Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2010
  • Posts 620
  • EE 100% (5)
USA USA
Posted: 3/7/2013 6:07:50 AM EST
I have a feeling this is one of those "can of worms" type topics, but I need to know. Which is "better" and why. Assume the carrier is 8620.

Thanks!

I was prepared for this, were you?
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2007
  • Posts 3842
  • EE 100% (158)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 6:25:57 AM EST
[Last Edit: 3/7/2013 6:51:45 AM EST by Medicfrost]
Carpenter. There is no dispute on this. Its stronger, but more expensive, which is why there are 8620 bolts also.

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2012
  • Posts 87
  • EE 100% (12)
USA UT, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 6:29:28 AM EST
How about 9130 steel? That's what the JP enhanced bolt is made from.

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jul 2008
  • Posts 1780
  • EE 100% (2)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 7:07:30 AM EST
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Aug 2008
  • Posts 1255
  • EE 100% (1)
USA VA, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 7:16:02 AM EST
As I understand it, Carpenter 158 is a case(surface) hardened steel where 8620 is through hardened.

This would allow C-158 to be very hard on the outside to prevent wear and crack formation while the inside is softer and more flexible to prevent crack propagation and absorb shock loads.

8620 being through hardened can either be softer and better at shock, or harder and better at wear but not both.



The above is just a guess based on what I know about metal hardening from knifeworking...
Originally Posted By HogJaws:
"You know things are bad in CA when chicks who do ATM for a living are giving up on the place."
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jun 2011
  • Posts 405
  • EE 100% (80)
USA IL, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 9:40:00 AM EST
[Last Edit: 3/7/2013 9:41:17 AM EST by DSArms_FAL]
For the bolt 158 or 9310 is what you want 9310 is about 8% stronger if that matters to you. 9310 would be better if you can find one that said 158 is the milspec so that will work too. I like above milspec whenever possible.

For the carrier 8620 or a good SS, you could do carriers in 9310 but it would be $$$$$$$$

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2008
  • Posts 945
  • EE 100% (10)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 3:48:19 PM EST
I thought 8620 was mil-spec?

Post first, ask questions later.
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2010
  • Posts 1520
  • EE 100% (17)
USA TX, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 3:50:41 PM EST
Originally Posted By deuc224:
I thought 8620 was mil-spec?


For the carrier it is, not for the bolt.

I can't understand why anyone ever buys things below-milspec.
Go to this page to simultaneously email ALL of your elected officials against gun control: http://www.ruger.com/micros/advocacy/takeAction.html
Crufflers Rule!
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Oct 2004
  • Posts 11734
  • EE 100% (7)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 4:38:39 PM EST
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with. I don't know of any 8620 bolts that have broken, but if I have a say in it, there won't be one in any rifle of mine.
"--you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
Heinlein
I was prepared for this, were you?
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2007
  • Posts 3848
  • EE 100% (158)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 4:47:13 PM EST
[Last Edit: 3/7/2013 4:49:07 PM EST by Medicfrost]
Originally Posted By deuc224:
I thought 8620 was mil-spec?


It isn't. Carpenter 158 is mil-spec.

Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


7, 566

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2009
  • Posts 3325
  • EE 100% (1)
USA MO, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 4:48:39 PM EST
Originally Posted By GHPorter:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with. I don't know of any 8620 bolts that have broken, but if I have a say in it, there won't be one in any rifle of mine.


Are you saying going with Carpenter 158 is a way of cheaping out?

Wait... what?
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Aug 2011
  • Posts 1326
  • EE 100% (22)
USA WI, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 5:18:12 PM EST

Originally Posted By Sheddy:
Originally Posted By GHPorter:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with. I don't know of any 8620 bolts that have broken, but if I have a say in it, there won't be one in any rifle of mine.


Are you saying going with Carpenter 158 is a way of cheaping out?

how'd you get that? lol

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2009
  • Posts 3335
  • EE 100% (1)
USA MO, USA
Link Posted: 3/7/2013 6:35:32 PM EST
Originally Posted By apierce918:

Originally Posted By Sheddy:
Originally Posted By GHPorter:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with. I don't know of any 8620 bolts that have broken, but if I have a say in it, there won't be one in any rifle of mine.


Are you saying going with Carpenter 158 is a way of cheaping out?

how'd you get that? lol


He was saying 8620 is milspec and that he doesn't know of any that have broken, I don't know, fuck I'm drinkin some more. I bought a Bravo Company bolt.

