User Panel
I still say they're classy as hell, and I've been on a serious #makequadrailsgreatagain campaign lately
|
|
I HATE that M203 cut-out. I don't own an M203, will never own an M203, and the last thing I want is a chunk cut out of my barrel to accommodate something I neither want nor could have, even if I wanted it.
Other than that, I like M4s just fine. |
|
@Gonzaar24, being Mil you should be able to get access to a SOCOM to handle? What branch are you?
Surely there are some around? |
|
Quoted:
What rifles are they? Are they 14.5 or are they 14.5 with a pinned and welded flash hider View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Gonzaar24, being Mil you should be able to get access to a SOCOM to handle? What branch are you? Surely there are some around? View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Airforce.security forces. Unfortunately we don't have the privilege of having access to the socom rifles. Maybe if I knew some PJs, or CCTs. I had a chance when I was stationed at Turkey one of the army spec ops dudes was hanging out at our range and wanted to show us some pointers. He even had his rifle too and i regret not handling it since he had out for us to see and hold. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The top one is a M4 clone I built with a McKay Enterprises lower and a Colt 14.5" barrel. The second one down is a LE6920 (16" bbl). The third is a build I did with a CMMG 14.5" SOCOM barreled upper and a LMT Defender lower assembly. The fourth one is a Sabre Defence XR-15 with 14.5" barrel. The last one also has a CMMG 14.5" SOCOM barreled upper. All the 14.5" barrels have pinned and welded FHs. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Dammit. Scrap that then. View Quote |
|
So, what weapon are you/your unit issued?
I know very little about Mil and who is issued what in general? It is different from branch to branch, and unit to unit, yes? |
|
|
Quoted:
So, what weapon are you/your unit issued? I know very little about Mil and who is issued what in general? It is different from branch to branch, and unit to unit, yes? View Quote |
|
Now your issue M4, is it burst?I assume so?
Eta: reread your earlier post see it is burst. Shows how little I know. I was under the understanding that all burst options were converted to full awhile ago. |
|
|
These are the only carbines that really interest me.
Attached File Attached File The 16" M4 style guns really don't appeal to me. |
|
|
Quoted:
These are the only carbines that really interest me. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/199700/Colt-933-Commando-1--235123.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/199700/th-8--235124.JPG The 16" M4 style guns really don't appeal to me. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That's what I got from BCM. 11.5" commando SBR. I originally wanted a Colt 6933, but at the time the BCM was easier to get. And yes I'm all about #quadrailsmatter https://s11.postimg.org/3oz6ip0vn/IMG_3228.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That's what I got from BCM. 11.5" commando SBR. I originally wanted a Colt 6933, but at the time the BCM was easier to get. And yes I'm all about #quadrailsmatter https://s11.postimg.org/3oz6ip0vn/IMG_3228.jpg View Quote |
|
Quoted:
These are the only carbines that really interest me. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/199700/Colt-933-Commando-1--235123.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/199700/th-8--235124.JPG The 16" M4 style guns really don't appeal to me. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
http://i.imgur.com/utgIrvJ.jpg View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Rifle looks tits. Love the camo. Guessing it's 14.5 with a pinned and welded flash hider to make it 16 inches? Or is it 14.5 overall. Wonder where everyone is sending their rifles to get their bbls shortened and welded/pinned View Quote ADCO are the ones I used. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
These are the only carbines that really interest me. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/199700/Colt-933-Commando-1--235123.JPG https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/199700/th-8--235124.JPG The 16" M4 style guns really don't appeal to me. |
|
I have a BCM SOCOM coming in tomorrow. It's going to be a Blockish 1 looking rifle. Probably not exact.
|
|
|
Yes. My AR-15 looks very similar to an M4, and I like how it looks,
|
|
I'm not necessarily all that worried about looks and I've been making a larger move lately (I used to be big into clones) towards what works for me, as opposed to how "cool" something is.
For me, that means longer/skinnier handguards that allow for more options in support hand placement along with lighter barrels + suppressor mounts and stuff like that. I still carry an M4 for work (I'm AF SF as well), but I vastly prefer some of the more modern stuff. |
|
|
I'm more of a rifle length fan, but I do love basic, stock carbines, so I put together an M4 a while back.
Attached File |
|
View Quote |
|
|
|
|
If you read Aaron Cohen's book, he said that the sole reason he went out for IDF SF was because they were issued the M4 and he thought it looked way cooler than the M16s.
Personally, I think midlength and rifle length gas systems with long handguards is the way to go. |
|
is Martha Steward going to be judging how our rifles look now?
|
|
I've never liked the way they look. With the fat hand guards it looks odd, although with the RIS/RAS it looks better. A 653 or 723 looks better than the M4 but they all have the pointless short hand guard.
What the M4 should have been IMO: Attached File Low profile gas block under the rail, still able to mount an M203, no bayonet capability. |
|
Quoted:
I've never liked the way they look. With the fat hand guards it looks odd, although with the RIS/RAS it looks better. A 653 or 723 looks better than the M4 but they all have the pointless short hand guard. What the M4 should have been IMO: https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/138579/M16A4M4-235669.JPG Low profile gas block under the rail, still able to mount an M203, no bayonet capability. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Certainly. Is it my favorite? No. However, it has a very iconic look. It always stood out to me as a kid. View Quote Personally, I love the LWRC stock the best but I am still a happy camper with an oldschool M4 stock. And Im not gonna lie Ive specifically used a few in recent builds cuz I like the classic look |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://i.imgur.com/utgIrvJ.jpg |
|
|
Quoted:
I'm assuming the weight comes from the quad rails. That's what everyone is saying about them and the reason they're going for keymod and mlok. I'm just not a fan of the long handguards. Good thing Midwest industries makes drop in mlok and keymod handguards View Quote |
|
|
Not a fan of the M203 barrel cut, but do love the balance of the government profile under the hand guards. I have 5 M4 clones, one kit I got today, one M4 upper I got today, and three with solid " medium " profile carbines. I prefer the M4.
|
|
Quoted:
I think they look cool and ended up making one a year or two ago, but I ended up selling it because they're outdated now. We have better technology that doesn't require a quad rail and fixed FSB anymore. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.