Site Notices
7/23/2014 4:06:00 PM
  Previous Page
Page:  / 2
Author
Message
maleante
Member
Online
Posts: 8820
Feedback: 100% (120)
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:27:57 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 12:29:33 PM by maleante]
If anyone ever wanted "proof", here it is for the unbelievers:



From a thread by ptoguy2002: http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_2_29/217533_Somebody_wanted_6940P_pics____.html&page=1#i1792165
I'll save my thoughts on the people who can spend any amount of dollars on a rifle but can't devote 20 minutes to getting their body in shape for another thread. -skinnysarge79
afropro
Offline
Posts: 82
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:33:33 PM
I thought everyone knew that you can shoot .223 in a 5.56 chamber. The question I always see is can you shoot 5.56 in a .223 chamber.
tctlrld
NFA Addict
Online
Posts: 2546
Feedback: 100% (87)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:35:05 PM
Originally Posted By afropro:
I thought everyone knew that you can shoot .223 in a 5.56 chamber. The question I always see is can you shoot 5.56 in a .223 chamber.


+1 - I didn't realize there was any confusion surrounding .223 in a 5.56 gun.
srob7001
Offline
Posts: 453
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:37:59 PM
Already knew that, but thanks for the pic to add to the collection of evidence.
texasbagman
Offline
Posts: 19
Feedback: 100% (10)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:47:03 PM
This isn't a question many needed an answer to, is it?
majorhavoc
Offline
Posts: 50
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:54:21 PM
That picture doesn't strike me so much as "proof" as it does a restatement of an already establsihed fact: that because NATO chambers have a longer throat, they therefore can safely accommodate the .223. cartridge.
StagTodd
Offline
Posts: 20
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 12:56:08 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 12:57:09 PM by StagTodd]
Pretty sure people get it backwards..

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!
Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1531
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:00:32 PM
Originally Posted By tctlrld:
Originally Posted By afropro:
I thought everyone knew that you can shoot .223 in a 5.56 chamber. The question I always see is can you shoot 5.56 in a .223 chamber.


+1 - I didn't realize there was any confusion surrounding .223 in a 5.56 gun.

+ 1

In this instance even a fool can get by safely.
Inherently idiot proof.

It's the other way 5.56 ––––->.223 where idiots have problems.
Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1532
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:04:10 PM
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Pretty sure people get it backwards.. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp102/todoubled05/b26876ed.jpg

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!

There all .224 yaaaaaayyy!
You're dangerously close to the idiot category

Forget pill diameter....it's all about the chamber.
duckdog
Member
Military
Offline
Posts: 423
Feedback: 100% (4)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:30:32 PM

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!

There all .224 yaaaaaayyy!
You're dangerously close to the idiot category

Forget pill diameter....it's all about the chamber.


.223 and 5.56 Not the same.
There and they're Not the same either
Engrish is fun too !!!
StagTodd
Offline
Posts: 21
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:36:23 PM
:( * note to self this forum lacks a sense of humor.*

If a 5.56 chamber can shoot a .223 but a .223 is bigger then a 5.56 how is this possible?

*scratches head*

EdgecrusherXES_45
You will refer to me as Awesome!
Offline
Posts: 5215
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:40:51 PM
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
:( * note to self this forum lacks a sense of humor.*

If a 5.56 chamber can shoot a .223 but a .223 is bigger then a 5.56 how is this possible?

*scratches head*



It is kind of like how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop the world may never know.
If something seems to good to be true it is best to shoot it just in case! - Fiona Glenanne
Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1534
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:47:43 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 1:54:13 PM by Direct-Drive]
Originally Posted By duckdog:
.223 and 5.56 Not the same.
There and they're Not the same either
Engrish is fun too !!!

You had better immediately inform the barrel makes of these important findings.
But fix yer Engrish so they won't think that it's a Chinese trick.



Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1535
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:51:17 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 1:55:01 PM by Direct-Drive]
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
:( * note to self this forum lacks a sense of humor.*

If a 5.56 chamber can shoot a .223 but a .223 is bigger then a 5.56 how is this possible?

*scratches head*


Where can I find some .220 pills for my .220 Swift.?
Wish they'd stop making barrels with weird bores.

NissanGuy08
Offline
Posts: 376
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:52:17 PM
Originally Posted By tctlrld:
Originally Posted By afropro:
I thought everyone knew that you can shoot .223 in a 5.56 chamber. The question I always see is can you shoot 5.56 in a .223 chamber.