Crufflers Rule!
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Oct 2004
  • Posts 11737
  • EE 100% (7)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 1:47:19 AM EST
Originally Posted By Sheddy:
Originally Posted By apierce918:

Originally Posted By Sheddy:
Originally Posted By GHPorter:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with. I don't know of any 8620 bolts that have broken, but if I have a say in it, there won't be one in any rifle of mine.


Are you saying going with Carpenter 158 is a way of cheaping out?

how'd you get that? lol


He was saying 8620 is milspec and that he doesn't know of any that have broken, I don't know, fuck I'm drinkin some more. I bought a Bravo Company bolt.

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).

"--you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
Heinlein
Border Bacon: Container Raider
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Mar 2003
  • Posts 19768
  • EE 100% (59)
USA USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 3:21:46 AM EST

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1982
  • EE 100% (76)
USA NJ, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 3:43:15 AM EST
this thread got me thinking, does anyone know what is used in the bolts on a lars-ops 4 side chargers?

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2005
  • Posts 978
  • EE 100% (42)
USA SC, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 4:34:56 AM EST
I will add to this by saying you could use unobtainium for the bolt but it wouldn't be worth shit if the heat treat is wrong.
So in certain cases a inferior metal could outperform a better one if the heat treat is to hard,soft or uneven.
This is a case where the suppliers should be just as important as the material
“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying all the wrong remedies.” G. Marx
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2010
  • Posts 522
  • EE 100% (7)
USA MI, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 4:43:58 AM EST
Originally Posted By mc556:
I will add to this by saying you could use unobtainium for the bolt but it wouldn't be worth shit if the heat treat is wrong.
So in certain cases a inferior metal could outperform a better one if the heat treat is to hard,soft or uneven.
This is a case where the suppliers should be just as important as the material



Right on brother!

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2010
  • Posts 253
  • EE 0% (0)
USA FM, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 5:44:10 AM EST
Originally Posted By blwngazkit:
As I understand it, Carpenter 158 is a case(surface) hardened steel where 8620 is through hardened.

This would allow C-158 to be very hard on the outside to prevent wear and crack formation while the inside is softer and more flexible to prevent crack propagation and absorb shock loads.

8620 being through hardened can either be softer and better at shock, or harder and better at wear but not both.



The above is just a guess based on what I know about metal hardening from knifeworking...


8620 can be case hardened by carburizing.

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Nov 2009
  • Posts 3654
  • EE 100% (79)
USA NV, USA
Military
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 7:13:54 AM EST
Originally Posted By wolverine05:
Originally Posted By mc556:
I will add to this by saying you could use unobtainium for the bolt but it wouldn't be worth shit if the heat treat is wrong.
So in certain cases a inferior metal could outperform a better one if the heat treat is to hard,soft or uneven.
This is a case where the suppliers should be just as important as the material



Right on brother!


Which is why I buy BCM bolts whenever I can...

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jul 2008
  • Posts 1782
  • EE 100% (2)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 8:12:34 AM EST
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2002
  • Posts 741
  • EE 100% (2)
USA PA, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 8:18:18 AM EST
Take a gander at the Troubleshooting forum... Several threads there where malfunctions (including sheared lugs) have been tracked back to 8260 bolts.
Pay the extra $ for a milspec bolt.

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2005
  • Posts 980
  • EE 100% (42)
USA SC, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 3:13:01 PM EST
[Last Edit: 3/8/2013 3:15:00 PM EST by mc556]
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here


I take it back they do have one on the site that is listed as 8620 BCG
It doesn't look like what they use but had it for sale along with other brands
“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying all the wrong remedies.” G. Marx
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2004
  • Posts 6175
  • EE 100% (72)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 3:14:11 PM EST

Originally Posted By mc556:
SNIP




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here

They did a run a few months back of 8620 bolts.

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Dec 2005
  • Posts 981
  • EE 100% (42)
USA SC, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 3:17:13 PM EST
Originally Posted By jaqufrost:

Originally Posted By mc556:
SNIP




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here

They did a run a few months back of 8620 bolts.



Damn your quick I was editing the post but you caught it before I got it fixed
“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying all the wrong remedies.” G. Marx
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2004
  • Posts 6176
  • EE 100% (72)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 3:20:54 PM EST
It popped up on active topics and I had already read the rest of the thread, lol.

