User Panel
[#1]
for the guys using Nightforce rings what height are you going with?
|
|
|
[#2]
Originally Posted By dslmgk:
Just got this from Leupold. Ordered it back in December. Called again in February and they sent this out. Part #112635 and it is a standard part. Not from the custom shop.http://<a href=http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/gg537/ontheline1/P3100021.jpg</a>" /> Cost 30 bucks. View Quote I second a side profile shot... preferably on the optic. Don't own a Leupy Mk4 yet myself but from what I understand... you replace the very top turret cap with this? So you still have the 1/2 moa adjustments but you can just look at the top turret cap for close 100 yard increment adjustments?? |
|
|
[#3]
Originally Posted By pennsylvaniaroots: for the guys using Nightforce rings what height are you going with? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By pennsylvaniaroots: for the guys using Nightforce rings what height are you going with? Originally Posted By Johnson184: I second a side profile shot... preferably on the optic. Don't own a Leupy Mk4 yet myself but from what I understand... you replace the very top turret cap with this? So you still have the 1/2 moa adjustments but you can just look at the top turret cap for close 100 yard increment adjustments?? Swapping Leupold turrets is like erasing the numbers off a ruler and writing in new ones. |
|
"Not proud of everything I've done, but at least you know I did it well."
|
[#4]
Originally Posted By RadOP:
Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By RTUtah:
Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
Will the Nightforce NXS 3.5-15 F1 fit a Mod0 with Swan Sleeve and ARMS medium rings? The external object diameter of the Leupold Mark 4 3.5-10x40 measures 1.832" and has a tiny bit more than 0.25" clearance between the objective and the Swan Sleeve. A seller of a Nightforce NXS 3.5-15 F1 said the external objective diameter is 2.321". Can anyone throw a pair of calipers on theirs and confirm please? If that 2.321" external objective diameter is indeed correct, then it should work. Has anyone tried to throw one in a set of ARMS mediums? With that setup, you can forget running lens caps, and I'm fairly certain the obj. bell is going to contact the sleeve anyway. Yeah I don't think you're going to clear the 50mm objective with #22Ms. I have no math to back this up, just some near-figurin' with my eyeballs. I second this Hahaha you guys are just jealous my Mod0 wants a Nightforce ;) No really though, the other afternoon I was poking paper at 200 yards and I couldn't freaking see the holes I was making with the Mk4 on 10x. The mirage wasn't helping, but it really bugged me I couldn't resolve the individual holes. And mil/mil would be nice. Hmmm... I did the math a few times... My current Mk4 setup has a 1.832“ objective external diameter and a hair over a 0.25" gap between the bottom of the objective and Swan Sleeve. I'd just have to add a quarter inch (the objective to Swan Sleeve gap distance; keep in mind the gap is actually a tick over 0.25", but I can't accurately measure it to that precision) twice (once for radius, twice for diameter) giving me an absolute maximum external objective diameter of 2.332". The external objective diameter of the NXS is 2.321" which should leave me with about 0.01" of clearance. Another option I've considered is removing the PEQ rail section - I'm waiting to hear the length dimensions and if the length of the NXS would place the objective in that removable section. Or you know, there's nothing wrong with chopping a SPR PEQ 2-3, right? |
|
|
[#5]
So whats the best way to get a mk12 upper? Build or buy? I priced out parts for a holland clone and it came out cheaper than places like BCM (Mod 0), so it seems like building is the best option? But I'm not an expert obviously.