+1 - I didn't realize there was any confusion surrounding .223 in a 5.56 gun.


this ^
rrjacobo95269
LRRP
Online
Posts: 395
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 1:53:53 PM
I think where some, get confused is when they see a .223 Wylde chamber that can shoot 5.56 ammo. I did, but that has been corrected.

RJ
Muad
Drinking the Kool-aid
Offline
Posts: 1025
Feedback: 100% (49)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 2:01:17 PM

Originally Posted By StagTodd:
:( * note to self this forum lacks a sense of humor.*

If a 5.56 chamber can shoot a .223 but a .223 is bigger then a 5.56 how is this possible?

*scratches head*


Can't tell if this question is serious or you being funny again.

The chamber is what's different, both .223 and 5.56mm use the same diameter projectiles (.224).

You need to read up on the differences in chambers. Your head will spin when you start looking at all the variations of .223 chambers. I think my buddy said there are like 40+ different types of actual .223 labeled chambers.




StagTodd
Offline
Posts: 22
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 2:02:04 PM
Originally Posted By Direct-Drive:
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
:( * note to self this forum lacks a sense of humor.*

If a 5.56 chamber can shoot a .223 but a .223 is bigger then a 5.56 how is this possible?

*scratches head*


Where can I find some .220 pills for my .220 Swift.?
Wish they'd stop making barrels with weird bores.



.220000 you mean. *clap clap*
Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1536
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 2:03:23 PM
Originally Posted By rrjacobo95269:
I think where some, get confused is when they see a .223 Wylde chamber that can shoot 5.56 ammo. I did, but that has been corrected.

RJ

Yep, they should just call it a "Wylde" chamber or a .223/5.56 Wylde chmaber.
Vendors will usually provide a "What is a Wylde Chamber ?" link when they're listing those chambers.
I have one and it runs Lake City XM193 great.
Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1537
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 2:06:08 PM
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
:( * note to self this forum lacks a sense of humor.*

If a 5.56 chamber can shoot a .223 but a .223 is bigger then a 5.56 how is this possible?

*scratches head*


Todd, get on the fuggin bus or you're going to blow yourself up.


Zhukov
Does not play well with others
Offline
Posts: 38407
Feedback: 100% (46)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 2:59:01 PM

Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Pretty sure people get it backwards.. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp102/todoubled05/b26876ed.jpg

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!

FWIW - the difference is in measuring barrel diameter with lands vs. grooves. That's why you don't see the numbers match up. Metric measures across the lands, we measure grooves.
Daddy loves you. Now go away.

Originally Posted By PAEBR332: Congratulations. This post has a created a stupidity event horizon from which no logic, reason or science will ever escape.
StagTodd
Offline
Posts: 23
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 3:55:00 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 5:06:32 PM by StagTodd]
Originally Posted By Zhukov:

Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Pretty sure people get it backwards.. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp102/todoubled05/b26876ed.jpg

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!

FWIW - the difference is in measuring barrel diameter with lands vs. grooves. That's why you don't see the numbers match up. Metric measures across the lands, we measure grooves.


Interesting. Didn't know that....

But out of all seriousness what I was trying to show in my original picture /post, was that how easy it is for someone who was uneducated on what will work with what when referring to standard AR-15 rifles. When worked out "mathematically" with the numbers at hand (.223 and 5.56) when converting the .223 to metric you get 5.66mm which you would think is a bigger round then a 5.56.

With that information and that numbers don't lie, one would assume that the smaller round (5.56) could be fired out the bigger chamber (.223) with no problem. When switched obviously you cant load somthing bigger (.223) im something chambered for something smaller (5.56).

This is just the theory I had on why people thought you could shoot a 5.56 out of a .223 chambered rifle.

Does that make sense?
Obo2
Offline
Posts: 442
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 4:21:31 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 4:23:26 PM by Obo2]
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Originally Posted By Zhukov:

Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Pretty sure people get it backwards.. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp102/todoubled05/b26876ed.jpg

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!

FWIW - the difference is in measuring barrel diameter with lands vs. grooves. That's why you don't see the numbers match up. Metric measures across the lands, we measure grooves.


Interesting. Didn't know that....

But out of all seriousness what I was trying to show in my original picture /post, was that how easy it is for someone who was uneducated on what will work with what when referring to standard AR-15 rifles. When worked out "mathematically" with the numbers at hand (.226 and 5.56) when converting the .226 to metric you get 5.66mm which you would think is a bigger round then a 5.56.

