User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 1:41:07 PM EDT
[#1]
It's probably a 6 position. I wouldn't worry about it and if it bothered me I would just swap in a 4 position tube. Thankfully the swap is pretty easy to do.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 2:28:31 PM EDT
[#2]
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 2:34:59 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 2:37:48 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 2:51:59 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. they arent crap. uninformed masses, yes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:06:00 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. Yep. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:20:46 PM EDT
[#7]
Quoted:
Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? It's their FN-15 with a different barrel length and new roll marks. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:25:05 PM EDT
[#8]
Quoted: Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:37:17 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am curious about the mag well roll stamp, after using my "Google Fu" I can't find any pics of the left side. I did see one on Instagram, someone posted a pic under the NRA Show but now can't find it now! Also confused about the barrel length, I read someone were early on that they were going to have 14.5" with extended A2 hidder. Also very curious how the "faked" the evil third hole and if it will accept my RDIAS? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? Probably just milled to look like a pin, like some people have done with their 80% lowers. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:38:39 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am curious about the mag well roll stamp, after using my "Google Fu" I can't find any pics of the left side. I did see one on Instagram, someone posted a pic under the NRA Show but now can't find it now! Also confused about the barrel length, I read someone were early on that they were going to have 14.5" with extended A2 hidder. Also very curious how the "faked" the evil third hole and if it will accept my RDIAS? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? The rollmark is the same as on their military versions. Also, there is no fake third hole. The pictures they referenced are of their military versions that actually are select-fire. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:49:17 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Yup, the various FN products I carried in the military were always good to me, and I have yet to see a reason why these FN mil series weapons would be considered crap, like many people here insinuate. I don't think that they are crap...never handled one. However my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong) is that FN civilian side cannot use any of the TDP that FN military has to build AR's. The 2 parts of the company are supposed to be completely separate. This FN military series should be well built like all FN stuff. I do think they are marketing it in a way so people believe that it is built by the military contractor. "shrug" It is a business after all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:51:36 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The rollmark is the same as on their military versions. Also, there is no fake third hole. The pictures they referenced are of their military versions that actually are select-fire. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? The rollmark is the same as on their military versions. Also, there is no fake third hole. The pictures they referenced are of their military versions that actually are select-fire. Ah, I hadn't seen the pics he was referring to, but I was thinking "Wow, they got really detailed if they did that...". Lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 3:59:52 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't think that they are crap...never handled one. However my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong) is that FN civilian side cannot use any of the TDP that FN military has to build AR's. The 2 parts of the company are supposed to be completely separate. This FN military series should be well built like all FN stuff. I do think they are marketing it in a way so people believe that it is built by the military contractor. "shrug" It is a business after all. That's right. Any company using distributed copies of the TDP must only use it to fulfill government contracts and can not use it to improve their own civilian-marketed product. I still trust FN to turn out a quality product though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 4:03:28 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's right. Any company using distributed copies of the TDP must only use it to fulfill government contracts and can not use it to improve their own civilian-marketed product. I still trust FN to turn out a quality product though. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I don't think that they are crap...never handled one. However my understanding (please correct me if I am wrong) is that FN civilian side cannot use any of the TDP that FN military has to build AR's. The 2 parts of the company are supposed to be completely separate. This FN military series should be well built like all FN stuff. I do think they are marketing it in a way so people believe that it is built by the military contractor. "shrug" It is a business after all. That's right. Any company using distributed copies of the TDP must only use it to fulfill government contracts and can not use it to improve their own civilian-marketed product. I still trust FN to turn out a quality product though. yup....they know a thing or 2 about building a good rifle. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 4:42:43 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The rollmark is the same as on their military versions. Also, there is no fake third hole. The pictures they referenced are of their military versions that actually are select-fire. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? The rollmark is the same as on their military versions. Also, there is no fake third hole. The pictures they referenced are of their military versions that actually are select-fire. Yeah but they have 2 different military roll marks I have seen, the older style and a newer style that strongly resembles current one use on there commercial rifles except slightly larger. My buddy who just retired has/had pics of his rifles over the years and 2 different styles exist. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 9:08:08 PM EDT
[#16]
I own a FN15.......Far from junk. Most of the bad stuff that gets said come from people with no first hand knowledge.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 9:19:46 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I own a FN15.......Far from junk. Most of the bad stuff that gets said come from people with no first hand knowledge. That's arfcom, and so appropriate for the OP. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 9:38:08 PM EDT
[#18]
For the record, i never said they were junk, i know they are on par with colt. I was just talking about the name "military collector series" is just a gimmick period, 6 postion tube and 14.7" barrel with permanent fh are far from milspec.
I am thinking about getting the 20" fn though  .
eta: and yes i have played with fn, believe it or not i served even though i dont have a tank icon  .
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 9:42:36 PM EDT
[#19]
Are pictures of the rollmarks out there yet?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/28/2015 10:42:40 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Buy while you still can........ |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 12:00:43 AM EDT
[#21]
I don't think that the FN rifles are junk, they are a tiny bit better than what is coming out of Windham Weaponry.