|
|
|
[#6]
Originally Posted By ReleaseTheKraken:
So whats the best way to get a mk12 upper? Build or buy? I priced out parts for a holland clone and it came out cheaper than places like BCM (Mod 0), so it seems like building is the best option? But I'm not an expert obviously. View Quote Are you going the clone route? Do you want a Mod 0 or Mod 1? If you scour the EE you can pick up pieces for your build here and there, that would be the cheaper route to go. If you don't want to wait you can contact Kevin at High Caliber Sales, he'll build you one (depending on parts availability). |
|
|
[#7]
Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ:
Are you going the clone route? Do you want a Mod 0 or Mod 1? If you scour the EE you can pick up pieces for your build here and there, that would be the cheaper route to go. If you don't want to wait you can contact Kevin at High Caliber Sales, he'll build you one (depending on parts availability). View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ:
Originally Posted By ReleaseTheKraken:
So whats the best way to get a mk12 upper? Build or buy? I priced out parts for a holland clone and it came out cheaper than places like BCM (Mod 0), so it seems like building is the best option? But I'm not an expert obviously. Are you going the clone route? Do you want a Mod 0 or Mod 1? If you scour the EE you can pick up pieces for your build here and there, that would be the cheaper route to go. If you don't want to wait you can contact Kevin at High Caliber Sales, he'll build you one (depending on parts availability). Clone-ish. If I were to build it myself it would be a mod H kind of build with a 16" and no top rail. I'd love to find a used handguard and a few others like that to save some cash, I'll keep an eye out on the EE and I might check out High Caliber Sales. Thanks! |
|
|
[#8]
Originally Posted By RyanO20:
Also at a better price than the Nodak. But I like the Nodak minimal engraving better, hmmm..... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By RyanO20:
Originally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
Originally Posted By DontBuryMe:
Originally Posted By Sogan:
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
How does the quality of the brownells compare to Nodak spud? I took it as NoDak machined them and then provided them to Brownells to engrave them and provide their serials numbers. Someone will chime in soon I'm sure I believe that is the case. I don't have an NDS to compare side by side, but these are excellent. The cleanest lowers I have ever purchased. "Designed in conjunction with Nodak Spud..." And the language in the video on this page , specifically "... that we are having done." at 0:24. Wow....Brownell's getting into the clone game! Also at a better price than the Nodak. But I like the Nodak minimal engraving better, hmmm..... Nodak sells blank a1 forgings to Brownells and Brownells has them machined elsewhere. Nodak does Not machine them. |
|
"These blistered hands will come to be the iron fist that bestows true and proper perspective."
|
[#9]
Those brownells and nds bother me. The front pin area isnt 90deg angle...its still got a curve to it. Luckily braceman did mine correctly. Its little shit like that bothers me.....u had ONE job lol
|
|
Please excuse my ways. Iraq Veteran. 45B.
Originally Posted By DangerJ: Pentagon should troll back, hit a few camps with drone strikes, then tag the coordinates in a post with #LOL |
[#10]
|
|
Please excuse my ways. Iraq Veteran. 45B.
Originally Posted By DangerJ: Pentagon should troll back, hit a few camps with drone strikes, then tag the coordinates in a post with #LOL |
[#11]
Originally Posted By RadOP: Originally Posted By secretwheelman: Originally Posted By RTUtah: Originally Posted By secretwheelman: Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak: Will the Nightforce NXS 3.5-15 F1 fit a Mod0 with Swan Sleeve and ARMS medium rings? The external object diameter of the Leupold Mark 4 3.5-10x40 measures 1.832" and has a tiny bit more than 0.25" clearance between the objective and the Swan Sleeve. A seller of a Nightforce NXS 3.5-15 F1 said the external objective diameter is 2.321". Can anyone throw a pair of calipers on theirs and confirm please? If that 2.321" external objective diameter is indeed correct, then it should work. Has anyone tried to throw one in a set of ARMS mediums? With that setup, you can forget running lens caps, and I'm fairly certain the obj. bell is going to contact the sleeve anyway. Yeah I don't think you're going to clear the 50mm objective with #22Ms. I have no math to back this up, just some near-figurin' with my eyeballs. I second this lol, I know but NF got me like . Just go Mod1 and you can legally use the NF. |
|
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
[#12]
|
|
|
[#13]
|
|
|
[#14]