With that information and that numbers don't lie, one would assume that the smaller bullet (5.56) could be fired out the bigger chamber (.223) with no problem. When switched obviously you cant load somthing bigger (.223) im something chambered for something smaller (5.56).

This is just the theory I had on why people thought you could shoot a 5.56 out of a .223 chambered rifle.

Does that make sense?

It does not make sense both 223 and 556 rounds use the same projectiles they're all 224 diameter. the difference just comes in pressures loaded in the rounds and mainly the throat dimensions in the chamber. The naming conventions of ammunition have a little bit less to do with dimensions and a little bit more to do with classification.
Direct-Drive
Offline
Posts: 1538
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 4:21:32 PM
[Last Edit: 4/13/2012 4:33:26 PM by Direct-Drive]
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
But out of all seriousness what I was trying to show in my original picture /post, was that how easy it is for someone who was uneducated on what will work with what when referring to standard AR-15 rifles. When worked out "mathematically" with the numbers at hand (.226 and 5.56) when converting the .226 to metric you get 5.66mm which you would think is a bigger round then a 5.56.

With that information and that numbers don't lie, one would assume that the smaller bullet (5.56) could be fired out the bigger chamber (.223) with no problem. When switched obviously you cant load somthing bigger (.223) im something chambered for something smaller (5.56).

This is just the theory I had on why people thought you could shoot a 5.56 out of a .223 chambered rifle.

Does that make sense?

I suppose someone coming from outside the firearms world and was a math nut might arrive at that conclusion. Sound familiar ?

Those that have been around guns and especially those that have reloaded know that cartridge designers that were working on a particular bore diameter needed to clearly identify their caliber even though it uses the same bore diameter as many others.

There is a large family of cartridges that use .224 diameter pills (bullets).

Just a few....from memory.

.218 Bee
.219 Zipper
.22 Hornet
.220 Swift
.221 Fireball
.222 Remington
.222 Remington Magnum
.223 Remington
.224 Weatherby Magnum
5.56 NATO

They're simply names like Curly, Moe and Larry.....they don't necessarily represent actual diameters.
The .224 bore, as you can see, is very crowded and I haven't even listed the wildcat family.

The problem comes from someone erroneously thinking (or being told) that "5.56" is just the military designation for ".223" (which of course is false).
Knowing that the bullet diameters are the same only reinforces the thinking error.
It's the chamber difference (freebore region) that gets you. The .223 freebore is shorter and jamming a full power 5.56 in there will spike chamber pressures in the .223 chamber.


Zhukov
Does not play well with others
Offline
Posts: 38421
Feedback: 100% (46)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 4:29:46 PM

Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Originally Posted By Zhukov:

Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Pretty sure people get it backwards.. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp102/todoubled05/b26876ed.jpg

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!

FWIW - the difference is in measuring barrel diameter with lands vs. grooves. That's why you don't see the numbers match up. Metric measures across the lands, we measure grooves.

Interesting. Didn't know that....

But out of all seriousness what I was trying to show in my original picture /post, was that how easy it is for someone who was uneducated on what will work with what when referring to standard AR-15 rifles. When worked out "mathematically" with the numbers at hand (.226 and 5.56) when converting the .226 to metric you get 5.66mm which you would think is a bigger round then a 5.56.

With that information and that numbers don't lie, one would assume that the smaller bullet (5.56) could be fired out the bigger chamber (.223) with no problem. When switched obviously you cant load somthing bigger (.223) im something chambered for something smaller (5.56).

This is just the theory I had on why people thought you could shoot a 5.56 out of a .223 chambered rifle.

Does that make sense?

Kind of, but it's a fallacy to think that 5.56mm/.223 are different sized bullets in the first place.

BTW: 0.223" isn't the correct diameter either. The correct bullet diameter for .223 is actually 0.224".
Daddy loves you. Now go away.

Originally Posted By PAEBR332: Congratulations. This post has a created a stupidity event horizon from which no logic, reason or science will ever escape.
jb3006
Offline
Posts: 3
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 4/13/2012 4:47:50 PM
Originally Posted By StagTodd:
Pretty sure people get it backwards.. http://i402.photobucket.com/albums/pp102/todoubled05/b26876ed.jpg

Math is fun yaaaaaayyy!


Forget about projectile diameter.
5.56mm is bore diameter (.219") and .223 (us std.) is groove diameter. Both caliber are same and uses same bullet diameter.
The big problem is free bore and leade dimensions.


  Previous Page
Page:  / 2