Lots will say to get the SBR stamp - but what does it get you?
The pistol is entirely legal as is. Adding a stock to it for the added expense of $400+ will not add that incremental increase in accuracy or comfort. All a stock does is spread out the recoil impulse, which isn't much, and allow you to elevate it in the shoulder pocket, which is just compensating for a sight line that is too short over the bore. If the sight line needs to be higher, taller mounts would be cheaper. You have to offset your shot at close range anyway.
What you trade off is every quality that a pistol offers under the law. You can carry it loaded concealed in a vehicle in many states because of CCW provisions as a handgun, a rifle, tho must be unloaded, cased, and out of hand, to conform to anti poaching practices. Crossing state lines is matter of considering their laws concerning use of pistols, but with an SBR, it's a matter of the ATF's permission, which much be arranged in advance.
So, for the money, you get to have less freedom and a SBR registered to you. Or a pistol and $400 of ammo to get used to the minor discomfort. To me the training would be the better benefit, and a pistol ready to hand than an unloaded rifle in the trunk.
If that wasn't the original intent - to use a pistol - then sell it and move on. One thing for sure about firearms, tho, you will eventually question the decision. The ATF's decision and the circus around it will only bring more light to the entire farce of the NFA.
Do you want to remember you bailed out just when the it was the beginning of the end for unConstitutional gun control? This is just a bump in the road - and the road crews are coming to fix it.