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak: Hahaha you guys are just jealous my Mod0 wants a Nightforce ;) No really though, the other afternoon I was poking paper at 200 yards and I couldn't freaking see the holes I was making with the Mk4 on 10x. The mirage wasn't helping, but it really bugged me I couldn't resolve the individual holes. And mil/mil would be nice. Hmmm... I did the math a few times... My current Mk4 setup has a 1.832" objective external diameter and a hair over a 0.25" gap between the bottom of the objective and Swan Sleeve. I'd just have to add a quarter inch (the objective to Swan Sleeve gap distance; keep in mind the gap is actually a tick over 0.25", but I can't accurately measure it to that precision) twice (once for radius, twice for diameter) giving me an absolute maximum external objective diameter of 2.332". The external objective diameter of the NXS is 2.321" which should leave me with about 0.01" of clearance. Another option I've considered is removing the PEQ rail section - I'm waiting to hear the length dimensions and if the length of the NXS would place the objective in that removable section. Or you know, there's nothing wrong with chopping a SPR PEQ 2-3, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak: Originally Posted By RadOP: Originally Posted By secretwheelman: Originally Posted By RTUtah: Originally Posted By secretwheelman: Your math is off. Those numbers leave you needing another .01". With that setup, you can forget running lens caps, and I'm fairly certain the obj. bell is going to contact the sleeve anyway. Yeah I don't think you're going to clear the 50mm objective with #22Ms. I have no math to back this up, just some near-figurin' with my eyeballs. I second this Hahaha you guys are just jealous my Mod0 wants a Nightforce ;) No really though, the other afternoon I was poking paper at 200 yards and I couldn't freaking see the holes I was making with the Mk4 on 10x. The mirage wasn't helping, but it really bugged me I couldn't resolve the individual holes. And mil/mil would be nice. Hmmm... I did the math a few times... My current Mk4 setup has a 1.832" objective external diameter and a hair over a 0.25" gap between the bottom of the objective and Swan Sleeve. I'd just have to add a quarter inch (the objective to Swan Sleeve gap distance; keep in mind the gap is actually a tick over 0.25", but I can't accurately measure it to that precision) twice (once for radius, twice for diameter) giving me an absolute maximum external objective diameter of 2.332". The external objective diameter of the NXS is 2.321" which should leave me with about 0.01" of clearance. Another option I've considered is removing the PEQ rail section - I'm waiting to hear the length dimensions and if the length of the NXS would place the objective in that removable section. Or you know, there's nothing wrong with chopping a SPR PEQ 2-3, right? The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! |
|
[quote]Originally Posted By Movistar:
Shooting unsuppressed is for the birds and criminals[/quote] |
[#15]
Originally Posted By rgb:
http://<a href=http://i1286.photobucket.com/albums/a616/rbreden/Mobile%20Uploads/2F6218DA-3E74-494D-A02F-448163F3CC4E_zpsw34vlzyk.jpg</a>" /> View Quote Ack! Where were you when I asked this question last month? Will an LT788 fit over LT104's rings? Kidding...interesting setup. |
|
|
[#16]
Didn't know either until this week. Took a chance, worked out well I think.
|
|
|
[#17]
|
|
|
[#18]
[b]Originally Posted By Zakk101abn
Noooooooo! How's that?! Sounds like you need a spotting scope, or a bigger bullet, or a Mod 1.... The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! View Quote Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. |
|
|
[#19]
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
[b]Originally Posted By Zakk101abn
Noooooooo! How's that?! Sounds like you need a spotting scope, or a bigger bullet, or a Mod 1.... The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. That analogy only works if the MOD 0 is the basic girls mother that is a little too old and a little too fat, but makes the basic girl look sooooooooo good. The Holland is the sexy sub, not technically a teacher but you gotta have it. |
|
|
[Last Edit: UsubM]
[#20]
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
Hahaha you guys are just jealous my Mod0 wants a Nightforce ;) No really though, the other afternoon I was poking paper at 200 yards and I couldn't freaking see the holes I was making with the Mk4 on 10x. The mirage wasn't helping, but it really bugged me I couldn't resolve the individual holes. And mil/mil would be nice. Hmmm... I did the math a few times... My current Mk4 setup has a 1.832“ objective external diameter and a hair over a 0.25" gap between the bottom of the objective and Swan Sleeve. I'd just have to add a quarter inch (the objective to Swan Sleeve gap distance; keep in mind the gap is actually a tick over 0.25", but I can't accurately measure it to that precision) twice (once for radius, twice for diameter) giving me an absolute maximum external objective diameter of 2.332". The external objective diameter of the NXS is 2.321" which should leave me with about 0.01" of clearance. Another option I've considered is removing the PEQ rail section - I'm waiting to hear the length dimensions and if the length of the NXS would place the objective in that removable section. Or you know, there's nothing wrong with chopping a SPR PEQ 2-3, right? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
