT CQB. What I also was trying to ask was if you had this experience to then post a review of why. Both uppers are going to handle and shoot a little bit different. However from your last post it looks like you haven't had this experience as is typical you Just post why what you own is better and not what you have had experience with. This doesn't help the person looking at a both and trying to make a expensive decision. Next time I will ask more direct questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/30/2012 11:48:33 PM
I spotted an LM8 MWS pass through the shop the other day. Didn't get to handle it much but it was not a lightweight. This model had an 18in barrel, and it sure felt heavier than the 16in MWS that was hanging on the wall.
Overall, unless I get to handle one at the range, I'll stick with the standard MRP uppers. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/31/2012 1:13:22 AM
[Last Edit: 7/31/2012 1:23:36 AM by M4A1]
Originally Posted By roady9999:
My point to your post really wasn't about weight savings. It really was asking a question implying you have shot the standard LMT CQB and the slick LMT CQB next to each other and from your conclusion you still prefer the Standard LMT CQB. What I also was trying to ask was if you had this experience to then post a review of why. Both uppers are going to handle and shoot a little bit different. However from your last post it looks like you haven't had this experience as is typical you Just post why what you own is better and not what you have had experience with. This doesn't help the person looking at a both and trying to make a expensive decision. Next time I will ask more direct questions. I never said one was better than the other, somehow your bad reading comprehension drew that conclusion for you. Considering that the reason to go with these new slick type LM8 rails is to save weight, and the weight savings is negligible, I don't need to handle it because I "prefer" forends with rails. If the weight savings was huge, I may consider the LM8. Since the weight savings is negligible, I prefer the standard, as do some of my friends at LMT. People can buy what they want, I am simply stating the facts about the weight. If people are flocking to the LM8 due to weight savings, they need to know what that weight savings is. Someone asked what we "prefer", and I "prefer" the standard for the reasons stated above. I never stated one was better than the other, that's all personal preference. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2012 12:54:40 AM
Once again you bring nothing to table other than I own a standard and it must be better than the LM8 because " I prefer the the standard LMT and also MY FRIENDS at LMT also Prefer the Standard LMT." So here is the problems I see. You comment on why your LMT is so great but you have no actual experience with the slim LMT. You quote sources of MY FRIENDs AT LMT say they prefer the standard LMT MRP but your won't tell who your source is? Does you source actually have experience with how these guns handle or is someone just blowing smoke up your ass about why they consider one better than the other. Once again your not bringing anything other than your own experience with the standard LMT to the table. I have no problem with someone reviewing what they own however I have no tolerance for someone saying a product is better than another product when they don't own or haven't shot that product. It is saying what i have is better because MY FRIENDS AT LMT TELL ME SO. Get over yourself and tell us why you like standard LMT? other than weight. woops you can't because you have never shot a LM8 LMT and can't tell us the difference other than YOUR FRIENDS AT LMT( cough cough bullshit who cares) prefer it so I Should. The person asking the question had a specific question that you answered with nothing to back it up. I like LMT as much as the next guy but I can't read what you are posting with questioning it and wondering why you won't let the product stand on it own merit.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/4/2012 3:39:56 AM
[Last Edit: 8/4/2012 3:40:32 AM by M4A1]
Originally Posted By roady9999:
Once again you bring nothing to table other than I own a standard and it must be better than the LM8 because " I prefer the the standard LMT and also MY FRIENDS at LMT also Prefer the Standard LMT." So here is the problems I see. You comment on why your LMT is so great but you have no actual experience with the slim LMT. You quote sources of MY FRIENDs AT LMT say they prefer the standard LMT MRP but your won't tell who your source is? Does you source actually have experience with how these guns handle or is someone just blowing smoke up your ass about why they consider one better than the other. Once again your not bringing anything other than your own experience with the standard LMT to the table. I have no problem with someone reviewing what they own however I have no tolerance for someone saying a product is better than another product when they don't own or haven't shot that product. It is saying what i have is better because MY FRIENDS AT LMT TELL ME SO. Get over yourself and tell us why you like standard LMT? other than weight. woops you can't because you have never shot a LM8 LMT and can't tell us the difference other than YOUR FRIENDS AT LMT( cough cough bullshit who cares) prefer it so I Should. The person asking the question had a specific question that you answered with nothing to back it up. I like LMT as much as the next guy but I can't read what you are posting with questioning it and wondering why you won't let the product stand on it own merit. Like I said above (twice), I never said anything was better than the other. I am simply giving specifications. A personal preference is not saying something is better. I'm not sure why it's so hard for you to grasp the comprehension of simple sentences.. I simply do not prefer hand guards without rails, no matter what brand it is... unless it offers significant weight savings. I'm done referencing your mindless posts. |
|