Member
Avatar
Dealer
Offline
  • Joined Mar 2011
  • Posts 3457
  • EE 100% (49)
USA WA, USA
Link Posted: 3/8/2013 5:12:52 PM EST
roy@weaponoutfitters.com
(425) 610-7556
http://www.weaponoutfitters.com
https://www.facebook.com/weaponoutfitters
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jul 2008
  • Posts 1792
  • EE 100% (2)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 3:41:49 AM EST
Originally Posted By mc556:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here


I take it back they do have one on the site that is listed as 8620 BCG
It doesn't look like what they use but had it for sale along with other brands


A few months back PSA didn't have any carriers in stock, only their own "PSA" branded bolts. I figured since their rifles came with 158 Carpenter steel bolts their "PSA" house branded bolts sold separately were the same as the ones in their rifles; dumb ass assumption on my part. It still pisses me off though and I still feel cheated a little by PSA and this bolt. They really have disappointed me over the last 6 months, sending the wrong ammo, a CHF barrel with a misaligned index pin, this substandard bolt I speak of, their lack of customer service after repeated e-mails until I make a "stink eye" thread in their industry forum and this one. I view them as a dime store vendor now sadly as they were my go to...

Wait... what?
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Aug 2011
  • Posts 1329
  • EE 100% (22)
USA WI, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 4:06:24 AM EST

Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By mc556:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here


I take it back they do have one on the site that is listed as 8620 BCG
It doesn't look like what they use but had it for sale along with other brands


A few months back PSA didn't have any carriers in stock, only their own "PSA" branded bolts. I figured since their rifles came with 158 Carpenter steel bolts their "PSA" house branded bolts sold separately were the same as the ones in their rifles; dumb ass assumption on my part. It still pisses me off though and I still feel cheated a little by PSA and this bolt. They really have disappointed me over the last 6 months, sending the wrong ammo, a CHF barrel with a misaligned index pin, this substandard bolt I speak of, their lack of customer service after repeated e-mails until I make a "stink eye" thread in their industry forum and this one. I view them as a dime store vendor now sadly as they were my go to...

Cheated because you didn't read the description?

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1990
  • EE 100% (76)
USA NJ, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 4:29:08 AM EST
so who has carp bolts in stock right now?

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jul 2008
  • Posts 1799
  • EE 100% (2)
USA GA, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 8:11:12 AM EST
[Last Edit: 3/9/2013 8:44:31 AM EST by jmreagan]
Originally Posted By apierce918:

Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By mc556:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here


I take it back they do have one on the site that is listed as 8620 BCG
It doesn't look like what they use but had it for sale along with other brands


A few months back PSA didn't have any carriers in stock, only their own "PSA" branded bolts. I figured since their rifles came with 158 Carpenter steel bolts their "PSA" house branded bolts sold separately were the same as the ones in their rifles; dumb ass assumption on my part. It still pisses me off though and I still feel cheated a little by PSA and this bolt. They really have disappointed me over the last 6 months, sending the wrong ammo, a CHF barrel with a misaligned index pin, this substandard bolt I speak of, their lack of customer service after repeated e-mails until I make a "stink eye" thread in their industry forum and this one. I view them as a dime store vendor now sadly as they were my go to...

Cheated because you didn't read the description?


Because they sell junk like that and the other things I mentioned...

FMJ
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2001
  • Posts 23870
  • EE 100% (6)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 8:25:53 AM EST
Originally Posted By GHPorter:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with.


+1


Thats why I only use Colt/LMT bolts on my go to.
YOU ARE THE SAFETY !!!
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Sep 2004
  • Posts 6180
  • EE 100% (72)
USA TX, USA
Military
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 8:38:09 AM EST

Originally Posted By FMJ:
Originally Posted By GHPorter:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
I'm interested to know just how many have broken 8620 bolts from hard use compared to 158...


A bolt is one part I do not want to go cheap with.


+1


Thats why I only use Colt/LMT bolts on my go to.
Why not AR15performance, JP, or LWRC?