Hahaha you guys are just jealous my Mod0 wants a Nightforce ;) No really though, the other afternoon I was poking paper at 200 yards and I couldn't freaking see the holes I was making with the Mk4 on 10x. The mirage wasn't helping, but it really bugged me I couldn't resolve the individual holes. And mil/mil would be nice. Hmmm... I did the math a few times... My current Mk4 setup has a 1.832“ objective external diameter and a hair over a 0.25" gap between the bottom of the objective and Swan Sleeve. I'd just have to add a quarter inch (the objective to Swan Sleeve gap distance; keep in mind the gap is actually a tick over 0.25", but I can't accurately measure it to that precision) twice (once for radius, twice for diameter) giving me an absolute maximum external objective diameter of 2.332". The external objective diameter of the NXS is 2.321" which should leave me with about 0.01" of clearance. Another option I've considered is removing the PEQ rail section - I'm waiting to hear the length dimensions and if the length of the NXS would place the objective in that removable section. Or you know, there's nothing wrong with chopping a SPR PEQ 2-3, right? I have a 3D model of an AR15 upper, various optics, and rings draw up in Solidworks. If you give me the specs of what you want I can model what kind of clearance you'll get. That's how I determined my rings and got about 2mm of clearance on my rifle. PM me if you're interested Originally Posted By ARdvark:
this page has no pictures https://farm2.staticflickr.com/1669/24448208284_ac25ba1e4f_h.jpg That rifle would look a lot better with a Nightforce on it... |
|
|
[#21]
Originally Posted By chenault:
That analogy only works if the MOD 0 is the basic girls mother that is a little too old and a little too fat, but makes the basic girl look sooooooooo good. The Holland is the sexy sub, not technically a teacher but you gotta have it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By chenault:
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
[b]Originally Posted By Zakk101abn
Noooooooo! How's that?! Sounds like you need a spotting scope, or a bigger bullet, or a Mod 1.... The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. That analogy only works if the MOD 0 is the basic girls mother that is a little too old and a little too fat, but makes the basic girl look sooooooooo good. The Holland is the sexy sub, not technically a teacher but you gotta have it. |
|
|
[#22]
Originally Posted By RadOP: Originally Posted By chenault: Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak: Originally Posted By Zakk101abn Noooooooo! How's that?! Sounds like you need a spotting scope, or a bigger bullet, or a Mod 1.... The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. That analogy only works if the MOD 0 is the basic girls mother that is a little too old and a little too fat, but makes the basic girl look sooooooooo good. The Holland is the sexy sub, not technically a teacher but you gotta have it. |
|
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
[#25]
I'm back in black! I'll install a long collar tonight and finish scrubbing the paint off the ARMS rings.
" /> Moved all my painted stuff to my recce. I think it fits the recce, and I just find a black Mod 1 all kinds of sexy. " /> |
|
|
[Last Edit: spermgewehr44]
[#26]
Originally Posted By mxdgood84:
That shits gonna be really, really high. M's on a swan sleeve are slightly higher than what I personally prefer, can't imagine H's. On an unrelated note if you want to part with those H's to fund some M's I'll be your huckleberry Pic thread: http://i1167.photobucket.com/albums/q627/Scatmanc2727/4-25-13/E016AF3E-5617-426C-BEB1-E4ABC15C38BB_zps6vwqjub3.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By mxdgood84:
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
[b]Originally Posted By Zakk101abn
Noooooooo! How's that?! Sounds like you need a spotting scope, or a bigger bullet, or a Mod 1.... The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. That shits gonna be really, really high. M's on a swan sleeve are slightly higher than what I personally prefer, can't imagine H's. On an unrelated note if you want to part with those H's to fund some M's I'll be your huckleberry Pic thread: http://i1167.photobucket.com/albums/q627/Scatmanc2727/4-25-13/E016AF3E-5617-426C-BEB1-E4ABC15C38BB_zps6vwqjub3.jpg I love this stick edit: page ownage |
|
|
[#28]
Originally Posted By spermgewehr44:
I love this stick edit: page ownage http://s25.postimg.org/rs1lnjyen/fam.jpg View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By spermgewehr44:
Originally Posted By mxdgood84:
Originally Posted By mtbspeedfreak:
[b]Originally Posted By Zakk101abn
