Site Notices
Author
Message
Yankees31
Offline
Posts: 67
Feedback: 0% (0)
Posted: 8/26/2011 10:33:15 PM
[Last Edit: 8/26/2011 11:21:36 PM by Yankees31]
Here is mine

ADCOR BEAR .223
Trijicon Accupoint 3-9x
American Defense Recon Mount
GG&G HD/QD Bipod
VLTOR EMOD Stock



Teknik
Offline
Posts: 40
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/26/2011 10:46:02 PM
Well do you have any reviews, thoughts, or anything to say about it?
Yankees31
Offline
Posts: 69
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 8/26/2011 11:26:03 PM
Whoops

Yes it shoots like a dream. The one thing I do find rather interesting is the lack of recoil it has compared to my other Gas Piston .223(LWRC M6A3)

Today I put 60rds through the LWRC and the BEAR and the recoil on the BEAR was quite a bit less.

I would not hesitate to tell anyone to get this rifle....they would NOT regret it!!!!
magiccarpetrides
Offline
Posts: 12
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 9/16/2011 12:01:34 PM
Nice lookin rig!
monkeyboy60
12131
Offline
Posts: 542
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 9/19/2011 3:59:50 AM
Originally Posted By Yankees31:
Whoops

Yes it shoots like a dream. The one thing I do find rather interesting is the lack of recoil it has compared to my other Gas Piston .223(LWRC M6A3)

Today I put 60rds through the LWRC and the BEAR and the recoil on the BEAR was quite a bit less.

I would not hesitate to tell anyone to get this rifle....they would NOT regret it!!!!

Nice and all, but, after 60 rounds, you "would not hesitate" to recommend it to anyone? Really?

Natty_Bumppo
La Longue Carabine
Offline
Posts: 6913
Feedback: 100% (110)
Link To This Post
Posted: 11/25/2011 12:19:37 PM
I spoke with Lt Michael Massa, USN (ret.) formerly of Team 10, he put 2500 rounds trough one in an afternoon and emphatically promotes the system. he describes himself as an M-4 hater and states he always carried an M-14 when active.
"The maintenance of the right to bear arms is a most essential one to every free people and should not be whittled down by technical constructions." [State vs. Kerner, 181 N.C. 574, 107 S.E. 222, at 224 (1921)]