FMJ
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Feb 2001
  • Posts 23871
  • EE 100% (6)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 8:55:38 AM EST
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By apierce918:

Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By mc556:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here


I take it back they do have one on the site that is listed as 8620 BCG
It doesn't look like what they use but had it for sale along with other brands


A few months back PSA didn't have any carriers in stock, only their own "PSA" branded bolts. I figured since their rifles came with 158 Carpenter steel bolts their "PSA" house branded bolts sold separately were the same as the ones in their rifles; dumb ass assumption on my part. It still pisses me off though and I still feel cheated a little by PSA and this bolt. They really have disappointed me over the last 6 months, sending the wrong ammo, a CHF barrel with a misaligned index pin, this substandard bolt I speak of, their lack of customer service after repeated e-mails until I make a "stink eye" thread in their industry forum and this one. I view them as a dime store vendor now sadly as they were my go to...

Cheated because you didn't read the description?


Because they sell junk like that and the other things I mentioned smart ass...


As a long time member here before 2001
I can see why BCM has earn there good following here at AR15.com

But I dont get PSA at all.

If I was to buy a Bolt for my SD/HD carbine ?
Colt
LMT
Stag /CMT marked bolts

I wonder if Paul gets his bolts from one of the above?

YOU ARE THE SAFETY !!!
pun
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Mar 2001
  • Posts 3490
  • EE 100% (111)
USA USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 10:03:40 AM EST
M14 receivers were made from a 12lb hammer forged and hardened 8620 receiver..no ?

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Aug 2001
  • Posts 6545
  • EE 100% (79)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 10:39:11 AM EST
Originally Posted By pun:
M14 receivers were made from a 12lb hammer forged and hardened 8620 receiver..no ?


What's your point? The right material for one application does not mean its right for another.
-"The truth does not require your belief in it to function."
-Genuine science is about gathering evidence and testing the veracity of theories, not cheerleading for a particular ideology.
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1995
  • EE 100% (76)
USA NJ, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 11:27:52 AM EST
Originally Posted By FMJ:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By apierce918:

Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By mc556:
Originally Posted By jmreagan:
Originally Posted By 45FMJoe:

Originally Posted By GHPorter:

NO. I'm saying that the spec for bolts is Carpenter 158, that's the kind of bolts I will stick with, and I'm not going to buy a bolt made of 8620 (which is the spec for CARRIERS only).



Exactly. Why anyone would buy lesws than mil-spec is a mystery to me.


I had a build going right before Zero got elected and bolts were mostly unobtainable. So I bought a PSA bolt; stupidly thinking everything PSA sold was mil-spec and was lucky enough to find any bolt then. I didn't even check to see if it was 158, hard lesson . So I ended up with an 8620 bolt from PSA and that's how I have a rifle with a less than mil-spec bolt. It pisses me off because every damned part of the rifle is mil-spec or better. When 158's become plentiful and prices get realistic I'll pull the 8620 and replace it. Until then, I'll run it hard and see how durable 8620 is...




When I look on there site all there bolts in there rifles and the BCG that are sold separate say they are Carpenter 158
Look here


I take it back they do have one on the site that is listed as 8620 BCG
It doesn't look like what they use but had it for sale along with other brands


A few months back PSA didn't have any carriers in stock, only their own "PSA" branded bolts. I figured since their rifles came with 158 Carpenter steel bolts their "PSA" house branded bolts sold separately were the same as the ones in their rifles; dumb ass assumption on my part. It still pisses me off though and I still feel cheated a little by PSA and this bolt. They really have disappointed me over the last 6 months, sending the wrong ammo, a CHF barrel with a misaligned index pin, this substandard bolt I speak of, their lack of customer service after repeated e-mails until I make a "stink eye" thread in their industry forum and this one. I view them as a dime store vendor now sadly as they were my go to...

Cheated because you didn't read the description?


Because they sell junk like that and the other things I mentioned smart ass...


As a long time member here before 2001
I can see why BCM has earn there good following here at AR15.com

But I dont get PSA at all.

If I was to buy a Bolt for my SD/HD carbine ?
Colt
LMT
Stag /CMT marked bolts

I wonder if Paul gets his bolts from one of the above?



why Colt given all the qc issues we've seen?

You throw STAG in there but won't look at PSA? I do not get that at all

agree with the poster above, why not ar performance, LWRC, or a host of others that are proven?

Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1996
  • EE 100% (76)
USA NJ, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 11:29:01 AM EST
Originally Posted By gunnut284:
Originally Posted By pun:
M14 receivers were made from a 12lb hammer forged and hardened 8620 receiver..no ?


What's your point? The right material for one application does not mean its right for another.


no offense but are you saying the M14 receiver is gonna see less stress than than a AR bolt?