Noooooooo! How's that?! Sounds like you need a spotting scope, or a bigger bullet, or a Mod 1.... The scope will probably touch. If not at rest, while the chassis is flexing during firing. Extreme temp changes and variances in parts could push it either way with .01". Stick with the leupy and get you a decent spotting scope, or... Have another excuse to build another MK12!! Mod1s look like any other AR though, soooooo basic. Like a white chick at Starbucks basic. And Hollands aren't even Mk12s, so get that idea out of your head right now! Lol For shits and giggles, I called ARMS to see if they had a spare removable Picatinny rail section for a #38 SPR PEQ 2/3 and they did not. However, they had a set of non lever stop high rings which I grabbed, so I'm trying to decide how dorky that'd look... The highs on the Swan Sleeve... I might pull the removable rail section to see if a machinist can reproduce one out of aluminum so I can file down for additional clearance with the medium rings. That shits gonna be really, really high. M's on a swan sleeve are slightly higher than what I personally prefer, can't imagine H's. On an unrelated note if you want to part with those H's to fund some M's I'll be your huckleberry Pic thread: http://i1167.photobucket.com/albums/q627/Scatmanc2727/4-25-13/E016AF3E-5617-426C-BEB1-E4ABC15C38BB_zps6vwqjub3.jpg I love this stick edit: page ownage http://s25.postimg.org/rs1lnjyen/fam.jpg Thanks man, feeling's mutual. Big fan of your attention to detail |
|
|
[#29]
Originally Posted By Johnson184:
I second a side profile shot... preferably on the optic. Don't own a Leupy Mk4 yet myself but from what I understand... you replace the very top turret cap with this? So you still have the 1/2 moa adjustments but you can just look at the top turret cap for close 100 yard increment adjustments?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Johnson184:
Originally Posted By dslmgk:
Just got this from Leupold. Ordered it back in December. Called again in February and they sent this out. Part #112635 and it is a standard part. Not from the custom shop.http://<a href=http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/gg537/ontheline1/P3100021.jpg</a>" /> Cost 30 bucks. I second a side profile shot... preferably on the optic. Don't own a Leupy Mk4 yet myself but from what I understand... you replace the very top turret cap with this? So you still have the 1/2 moa adjustments but you can just look at the top turret cap for close 100 yard increment adjustments?? Look on page 817. I am no visionary on these matters. I did read this thing from page 1 thru the present. Amazing amounts of clone information in here! |
|
|
[#30]
|
|
|
[#31]
Originally Posted By Davey_Sickboy: http://<a href=http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww245/Davey_Sickboy/2016-03-11%2018.22.47_zpsflz8ufjl.jpg View Quote |
|
"Not proud of everything I've done, but at least you know I did it well."
|
[#32]
Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
That guy in the back is eyein' that shit up real hard. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By secretwheelman:
Originally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
http://<a href=http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww245/Davey_Sickboy/2016-03-11%2018.22.47_zpsflz8ufjl.jpg Lol, he's like....."It looks like a mk12 mod1......but it's making a bigger boom" |
|
|
[#33]
Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ: Thank you sir Edit page ownage: This is the progress I made last time I was home, love this rifle http://<a href=http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a556/USMC_FMJ/DSC_0007_zpstapmwkss.jpg</a>" /> http://<a href=http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a556/USMC_FMJ/DSC_0002_zpsvnhjc4zw.jpg</a>" /> View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ: Originally Posted By minion42: Originally Posted By USMC_FMJ: What Doctor mount is that? LT788 Thank you sir Edit page ownage: This is the progress I made last time I was home, love this rifle http://<a href=http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a556/USMC_FMJ/DSC_0007_zpstapmwkss.jpg</a>" /> http://<a href=http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a556/USMC_FMJ/DSC_0002_zpsvnhjc4zw.jpg</a>" /> |
|
|
Always check your 5 and 25 while watching your 6
TX, USA
|
[#34]
|
|
[#35]
Originally Posted By js1977:
Well I finally got my upper back, they had to remove a little paint and heat it up, but got it switched out in the end. I'll paint it once I get a little time and a sunny day. <a href="http://s788.photobucket.com/user/jimmys120/media/9ECB986D-EA4E-4326-A3A2-4DE33C16E466_zpsngr0tstb.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i788.photobucket.com/albums/yy166/jimmys120/9ECB986D-EA4E-4326-A3A2-4DE33C16E466_zpsngr0tstb.jpg</a> View Quote What was the issue to begin with? |
|
|
Always check your 5 and 25 while watching your 6
TX, USA
|
[#36]
couldn't get the gas block off to save my life, haha!
|
|
[#37]
Originally Posted By js1977:
couldn't get the gas block off to save my life, haha! View Quote Been there before. If it doesn't come off easily, baking it or access to a press is best. I've had to use a grinding wheel to cut one off and the Mod 1s GB has taken plenty of beatings to instal and remove. I've even spent an hour with a sanding block and Dremel to "try" and get a better fit. |
|
|
[#38]
|
|
Does this smell like chloroform to you?