They are a good plinking grade rifle but they are not equal to Colt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 12:09:31 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't think that the FN rifles are junk, they are a tiny bit better than what is coming out of Windham Weaponry. They are a good plinking grade rifle but they are not equal to Colt. Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 12:20:32 AM EDT
[#23]
Lol at the Colt fan boys.
Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 12:22:26 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I don't think that the FN rifles are junk, they are a tiny bit better than what is coming out of Windham Weaponry. They are a good plinking grade rifle but they are not equal to Colt. Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? I don't really have opinions... |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 12:28:55 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. Neither do fn military rifles 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 12:49:35 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Neither do fn military rifles Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. Neither do fn military rifles Really? Never would have guessed. Gubment spec and all that I guess. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 1:21:14 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Really? Never would have guessed. Gubment spec and all that I guess. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. Neither do fn military rifles Really? Never would have guessed. Gubment spec and all that I guess. CHF should be MILSPEC IMO. Might be someday. I know it is for the 240 and/or the 249 |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 3:07:05 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't really have opinions... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think that the FN rifles are junk, they are a tiny bit better than what is coming out of Windham Weaponry. They are a good plinking grade rifle but they are not equal to Colt. Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? I don't really have opinions... And apparently no facts either. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 4:09:30 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For the record, i never said they were junk, i know they are on par with colt. I was just talking about the name "military collector series" is just a gimmick period, 6 postion tube and 14.7" barrel with permanent fh are far from milspec. I am thinking about getting the 20" fn though .
eta: and yes i have played with fn, believe it or not i served even though i dont have a tank icon .
I don't think it is a gimmick, it is what people have requested from them. I don't blame them for following up on it. I don't have a tank icon, a LE badge icon, firearm instructor icon, or a NRA icon either. It doesn't change that I'm prior service, LE, a firearm instructor/ armorer, and life time NRA member. I see no reason to send my personal info in to this or any other website. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 5:44:31 AM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: "Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally....  FN aint a company like DPMS. They're arguably the best arms company in the world |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 8:03:03 AM EDT
[#31]
Are these even available yet?
I have been wanting a basic m4. Seems like this one would take the hassle out of parting one together. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 8:19:43 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's their FN-15 with a different barrel length and new roll marks. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Anyone have one of the new FN "Military Collector Series" M4s yet? Do you have pictures? I would like to see the roll stamps and UID markings. I was looking at FN's site though and it lists it as having a 6 position stock, I thought they were supposed to be the same as their military line except for being semi only and having a longer (14.7 inc) barrel with a permanent A2 flash suppressor? Is this a misprint? Shouldn't it be 4 position? It's their FN-15 with a different barrel length and new roll marks. This. Not made on the same lines as .mil FNs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 8:30:18 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are these even available yet? I have been wanting a basic m4. Seems like this one would take the hassle out of parting one together. I'm sure they'll be out there for $1500. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 10:09:42 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And apparently no facts either. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think that the FN rifles are junk, they are a tiny bit better than what is coming out of Windham Weaponry. They are a good plinking grade rifle but they are not equal to Colt. Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? I don't really have opinions... And apparently no facts either. Here are some facts, it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt. Legally they could have made a better rifle than Colt but since we are seeing things like end plates that are not staked and their receiver extensions/buffer tubes are not forged it appears that FN has chosen the lesser quality route. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 10:22:49 AM EDT
[#35]
Are the FN rifles even out for sale yet? If so, What's the street price on them?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 2:52:58 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Here are some facts, it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt. Legally they could have made a better rifle than Colt but since we are seeing things like end plates that are not staked and their receiver extensions/buffer tubes are not forged it appears that FN has chosen the lesser quality route. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think that the FN rifles are junk, they are a tiny bit better than what is coming out of Windham Weaponry. They are a good plinking grade rifle but they are not equal to Colt. Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? I don't really have opinions... And apparently no facts either. Here are some facts, it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt. Legally they could have made a better rifle than Colt but since we are seeing things like end plates that are not staked and their receiver extensions/buffer tubes are not forged it appears that FN has chosen the lesser quality route. Why "it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt?" |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 5:08:57 PM EDT
[#37]
The one thing Ive learned since purchasing my FN15 is that Colt guys LOVE their rifles.......its a losing battle trying to discuss anything,
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 5:33:40 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. That's almost the route I went. FN barrel, LMT BCG, Geissele trigger, but I'm sure it's junk to the colt fanboys. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 6:56:26 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Why "it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt?" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Any facts to back this up, or are you just giving up your opinion as fact? I don't really have opinions... And apparently no facts either. Here are some facts, it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt. Legally they could have made a better rifle than Colt but since we are seeing things like end plates that are not staked and their receiver extensions/buffer tubes are not forged it appears that FN has chosen the lesser quality route. Why "it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt?" FN has the TDP but is not legally allowed to use it. They could go beyond the spec in some areas. Barrel steel, CHF etc. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 7:33:31 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... You may know this will these lowers be clone correct for the MK12 and MK18 builds if so I think I may have to pick up a few. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 7:48:01 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You may know this will these lowers be clone correct for the MK12 and MK18 builds if so I think I may have to pick up a few. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
"Military Collector Series" is just a gimmick to sell rifles, i'll stick to colt. Idk bro....I think they're pretty legit personally.... You may know this will these lowers be clone correct for the MK12 and MK18 builds if so I think I may have to pick up a few. The only mk 12 or mk 18 receivers I've seen have all been Colt, but honestly, I'd rather use FN.