Prince Regent of the Inkies
Avatar
Bronze
Online
  • Joined Aug 2009
  • Posts 953
  • EE 0% (0)
USA MS, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 12:19:08 PM EST
Originally Posted By RUTGERS95:
Originally Posted By gunnut284:
Originally Posted By pun:
M14 receivers were made from a 12lb hammer forged and hardened 8620 receiver..no ?


What's your point? The right material for one application does not mean its right for another.


no offense but are you saying the M14 receiver is gonna see less stress than than a AR bolt?


A different type of stress, with more material involved, so it's an apple and oranges comparison. 8620 and 158 are different materials, and 158 has properties better suited to the peculiar stresses imposed on an AR bolt.
9-1-1 ring ring
put me on with charlie sheen
what the fuck is this
Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Aug 2001
  • Posts 6546
  • EE 100% (79)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 12:19:26 PM EST
Originally Posted By RUTGERS95:
Originally Posted By gunnut284:
Originally Posted By pun:
M14 receivers were made from a 12lb hammer forged and hardened 8620 receiver..no ?


What's your point? The right material for one application does not mean its right for another.


no offense but are you saying the M14 receiver is gonna see less stress than than a AR bolt?


I'm saying the applications are different and the comparison is not necessarily valid. Rainier lists their Select barrel extensions as being 4140AE, why don't we have bolts made from that? The total volume of stress is less important than how the stress is applied and distributed.
-"The truth does not require your belief in it to function."
-Genuine science is about gathering evidence and testing the veracity of theories, not cheerleading for a particular ideology.
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Jan 2009
  • Posts 1998
  • EE 100% (76)
USA NJ, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 12:23:22 PM EST
Originally Posted By gunnut284:
Originally Posted By RUTGERS95:
Originally Posted By gunnut284:
Originally Posted By pun:
M14 receivers were made from a 12lb hammer forged and hardened 8620 receiver..no ?


What's your point? The right material for one application does not mean its right for another.


no offense but are you saying the M14 receiver is gonna see less stress than than a AR bolt?


I'm saying the applications are different and the comparison is not necessarily valid. Rainier lists their Select barrel extensions as being 4140AE, why don't we have bolts made from that? The total volume of stress is less important than how the stress is applied and distributed.


agree on most points and thanks for clarifying but the overall level of stress application is still important and probably the biggest factor in malfunctioning/breaking parts.

Regardless, way too much is made of this back and forth on these boards. We've got $hitty Colt bolts breaking frequently and we know they use good materials so it's not just the materials. As someone said earlier, it's not just the material but the way it's made, hardened, and cut.

pun
Basic
Offline
  • Joined Mar 2001
  • Posts 3491
  • EE 100% (111)
USA USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 2:57:54 PM EST
My point is M14 receivers take alot of abuse and H&R receivers were not heat treated right and became brittle they lost the contract..my point is if its heat treated right and made right it should be fine.I had a Bushmaster bolt in 93 go 14k rounds before I lost 2 lugs and they dont use at that time anyway carpenter 158.

Member
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined Aug 2001
  • Posts 6547
  • EE 100% (79)
USA FL, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 3:08:19 PM EST
[Last Edit: 3/9/2013 3:09:11 PM EST by gunnut284]
Originally Posted By pun:
My point is M14 receivers take alot of abuse and H&R receivers were not heat treated right and became brittle they lost the contract..my point is if its heat treated right and made right it should be fine.I had a Bushmaster bolt in 93 go 14k rounds before I lost 2 lugs and they dont use at that time anyway carpenter 158.


Got it. I certainly agree that heat treat and proper manufacturing processes are key to a quality end product. I would take a properly made 8620 bolt over an improperly made C158 bolt but will stick with properly made C158 bolts if at all possible. It appeared you were suggesting 8620 was fine because it was used in M14 receivers.
-"The truth does not require your belief in it to function."
-Genuine science is about gathering evidence and testing the veracity of theories, not cheerleading for a particular ideology.
...believe in me, I'm with the High Command.
Avatar
Bronze
Offline
  • Joined May 2006
  • Posts 4237
  • EE 100% (28)
USA MO, USA
Link Posted: 3/9/2013 8:23:22 PM EST
8620 is Mil Spec for M-16 bolt carriers, Carpenter 158 is the correct Mil Spec for M-16 bolts.
"When trading bullets it is better to give than to receive"

"Take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your clothes and buy one!" Jesus Christ - Luke 22.36

NRA Endowment Member
Top