|
[#39]
|
|
You said
All this time that you would die for me. Then why? Are you so suprised, when you hear your own Eulogy?" |
[#40]
Does any one have an A.R.M.S #22 TRC TRR set up for sale? New or used, painted or not doesn't matter as long as it works. I'll take it want it bad
|
|
|
[#41]
|
|
|
[#42]
NLS #22's... I take it the only way to acquire them is via the EE?
|
|
|
[#43]
Originally Posted By TXDirtyMaxDiesel: Heres a pic of my 16" MK12ModFU. 16" Douglas bbl. Colt upper/lower. Im sure that y'all can figure out the rest. Posted this pic on my IG, but figured id share here too. http://i1245.photobucket.com/albums/gg581/TexasOilOutlaw/DSC_4426.jpg View Quote Hawt even if it ain't 18". |
|
http://www.amazon.com/Gentle-Propositions-J-S-Economos/dp/0615997635
|
[Last Edit: RyanO20]
[#44]
Go to SWFA and buy one.
@ShaneWang http://swfa.com/ARMS-22TRC-Tactical-Ring-Cap-P6071.aspx http://swfa.com/ARMS-22TRR-Tactical-Ring-Rail-P6072.aspx |
|
|
[#45]
ordered thanks! didn't want to order directly from A.R.M.S, their shipping is expensive and slow and other places are all out of stock
Originally Posted By RyanO20:
Go to SWFA and buy one. @ShaneWang http://swfa.com/ARMS-22TRC-Tactical-Ring-Cap-P6071.aspx http://swfa.com/ARMS-22TRR-Tactical-Ring-Rail-P6072.aspx View Quote |
|
|
[#46]
|
|
|
[#47]
Originally Posted By blkrmycs:
So this FINALLY happened today. 11 months 4 days. form 3, form 4, a*/ blunder, certified copy.http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc380/meusoc73/20160312_173532%201_zps1v6qb3ib.jpeg[/URL]] -------[URL=http://[URL=http://s1208.photobucket.com/user/meusoc73/media/20160312_172350%201_zpsqms4o2r6.jpeg.html]http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc380/meusoc73/20160312_172350%201_zpsqms4o2r6.jpeg View Quote Oh man! That's awesome! Now all you gotta do is put that badass paint job on that can! Paintball things! |
|
|
[Last Edit: blkrmycs]
[#48]
Originally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
Oh man! That's awesome! Now all you gotta do is put that badass paint job on that can! Paintball things! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Originally Posted By Davey_Sickboy:
Originally Posted By blkrmycs:
So this FINALLY happened today. 11 months 4 days. form 3, form 4, a*/ blunder, certified copy.http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc380/meusoc73/20160312_173532%201_zps1v6qb3ib.jpeg[/URL]] -------[URL=http://[URL=http://s1208.photobucket.com/user/meusoc73/media/20160312_172350%201_zpsqms4o2r6.jpeg.html]http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc380/meusoc73/20160312_172350%201_zpsqms4o2r6.jpeg Oh man! That's awesome! Now all you gotta do is put that badass paint job on that can! Paintball things! Thanks Davey , I was thinking I might try the twine wrap at first. if not rattlecan mafia. |
|
|
[#49]
Originally Posted By blkrmycs: So this FINALLY happened today. 11 months 4 days. form 3, form 4, a*/ blunder, certified copy.http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc380/meusoc73/20160312_173532%201_zps1v6qb3ib.jpeg[/URL]] -------[URL=http://[URL=http://s1208.photobucket.com/user/meusoc73/media/20160312_172350%201_zpsqms4o2r6.jpeg.html]http://i1208.photobucket.com/albums/cc380/meusoc73/20160312_172350%201_zpsqms4o2r6.jpeg View Quote Old pic: |
|
[quote]Originally Posted By Movistar:
Shooting unsuppressed is for the birds and criminals[/quote] |
[#50]
Originally Posted By dslmgk:
Just got this from Leupold. Ordered it back in December. Called again in February and they sent this out. Part #112635 and it is a standard part. Not from the custom shop.http://<a href=http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/gg537/ontheline1/P3100021.jpg</a>" /> Cost 30 bucks. View Quote Are you going to be spray painting your rifle/scope? Trying to figure out how you'd be able to FDE that without messing up the lettering on the top. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.