I fucking love FN, and I fucking love Colt. So if you build a mk 12 and mk 18 on these receivers and somebody screams not clone correct, tell em to suck a fatty. The FN receivers I've seen on service rifles has been mostly on M16's, and I've seen a few on M4A1's now that they're getting out there. Hard to say if they will ever end up on mk 12s and mk18 in the future though, because I just have no idea lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 8:34:01 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are the FN rifles even out for sale yet? If so, What's the street price on them? I have seen the 20" and carbine versions for sale online for a while now unless those are not the same as the one being discussed. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 8:38:42 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FN has the TDP but is not legally allowed to use it. They could go beyond the spec in some areas. Barrel steel, CHF etc. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Why "it is not legally possible for FN to build an AR15 that is equal to Colt?" FN has the TDP but is not legally allowed to use it. They could go beyond the spec in some areas. Barrel steel, CHF etc. Yep, It was part of the gov't rules FN had to except to gain access to the TDP to build rifles for the gov't. Before FN started up a commercial line of ARs there were a few big threads on why FN didn't have a commercial line of rifles. Those old threads are probably buried somewhere but I can't find them and I can't be the only one that remembers them. The "why" seemed to be common knowledge back then but that knowledge just kinda went "POOF" when FN came out with their commercial line. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 8:39:49 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have seen the 20" and carbine versions for sale online for a while now unless those are not the same as the one being discussed. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Are the FN rifles even out for sale yet? If so, What's the street price on them? I have seen the 20" and carbine versions for sale online for a while now unless those are not the same as the one being discussed. If the lower was laser etched then it's not the same line. I haven't seen these for sale yet |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/29/2015 10:18:55 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I have seen the 20" and carbine versions for sale online for a while now unless those are not the same as the one being discussed. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Are the FN rifles even out for sale yet? If so, What's the street price on them? I have seen the 20" and carbine versions for sale online for a while now unless those are not the same as the one being discussed. Those are the FN15 models. In all likelihood, the "Military Collectors" models will be very (very) similar, aside from the markings (and barrel length of the carbine). |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2015 2:27:13 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That's almost the route I went. FN barrel, LMT BCG, Geissele trigger, but I'm sure it's junk to the colt fanboys. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. That's almost the route I went. FN barrel, LMT BCG, Geissele trigger, but I'm sure it's junk to the colt fanboys. Yep. I continue to catch crap from them just for daring to suggest that an M4 could be made from non Colt parts. One even compared Colts to supermodels and non Colts to meth heads.  Yet they call me the unreasonable one.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2015 2:59:13 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yep. I continue to catch crap from them just for daring to suggest that an M4 could be made from non Colt parts. One even compared Colts to supermodels and non Colts to meth heads. Yet they call me the unreasonable one.Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. That's almost the route I went. FN barrel, LMT BCG, Geissele trigger, but I'm sure it's junk to the colt fanboys. Yep. I continue to catch crap from them just for daring to suggest that an M4 could be made from non Colt parts. One even compared Colts to supermodels and non Colts to meth heads. Yet they call me the unreasonable one.Still?? You have been kicking the shit out of this dead horse, but I have not seen anything since that old thread when you were looking for parts. Did you start another thread in GD or something? |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2015 5:59:13 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Still?? You have been kicking the shit out of this dead horse, but I have not seen anything since that old thread when you were looking for parts. Did you start another thread in GD or something? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol at the Colt fan boys. Colt doesn't even use CHF barrels, I'd rather have a PSA with a nice trigger and a Daniel Defense BCG. Oh wait, I do. That's almost the route I went. FN barrel, LMT BCG, Geissele trigger, but I'm sure it's junk to the colt fanboys. Yep. I continue to catch crap from them just for daring to suggest that an M4 could be made from non Colt parts. One even compared Colts to supermodels and non Colts to meth heads. Yet they call me the unreasonable one.Still?? You have been kicking the shit out of this dead horse, but I have not seen anything since that old thread when you were looking for parts. Did you start another thread in GD or something? Yep he started a thread about SOPMOD stocks |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2015 7:00:00 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yep he started a thread about SOPMOD stocks QD SOCKETS ARE THE DEVBIL |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/30/2015 7:23:43 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
QD SOCKETS ARE THE DEVBIL Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yep he started a thread about SOPMOD stocks QD SOCKETS ARE THE DEVBIL OMG I AGREE. The hole makes you look like a civilian!!!!!1111! |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
